USA, the world's number one terrorist state lying about avoiding miscalculations with China

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Friday (Jun 16) that his coming visit to China aims to open up better communications "by addressing misperceptions and avoiding miscalculations".

"Intense competition requires sustained diplomacy to ensure that competition does not veer into confrontation or conflict," Blinken said. CNA

The Americans are trying to deceive the world and China that they are trying to avoid conflict and war by visiting China to talk about avoiding miscalculations.  Blinken is just the typical white men that went to talk peace with the Red Indians but harbouring plans to massacre them and steal their land, with a bible in hand and a gun behind his back.

To understand where he is coming from, one must understand where and what were the causes of instability, threats and crisis in East and the South China Sea region. The main provocateur of instability, crisis and war is the Americans. In the north, they have been provoking and threatening North Korea with their military bases, flying nuclear bombers and conducting military exercises to simulate an invasion of North Korea on the waters of North Korea. Further south, they have been agitating and encouraging Taiwan to break away from China. In the South China Sea, they have been inciting and goading the Asean states to claim Chinese islands with promises of military support and intervention. 

These are the causes and roots of instability and war making potentials. Without the Americans pulling all the strings, sending their war planes and warships into the region, there is no crisis, no tension and no crisis.

This trip by Blinken for talks with China is nothing different from talks about Code of Conduct in the sea and airspace around China. In this talk the Americans would also be talking about Taiwan, a domestic issue of China. What the Americans are going to tell China is very simple. They are going to do this and that, and China must not do this and not do that. In other words, the Americans are saying, we are going to mess with China and it is best that China stay out of the way of the Americans, to avoid any miscalculation that would lead to a war.

In the case of Taiwan, the Americans are going to tell the Chinese, China cannot reunite with Taiwan, they are going to sell weapons to Taiwan, they are going to station troops in Taiwan, they are going to send their politicians to Taiwan to instigate the Taiwan independence movement, they are going to defend Taiwan militarily. And China must not stop the Americans from what they are doing and going to do to keep Taiwan independent from China. And to avoid miscalculations, China must stay away from Taiwan and American forces. This is outright and blatant interference in China's internal affairs, and outright confrontation with China coaxed in American deceptive words and language of talks. They are telling China that they are the Empire and Taiwan is under their protection. Would China be duped by Blinken to talk about its internal affairs, of reuniting with Taiwan and be told to accept the Americans' conditions...to avoid a crisis and miscalculations?

Also, the Americans are going to tell the Chinese that they are going to sail their warships through the Strait of Taiwan and their aircraft carriers in the East China Sea. And China must stay away from the American warships to avoid miscalculation. Would China show the Americans the middle finger and tell the Americans that these are hostile and unwelcome military presence and China would deal with them accordingly as China deems fit, not as desired or told by the Americans.

In the case of North Korea, the Americans would want to keep their military bases, weapons, including nuclear weapons in South Korea and would continue with their provocative military threats against North Korea with their allies South Korea, Japan and now the Philippines. They would increase their war machine and soldiers in South Korea. And China must stay away in a war with North Korea. Would China accept that?

In the seas and airspace around China, including the South China Sea, the Americans would want to continue to send their warplanes and warships to conduct espionage and spying missions in these area, including the provocative 'freedom of navigation' missions, and China must keep away from the American warplanes and warships, and to keep them safe, not to interfere with their provocative behaviours. Would China accept these demands, now coaxed as terms of negotiation to avoid miscalculations, so that the Americans can do what they want around China?

The latest, the Americans and the Japanese are sending their coast guard ships to patrol the South China Sea. Coast guards are the equivalent of the police force used to patrol a country's territorial seas. The Americans and the Japanese are claiming the South China Sea as their territorial waters. For them to send their coast guards to patrol the seas, this is a de facto ownership of the waters in the South China Sea. The American crony Asean states would not see this expansionist act of the Americans and the Japanese to claim the South China Sea. Eventually their coast guards would make it a permanent presence in the region, like it belongs to them. And Blinken is going to set the rules for China not to intercept or chase away these coast guard ships. Would China allow this to happen and accept it as a fait accompli? 

Forget about sleeping Asean. Some are in cahoot with the Americans to control the South China Sea militarily. This is Expansionism and provocation by the Americans, acts of hostility to challenge China's control in the South China Sea. These are dangerous rogue behaviours that would lead to a crisis. With so many foreign warships messing around in Chinese waters, miscalculations would happen that could lead to confrontation.

Avoiding miscalculation is not to tell China that it cannot do this and that to confront the foreign forces. Avoiding miscalculation is for the hostile foreign forces to stay away from the region and not to provoke China with their hostile and aggressive warplanes and warships.

If the Americans and hostile foreign powers stay away from the region, there will be peace and no crisis, and no need to worry about miscalculations. There will be no need for Blinken to fly to Beijing to threaten and tell the Chinese about such risks. Just stay away from Chinese airspace and territorial waters. Just stay out of Taiwan and stop all the mischievous and gangster behaviours on Taiwan. Period.

PS. This is standard gangster tactic. They create troubles and then come and talk terms to prevent trouble, as if they are the good guys. And if you ignore them, they would blame you for not wanting to talk to avoid trouble.

American $600b pipe dream

 Indians have pipe dreams. I mean those Native American Indians always smoke, what they used to call 'peace pipes', when negotiating with the Whites, and got conned everytime. Me one puff and you one puff, and everything is solved. Ahem ahem, solved meaning gone with the smoke for the Native American Indians. Land gone, people genocided, but they had the bible in hand.

Hope this time the Whites get conned instead by the other forked tongue people. Well, looks like Apple probably did get conned this time isn't it, but will never talk about it. But Apple was pressurised by the USA Government to move away from China.

I almost fell off my chair when I read that Biden is going to build a railroad all the way across the Pacific Ocean to the Indian Ocean. And he wants to also build a bridge across the Indian Ocean to rival China's BRI. Whether Joe Biden will still be alive to see his wet dream come to fruition is the question, not to talk about the expertise needed to build that railway and bridge connection. Ok, he said he is fit, healthy and robust. Who can argue with that?

In fact Joe Biden did not know what he was talking about actually about the railroad across the Pacific, since his handlers later had to come out to correct his dementia mind. He probably thinks the Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean are in USA's Long Island Sound or the Great Lakes. Even then, it probably will not be built for another thousand years. But let us just assume he will do what he said for the time being. Trump will take them down as soon as he is elected again. It is just a game to them.

There have been so many projects that Joe Biden has in his demented mind, the US$600 billion for global infrastructures, the US$350 billion (later shrink to US$350 million) for 50 African nations to do digital transformation, the US$150 million for ASEAN to buy sampans to patrol the waters around this region, and now the imaginery bridge and railway to be built to nowhere. What will that cost is no problem for the USA in Joe's mind of course. Just print away the problem, export the inflation and it becomes someone else's problem. Not so easy this time around.

What and which country is that bridge supposed to connect? No card to prompt him, since it was some hot air expelled on the spur of the moment. Just pluck the great idea from thin air and gloat about it. That is about it. Joe Biden really thinks that the whole of ASEAN and India belongs to USA, and he can build anything he wants.

Anonymous

President Tharman good enough to be PM Tharman?

 Tharman as President of Singapore will create a very interesting scenario. Foremost, despite a few racists that keep condemning Singapore Chinese as racist and quoting a few cuckoo incidents to justify their exaggerated and mischievous description of the Chinese majority here, the general view on the ground is that Tharman is extremely popular and well liked. He is being rooted to win the election hands down with a huge majority, and with most of the votes coming from the Chinese population, the same people being accused of as racist especially against Indians. Browsing through the varies media sites, main stream and social media, the impression of Tharman by everyone is fairly similar. No one is disturbed by his Indian race. His race is never an issue except maybe over representation of the Indians in the Singapore polity, in high places and in the corridors of power.

When Tharman is popularly elected as the next President, would this dispel once for all, the accusation that Singapore Chinese are racist? Would the real racists that have been making these mischievous allegations swallow their bad vibes and acknowledge that Singapore Chinese are not racist?

Another interesting point that could be linked to Tharman's coming Presidency, if the result is a landslide victory against a Chinese candidate, and overwhelmingly voted to the top job in the island by the Chinese majority, is the question that has been troubling many politically aware Singaporeans.

If Singaporeans are ready for an Indian President, intentionally voted an Indian as the next President, would the often touted narrative that Singapore is not ready for an Indian PM still holds?  The positions may be different, a President versus a PM, but both are the top two political jobs in the island. The only difference is that the President is elected by the people, the masses. The PM is not elected by the people in an open election, but chosen by his little circle of party members.

Can the election of Tharman as an Indian President change anything in Singapore politics? Would the thinking that Singapore is not ready for an Indian PM becomes a myth? Further, the Constitution does not rule out an ex President from becoming a PM.  Could Tharman rejoin the Party after his Presidential term and vie to be the PM as a politician?

What do you think?

Short summary: Why Macron and BRICS?

It is an undisputed fact that Emmanuel Macron is a Rothschild's family messenger boy.

This is a classic financial business about moving capitals, much of it being cash. As any hedge funds, Rothschild's funds have analysts--we will omit now their quality issues--who are tasked with assessment of threats and probabilistic analysis designed to preserve and grow the capital. Macron's asking for invitation to BRICS IS NOT an act of espionage or being a Trojan Horse, not at all, it is about trying to negotiate at the fringes of BRICS summit the fate of Rothschild's capitals. The trajectory of the combined West is now well pronounced and the growth of volatility and radical decline are already in progress. This is a bad-bad situation for capital. Money loves stability and calm.

Evidently the truth of SMO started to trickle to those analysts and THE family and even unsophisticated observer can easily surmise now the scale of geopolitical change--it is unprecedented in modern history. It is also metaphysical--cash, even enormous amounts of it, means absolutely nothing if it does not rest on firm foundation of massive military and real economic power. We can observe not just the end of the West's hegemony, a much more profound change is in progress--the death of financial capitalism and exposure of money as merely a tool, not the substance.

Dedollarization is proceeding at an incredible pace.

In short, Macron is merely a caretaker, nothing more. Hence, "please invite me to BRICS summit". It is also a desperate attempt to grab Putin and Xi's sleeves and try to be heard for a minute. Rothschild's family fortunes want to be guarded by S-400 and T-90Ms with SU-57 instead of Patriot PAC3 and Leopard-2s. That's it, there is nothing more to it.

Link to article:
https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/

P.S. Rich family want to 'run road' liao!!

Anonymous

Apple's Indian wet dream turned into a nightmare

Apple's big time move to India is a total mess. India failed to provide the skilled manpower needed to staff all of Apple's and its downstream supply chain's requirements, with only a fraction of the manpower available to run the factories in India, and therefore unable to provide them and Apple the security to move smoothly forward.
Remember that India's population is still largely a service oriented country, with about 70% still engaged in agriculture. How are these people able to work in a high-end electronics environment is a mystery. India is putting the cart before the horse by embarking on big time manufacturing without preparing the ground well before it happened. But India has little choice, because without manufacturing to provide mass job creation for its huge growing population, that is now No.1 in the world. Indians must be really proud of this achievement.

Apple is now in a bind in India. This is made worse by some of the supply chain supporting players moving out, that were forcibly told to follow Apple's big move to India earlier. Ironically these supply chain players are now attempting to return to restart their main production facilities in mainland China, where manpower is not a problem and infrastructures to serve them are all at hand.

Of course there are so much propaganda about Western companies lining up and rushing to move out of China, but please have some salt on hand. No other country is large enough to provide the kind of environment for large scale manufacturing without the kind of skilled workers and supply chains to back it up. Finding out the hard way is truly costly.

Under pressure by Apple's move to India, Wistron Corporation, a Taiwanese company, relocated part of its Iphone assembly facilities from China to India. And so does Foxconn Technology Group of Taiwan. Without the skilled manpower support in India, which arguably is the Achille's Heel of electronics manufacturing, Wistron suffered and eventually and predictably had to relinquish its facilities it set up in India to the Tata Group, the Indian conglomerate. Foxcomm, likewise is in dire straits for the same manpower shortage reasons. Both are now regretting their earlier moves and intends to move back and concentrate on mainland China. They are realising that there is no way they can decouple from China.

Chinese companies could do well to avoid India, as it has already been shown that when they have achieved success after working their guts out, the Indian Government will find ways and means to force them to cede over power to Indian control. That has already happened with Xiaomi, Oppo and others, and not just Chinese companies, but Wistron of Taiwan as well. Just wondering is this the way why Indians are sitting pretty on top as CEOs of multinational conglomerates?

Modi can do all he wants to lure USA companies to invest in India, but it is best for those in Asia, and particularly China, to avoid India, not just in investments, but in bidding for projects in India. The problems will only be known to them after the agreements are signed. Japan found out the hard way with its HSR project in India.

Anonymous