Slimy UN asking US to work with China to make peace in Gaza

 China will never be able to broker a peace deal between Israel and Palestine, even if it tries. Not when the USA is behind the scene supporting Israel and that is why it will never happen. And the USA will never give China the initiative to do that. That would mean a loss of face again.

The deal between Iran and Saudi Arabia was able to be carried out because Saudi Arabia was then getting tired of the USA trying to force Mohammed bin Salman into compliance like his father, pandering to the USA's dictate. The peace deal was brokered by keeping out the USA from the room during the negotiations. This young man has a mind of his own, and knows the kingdom had, all over the decades, been taking care of the USA's interest in the Middle East by pricing oil in US$.

That support by OPEC in pricing oil in US$ was MBS bargaining chip in the face of Joe Biden's slight by calling him a 'pariah'. Being called a 'pariah' was a really degoratory insult which MBS clearly was hurt very deeply. The consequence threatened against him was never put into gear, so far, as the US$ hegemony hangs in his hands with the Saudis as the leader of OPEC. Even in the face of repeated cutbacks in oil production, against the dictates of the USA, those actions shows the determination of MBS to cross swords with the USA.

When Saudi Arabia and Iran were enemies, we could perhaps surmise that the Arabs would not support the Muslims in the Middle East. But now for the USA and Israel to play that card is no longer feasible, with Iran and Saudi Arabia no longer in conflict. Just like trying to create tensions between China and Russia amid the Ukraine War, which did not materialise. It is heaven's will that Iran and Saudi Arabia are no longer in conflict. And it is all thanks to the USA pushing Saudi Arabia in the wrong direction as it did with Russia.

Anonymous

Jews control the USA

 The Jews control the USA has long been the sayings of many. Some are even saying that USA is the bitch of Israel.

It has long been known that the USA has been supporting Israel monetarily for decades with billions in aid provided annually. The Jews have been running the White House for many decades, with Jews in many of the important positions inside the White House Administration, Republicans and Democrats alike.

In fact draining the swamp is just a lame talk, as the swamp is still infested by Jews. As of 2023, there were nine Jewish Senators and 26 members of the House of Representatives serving the USA Congress. Among the more prominent ones are Chuck Schumer, Bernie Sanders, Richard Blumenthal, who are still inside the Administration. Antony Blinken is a Jew.

Therefore, Israel knows that support from USA is a given, which is why it is so arrogantly proclaiming its intention to take over the whole of Palestine and call it its own. That means genociding the whole population in Palestine. 

Anonymous

British journalist accuses Western media of bias in reporting on Israel-Palestine conflict

British journalist, Harry Fear, has accused Western media of exhibiting bias in its coverage of the Israel-Palestine conflict, saying the “overarching storytelling” is based on the Israeli narrative, Anadolu Agency reports.

Speaking to Anatolia, Fear, known for directing the 2019 documentary, “Gaza: Still Alive”, critiqued the language used by mainstream Western media while reporting on the conflict that flared up last week after a surprise attack by Palestinian group, Hamas, on Israel.

Since then, Israel has continued heavy bombardment of Gaza, and has cut its water and electricity supplies, further worsening the living conditions of the Territory that has reeled under a crippling siege since 2007.

Fear said: "What we are looking at now is a bloodbath, a bloodbath designed to exact revenge on the Gaza population." Gaza's death toll has soared to 1,900 with nearly half a million displaced, as 1,300 were killed in Israel almost one week after Hamas' assault on Israeli towns.

He said the Western media focused on unverified information about Israeli civilians, while neglecting the suffering of Palestinian civilians, especially children who were killed over the years.

Singling out the BBC and other reputed media organisations for their choice of words when covering the Gaza conflict, Fear said the British public broadcaster used distinct terminology in its reporting, referring to those killed in Gaza as “died,” and those in Israel as “killed”.

Fear also criticised other mainstream outlets for their apparent lack of empathy towards Palestinian civilians. "Because Palestinians have basically been categorised effectively as unpeople, humans that are just, well, ‘human animals’, to use the word of the Israeli officials,” he said. “And that’s very much how the mainstream narrative captures the story as well."

He said “the framing of the conflict in this latest round of fighting usually completely silences the context of 16 years of strangulation and siege, an ongoing war on Gaza, complete denial of Palestinians, human rights, civil rights, political economic rights, really that “dignity as humans at all, largely based on an ideology of racial supremacy and domination.”

The British journalist also highlighted the rapid dissemination of false and manipulative news regarding the conflict, saying: “The point is, of course, this is an ongoing war between Israel and Palestinians, and part of that is an informational war. It is a propaganda war.”

Commenting on an allegation by an Israeli journalist who claimed live on air that Hamas beheaded 40 Israeli babies, Fear said: “Is it true that Hamas carried out beheadings of 40 children? Well, it looks like that that isn’t true, because there “There has been no evidence.”

But, he added, “The story was then fed effectively throughout the English-speaking western media landscape, including landing on the front pages of major London newspapers.”

Palestinian children “have already been beheaded by Israel’s aerial bombardments, but that is of little to no report in the Western reportage,” he said.

Anonymous

World leaders in Beijing talking about development, cooperation and trade

 

3 min clip of world leaders arriving in Beijing for the Third Belt and Road Forum. They are there with clear priorities in mind, development, peaceful cooperation and trade. On the other hand, the Americans and their warmongering allies are very busy engaging in wars, killing and destruction in another part of the world.

Wherever and whenever China is involved, it is about cooperation and economic development, win win solutions, not wars.

Wherever and whenever the Americans and their gangster allies are involved, it is about wars, threats, tensions, insecurity, instability, forming gangs, terrorism ....

Who are the warmongers? Who are the troublemakers, gangsters, terrorists of the world?

Money in the banks is not safe

 It is time to return to the old practice of keeping your hard earned money under your bed in Ovaltine tin cans. That is probably safer than putting your money in the big banks, thinking that they are big, strong and safe.  The number of people losing their savings in the banks from scammers have reached an unacceptable level and that the banks have acknowledged that money kept by them is now NOT safe. So, other than putting their staff on high alert, introducing more levels of protection and authentication, they are now asking depositors to keep their money in the banks under lock and key. Can only withdraw physically and in person.

The push to use internet in money transaction has reached a point that it is turning into a high risk business for the depositors. Money kept in the banks and stolen by the scammers is not the bank's responsibility and the depositors have no way to claim back from the caretakers, the banks, for money in their charge. Is this an acceptable position? If this is so, then why should people put their money in the banks?

How much of the banks' problems were the result of farming out their digital transaction to foreigners? With so many foreigners working on the banks' operation systems, knowing the systems and the weaknesses, even responsible for the design of such systems, with access to all the firewalls etc etc, if they turn bad, if only one or two turn bad, the banks would be like a house full of holes.

If banks are not safe, cannot guarantee the safety of the depositors money and have no responsibility and accountability if the money is stolen, where is the protection for the depositors? Is this a sound basis for the operations of the banks? Let me have your money, but if lost, not my problem? How can banks be allowed to roll out digital systems that are not safe and need not be responsible for money lost using the system? What kind of logic and fairness are these?

Can the govt also tell the people that their money in the CPF, if stolen by the scammers, the govt will not be responsible for it?

The money lost to scammers has reached a breaking point that would cause the collapse of the banking system if the trust in the banks is lost. When depositors cannot trust the banks to safe keep their hard earned money, why put the money in the banks?

What do you think?