Now, how different is this threat about destroying TSMC, from what Biden tried to say about taking out the Nord Stream pipelines, convincingly insisting that he had a way somehow. And he did it, still denying though, and even blaming an unknown perpetrator.
There is nothing that the 'International Terrorist' would not do, when it comes to sabotage, subterfuge, instigation, assassination and destruction, which they are the masters. Look at the way they are now spinning their way out of the Nord Stream attack, by dragging in more and more scenarios to muddy the waters.
Just look back at the John F. Kennedy assassination and all the questions that never will get answered, with the death of Jack Ruby. Just look at the 911 attacks that brought down the twin towers, with all evidence that were instrumental in proving how the steel structure of the two towers could melt so readily under such low temperature. All evidence were totally swept clean almost immediately, and the fabricated circumstances that prevented the taking down of the hijackers of those planes also getting a good spin that muddied the waters even more. Just look at the Jeffrey Epstein case involving rich and high level people that resulted in his 'necessar' suicide in prison, with cameras not working at the right place and the right time. How conveniently it was all set up to happen.
Now they are selling the narrative that those nuclear powered submarines for Australia will not be armed with nuclear missiles and that the IAEA will see to it that it does not happen. You can believe in the IAEA at your own peril. The IAEA is basically to watch Iran's and other unfriendly non Western countries nuclear weapon development, and definitely not in its interest to monitor whether eventually nuclear missiles will be on board those nuclear powered submarines. AUKUS will wriggle its way around this problem for sure. What did the IAEA do when Trump unilaterally put away nuclear treaties with the Russians?
China knows how the USA and the Western powers work their way around. It is the same modus operandi they used to set up military bases on other country's soil. It is also the same way they tried their stunt in Ukraine, promising Gorbachev that Nato would not expand an inch eastward. When Nato tried to include Ukraine into their expansion towards the Russian border, that is the 'Red Line' that Russia is not allowing. The USA via Nato was trying to place nuclear missiles in Ukraine to target Moscow. Nothing more, nothing less.
To have a foothold in any country, the USA will first generate a threat, then turned angelic by going in on the pretext of protecting the country with military assistance, that will eventually lead to their permanent stay, that will eventually lead to their insisting for a military base set up for them.
China knows that eventually, those nuclear powered submarines for Australia will be turned into nuclear armed submarines. This is the USA's and the West way of working their evil plot around not so innocent alliances, like their funded NGOs. The USA and UK are trying to station nuclear weapons in this part of Asia, and countries around the region better wake up. Whether that has already been done in Japan is not clear cut but highly suspected. It is not in Asian countries interest, but unwittingly they have been used as pawns for an ulterior motive through the setting up of AUKUS.
Anonymous