I was watching a discussion in a forum where Eric Li was having an exchange with John Mearsheimer on China and the USA. Melsheimer repeated the typical America narrative that the Americans expected China to be like the USA after joining the WTO and became rich, that China would become a responsible stakeholder. Instead, China's gain in economic wealth was translated to exercising its military might. The Americans and western audience took these comments as the truth without questioning. So would the brain dead Anglophiles, that China is an irresponsible stakeholder and wielding its military might all over the world. It does not need much thinking to know that these are American lies spread without any element of truth, just plain lies concocted by the American propaganda machine. And they said, as long as you keep repeating the lies, the bigger the lies, after some time it would become the truths in the subconscious of the unthinking, even if they are well educated, especially the Anglophiles.
Just ask, how irresponsible is China as a stakeholder in its relations and activities all over the world? What have China been doing that were considered irresponsible? Is the promotion of BRI, to connect the whole world for trade and cultural exchanges irresponsible? Is the formation of SCO, BRICS, AIIB, NDB, etc irresponsible? Is the building of ports, infrastructures, roads, high speed rails irresponsible? Is becoming the number one trading partner of more than 140 nations irresponsible? Is producing all the goods and services for the world, cheap and good, irresponsible? Overcapacity in manufacturing goods that are needed and wanted by the rest of the world irresponsible?
The Americans and the westerners are not doing any of these and are claiming themselves to be responsible stakeholders for producing highly expensive overpriced goods and services of lower quality responsible stakeholders?
On the other extremes, they are conducting wars, waging wars, provoking wars all over the world, committing genocides, are these the behaviours of responsible stakeholders? And they accused China of using its military might, where and how? Is China fighting in any war, fighting in Ukraine, fighting in the Middle East, in Africa, conducting regime change ie killing and assassinating heads of govts and countries, invading countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran, and massacring the Palestinians daily?
Only the really brain dead would take all the American lies without questioning, did not want to question, did not want to know, did not want to see the wars and destructions the Americans and the West are committing using their military might. They are so blind to the crimes, war crimes and crimes against humanity of the Americans and the West and pointing the fingers at China for militarily aggressive when not involved in any wars, not firing a single bullet for the last 50 years.
When are these brain dead Anglophiles, the Americans and the West, including snake oil salesmen like Mearsheimer going to see what the Americans are doing around the world vis a vis what China is doing around the world? Who is the irresponsible stakeholder? Who is using its military might to bully the rest of the world, threatening to start wars everywhere, threaten to attack China and actually invaded so many countries and still fighting war in Ukraine and the Middle East and committing genocide against the Palestinians? No, no such things, or what the Americans are doing are responsible and their wars are justified, for the good of humankind?
Let me refresh the memories of Mearsheimer and the West, including the brain dead Anglophiles of what they would regard as responsible behaviours of a stakeholder.
1. Fabricated lies of WMD to invade Iraq, massacred the Iraqis and turned Iraq into a failed state.
2. Assassinated many state leaders that did not agree with American hegemony and conducted regime change.
3. Committing genocide in Gaza, still going on every day, 24/7.
4. Funded the CIA, ie Criminal Interventionist Agency of the American govt to destabilise countries, fund and support terrorist groups, conduct terrorism all over the world.
5. Start endless wars of aggression.
6. Provoke and incite wars, form aggressive gangs to bully small states.
7. Weaponise the dollar and the world's financial system for its own interests.
8. Arbitrarily seize the wealth of individuals and nation states.
9. Sanction countries and impoverish countries to destroy their lives and livelihood of nation states.
10. And many more.
Stop spreading outdated lies about China. The world is not stupid and have eyes to see and ears to hear. Only the brain dead would not be able to see or hear and know the truth. Americans and the West are responsible stakeholders, not involved in wars of aggression and oppression? They are the terrorists of the world. They are the gangsters and criminals of the world.
4 comments:
Who has over 800 military bases all over the world? For every military base US has, China has a trading base. Let the yanks die a slow economic death. Debt already surpassed 37 trillion.
The USA and the West always complain about China not playing by the rules. By whose rules are they talking about? The USA self-proclaimed 'Rules Base Order' that everyone is supposed to follow?
China abusing it military might? That is truly laughable. I do have some respect for John Mearsheimer's views, with due respect to his reputation, but not after reading some of his totally warped viewpoints. This man is all out to demonize China and put it in bad light. Which is why he cannot see eye to eye with Jeffrey Sachs when it comes to debating China.
Who is the greatest abuser of military power? Who started all the wars - in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine and now about to ignite a big war with Iran coming soon? Who supports genocide in Gaza and earlier in Yemen? Yemen's genocide was swept under the carpet by the MSM.
How many military bases does China have around the world compared to the USA's 800 plus bases all around the world, that might classify China as an abuser of its military might? Countries do not build military bases in other sovereign states on the pretext of protecting them. They are to deter them from going against the interest of the USA. This is just military coercion masquerading as protection. For interests' sake, protection against who? Against imaginary and hyped-up enemies that do not exist. If I may say so, all the protection needed by countries is against the USA, the one and only rouge state in recent history.
https://youtu.be/sOT5R8KZ6aU?si=Qgd6hpWayO09u1R8
India beggar after slapped by UAss begging China
China is playing a different military game from the USA.
According to Kevin Walmsley on his site 'Inside China Business' China is doing things radically different from the USA and that is perhaps why John Mearsheimer is accusing China of abusing its military might by not following traditional rules. There are no rules when it comes to a country not willing to continue to allow itself to be bullied under such rules of engagement.
The USA is slowly being outflanked by Chinese military innovation, even with the benefit of experts in its military industrial complex by not thinking out of the box and still stuck with its mindset on building bigger aircraft carriers to project power.
China is going big into building drone carriers, the alternative to building aircraft carriers that are expensive to build, needed support ships for protection, carried thousands of expensive planes and very expensive to maintain with large crews, whose loss are going to be detrimental to the navy's power.
Drone carriers are cheaper to build; with drones they carried even cheaper to build than those expensive fighter jets costing hundreds of millions each. Besides that, drones carry no crew for active missions. China is now building military drones capable of taking off vertically from small vessels, even fishing vessels. We all know how many fishing vessels that China has around the seas with China the dominant ship builder in the world that nobody can now touch. Is that the reason the USA is trying to hype up the danger of China's shipbuilding industry as well?
In a word, when it comes to a war, China has a whole armada of small drone carriers that are game changers in every sense of the word. And these can be everywhere, ready to launch drones at targets that probably aircraft carriers do not have the luxury of carrying out close enough. Having said that, hypersonic missiles can probably do the job as well, which China is no laggard in their development.
Post a Comment