30 years ago
Hsien Loong too headed a similar committee to look into the future of Singapore
and an appointment of such a nature has very serious implications. In Hsien
Loong’s case it was to put on notice that he is the PM in the making and the
Committee he sat on would be used to cultivate and build his support base. Heng
Swee Kiat is now given the same opportunity to build his base and looking good
to be the future PM in the making.
A Committee
to look into the economic development of the country is part and parcel of the
planning process and also indicates the priorities of the govt. We had seen two
decades of growth at all cost and how it has changed the fabric of our society
and the demography of the people, now with many new citizens and foreigners.
What is
missing till now is the security angle. The security of the country did not
seem to warrant any attention other than the doctrine of a strong defence force
to thwart a foreign invasion. The danger of bringing in so many foreigners and
allowing them to take a controlling stake in many key industries and positions
surely must deserve more considerations and raise concerns on the security of
the country. How would these new citizens and foreigners impact on our national
security, social security and the life of our citizens are serious matters that
cannot be left to chance.
Would the
govt think it necessary to form a Committee to review the security implications
of the liberal and indiscriminate immigration policy? What is the point of
economic growth when it ends up with the people losing their jobs, homes and
even country to foreigners, to be replaced by foreigners? What could happen if there is an
international crisis, war, etc that calls on the loyalties of the new citizens
and PRs and residents in the country to take sides or being exploited or
attracted to do damage to the country’s security and other aspects of life and
industries in the country? What would
happen if the Committee for economic growth recommends another CECA type of
free trade agreements and open the immigration door wider still?
The security
people must play a bigger role and a Committee on Security is calling and
urgent in view of the immigration policy, the large foreign population and the
problems of terrorism all over the world. We cannot take our national security for
granted and hope for the best.
What is Chee
Hean doing or thinking as the Coordinating Minister for Defence and National
Security? Should he call for the formation of a Committee to look into the
security of our country?