Colonialism versus Neo Colonialism

 When the European gangsters and pirates raided the world, they came with their guns and weapons that the natives did not have and could not fight back. Then they seized the land and formed so called govts. They appointed themselves head of this and head of that and put all the white men in charge of this and in charge of that. All the industries and businesses became their properties.  All the land became their land. And they imposed taxes on the people, just like the gangsters collecting protection money from the small businesses.

And of course they grew rich, very rich. In simple terms, they set up a system to legally rob the country and the people.  It was organised crime to benefit and profit themselves. They had free land, free labour, freedom to impose taxes on anything they wanted, to take money from the people short of calling the people slaves. Come to think of it, it was organised slavery with legal terms and concepts.

Colonialism was an efficient system for the thugs, gangsters and pirates to rob a country systemically and legally. They became the law, they were the law. What they said became law. They were above the law.

And the whole world, their colonies, were robbed of their wealth.  And they became very very rich, living in style, like Swiss standard of living, building fanciful family homes and estates, manors, counties in grandiose style, and lived in splendour and luxury, while the slaves, the subjects in the colony, just worked to support their high living.  The subjects could not fight back, unable to fight back, and as long as they had enough to live, a roof over their head, life goes on and on, with the gangsters getting richer and fatter by the day, and lazier as well.

Then they made themselves the aristocracy, short of becoming royalties. They rode horses for pleasure, went to theatres, went for holidays, looked for adventures when their lives got too boring because of too much money and no need to work for it. The people in their fiefdoms did all the work.

This was Colonialism. It worked in the past and the present. It was built on a relationship between the colonial masters and their subjects aka slaves who did not know they were slaves, slaving to fatten their masters and to support their lavish lifestyles. And the aristocracy grew in numbers and their titles and wealth became inheritance to be passed down from generations to generations, not taxable.  Their descendants no longer need to work for a living, living off their titles and inheritance.

This is Colonialism in simple plain language, a system to rob a country by a bunch of gangsters. Is it applicable today? Neo Colonialism?

China must end its non interference policy in domestic affairs of other countries

 China has consistently adopted the policy of non interference in the domestic affairs of other countries since its rise as a super power. While China is keeping to its words, the Americans continue to meddle and interfere with the domestic affairs of every country in the world, in the name of democracy and human rights, two arbitrary and controversial concepts as passports and authority for intervention.  And the Americans also use these to interfere in China's domestic affairs in every opportunity, real or fabricated.

China did not retaliate because of its own policy of restraint and non interference even under the constant barrage from the Americans.  This policy makes the Chinese looked stupid and hapless and being attacked but not hitting back. It became a one way street, with the Chinese tying their own hands and become a punching bag for the Americans, and still being accused by the cunning Americans for being aggressive and assertive.

China must abandon this policy of non interference.  Don't get me wrong. China must not interfere with the domestic affairs of countries but not to countries that kept on interfering and attacking China's domestic affairs. The Americans and 5 eyes countries and European countries are repeatedly interfering in China's domestic affairs and making China looking bad. And because China did not hit back, many silly little countries also think it is ok to attack China since China would not hit back.

With the change in its foreign policies and wolf warrior diplomacy, China must take a step further and let it be known to the world that China would not interfere in other countries' domestic affairs only when these countries did not interfere with China's domestic affairs.  Any country that took liberty to take potshots at China would received the same potshots in their face.

It is time China use the megaphone to denounce American crimes against humanity, genocides, warmongering, lies, fabricating lies and planting false flag incidents, and not forgetting the Americans' anti blacks and coloured people racism in homeland America.  China must set up agencies specifically assigned to blare about the abuses and crimes of the Americans for the rest of the world to hear.

China must hit back at the Americans and Europeans by interfering and meddling with their domestic affairs with the same intensity and regularity done against China. Both sides can play the blame game.  Both sides can hit and kick at each other. China must not be always on the receiving end and not hitting back.

The biggest genocide in human civilisation was committed by the white Americans against the native Americans in America. The worst violation of human rights and human dignity was committed by the white men against the African blacks for a couple of centuries in black slavery, and the discrimination against the blacks is continuing today.  

China, please take it up from here. Throw away the stupid non interference policy when others took liberty to interfere with your domestic affairs. Be principled only with honourable people, not with thugs, gangsters and evil men and women. Do not play fair with the devils.

Janil Puthuchery - The most talented minister

 

 I thought I saw Janil making a presentation on Climate Change in CNA. Indeed it was him. And he did a very good job as a TV presenter. He must have put in a lot of effort and time into the programme.

Janil is not only a minister, but also a doctor and now a TV presenter. What other hidden talent has he got, still hidden and not known to the public?

I hope CNA will make up to him for his good show with a good pay or gratuity. He can't be putting so much time and effort for nothing when he has a very heavy load as a minister. And CNA must not forget to compensate the govt for his time and make good the equivalent of his minister pay on a pro rata basis. This is only fair. His time is very expensive.

Janil must be the most talented catch by the PAP. With a loud hailer in hand, he could even be the super salesman in Chinatown if he wanted to. Let's see who else would show his or her untapped talent on TV or whatever acts they could put up with to share their talents with the people. Sure the people would want to see a different side or aspect of the MPs and Ministers and be impressed. I am definitely very impressed with Janil's performance as a TV presenter.

Looks like all the available talents in Singapore is with the PAP. No wonder they are being paid in the millions or nearly there for the non ministers. OK, I stand corrected in case I have insulted some for earning less than $500k and fall into the mediocre category. I think many MPs are also millionaires in their own rights. Think of the number of directorships they are holding. Ok, count the opposition MPs out on this.

In summary, I think all of them are getting more than $500k in total annual income and surely cannot be in the mediocre or average level of people.

Good show, multi talented super talents of Singapore. Would there be any magicians among them?

More silly western articles attacking and smearing China in local media

 Commentary: China’s divide-and-conquer strategy isn’t fooling anyone anymore
 

Recent actions involving Australia and New Zealand reveal the country’s modus operandi can be effective but will have broader, corrosive implications for China, says Christian Le Miere....

A PATTERN OF COERCIVE DIPLOMACY

Beijing uses a range of tools and tactics to divide and conquer. This consists of economic and diplomatic levers to punish states that have transgressed unwritten red lines and market-based enticements for smaller, weaker states to cultivate influence.


Many such tactics are not unique to China. It is commonplace for countries, particularly larger ones, to sanction others in tits-for-tats to shape behaviour and maintain state-to-state relations on an even keel in protecting domestic interests and pursuing national goals.
 

But Beijing is relatively unusual in the manner in which it undertakes this coercion, using disproportionality, extra-legal processes, and deniability....CNA

 

Why would CNA regularly put up such silly articles written by the white men to demonise and attack China? The divide and conquer strategy has been the hallmark of western imperialism and colonialism for centuries when they divided and conquered the whole world. Many countries are still under the controls of the white men, including large swathe of land mass like the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many parts of the world. No, not true? Cannot see? These lands belong to the white men, they never conquer them? Practically every country in the world was, and some still, conquered by the white men.

Many countries in Latin America, Africa, Middle East, Europe and Asia are living still under this divide and conquer strategy. Japan and South Korea are still semi colonies of the white men. Europe, with the EU countries in general and Germany in particular, are still controlled by the American Empire. Needless to say what is happening in the Middle East and Africa and Latin America. No, no, not true? Come off it you silly twits. Open your eyes and stop deluding yourself.

China conduct divide and conquer diplomacy? Which country has China conquered? Fucking liars. China dividing and conquering Australia and New Zealand? What the fuck are you talking about? The current diplomatic rift with Australia is caused by the Australians taking all kinds of punitive economic and political measures and pot shots at China before China started to kick their arse. China did not start this. China was happily trading with Australia for decades, throwing billions of dollars into the Australian economy before the current spat. There was absolutely no coercion or threats of any kind from China. If Australia did not gang up with the USA to attack China, would this happen, would China cut off trades with Australia, stop buying Australian produce, coal, iron ore, wines etc etc?

Where is this shit called divide and conquer Australia and New Zealand coming from? Smoking too much grass or popping too much ice pills?

What does this writer think of what the Americans are doing with their warships all over the world and daily attacks against China?

What would China perceive if Singapore's media continuously published such silly biased western articles to attack China? Do the Singapore media really think such silly articles are objective read for its readers?

Which country has been conquered by China? I know that the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and many others around the world are conquered and occupied by the Europeans till today. And many still in the process of being conquered, occupied with American and European soldiers in their land. 

Think Iraq, Syria, Libya. Also think Germany, Japan, South Korea, Falkland, Hawaii, ....

China is still trying to recover its lost territories in Taiwan and many pieces of land on its borders and the South China Sea and East China Sea. There were China's territories conquered by foreign powers and it is China's legitimate right to take them back, not divide and conquer.

PS. The main media are controlled and managed not by stupid people. Did they not know the implications of publishing such hostile and negative articles smearing China and what the Chinese govt would read of the intent and agenda for doing such things?

Mars pictures - Are they real?

 

The above 2 pics from NASA of Mars from its latest rover show a distinct curved horizon of Mars very similar in perspective of NASA pics of the moon. The size of the moon relative to the earth is a few hundred times smaller. Mars is about half the size of the earth. Pics taken at this angel and the distance to the horizon would not show such a big curvature unless taken from a very wide angel lens. Both pics do not look like taken from very wide angle lens.

This NASA is supposed to be a stitched panorama view from several pics, unless it is just one frame.

The above 2 pics are by China's probe Tianwen1. The top pic is taken from quite a distance from the surface of Mars and still not able to see the curvature of Mars, because Mars is too big, many times bigger than the moon. The lower pic is a closer view. Notice the texture of Mars' surface...does not look anything like on earth, especially the whitish elongated stuff. 

The NASA pics look very earth like, like the surface of earth in some corners.

 

Now look at earlier pics of Mars from other Nasa rovers. Below are two parts of a panorama view of Mars. Notice the horizon was not curved.