How did China choose its political leaders? How did Xi rise from village chief, from secretary of small town, cities to become provincial governor and eventually the Secretary of the CPC and President of China? Despite being a princeling, well connected, Xi's journey to the top was long and arduous, put to the test at every level, challenged, and survived a gruelling meritocratic system, competing against his peers all the way, before finally picked and elected by the cadres to be the top man.
All Chinese political leaders went through the same journey, trained and tested to be full time professional political leaders. And they are not simply pull off from the streets. The first credential is to be academically brilliant, the top of their cohorts to join the CPC. By the time they reached the position of provincial governor or mayors of big cities, they would have many years of experience and honed their skills in state management and prepared to manage the country.
The long process would have weeded out the weak and less capable leaders along the way, caveat, some may got through the process through unsavoury and unethical ways. But the real leaders would survive and made it to the end. It is in another way like going through an educational system and graduated to universities by proving themselves in front of their peers.
The American so called democratic system is a case of lucky draws. Every 4 or 5 years there will be an election, and anyone could offer himself to be elected to be mayors, governors, people's representatives and the President. The candidate can be from anywhere, can be clowns, charlatans, criminals, salesmen, conmen or professionals of all trades. As long as they can find the money and the supporters behind them, they are good enough to lead, even when they have not a single day of experience in managing public affairs or affairs of the people. There is barely any criteria to select the best candidate in terms of character, proficiency, ability etc to be a political leader.
This also applies to the highest position, the President of the United States. And when elected, he simply pull rabbits out of his bag to fill the rest of the top appointments in his administration. Mostly inexperience and untested men and women in political leadership and looking after affairs of the state and people.
The elected President is the new God in choosing his best team, dream team, based on his own intellect, if there is any, or his contacts. And this bunch of people coming from no where, would then make decisions for the country, the people of the USA, in the people's interests, hopefully, or in their own interests. And this is touted as the best system for the world to emulate, American Democrazy, oops, Democracy. It is like awarding university degrees without having to pass through every stage of the education system and be qualified to teach. And some would be awarded Ph Ds as well, like they were deserving and the best qualified for it. By the way, only the President is elected. The rest of his cabinet are not elected by the people. Yes, NOT by the people. No mandate or approval from the people.
Which system is more reliable to produce the better political leaders to lead the country?