AHPETC – A classical novel in the making

In schools, literature books are often used for character analysis whereby the characters were slowly revealed a little at a time as they entered the story, through their actions, inactions, what they said, what they did not say, and the truths and the lies they committed. The Water Margin is one of the four Chinese classics that told the stories of 108 heroes, wronged by the system, made victims of the state and turned bandits, and then returned to the fold of officialdom.

A book like AHPETC, standing for All Human Personalities Exposed Through Controversy or Conspiracy, would be an interesting addition to the list of local literature books that deserved a place among the great books chosen by MOE for our students. This book is easy to write and very current, and all that needs to be done is to compile all the speeches made in Parliament or articles printed in the local media will do.

And there is a compelling story behind the AHPETC to back up the characters with plots and counter plots, with conspiracies mixed with truths and half truths, with fabricated truths and lies, with virtues and pretentious virtues, and everything that is needed to make a great story. But as the book’s title stands for, it is a fascinating way to reveal the characters, fake and real personalities and goodness of 108 or 109 heroes or anti heroes in the story now playing in Parliament.

Among the sub plots of loyalty, infidelity, deceit and honour, righteousness, treachery, heroes defending the common folks against crooks and bandits, the use of power and threats, oppression, friendship and betrayal, every character will be carefully painted out in great details. There will be the honourable, the generous, the honest, the religious, the reasonable man, the righteous, the statesmen versus the dark side of the vicious and dishonourable, the cheats, the devious, bandits, gangsters, liars, ball lickers, cronies, the untrustworthy, the deceitful, the corrupt, and the sly, and many shades of human characters all at play individually or in combination. Of course the hypocrites would be aplenty. Then there would be the heroes fighting for the poor men against injustice, the plotters and conspirators plotting against the enemies, and for good measures one could even see spies, agents, moles, infiltrators, subversive elements all in the story.

And there is always the moral of the story of the good versus the bad and how the good will triumph over the bad, or evil over goodness, all built around the main plot, the Crime of the Century. The subplots could include coercion and pressure, harassments, subversions and cloak and daggers stuff. Great stuff.

I am so eager to start working on this book for the good of posterity. It would become a classic on understanding human characters and their motivations and ambition, how they compromised themselves for selfish interests. It would join the Hard Truths and other great books like From Third World to First World and the impending and highly expected modern classic From Third World to First World as literary treasures.

Would there be anyone willing to sponsor the publication of such a great classic in the making? I think it will in good company with George Orwell’s Animal Farm and 1984.

AHPETC – more articles in the ST today

Another 3 pages of the ST were devoted to the ‘Crime of the Century’ in Singapore politics. More than half of today’s front page was on this topic. I have been given these articles a miss for obvious reasons. It is very taxing to read unless I am writing my Ph D thesis. Maybe one day I shall write a book about the political crimes in Sin City. Reading the headlines would be enough to know the content in the ST articles. A few snippets like the occasional highlighted quotes would be about the most I could spare with my precious time on the issue.

I did notice a couple of interesting ones and I would like to post them here for reflection. Although the principles, concerns and moral values etc are supposed to be about the AHPETC case, I think they are for general applications and can be applied to all cases of wrong doings. There cannot be exceptions or else the bandits would be using them to run down on their victims and appearing to be god like. Justice, righteousness and human decency apply to all mortals.

The first quote by Heng Swee Kiat is this:

‘I am very concerned about the pattern in which the WP has betrayed the people’s trust. It has a consistent pattern of denial, deflection and protection of its managing agent, which suggests a serious rot is happening.’

My head was shaking after reading it. The ST added this to the quote. ‘Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, accusing gthe Workers’ Party(WP) of lacking integrity in dealings with managing agent FM Solutions and Services (FMSS), owned by eye officers of the WP run town council.’

The second quote is by Hri Kumar.

‘Why should the WP be let off easy just because it is the opposition? And why should its residents be forced to accept anything less than full accountability? This cannot be the right way forward.’

My head was shaking from left to right too reading this. ST added this, ‘Mr Hri Kumar Nair (Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC), on why the WP town council must he held to the same standards as other entities that have been audited by the Auditor-General’s Office.

I think it is more interesting to read about the political ‘Crime of the Century’ in Malaysia involving Anwar and all the indisputable hard evidence brought to bear against him by the authority. It would be good if the Malaysian ST could orchestrate and produce a few pages of articles on the juicy details for public consumption and turn the paper into an evening tabloid on sexy stuff. What a disappointment.

I must say the Malaysian ST is sexier to read than our very predictable ST.

GE 2015/16 - PAP won Round 2 against WP

If one is to read the deluge of articles in the main media on the AHPETC saga, one would get away with the impression that PAP has won both rounds. The first Round was several pages of the AGO’s report on all the breaches committed by the AHPETC. The second Round was in Parliament when Shanmugam spoke like a God scolding the WP and accusing them of being unlawful and losing public money and many other things. And Boon Wan joined in to withhold $7m of subsidies for S&CC that should be given to AHPETC until they clean up the mess.
 
With these two victories and perhaps more to come if the AHPETC were to be charged in court for criminal breaches, it would be 3 successive rounds of victories for the PAP. It would also look like PAP has demolished the WP and would easily win the GE hands down. But this is only one side of the story.
 
Reading the social media the mood and temper changed sides. The issues were bullying tactics, unfair tactics, abuses of the system, etc etc that were leveled at the PAP by the netizens. There was outrage, cries of infamy! They were not interested in what the PAP was accusing the AHPETC for, dismissing them as pure hypocrisies. They totally ignored these as part of politicking to discredit the WP, nothing more, nothing less. They were angry by these and many other attacks on the WP.
 
The question now is what would all these mean in the GE? Would the voters be won over by the PAP for their righteousness in discrediting the WP? Or would all the tactics and actions of the PAP be seen as unfair bullying and be translated into sympathetic votes for the WP? Would the voters be so pissed that they would stand up for the underdog against the Goliath swinging his sledgehammer? There are bound to be a lot of cynicism and many were saying that the PAP were winning battles but losing the war. The hearts and minds of the voters are shaken by the strong and heavy hand tactics of the PAP in its dealings or fixing of its political enemies.
 
On the other hand the PAP and its supporters would be smiling at how clever they bashed or fixed up the WP and whitewashed it to oblivion and congratulating themselves for a job well done, and waiting to pop champagne after the GE. There must be a lot of optimism and praises in the PAP camp. They won, or shouts of ‘We won’ can be heard though the GE is still waiting to happen.
 
First the PAP threw out the goodies to sweeten the ground. Now they hung the strongest opposition, in a way sealing the fate of the WP, untrustworthy, could even be charged in court and disqualified. What is there left to be done than to call the GE? Oh, wait, more goodies coming from the Budget and viola, what a piece of cake, time to eat the pudding.
 
The social media and the lunatic fringe are just that, kpkb and making noise in the wilderness. What do you think? Great strategy? One camp crying foul and another popping champagne. Who would ultimately triumph in the GE? Who is the devil and who is god must be pretty clear to both sides and the bystanders.

In Politics – a matter of whiter than white

I had a few minutes of watching In Parliament on the telly last night and saw the expected fireworks on display. Though I did not want to waste my time going through the drag, I still could figure out what were the main issues and points in discussion. Going forward, I hope all the opposition political parties will review the sessions over and over again as a lot of lessons could be learnt from it. From the administrative point of view I would hazard to offer a few suggestions to the opposition political parties so that they would avoid the treacherous path ahead.
 
The situation, the opposition parties must know that the realities are not as simple and straight forward as they thought it to be. They cannot take things likely and easily as they are dealing with a team of politicians that are white, flawless, spot less and god like. This is the starting point. To stand a chance of surviving the ordeal, they need to be whiter than white. Just being white or blue but with some spot is not enough. Every spot would be put under the magnifying glass to check the details, for the little blemishes and hair if any.
 
Administrative procedures and process cannot be slipshod. The rules cannot be compromised. And having husband and wife team, with one with the authority to approve what the other is doing is a big no no. And when money is concerned, it is worst. It demands the highest level of integrity, transparency and accountability. There cannot be any room for conflict of interest. This is basic, fundamental in administration and accounting. Even a schoolboy would know. Do not think other people can do it so you can also. A conflict of interest is a conflict of interest. Period. There is no exception, no otherwise.
 
And here there is public money involved. A lot of public money is involved, millions. And I would like to quote Shanmugam, ‘The rhetoric from the Workers’ Party (WP) is always about helping the poor man. The reality is that the WP took money from the man in the street and gave it to FMSS. Maybe thee was no one taking the money, through the back door in the dark of the night, because the money was going out in broad daylight, through the front door.’
 
I hope this is not too difficult to understand. No political party should go around talking about helping the poor man and then ended up taking their money from them and gave it to some other organizations or to themselves. This is the first cardinal sin. Cheating the poor man! Don’t ever be accused of cheating the poor man. You cannot cheat a poor man. They know. How can anyone or party does this and get away with it? The second point, even if it is approved legally or officially, it is still theft in a way, like money going through the front door. Yes, how can people do such a thing and think they can get away with it?
 
All opposition parties must learnt these rules from the PAP, be very careful with the people’s money, the public money. The PAP has done this very well, beyond reproach. Every cent must be accountable. No taking the public money from the front door and not in the dark of the night. Both are equally wrong.
 
The lessons are painful but there are a lot of hard truths in them. Be whiter than white. White is not enough unless you are in power. Until you are in a position of absolute power, be clean, be transparent, be accountable. And when people ask you to tell the truth in Parliament, to come clean, you must answer and come clean. How to be clean and transparent when you refused to tell, to come clean?

AHPETC actions ‘unlawful’, public monies lost

These are two very serious charges made by Shanmugam and appearing on the front page news today. I would presume, yes I am a layman and do not understand if this is different from breaking the law, that unlawful means breaking the law. What should the Govt do when the Law Minister accused the AHPETC of being ‘unlawful’ even with inverted commas? I would again presume, or shall I think, the Govt or the Law Minister is going to file charges against the AHPETC for breaking the law, or is it breaking some rules and regulations or procedures of the Town Council Acts that may not amount to criminal charges?
 
And the second charge, for causing the lost of public monies, not stolen or theft, but could also be charged for negligence or not doing due diligence in their fiduciary duties. So, should the AHPETC be preparing for a criminal lawsuit coming their way?
 
When the Law Minister said AHPETC broke the law, or ‘unlawful’, it is not play, play and the AHPETC better start to pray, pray on what is the next move by the Law Minister.
 
Let’s wait for In Parliament Act 2.