9/21/2025

Not all countries, pro West, are counting on Russia and China

 Oh, not all countries around the world are counting on Russia and China to defend them against the USA. The Anglo-Saxons in Europe are clearly against Russia and China and desire nothing less than seeing the downfall of Russia and China. The Japanese and South Koreans are unfriendly towards Russia and China. Little Mickey in ASEAN is not a friend of China, antagonizing China, day in and day out. Then, there are still Dictators in Africa colluding with the Anglo-Saxon whites to make sure the Whites do not fall, which means they do not count on Russia or China to do anything to upset their interest sleeping with the USA and Anglo-Saxon partners in crime.


If I may say so, even the Mexicans are now turning tail and sucking up to the USA with a little bit of pressure from the USA. I was wrong to think that Mexico was gloating earlier about countering the USA over tariffs. I can now see that it was all an illusion. Mexico is going to find out the cost very soon.

Now, would we even believe that India is counting on Russia and China to do the necessary? India needs the USA and is presumably helping the USA by sabotaging Russia and China under their noses in BRICS and SCO.

Anonymous

9/20/2025

Arab Nato - Pakistan monetising its nuclear power

 The reputation of Pakistan as a modern fighting force, with some of the most advanced and battle proven weapons is steadily climbing and increasing being sought after as a formidable military ally. Nothing much need to be said once proven on the battlefield. The downing of 6 Indian best fighter aircraft in single battle is legendary stuff. This would be the case study for all military colleges for a long time to come, the biggest air battle of the 21st Century, won by a Muslim state.

The Arab world is hungry for a defence partner that they can rely on against the aggressive and belligerent Israelis. Not a single Arab state could meet the requirements except Pakistan. The Arab world's call for an Arab Nato, attack one means attack all, is at best a slogan when they did not have the confidence and military hardware to take on the Israelis. Pakistan is the only country that they can check in all the boxes. Advanced fighter aircraft and weapons systems, battle proven, nuclear power to counter the Israeli nuclear threat, and strategic distance that makes it difficult for the Israeli to conduct a sneak attack. And Pakistan has an axe to grind against the Israelis for fighting on the side of India in Operation Sindoor. 

And something more important, the Israelis have the mighty Americans on their back, Pakistan has China behind them. Pakistan is the only country that China is offering its advanced weapons systems and in great numbers, as good as full and unconditional support, like what the Americans are offering the Israelis. Pakistan and the Arab world can count on China to do whatever is necessary in their war with Israel. Pakistan is monetising its nuclear power. Non nuclear power countries can buy nuclear protection and, in a way, becomes a nuclear power without building the bomb.

Saudi Arabia has jumped into this window, signed a defence treaty with Pakistan with a clause that said attack on one means attack on both countries. This is asking for a nuclear umbrella directly from Pakistan and indirectly from China to counter Israel's nuclear threat. It was also reported that Pakistan would be deploying ground forces to defend the sky of Saudi Arabia. If this materialised, it would change the whole military balance in the region. The Americans would be in rage. But the Americans have proven to be unreliable and untrustworthy, a betrayal of the Arab world, after the bombing of Qatar. It was another 'weaponising of the dollar' moment with far reaching strategic consequences. Only the Washington clowns could repeat this deadly mistake all over again, destroying the credibility of the Americans. They did not have any strategic depth in their thinking.

The first seed for an Arab Nato has been planted, and more Arab countries are expected to follow suit. This is the first significant and positive development in the Arab world that would otherwise be more of the same, talk tough, chest thumping and fizzle out the moment the meeting ended. Further extension could turn an Arab Nato into a Muslim Nato when Iran, Indonesia and Malaysia join the fold.

Pakistan is turning out to be the white knight of the Arab world. More money, billions would be pouring into Pakistan, to help Pakistan to acquire more deadly and advanced weaponry from China for the defence of the Arab world. Saudi Arabia and Qatar have already signed checks for billions for Pakistan to acquire the J35s and air defence systems from China. With a stroke of a pen, the Arab world is transforming itself into an Arab alliance with nuclear backing, no longer held at ransom by the Americans and the Israelis.

Trump wants to bring back manufacturing but investing heavily in UK?

USA tech giants are now talking about investing heavily in tech in the UK. Is this the agenda of Trump and how does that reconcile with his call to lure manufacturing back to the USA? Or is his mental capacity already badly afflicted by dementia, totally forgeting about making USA great again?

Or is this move just to lure the British public to welcome him during his second visit to the UK, the dangled carrot that could be withdrawn once the visit is over. The Brits, I mean the common beans, are already planning huge protest over the visit. Let us watch the show unfolding.

Meanwhile, the South Koreans are very unhappy over the ICE treatment of South Koreans workers, arrested and chained like criminals. Hyundai workers are saying they do not have much appetite to work in the USA anymore, despite the charade of new special visas for them.

On another matter, Trump did not understand the hidden message of slight delivered by the South Korean President during a visit to the White House. The South Korean President first praise Trump for his attempt to bring peace to the Korean Peninsula in past meetings with Kim Jong Un, but beneath that accolade lies the insult that perhaps Trump might consider even building a Trump Tower in North Korea. That is as much a veiled insult hitting below the belt. But Trump is always stupid enough to be insulted in his face. He just grinned as if nothing happened.


Anonymous

USA is caught in a bind, living in delusion

Making light of the danger of the tiger and riding the tiger is already difficult to dismount without being eaten. Trying to antagonize and attempting to ride roughshod over the Dragon is much more difficult to dismount. Not only the rider gets destroyed, but the whole country is facing destruction.

The USA is caught in a bind, unable to contain China and unable to cripple China's progress while watching helplessly. Two important measures by China had already sent the USA reeling - the migrating of agricultural imports towards Brazil, Argentina and Russia and the sanctions on rare earth magnets. Wasting money and already scarce resources sailing warships and conducting joint military exercises close to China is just throwing money into a black hole. Talk about spending more and more money on defense that reaps little in benefits, while having problems with ballooning deficits takes the cake.

The US$ is losing value by the day, and investors are fleeing. So far this year, the US$ has lost 11% of its value. Forget about the all- time highs on the stock market. It is just a mirage. Just like the mirage in the jobs market with high job creation trotted out only to be punctured like a balloon further down the road. Nothing is real, all hype and grandstanding.


Anonymous

China and USA, which country takes good care of its people

Margaret Thatcher was perhaps the last credible breed of British Prime Ministers. After her came all the clowns running the UK just like a circus.

Under a two-party rule, this is the eventual outcome, the same as in the USA. And it is the same elsewhere and everywhere. Thomas Paine had this to say - 'Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; at its worst state, an intolerable one'.

So, what is the difference between Governments in democratic countries and that in autocratic states? We could be blinded just by definition alone, calling one the good guy and the other the bad guy. There are bad Governments in a democracy as well as good Government in an autocracy. The criterion is how they treat the people and whether the Government's priority is lifting people out of poverty to enjoy a better life. Some African countries are thinking much more rationally than we have given them credit for.

But the show must go on, and we must keep flogging the dying democratic horse as the system that is best suited for everyone.


Anonymous