My
previous post discussed the pros and cons on forgiving the wrong doers. The
generous and kind would want to forgive and let the asshole go in peace with a
lesser sense of guilt. Those who were hurt badly would find it difficult to
forgive and would not want to forgive. It would be too easy for the asshole
after what he had done to the victims.
Is
there a case against forgiving? Forgiving a child is easy for the child did not
know what he has done. Ignorance or innocence could be a reason to forgive when
there is no intent or not knowing the harm that could be inflicted on the other
party. But when the asshole is a smart
ass, knowing very well what he was doing and the pain inflicted, why should the
asshole be forgiven? Why must the victim be the generous and kind one, to take
the whacking and to let the asshole go free?
There
are many instances of assholes bullying, taunting and torturing their victims
right before our eyes. And the arrogance, the abuse of power and position and
wealth to oppress, to hurt, to ridicule, to bankrupt or to put people behind
bars, all done with a clear intent to harm the victim, why should the asshole
be forgiven? There is another way of looking at this. A politician is like a
man in ‘Jiang Hu’, 人在江湖,生不由己,he just had to do it
knowing very well the consequences or it is ‘you die or I die’. So be it. I
think this is bull. Modern day politics in a civilized society should be civil.
Another
point, why forgive when the asshole did not see anything wrong in what he did?
And why forgive when the asshole did not even ask to be forgiven? When the
asshole is repentant, remorseful, and regretted for what he had done, and come
begging for forgiveness, there is a case to forgive, to be kind and generous.
Why forgive an asshole that may even call you daft or silly to forgive him and
may want to shit on you one more time if given the chance and walk away strutting
around like a vain cock, telling the world how clever he is?
And
for those assholes that are still cocky like hell, and seeing all the pleas to
forgive but still go about bullying others, ridiculing others and harassing
their victims, let there be no forgiveness when their turn come. They know,
they knew what they were doing and what they are in for. Live by the sword die
by the sword, like a man. There shall be no mercy to the evil and wicked,
especially the very clever ones.
God
also believes so. He said he would come, one day, to judge and would judge
fairly. The evil ones would be burnt in the sea of fire. No amount of
confession or forgiveness would save him. Many clever ones do not believe in
such nonsense or they would not be doing what they did.
There
is another big reason not to forgive when politicians are wicked. They are not
supposed to, and there is no good reason to be so. The first premise of going
into politics is to serve the people, to do good for the people. Another person
or party too has the same idea, to do good and to serve the people. What is so
wrong, so objectionable and unforgiveable for another person or party to step
out to want to serve the people that they must be destroyed? They may have
different ideas and ways to serve the people and it is up to the people to
choose or reject them.
There
is no good reason to what them dead, to want to crush them like cockroaches at
every opportunity. What is there to be
so cruel and wicked, to adamantly want to harm them for wanting to serve the
people, to want to fix them? They are just like you, to serve
the people. They are not gangsters out to kill. Politicians are not gangsters,
right?
Going
into politics is an altruistic endeavour. Going into politics is not about
grabbing power, for personal glory and interests, to destroy other people who
want to do the same and not allowing them do serve the people. Why is it
necessary then to destroy other people who also want to do good? It simply
means that the intention is not altruism but personal, about protecting selfish
interest, power and glory.
For
this reason, there should not be forgiveness as the intent is not good, not
about serving the people but self serving. You are depriving the people from
being served by better men and women with better ideas.