5/25/2008
Is there a gag order?
Or is there a unwritten order not to engage bloggers in cyberspace? Or is it a crime or a sin to be seen in cyberspace for official or professional journalists and reporters? More likely it is a kind of self censorship. Without the official nod, without anyone saying it is ok, better stay clear of cyberspace.
I have on many occasions quoted journalists and reporters on their articles and views, with their names clearly written. I was hoping that they would come by and add in their views or to offer some alternative views. It was always silence. I have yet to see a journalist or reporter engaging the bloggers in cyberspace. For that matter, people in authority. Are they afraid that their names will be tarred with feathers? Or are they afraid that their views will not receive the same silent approval, or be attacked and they could not defend by censorship or by not printing the rebuttal?
Cyberspace is the most level playing field one can get in a discussion. Everyone is free to post, from king to pauper. But titles are not respected. It is the view that carries the weight.
When will official and professional journalists and reporters feel safe and comfortable to write and post freely in cyberspace?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
To answer your last question, when pigs start to fly.
If I spent all day writing for a living, the last thing I would want to do is to defend my opinion.
It's ALL opinion, and only opinion. How much time and effort -- which can be used for more 'pleasurable alternatives' instead -- is the defense of one's opinion worth?
Post a Comment