Who’s afraid of Roy Ngerng?

I have several titles in mind for this piece, like Crowd Funding or People’s Power Singapore style. The above title is quite catchy and amusing and had my vote. The gist of this article is not about who is afraid of who but the evolving political consciousness of the Sinkies crawling their way back to become Singaporeans again. There are so many serious issues facing the Sinkies today, once timid and docile to the extent of being daft, but gradually rediscovering themselves and recognising the need to stand up to fight for their rights to live a decent life in a country overwhelmed by the presence of foreigners poised to edge them out of their comfort zones. Many have already fallen victims to this deluge of so called foreign talents or funny talents that their life style and livelihood have taken a serious setback.

The current hot issue is the life savings of the people in the CPF and this is gradually transforming into a grey area when ownership becomes a questionable issue to the detriment of their rightful owners. While the Govt continues to behave smugly and try to explain away their rights to determine and decide for the people in the use of their savings, and when and how much should be returned to them as if the money belongs to the Govt, the docile Sinkies are rising to demand to have their money back as promised. For the moment the Govt is still having the upper hand, holding the trump card of legislature to make whatever it wants to do legal. The Sinkies are not taking it quietly, not going to be pooh poohed away by superficial explanations that even children would not find them funny.

This tussle for the return of the people’s savings has indirectly led to a defamation lawsuit involving a young blogger and the Prime Minister. Roy Ngerng has crossed the line by his comparison of the trial of misappropriation of the City Harvest Church fund and the CPF money and the Prime Minister. The PM is demanding for his pound of flesh by engaging the island’s top defamation lawyer to sue Roy Ngerng.

Many people in the social media are rallying to support Roy financially and morally in his legal battle with the PM not because they agree to his allegation but more because of their unhappiness over the CPF money and also a righteouness to defend the weak against the mighty. It is like the people standing up to the govt. It is like a surge of People’s Power against the Govt. And the people are doing it the Singaporean way, through the legal system, abiding by the rule of law.

To protest or to challenge the Govt, they are not marching in the streets with their feet. They are storming into the courts of law with their money. In one day, $15,000 was raised through anonymous contributions ranging from $2 to $1,000. By end of yesterday, more than $36,600 has been received. Roy is aiming to raise $70,000 to cover his legal fees and it looks that this is not a difficult target to achieve. The  People’s Power will be determined by the sum of money raised. No violence, no street protest, no burning of police cars or rioting. It is all about money, the only language Sinkies understood.

No money no talk. No money no justice as the price for justice will not come cheap, at least $70,000 for a start. The rich and powerful can literally drown the poor and weak by unleashing the might of their war chest of money.

Would Roy get the support from the people, would the people rise in tandem like a spontaneous uprising by throwing their money behind Roy? Or would the CPF members abandon Roy to fight his own battle, just like all the pathetic Sinkies? From the donations received so far, there are enough Singaporeans who are willing to put their money behind Roy.

Kopi Level - Yellow

Obama the comedian and the Yakuza

There is a report in the media about Obama reviewing American policies and ‘vows to act against aggression’ a few days back. Obviously Obama did not know or is unaware that the Americans are the biggest aggressor in the world, or pretending not to know.  The Americans have been conducting aggression in many countries for decades unceasingly, engulfed in wars of aggression but hidden under the guise of defending the democracy and human rights. I can’t help calling him a joker.

Oh, actually Obama was talking about regional aggression and regional aggressor that needs to be checked, like China. International aggression and international aggressor like the Americans have no checkers and no one to check them. It is the right of the Americans to be an international aggressor and they can do it with impunity. Who can check the American aggression?

Obama also cautioned against the use of force. American aggression did not involve the use of force. They were always peaceful in nature, without destruction and loss of lives. When Obama cautioned against the use of force, he was referring to other aggressor countries. The Americans never use force in their aggressions against other countries. America always led by examples, and American influence is always stronger by such examples of not using force, like in Iraq, Libya, Iran, Afghanistan, in Vietnam, in Korea.

Obama let the cat out of the back when he said America ‘is moving away from direct military actions.’ So there you have it, the Americans have been involved with direct military actions all the while, use of force. All the talks about not using military force were lies.

Obama is a great comedian in the making. He can start a second career in Hollywood when his term as the President ends, as a comedian of course.

Yesterday, ‘Hagel said the United States took no position on the merits of rival territorial claims in the region, but added: "We firmly oppose any nation's use of intimidation, coercion, or the threat of force to assert these claims."  Hagel then threw his weight in support of greater military role for Japan in regional affairs. Japan is now unleashed as the top war dog of the American pivot and the Americans are expecting the East and South East Asian countries to join this invader of their countries against China. Some of these countries have forgotten what Japan did to them in WW2 and that their fate as colonies of Imperial Japan. The Japanese are reviving their imperial and military ambition to be the military power in the region. Asian countries that failed to learn from the evils of the Japanese past would have to pay dearly one day should they be ruled by the Japanese again.

Amy Khor the way to go

I can see where Amy Khor was coming from when she told Foo Mee Har that foreigners first in employment was a bad policy. She is a living example of how good it is to place foreigners first ahead of Sinkies when the foreigners are super talents. If we don’t have this policy we would not have the privilege and benefits of having her as a minister in Parliament. We would surely lose her to our competitor country and would therefore be disadvantaged. And the other foreigner turned Sinkie ministers and MPs are all living proofs of how good this policy is.

 Let’s take this policy a step further. In this competitive world, not having enough foreign talents is unacceptable as the foreign talents that we rejected would go to our neighbouring countries to compete against us. We have no choice. Then look at the good side, if all the world’s talents are here, even replacing most of the Sinkies that are less talented, Singapore will definitely benefit from their contributions to our economy and prosper.

Sinkies who have been displaced by these foreigners need not worry as there will be other jobs created for them. The finest choice is to be their own boss, as the infamous Sinkie taxi drivers. The rich and talented foreigners would be their customers to give them good tips for good services. And they can be very nice to their foreigner customers to show to the world that Sinkies are not xenophobic.

For those Sinkies that still could not find a decent job, they can look forward to workfare handouts by the govt. And for those who are more entrepreneurial, they can emigrate, sell their HDB flats and take out their CPF savings and live like a king in Batam, Bintang or JB. Johore is looking more attractive with the gargantuan Iskandar project. Sinkies can live there and work there. But with the withdrawal of their CPF and the selling of their flats, they don’t really need to work at all. They can retire there and no need to come back anymore.

Singapore will prosper with all the talented foreigners flooding into the island. Sinkies can go elsewhere if they are not good enough, not competitive enough, not talented enough. That is life. For the losers, what can you expect? You have to look after yourself or blame yourself. You have to be responsible to your own life. For the survival of Singapore as a prosperous city state, only the best are needed. If Sinkies are second best and cannot find a place here, just too bad. Singapore must be the best place to live for the best people in this world.

Sinkies that are not the best, please do not begrudge this practical policy of foreign talents first. Singapore must prosper as the best city for the rich and talented.

Kopi Level - Green

Matilah Singapura says CPF is a form of tax

Chuan Jin said CPF is your money. Matilah Singapura, one of my loudmouth extremely opinionated fans in mysingaporenews disagreed, and for many years had been scolding everyone for thinking or believing that the CPF money is their money and not a tax. So, who is right, the minister or Matilah Singapura?

If I believe in authority, I must agree that a minister must be right. How can a minister be wrong or be telling lies? And I must naturally disagree with an opinionated foul mouth blogger that he is wrong. A blogger simply has no credibility when put beside a minister.

Another way of deciding who is right is to draw up a list of criteria to give one an objective way of comparison. When the money is your money, the criteria to support such a conclusion are very straight forward. You can take the money anytime you like and put it into your pocket. You can buy anything you like, anytime you like without having to ask anyone for permission. Another simple test, you can hold the money in your hand to touch and enjoy the smell of money. This is definitely different from looking at a piece of paper saying you have so much money but cannot touch or see the money.

Let’s look at the money in the CPF that Chuan Jin is your money.

Can you take back your money anytime you like when you feel like it?

Can you spend on anything you like at your fancy?

Or can the person holding your money for safekeeping be allowed to spend your money without your consent or even force you to spend your money because he said so?

Can the person keeping your money decide when and how much to return to you?

KNN, looks like this foulmouth blogger called Matilah Singapura is right leh. The money is not your money when you can’t spend it as you like. But is it a tax like what Matilah Singapura called it? This one is a bit technical. Must ask a legally trained professional to explain. But such professionals are likely to say yes and no subject to this and that and you end up not knowing what they are saying. And so far none of them want to say anything. Maybe no one ask them or no one pays them to say something. Mahathir once said, fishing in Malaysia very easy. In Singapore, very difficult as the fish would not open their mouths.

So, is CPF your money?

Kopi Level - Green

Roy Ngerng needs your help

Hello everyone, thank you for your support and well-wishes. It has been an arduous two weeks. I am doing well so far.
 
Last Sunday, the Singapore prime minister issued a letter of demand to me for defamation. I have thus far acceded to the requests of the prime minister to remove several of the articles that I had written and a video that I made. I have also offered the Prime Minister my apology…
 
Raising Funds
 
My lawyer, M Ravi, will be leading a team in preparation for the hearing. As most of you know, he champions many Human Rights causes, most of which he undertakes without charge. However, he only has a small practice with finite resources. In view of the magnitude of the matter, the amount of resources required and the likelihood that it will last almost a year, I need to raise the legal fees required.
 
I expect the legal fees would amount to at least $70,000 and this would include:
• Filing fees
• Research
• Lawyer’s fees
 
If you would like to help me with this, you can make a deposit to the following accounts:
 
• POSB Savings Account Number: 130-23068-7 Name: Ngerng Yi Ling
 
Any amount will be much appreciated.
 
The actual amount of damages, which is separate from the legal fees I am trying to raise, will only be known after the court case is over.
 
Redbean: Roy needs your help, however small does not matter. It is a show of your moral support. And don’t forget to made a date with him at Hong Lim Park, 7 Jun at 4pm to hear him and Han Hui Hui speaking for your CPF savings.