American and Israeli weapon systems are only superior by lies

 Now the attack on Israel comes from many directions - Iraq, Lebanon, Iran and Hamas. Does Israel have all the 'Iron Dome' defense capabilities to deal with all of them? How many Israeli patriot missile defense batteries are left? And the Houthi's have added another dimension to the conflict by targeting Israeli ships transversing the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.

The Muslim countries in the Middle East have now found the 'Archille's Heel' of the Israeli invincibility myth since the missile attack by Iran. That unprovoked attack on the Iranian Embassy in Syria was really a colossal mistake by Israel, that many analysts are now saying. It led to the puncturing of its 'Irone Dome' myth and laid bare its weaknesses.

That such a highly touted defense system is now left in ruins by unheralded cheaper ways of overcoming it is a lesson that has to be learnt. Same as the USA overpowering aerial and highly touted and highly trained military personnel falling to tenacious and fearless North Vietnamese fighters is telling. But warmongers never bother to learn. Oh, let us not forget also the Taliban farmers enormous feat of defeating the USA using just small arms with no aerial or highly rated logistical support.

Anonymous

PS. All those silly countries clamouring to buy Patriots and F35s are being exposed for their stupidity. When other countries did not have any weapons, these fakes would be the best. But when there are better weapons available, the fakes would be fakes.

Xi's trip to help struggling European states bankrupt by the Americans

 We know for a fact that Xi will never travel outside China unless it is vitally important.

And whatever is expected of such visits is never about countering the sovereignty of another country or taking it down, unlike the USA. This trip by Xi to Europe is no exception. China's priority is all about forming economic alliances, helping countries to rise above poverty, which is just what the objective of the BRI and the formation of BRICS are for, being first and foremost economic blocs, not alliances to counter the military powers of the USA, unlike the Five Eyes, QUAD or AUKUS.

Even those innocent-sounding Global Infrastructure Investment and India/Middle East/Europe Corridor initiated by the USA are just to counter China's BRI. Investments should first and foremost be about benefiting parties involved, not wasted on countering an already favorably accepted and beneficial concept as the BRI. Such mentality is just as wasteful as churning out weapons and having to start wars to destroy.

China's help is always for the longer term, like the help that China gave Africa, which goes back to the days of the 50s, when China was even poorer than Africa. African leaders always like to mention that episode and are outwardly extremely grateful. There was one African leader who even talked about China facing food shortages at home and yet was sending food to help certain African countries facing famine.

With the USA, any summit, any meeting between its leaders and others is always centered on countering China or Russia. These two countries can never be left in peace in any conversation between the USA and its allies.

Jealousy and envy coupled with hatred will eventually swallow up the USA and its Western backers. 

Anonymous

F35s is a piece of fake waiting to be scrapped, F22s already scrapped

 Several articles have been written about the F35s and its perennial shortcomings. After more than a decade and a half of tinkering with its problems ever since entering service in 2006, nothing came out of Lockheed Martin's attempts to solve those problems that still persists.

And those persistent problems are still afflicting the aircraft, with the USA even admitting that only 25% of the F35s in its fleet are fit for combat duty. That tells the whole story and just boggles the mind that some countries are still vying to buy them at exorbitant prices. A newer version of that plane is already being produced and the price is said to be 'astronomical'. But some silly goons will still buy them undoubtedly.

One of the many problems of the F35 is the special skin coating needed for radar evasion which is reported to peel off after just a few flights. Such peelings will render the stealth factor to be compromised.

In the face of recent developments in radar technology and the relatively slower flying speed of the F35 compared to other newer supersonic fighter jets, the F35 is losing its relevance. Its only useful role is carrying out bombing missions using its stealth approach, which is becoming irrelevant with newer radar capabilities being developed to track them. Only continued hyping has kept it in production to sell to those still living under a rock.

Moreover, smaller countries have little use for them as bombing other much bigger country is not in their interest. The USA's experience in Vietnam shows clearly to the world that using carpet bombing is a perfect example of how a war can still be lost with that superior advantage.

And the USA is also said to have stringent covenant regarding the F35's usage and in whose hands they can be flown. A F35 falling into enemy hands or crashing in enemy territory is a big matter of concern. However, in today's weaponry development, it may be a different story. China was not even interested in the F35C that fell into the South China Sea in 2022, while landing on a carrier, which the USA had been blowing up the fear that the Chinese may be attempting to salvage it to learn its secrets.

Just a matter of interest, reports have now surfaced that some of the supposedly destroyed weaponry left behind by the USA during its hurried scampering out of Afghanistan, some have been rebuilt by the Taliban and are causing nervousness in the USA and the West. The USA may have assumed that they have damaged those weaponry beyond repair before their hurried escape from Kabul, but using reverse engineering the Taliban has managed to reap a windfall not only in breathing new life into those damaged weapons but also in understanding the workings of those weapons, which will serve them well. If they share them with the Russians or Chinese, that will be highly detrimental to the USA. Shooting its own foot is becoming the hobby of the USA.

Anonymous 

PS. F22 is supposedly the best air superiority American fighter. Why did the Americans scrapped production of this aircraft when they did not have another better aircraft? Very likely the hype about the F22 is just that, hype, not real. So it is better to scrap it fast. F35 is nothing better than the F22 but another hype. Since there are still stupid buyers, the Americans would just keep pushing and selling it like fake mRNA vaccines. There will be suckers wanting to buy it. If not, coerce them to buy and keep spreading the fantasy that it is the best American aircraft, the best in the world.

The world would be choked to death by American's evil Rules Base Order

 Very soon the USA will pass a law that buying cheap is illegal and a crime. People of all countries must buy expensive things to make sure the USA can compete. In this way, the whole world would have to compete over who can turn out the most expensive things. And the USA will win hands down.

Hey, it has already happened with the EU. Buying cheap Russian energy is not in the interest of the USA, and so it threatened Germany and those countries constructing the Nord Stream 2. But Russia proceeded to complete the pipeline on its own. Unable to stop it, the USA, in complicity with its Anglo-Saxon terrorists, blew up the Nord Stream pipelines.

China has voiced its support for the UN's move to conduct an investigation into who blew up the Nord Stream pipelines. Sweden objected to most people's surprise! Why is Sweden suddenly so vocal in objecting? Was Sweden the country that blew up the Nord Stream 2? Or was it jointly involved in the plot?

I believe Denmark police was involved in an earlier investigation, but called off claiming there was no 'deliberate sabotage'. Nothing further was revealed about how they reached that conclusion. Some other EU country also conducted investigations but was too timid to reveal the truth, possible under threat, but citing 'for security reasons'.

The 'no deliberate sabotage' story from the Danish police to distance itself from the investigation was really intriguing. It does not tally with reality and perception as the USA had all the motive to take down the pipelines. Even fake narratives were later invented to cover the truth, using five Ukrainian Patriots in a boat to take the blame. Even if it was physically impossible, why make such an elaborate narrative to fool the world. That the five men in a boat did it, does that not clearly show that deliberate sabotage was intended, even if that was an imaginary story.

Anonymous

Asean's silence, ...consent or disapproval of American/Pinoys ratcheting tension in the region?

 

 In the name of an 'aggressive and provocative' China, the Americans have been inciting the Pinoys to provoke China on a daily basis, hoping to start a war in the region. The piece of scrap iron in China's Ren Ai Reef has been there for about 25 years, with China tolerating its rotting presence. No country would have the patience and tolerance to have a piece of foreign shit on its territory. China was kind and sympathetic to a poor little country and accepted their silly excuses of not able to pull it to sea and needed to protect a piece of rotting junk which the Pinoy called a ship, a warship, the pride of the Pinoy Navy. Can you believe that?

China was being patient and waiting for nature to take its own natural course without the need to kick out the Pinoy junk. Then come the evil Americans, their hideous hands stroking and prompting the Pinoys to want to make the rotting junk a permanent feature on Chinese soil, to stage a claim on Chinese island. As the Pinoys, with the Americans behind their back, keep on provoking China to pick a fight, China is still restrained, not wanting to fire the first shot. China's patience is running out and has now resorted to using water cannon to lash out at intrusive Pinoy fishing boats and coast guard ships.

The provocations have increased daily and in greater intensity, spreading to other islands and even a war game to simulate attacking Chinese ship and taking of Chinese islands.

While all these silly Mickey Mouse antics are happening, the rest of the Asean states have been reticent. But it is clear that they are watching carefully at how the Pinoys are going to start a fire in peaceful Asean region. Are the Asean states consenting to the aggressive provocation of the Pinoys and the Americans? Or they are showing their disapproval of the Pinoys by not saying a word?

Who is the aggressive party in this conflict that is moving closer to the point of an open war? The Pinoy Mickey Mouse on its own is totally irrelevant against the PLA. Why are they acting like the silly Mickey Mouse to provoke China leaves no room for guessing. The evil hands of the warmongering American terrorists are everywhere. And they are not hiding either.

When would Asean speak out, to make a stand on this provocation? The recent survey that Asean states have tilted towards China is a stark reminder to the American terrorists and the Mickey Mouse that Asean is not behind them. China is waiting for Mickey Mouse to fire the first shot before roasting it.

The Americans would not be able to do anything about it. The Americans are clearly losing the war in Ukraine despite the full support and favourable geography of Europe and NATO. In the South China Sea, it is literally between the devil and the deep blue ocean. AUKUS is nothing but a lame duck. Then, Japan would not dare to commit itself to a war against China. There will be no Japan to talk about when China strikes. India is all hogwash, a poor third world pretender that is no match for China except blowing its mouth about how great and powerful it is.

Would Asean continue to be reticent and allow Mickey Mouse and the American terrorists to turn the region into another war zone? Not saying or condemning the provocations by Mickey Mouse and the American terrorists is not a solution for peace in the region.