10/31/2022

U.S. frenzied fear of losing its number one position to China is lunacy, hysterical and irrational.

      The United States had inherited the mantle of British brutal colonialism and imperialism. It went further than the British in its barbaric treatment of the natives who were subjected to wanton atrocities and merciless tortures to fulfill their colonial demands of taking over native lands, resources and properties.

There are many facets of American imperialism in which it has persistently pursued to achieve its number one world power status. They involve political control and governance, the military dominance, economic control, trade and finance and monetary control, use of illegal toxic sanctions and blockades. 

Let's take a look into British imperialism and colonialism which was later followed by the Americans. British savage aggression and expansion into China from the 1830s to 1940s corrupted Chinese society adversely. Chinese culture was greatly affected and compromised by the introduction of toxic Christian religious doctrine and Western immoral acts and behaviour. British and Western speculative land deals in China had altered the Chinese countryside adversely to the benefit of the Western occupation powers. Everywhere the British went be it in India, Africa, Malaya or elsewhere it was the same operandi of exploitation as if it was the natural order of things. 

The British colonialists did not care to learn local languages and customs though they did teach the natives English out of utility necessity. They built churches to cater to their own kind of Christian believers. They invariably tried to subvert the natives religious beliefs and their local deities. They eradicated local customs and religious practice and social norms of behaviour without anything better to offer.

The British imperialist and the West would always bring their own business practices which they expected the natives to follow and their own goods or merchandise to be traded. They brought their own laws and imposed the same strictly on the native peoples. 

Of course with their presence the British and Western colonialists even brought their own diseases like influenza, small pox, veneral diseases, gonorrhoea and other European diseases which soon scourge the local populations. 

When the British imperialists could not get their own way with the natives they resorted to rule the natives by treachery of dividing the natives. They sow dissensions among the natives by pitting tribes against other tribes, clans against clans and religion against religion. When all the aforementioned failed they brought in their military, their troops and gunboats to impose their dictatorship on the natives. They would never hesitate to kill, murder, assassinate  and massacre the natives to get what they wanted and to impose their rigid control and hegemony as savage imperial power. In short they never care to show their barbaric power to rule by force.

The Anglo-Saxon  British imperial empire had set the way of stringent barbaric imperial rule over conquered lands and peoples  by killings, massacres and genocides  and the evil mantle of which was later to be inherited by its descendants the even more savage and wicked Anglo-Saxon American Empire.

The barbaric United States was founded in 1776 as a breakaway entity from the evil British Empire. It inherited all the evil traits and mal practices of the British imperialist and colonialist. From day one of its founding it had already prepared in detail its ambition of taking over the whole of North America by invading the hundreds of native American states and by invading large swathes of Mexico territories. To ensure white Anglo-Saxon permanent occupation of these new invaded territories the United States went on a spree of weeding out all native American Indian population through massive killings, massacres and genocides.

In 1823 President Monroe instituted the diabolical Monroe Doctrine to let US exercise full absolute control of all Latin America countries. Under the Monroe Doctrine all foreign countries especially the continental European countries were not allowed to trade or sign any treaty with any of the Latin American countries except through permission from Washington. All trade, import and export of Latin American countries must first obtain permission from Washington which would have first charge of custom and excise duties on all products imported or exported. This was imperial United States practice of extra territoriality and hegemony which turned all Latin America countries into American semi-colonies. The United States enforced the Monroe Doctrine by means of its powerful military.

Of course all the while there were strong oppositions to US imperialism. It was only after the Second World War that  Latin America countries were able to get rid of the toxic Monroe Doctrine. Even then the evil United States has never ceased to interfere with the sovereign rights of the Latin American countries for it always interfered militarily with their internal affairs often through subterfuge, subversion, military coups and brutal regime change.

The United States had similarly tried to impose its imperialism on China since the late 1918 to late 1940s and even to this day. In 1918 US ganged up with the European powers to hand over the Chinese province of Shangtung to Japan. Then in the 1930s to early 1940s it connived and colluded with England, France, Italy, Germany, Russia and Japan to carve off enclaves or concessions in many Chinese ports and cities to be controlled exclusively by them under their extraterritorial rights thus reducing China to be a semi-colony of these foreign powers. 

However, in 1949 China under the Chinese Communist Party led by Chairman Mao Tse-tung and his comrades was able to throw off the yoke of Western and Japanese imperialism and established the Peoples Repunlic of China in Beijing on 1st October, 1949. 

However, after the establishment of the PRC the US continued to interfere in China's internal affairs. With the defeat of Chiang Kai-shek in the Chinese civil war, the US helped ferried over a million of Chiang's followers and soldiers to Taiwan to continue to harass mainland China. The US Seventh Fleet stationed in the Taiwan Straits prevented the PRC from liberating Taiwan which was occupied by Japan in 1895 but restored to China legally after the Second World War via the Potsdam Treaty.

From 1973 to early 1980s America entered into some sort of peaceful detente with China when it felt threatened by the military might of Soviet Russia. The United States under three joint communiques with China recognized 'Taiwan' as an integral Chinese sovereign territory and that there is only Óne China' in which the island of Taiwan belongs to. The United  Nations Organisation and the United States as well as the 180 over countries in the world recognize the PRC -- The People's Republic of China as the sole government of China.

In the meantime China was busy labouring very hard to build up its shattered economy after more than a century of wars imposed on her by the Western countries and Japan which was followed by their relentless extreme diabolical exploitation that impoverished China to no end and reduced her to a dilapidated pauper state. 

In the interim period of a more peaceful environment from end of 1980s to 2015 China's reconstruction proceeded at a very rapid tremendous pace  in all spheres of economic activities, in industries and manufacturing, in trade and commerce, science and technology, high tech, infrastructures, space technology, cyber , internet, 5G and 6G. 

The West especially the United States  watch at China's phenomenal rise with neurotic fear and consternation. How can a non-white country be a ble to achieve so much in so short a time. No, China must not be allowed to continue with such phenomenal advancement. Thus the US which looks at China's rise with jaundiced eyes has decided to kick in the Wolfowitz Doctrine against China. And that is China's development must be stopped at all cost in its path and China must be destroyed for the US will not allow China to become as rich and powerful as the United States and to grow in status either as a regional or global power to challenge America. This is America's utter arrogance which demands a challenge from the world especially from Russia and China.

That is a sort of insidious doctrine that poses a threat not only to China but to the whole world and yes to US itself. The evil US is so illogically consumed with false ego that it is the world's only superpower and no matter what it wants to preserve its primacy, supremacy and hegemony over every other country. The United States now seems intent on no holes barred confrontation against Russia and China, both powerful nuclear armed states. It looks at China's peaceful rise with hysterical neurotic fear that it has been provoking China endlessly with naval and jet fighters incursions into China's coastlines and airspace. Further it tries to contain China's peaceful development with a multitude of diabolical factors. It carries out a trade war with China and impose unreasonable  technological sanctions against Chinese companies and Chinese professionals. It intentionally creates endless tensions in the Taiwan Straits by violating the three joint communiques. It is also misleading its puppets like Japan, South Korea and Australia as pawns and frontline provocateurs under its mafia gang blocs QUAD, ANKUS and whatever to go against China. All these nefarious and diabolical activities will not bring a good end to the United States. America is extremely irrational and is now behaving like a beheaded dying cockerel strutting violently in its last moments of life.

China has made it very clear that its strive for progress and development is to bring a better life and living for all Chinese people and citizens. China has no interest to displace US as the world's policeman or its number one position in the world. So why is the evil United States so uptight and unreasonable and still has frenzied fear of China and in wanting to provoke and draw China out for confrontation and conflict in an unnecessary nuclear war. 

A nuclear war between nuclear powers like US, Russia and China poses a threat to the end of mankind and must never be allowed to happen. Hopefully the  warmongers in Washington, Wall Street and Pentagon will wake up to this lethal danger and change their ways and thinking to walk a more peaceful path before it is too late.

Southernglory1

Monday, 1st November, 2022





 

Picking political allies, friends or relatives to top leaders

Many western media reported that Xi Jinping has consolidated his power and appointed his allies into the Politburo Standing Committee, which is the top decision making body of the Communist Party of China.

I find this narrative to be dishonest.

The above is a comment by Tan Kin Lian in his article posted in TRE. Tan Kin Lian said all political leaders did the same thing.

How many people agree or disagree with him? Is this a practice only in China? Did Singapore practise the same? Oops, let's not use Singapore for this discussion. Let's use the USA. Did the Americans practise the same, the President of USA appointing his allies to top positions? Did Biden do it? Did Trump do it?

In the case of Trump, I think he did not. This is not western practice as it portends some kind of corruption of power.  And Trump did not do it, or he did a bit of it. Trump only appointed his family members into power, his son in law, his daughter and dunno who. And this is different from appointing his allies like Bannon, Bolton and the likes. This is nepotism. Which is more serious? Appointing allies or family members? Or appointing allies plus family members?

Why is this an issue when Xi appointed his 'allies' who are top leaders that rose from the ranks and have proven themselves and had worked with Xi before? From another perspective, Xi had seen them worked and tested them and thus trusted them and their abilities. Xi needs able and trusted men to work with him when he is making decisions that affect the whole country of 1.4b people.

Where did Trump or Biden picked their allies from, other than family members? Many of them were not tested in government, some were just salesmen or koyok sellers from God knows where.

The Chinese system of picking able men that have proven themselves and handpicked by the President is a much better and meritorcratic system that the American system of anyhow pick anyone from anywhere, even from the bedroom.

What do you think?

Covid19 - Who is lying and why are they lying?

 'A Closer Look At The COVID Mortality Rate'


'One of the most consistent efforts made by “experts” during the early stages of the pandemic was to attempt to impress on the public that COVID was an extremely deadly disease.'

'While “experts” could be forgiven for being unsure about the death rate of a brand new illness with very little data available, the fear-mongering and world-altering policy enacted based on these estimates has caused incalculable damage.

It’s now widely known and accepted that these estimates were wildly incorrect, off by orders of magnitude.'

'But a new paper out from one of the world’s leading experts confirms that they were off even more than we previously realized.

John Ioannidis is one of the nation’s leading public health experts, employed at Stanford University as Professor of Medicine in Stanford Prevention Research, of Epidemiology and Population Health,” as well as “of Statistics and Biomedical Data Science.”'

'He also took part in the infamous seroprevalence study conducted in Santa Clara County, led by Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

That examination, which looked at antibody prevalence in the San Jose area, came to the conclusion that COVID was already significantly more widespread by March and April 2020 than most people realized.

This had wide-ranging implications, but the most important revelation was that the estimates of COVID’s mortality rate used by “scientists” and the WHO were almost certainly much too high.'

'Ioannidis and his co-writers reviewed 40 national seroprevalence studies that covered 38 countries to come to determine their estimates of infection fatality rate for the overwhelming majority of people.'

'So what did they find?

The median infection fatality rate for those aged 0–59 was 0.035 percent.

This represents 86 percent of the global population and the survival rate for those who were infected with COVID pre-vaccination was 99.965 percent.'

'For those aged 0–69, which covers 94 percent of the global population, the fatality rate was 0.095 percent, meaning the survival rate for nearly 7.3 billion people was 99.905 percent.

Those survival rates are obviously staggeringly high, which already creates frustration that restrictions were imposed on all age groups, when focused protection for those over 70 or at significantly elevated risk would have been a much more preferable course of action.'

'The researchers broke down the demographics into smaller buckets, showing the increase in risk amongst older populations, and conversely, how infinitesimal the risk was amongst younger age groups.

Ages 60–69, fatality rate 0.501 percent, survival rate 99.499 percent
Ages 50–59, fatality rate 0.129 percent, survival rate 99.871 percent
Ages 40–49, fatality rate 0.035 percent survival rate 99.965 percent
Ages 30–39, fatality rate 0.011 percent, survival rate 99.989 percent
Ages 20–29, fatality rate 0.003 percent, survival rate 99.997 percent
Ages 0–19, fatality rate 0.0003 percent, survival rate 99.9997 percent'

These numbers are astounding and reassuringly low, across the board.

Yet now we have another piece of evidence suggesting that the initial WHO estimates were off by 99 percent for 94 percent of the world’s population.

'If sanity and intellectual honesty still existed, these estimates would be front page news for every major media outlet in the world.

Instead, because the media and their allies in the tech, corporate, and political classes promoted and encouraged lockdowns and restrictions while censoring dissent, it’s ignored.'

Link to article:

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/closer-look-covid-mortality-rate

But they’re almost nonexistent for children. 
 
 Anonymous 


10/30/2022

Rishi Sunak - Calls for Indian PM gets louder


“Will Rishi Sunak’s rise in UK prompt soul-searching in Chinese-majority Singapore?” asked South China Morning Post writer Dewey Sim, who also pointed out that the country’s top leaders have all been of Chinese descent, as is Finance Minister Lawrence Wong, who has been designated to succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong....

...when asked by Assistant Professor Walid Jumblatt Abdullah of NTU’s School of Social Sciences’ public policy and global affairs programme, “Is it Singapore who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister, or is it the PAP (the ruling People’s Action Party) who is not ready for a non-Chinese prime minister?”


Mr Heng said, “My own experience in walking the ground, in working with different people from all walks of life, is that the views — if you go by age and by life experience — would be very different.”

The above comments were from an article in theindependent.sg titled 'Netizen: ‘Will Sunak’s rise in UK (as 1st Indian PM) prompt soul-searching in Chinese-majority Singapore?’'

The struggle for an Indian PM in Singapore has been going on for quite some time. Fortunately or unfortunately, the Indian MPs and ministers did not seem to be interested in wanting to become the PM and thus the heat was laid off for a while. Now this Sunak Miracle in the UK has started a revival for an Indian PM. Would any Indian MP or minister be ambitious enough to say he is ready to be the PM of Singapore now? If not, the debate would die off soonest, and the coffin would be sealed once Lawrence Wong is appointed as the next PM. Then the wait would go on till the next GE.

On the other hand the ground is being prepared for greater acceptance of Indians as part of the family. If you notice the advertisements on Youtube, not sure if it is happening in Mediacorp channels, whenever the clip is about a couple or a family, it is always an Indian man and a Chinese girl or woman. This is a consistent message. How it started, when it started, who started this, but something is going on to bring greater acceptance that an Indian man is the choice for the Chinese woman. Is this an official campaign, or just the initiative of commercial advert producers, not sure. Let this subtle message go on for a while and Indians would become part of the Chinese family by choice, and an Indian PM would be more easily acceptable. Then there would be no more angst about when Singapore is going to have an Indian PM. And Indian MPs and ministers would be more forthcoming in wanting to be the next PM. Bravo!

The quest for an Indian to be the next PM of Singapore has been set in motion. The ground is being prepared dunno by who.  And many Chinese girls would be looking for an Indian man as husband or boyfriend. Be patient. Singapore is social engineering another big mindset and social change. More kopi susu?

Churchill turning in his grave

 

Sunak is out to prove Churchill wrong. For a start, he is ruling Britain now. The Brits think he is fit to rule them.  Any more Churchills out there?