When I heard that MP Murali asked in Parliament if Kong Hee can serve his jail sentence at home I was really shock. Who in his right mind would ever think of that except for minor crimes. Any crime that deserved a jail sentence cannot be minor. When I recovered from my shocking spell and recomposed myself, I started to appreciate what this Murali had in mind. He came across as a very caring MP, caring for voters in his ward. Oops, I am not sure if Kong Hee is a PR, a local, or a citizen. Can anyone confirm this? And if indeed Kong Hee is a citizen then his MP should be speaking for him. I also think Murali is not his MP. Where is Kong Hee's MP, sleeping, not caring for the people that voted for him?
I have further thoughts on this matter and the more I think about it, the more I am convinced that Murali has very good intention. Put it this way, cheating a few million dollars without intention to cheat and never benefiting from it except for his wife, should not be dealt with so harshly. And Kong Hee is such a nice guy, saving so many poor souls and helping them to be rich and to go to heaven. These must be good mitigating factors to deserve serving his jail sentence at home.
There are also obvious tangible and financial benefits and considerations to support Murali's thought. It is very costly to keep a person in prison. The cell and the bed, the medical support and the 'Or tau png' ie black bean rice, also cost money. There will be so much savings if Kong Hee would to serve his sentence at home and pay for his own cell, his own food and medical services. And the cell and cells for such cases would be needed for those creating fake news or cannot pay their compulsory CPF insurance schemes. The prison must prepare to cater for more intakes with so many new laws coming up.
An added financial incentive would be that prisoners granted jail sentences at home would have to pay $100 a day for this privilege. And there will be no discount for holidays and Sundays. The govt coffers would be much richer if the sentence of 7 years, ie 7x365x$100 is paid. I think this is great idea. And the rich prisoners would be more than willing to serve their jail sentence at home so that the cell space could be allocated to other more needy cases, the hardups that cannot afford to pay.
What do you think, good idea or not? I fully agree with Murali though Shanmugam has rejected it. This is indeed a fine idea from a very clever and caring MP. 'Mo tak teng'. Any idea that makes money for the govt, I like. Then perhaps they would spare the people's savings in the CPF from more compulsory schemes.
3/20/2018
Stupidity of Asean leaders is unlimited
The recent Asean Summit Meeting with a little country like Australia,
big only in land mass, speaks for itself, that Asean leaders are still
wearing blinkers and could not tell the difference between a dwarf and a
giant. But this is not the most stupid part of this meeting. In the
concluding message, Turnbull had this to say as he assumed the role of
big brother of the little coloured people.
‘Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull at the conclusion of an Asean-Australia special summit. Mr Turnbull said Asean and Australia reaffirmed their commitment to respond strongly and resolutely in the face of the reclusive state’s “reckless and illegal nuclear-missile programmes”.’ CNA
What is so reckless about North Korea having nuclear weapons to protect themselves and prevent themselves from the same fate as Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi people when the USA is going to make its nuclear arsenal more deadly? What grave concerns? When have the North Koreans used nuclear weapons on any country? When have the North Koreans threaten to nuke any Asean country or want to conduct a preemptive strike into any of these silly countries? Is there any reason for the North Koreans to want to do so? The grave concern is the USA threatening to conduct a preemptive strike against North Korea. Can the stupid Asean leaders see the difference?
Which evil country has been threatening to nuke other countries by accusing other countries as a threat to them? Which evil country had actually nuked another country? Which evil country has been conducting wars of invasion, regime change everyday for the last seven decades? Which evil country has been stoking war, provoking and instigating for war?
Isn’t such a country more reckless and dangerous instead of North Korea? Asean was formed to foster closer economic ties among its member countries and with other countries. Why is Asean now behaving like an American lackey singing the American lies and demonising countries that the Americans want them to demonise? Why allowed the Americans and Australia to set the agenda?
While North Korea is repeatedly being bashed by silly Asean leaders, the smarter European countries are having their own friendly negotiations with the North Koreans without having any fear of a ‘reckless’ nuclear North Korea. Why are European countries feeling so safe and secure and why are some silly Asean countries feeling so unsafe and unsecure of North Korea? The Swedes and Finns are very comfortable talking to the North Koreans and making friends with the North Koreans. And if I am not mistaken, some Asean countries are also quietly trading with the North Koreans except those semi colonised non independent countries that are controlled by the Americans.
What have Asean countries got to fear North Korea about when all its neighbours are not uttering a word except those allied with the evil Empire and wanting to invade that country? Why waste time talking about a non problem just because the Americans and the Australians want to make it a problem?
When would Asean leaders grow up and think independently, that North Korea is not the concern of Asean, and to tell the Americans that it would not want to be dragged around by the ears by the Americans?
Angmoh tua kee is it?
PS. If the sillies had their ways, in 30 years time Singapore would have a bigger population than Australia. Would Asean then hold a summit as a group with Singapore?
‘Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull at the conclusion of an Asean-Australia special summit. Mr Turnbull said Asean and Australia reaffirmed their commitment to respond strongly and resolutely in the face of the reclusive state’s “reckless and illegal nuclear-missile programmes”.’ CNA
What is so reckless about North Korea having nuclear weapons to protect themselves and prevent themselves from the same fate as Saddam Hussein and the Iraqi people when the USA is going to make its nuclear arsenal more deadly? What grave concerns? When have the North Koreans used nuclear weapons on any country? When have the North Koreans threaten to nuke any Asean country or want to conduct a preemptive strike into any of these silly countries? Is there any reason for the North Koreans to want to do so? The grave concern is the USA threatening to conduct a preemptive strike against North Korea. Can the stupid Asean leaders see the difference?
Which evil country has been threatening to nuke other countries by accusing other countries as a threat to them? Which evil country had actually nuked another country? Which evil country has been conducting wars of invasion, regime change everyday for the last seven decades? Which evil country has been stoking war, provoking and instigating for war?
Isn’t such a country more reckless and dangerous instead of North Korea? Asean was formed to foster closer economic ties among its member countries and with other countries. Why is Asean now behaving like an American lackey singing the American lies and demonising countries that the Americans want them to demonise? Why allowed the Americans and Australia to set the agenda?
While North Korea is repeatedly being bashed by silly Asean leaders, the smarter European countries are having their own friendly negotiations with the North Koreans without having any fear of a ‘reckless’ nuclear North Korea. Why are European countries feeling so safe and secure and why are some silly Asean countries feeling so unsafe and unsecure of North Korea? The Swedes and Finns are very comfortable talking to the North Koreans and making friends with the North Koreans. And if I am not mistaken, some Asean countries are also quietly trading with the North Koreans except those semi colonised non independent countries that are controlled by the Americans.
What have Asean countries got to fear North Korea about when all its neighbours are not uttering a word except those allied with the evil Empire and wanting to invade that country? Why waste time talking about a non problem just because the Americans and the Australians want to make it a problem?
When would Asean leaders grow up and think independently, that North Korea is not the concern of Asean, and to tell the Americans that it would not want to be dragged around by the ears by the Americans?
Angmoh tua kee is it?
PS. If the sillies had their ways, in 30 years time Singapore would have a bigger population than Australia. Would Asean then hold a summit as a group with Singapore?
3/19/2018
The most successful fake news campaign – demonizing China and the Chinese Civilisation
Fake news as a weapon of war to confuse, mislead, attack and demoralise
the enemies is nothing new. It is a consistent campaign conducted over
time, years, decades, even centuries, to destroy the enemy without
anyone knowing what was going on. In the words of Michael Raska, from
S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies ...fake news is a weapon
used for invasion by other countries. “A campaign of disinformation,
where falsehoods are spread subtly and gradually, could be the first
step in an attack on Singapore. This is especially so for foreign actors
who want to attack Singapore, but cannot do so using military means.”
The most successful fake news campaign was conducted by the West and western media to demonise China and the Chinese Civilisation over the last few centuries. If you remove the word ‘Singapore’ in the above quote and insert ‘China’, it is exactly what was happening in the past till today and going on everyday even in articles from western mischievous writers in our local papers.
China was a victim of invasion, colonialism and imperialism until the country was bankrupted, the people humiliated and demoralised and their confidence as a civilisation totally destroyed. But the West and western media glorified their wars and invasion of China and the rest of the world as if Imperialism and Colonialism were the good things, the invaders and murderers and plunderers were the heroes, the good guys, knighted as Sir this and Sir that by their kings and queens. And the real victims, the Africans, the Asians, the Indians and the Chinese were the bad guys.
The success of this fake news campaign is so damaging till today that many Asian leaders are still fearing China as a war monger waiting to conquer and invade their countries when the real invaders were the Western countries and Japan. And to many people of Chinese origins in SE Asia, they even despised China and the Chinese Civilisation, ashamed to be Chinese, even hating the Chinese without knowing why but for the reasons planted into their unthinking mind by the western media.
And when the West ridiculed China, passed rude remarks about Chinese, they would giggle and agree, thinking that they were not Chinese and had nothing to do with being Chinese though they have yellow skin and Chinese parentage. Many would join in the attack and pass humiliating remarks about Chinese, not admitting that they were Chinese. Some may even want to change the colour of their skin, bleach them to be whites.
The local media did not help, in fact continue to publish articles of western origins that were anti China and the Chinese civilisation regularly as if they were truths and not fake news. The common angle that these western articles took would be China may be building roads and infrastructures for the developing countries, but China did not do it for humanitarian grounds but eyeing their natural resources. What is wrong with exchanging their work in infrastructure development with raw materials when these countries could not pay with currencies? Do they expect China to build all the infrastructures for free? Compares with the West selling arms and goods to these countries, for free, for humanitarian reasons? The colonisation of these countries was for humanitarian reasons, to civilise these countries, by robbing them of their land and natural resources without paying a single cent?
The media has been well exploited by the West for centuries to gold plate their evils deeds, their plunderings and killings of Asians and Africans while at the same time demonising other Asian and African countries. There was no condemnation of the mass murders and genocides conducted by the white Europeans in the past and in recent years. The native Americans, the African native slaves, the mass killings in North Korea, Japan, Vietnam, in Iraq, Libya, Syria, in Afghanistan, in many north African states, in Latin America, in the Philippines.
Practically all western media are in the job of passing fake news to glorify the West, the European Empires, the American evil Empire, their killings by the hundreds of thousands in the Middle East and Africa with impunity while accusing the Asian leaders of crimes against humanity. Duterte is a key victim, Assad, Kim Jong Un, now Aung San Suu Kyi, soon would be Najib. Putin and Xi are on the wanted hate list.
Who are the real producers of fake news? Main media or social media? The main role of mysingaporenews is to question and cast doubts on what the main media is pushing as the truth. Mysingaporenews will question what it thinks is fake news, half truths or misinformation to let the readers find their own truths.
Who is conducting a campaign of misinformation and falsehood, reputable western media? All the big names in the media industry are printing real news, not misinformation with private and hidden agenda?
What a joke!
PS. Anyone who has Chinese blood in him or her is a victim of this smear campaign originated from the West, even if he/she thinks he/she is a banana.
The most successful fake news campaign was conducted by the West and western media to demonise China and the Chinese Civilisation over the last few centuries. If you remove the word ‘Singapore’ in the above quote and insert ‘China’, it is exactly what was happening in the past till today and going on everyday even in articles from western mischievous writers in our local papers.
China was a victim of invasion, colonialism and imperialism until the country was bankrupted, the people humiliated and demoralised and their confidence as a civilisation totally destroyed. But the West and western media glorified their wars and invasion of China and the rest of the world as if Imperialism and Colonialism were the good things, the invaders and murderers and plunderers were the heroes, the good guys, knighted as Sir this and Sir that by their kings and queens. And the real victims, the Africans, the Asians, the Indians and the Chinese were the bad guys.
The success of this fake news campaign is so damaging till today that many Asian leaders are still fearing China as a war monger waiting to conquer and invade their countries when the real invaders were the Western countries and Japan. And to many people of Chinese origins in SE Asia, they even despised China and the Chinese Civilisation, ashamed to be Chinese, even hating the Chinese without knowing why but for the reasons planted into their unthinking mind by the western media.
And when the West ridiculed China, passed rude remarks about Chinese, they would giggle and agree, thinking that they were not Chinese and had nothing to do with being Chinese though they have yellow skin and Chinese parentage. Many would join in the attack and pass humiliating remarks about Chinese, not admitting that they were Chinese. Some may even want to change the colour of their skin, bleach them to be whites.
The local media did not help, in fact continue to publish articles of western origins that were anti China and the Chinese civilisation regularly as if they were truths and not fake news. The common angle that these western articles took would be China may be building roads and infrastructures for the developing countries, but China did not do it for humanitarian grounds but eyeing their natural resources. What is wrong with exchanging their work in infrastructure development with raw materials when these countries could not pay with currencies? Do they expect China to build all the infrastructures for free? Compares with the West selling arms and goods to these countries, for free, for humanitarian reasons? The colonisation of these countries was for humanitarian reasons, to civilise these countries, by robbing them of their land and natural resources without paying a single cent?
The media has been well exploited by the West for centuries to gold plate their evils deeds, their plunderings and killings of Asians and Africans while at the same time demonising other Asian and African countries. There was no condemnation of the mass murders and genocides conducted by the white Europeans in the past and in recent years. The native Americans, the African native slaves, the mass killings in North Korea, Japan, Vietnam, in Iraq, Libya, Syria, in Afghanistan, in many north African states, in Latin America, in the Philippines.
Practically all western media are in the job of passing fake news to glorify the West, the European Empires, the American evil Empire, their killings by the hundreds of thousands in the Middle East and Africa with impunity while accusing the Asian leaders of crimes against humanity. Duterte is a key victim, Assad, Kim Jong Un, now Aung San Suu Kyi, soon would be Najib. Putin and Xi are on the wanted hate list.
Who are the real producers of fake news? Main media or social media? The main role of mysingaporenews is to question and cast doubts on what the main media is pushing as the truth. Mysingaporenews will question what it thinks is fake news, half truths or misinformation to let the readers find their own truths.
Who is conducting a campaign of misinformation and falsehood, reputable western media? All the big names in the media industry are printing real news, not misinformation with private and hidden agenda?
What a joke!
PS. Anyone who has Chinese blood in him or her is a victim of this smear campaign originated from the West, even if he/she thinks he/she is a banana.
Fighting Deliberate onLine Falsehoods, with Whose Truths?
by MIKOspace
Singapore has begun public hearings by a Parliamentary Select Committee into
Deliberate Online Falsehoods.
After a few days of hearings, the emergent motherhood consensus is that deliberate online falsehoods can
fracture and rapture social trust to the extent as to injure public safety and harm
social order should they lead to pervasive and destructive civil disobedience.
I have underlined and emphasized the word “deliberate” so as to
highlight its vague distinctions with “unknowing” or “unconscious” types of
online falsehoods. Admittedly, these
apparent distinctions are rapidly lost in various intellectual and semantic
translations.
Misinformation, half-truths and fake news are in fact not new. We are surrounded by all forms of fake and
false information in advertisements, man-made religions, philosophies, news articles
and public relations spins. Official censorship together with the ideological
control of the news and publishing media are also propaganda serving specific
and particular power and economic interests.
According to The Oxford English Dictionary, the new word for 2016 is “post-truth”. It refers to the existence of “alternative”
truths. Whither therefore the status of “deliberate falsehoods” in the internet
era of “post-truths”?
The sobering truth is that all information is “deliberate”
falsehood and partial-truths to varying degree. Indeed, many would even challenge this statement itself as “deliberate”
falsehood and a half-truth! And they
would be neither wrong nor right! Even as I strenuously state it with the
sincerest of conviction and belief! To
me therefore, it is a fully true statement. And it also does not matter to me
if you should consider it a falsehood.
Indeed, what difference does it matter? Herein lies the challenge in the
war against “deliberate” online falsehood. If you don’t believe it, then
don’t. If you believe it, then own it
and make it your very own!
In The
Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli’s advised that “… he who seeks to deceive will always find
someone who will allow himself to be deceived.” To Machiavelli, the people are simple-minded,
naïve and gullible, and therefore can be easily manipulated all the time (by those who have the power to do so). [italic
words added are mine]. Indeed, Machiavelli of course could not be more wrong
or right.
With today’s Internet, Google, Facebook, Instagram, Whatsapp … etc, we
can expect unpredictable hysteria by the “naïve, gullible and simple-minded” at
a greater speed and with dire public safety consequences. Facebook
has boasted of its active influence on the Arab Spring. Both Facebook and Google do not however agreed
to any restrictions or ban on the posting of partial truths, falsehoods and
fake news. Quite understandably, no social media has the credentials to assume
the role as a Truth-Watcher or Gate-Keeper on the Internet.
Every computer or
mobile phone is a microphone for anyone who has something to say or write truth
to the rest of the world. Indeed, no legitimate voice should be silenced, but
it is arguable as to whether every voice should deserve equal air time on the
proverbial social media microphone. The opportunity to be heard and thereby to
influence is not a natural inherent birth right. Concepts, opinions, perceived
facts and thought belong to the marketplace of ideas and innovations in the
highly contested space of social reality.
Whatever and whichever prevailed are socially filtered and constructed
through a process of mental and cultural construction that differentiate
“falsehoods” from the applicable and practicable truths. Unfortunately, this
truth-making process is often corrupted and interfered by crooked and less
honourable people in positions of power.
Action
Sensors on onLine Falsehoods
It is not within the
capability and capacity of the Parliamentary Select
Committee into Deliberate Online Falsehoods (PSCDOF), nor does it has the
wisdom, competency and moral aptitude, to recommend and define the parameters
of the vast arrays of applicable and practicable truths for the diverse
Singapore population.
There are three (3) Action Sensors to evaluate whether corrective actions
are necessary on alleged online falsehoods. The Action Sensors are (1) Content;
(2) Context; and (3) Consequences. They are inter-related to be considered
together integratively.
Content
A mere statement or
publication, however disagreeable or objectionable, does not render itself
sufficient to be chastised or proscribed or punished. Since most information is
incapable to be absolutely 100% true, partially true information likewise
cannot be regarded to be totally false. The absolute truthfulness of statements
and publications may often be irrelevant to those who find them objectionable
or disagreeable.
This is obviously
true with regard to any information pertaining to religious beliefs, traditions
and practices held by believers or regarded by nonbelievers. Absolute truth is
totally immaterial and irrelevant to believers and nonbelievers.
Within science in
the disciplines of medicine, physical and biological sciences, there are also
wide disagreements over theories, models and methods and which in turn provide
the motivation and momentum for further research and their innovations. Social sciences clashed repeatedly over the
validity and reliability of their predictions, findings and theories.
As long as the
contents of statements or publications are within the permissible bounds of
applicable defamatory, libel and slander laws, there should be no basis for any
punitive actions.
Context
The context of disagreeable
or objectionable statements or publications is an important factor to
understand the motivation and purpose of their author(s). What is known regarding the degree of
intellectual acuity and their respective depth of technical knowledge in the
subject(s) expressed or written about?
What audience or readers are addressed by the authors? Are the purposes
personal, educational, political, social, economic and/or casual
conversational? Is the context closed or
opened, referring to whether the statements and publications are intended for
named individuals or a defined specific group or for the unspecified
public? A careful assessment of the
context is critical to adjudge and infer whether the author(s) intend to cause chaos
and mischief, harm public safety, denigrate self-respect, destroy self-esteem,
entertain, educate and/or informational.
As long as there is
no intention to disrupt social harmony or harm public safety, vigorous debates
and conversations among well-informed and knowledgeable individuals in deeply
divisive subject matters such as politics, religions, history, traditions and
personal preferences, especially where one has the freedom to choose to enjoin,
rebut or leave the discussions or debate, there should be no need for any
interference by government officials or state authorities.
Consequences
When the conflation
of content and context resulted in damaging the social fabric of harmony,
increased religious and racial tensions, disrupting social peace and harm
public safety, enforcement actions are not only necessary, they are vital to
restore peaceful social order. This is however applicable only in genuinely
democratic societies. The strength of democracy does not however require the
prohibition of falsehoods, but in their counter arguments and vigorous rebuttal
where they matter.
Ironically, in
freely democratic elections, the amounts of misinformation which deploy
deliberate online and print falsehoods often multiply to overwhelm the
voters. Examples from the USA, UK, Europe
and neighbouring nations require no elaboration.
However, to advocate
by insisting on absolute truthfulness during elections is disingenuous and
naïve. It is also a no-brainer proposition. Internet accessibility drives the
momentum of both volume and quantity of information and misinformation. Just as misinformation, half-truths and fake news are part and parcel of daily
human society, they are also indispensably integral for many politicians during
elections to grab and win the benefits of power and privileges.
Use IoT to Manage onLine Falsehoods
A non-partisan infrastructure comprising a mix of local and foreign
election watchers with security enforcement powers is needed to assure that
social peace is preserved and public safety maintained at a high level during
and between the election periods.
The key in the
effective management of online falsehood is NOT the utopian promotion of truth. It is in the control and minimisation of the
negative disruptive consequences of less-than-truthful information that
matters. The following four (4) strategies using Internet-of-Things [IoT] can
create a favourable impact:
[1]
Technology
Eliminate anonymous
internet postings. Internet Service
Providers (ISPs) and Social Media owners eg Facebook, Twitter, Instagram … etc
must maintain registration of the valid and legitimate names of their
subscribers who want to access and be accessible from Singapore. This would also include any websites who
allow feedback and comments on all things Singaporeans. Web-site and social
media owners shall be held legally and punitively responsible for harm and
damage to individuals and public safety.
[2]
Education
Develop a high level
of debating skills in our students, including critical thinking and independent
thought. Regular research and essay
writing on contentious subjects, field trips, followed by presentations and
questions from peers, teachers and visitors would help to reduce students’ simple-minded
gullibility and naivety.
[3]
Public Discourse
Promote regular
public forum to encourage debates and critical discussions on interesting
subject topics, and to learn the etiquette of mutually respectful
conversations. This would also raise the
quality of comments and debates on the internet.
[4]
Legal and Regulatory
Without anonymity,
online actors who choose to cause social chaos and mischief, harm public
safety, denigrate self-respect and destroy self-esteem of individuals and
communities should face the full extent of incarceration and other legal
punitive measures.
Freedom is our noble and privileged foundation to secure for ourselves,
our children, our grandchildren and fellow Singaporeans the right to speak and
write truth to power and the world. Every Singaporean should be educated to know and understand
that they should not pre-digest any opinion unthinkingly, and they should not
gullibly swallow everything that come through the internet and social media taps.
Read, listen and research everything of relevance and interest; question all but believe none of them; and arrive at your very own conclusions. There is no other victorious way to combat deliberate online falsehoods.
3/18/2018
Tiger without his father
Tiger Woods has returned to play competitive golf again. He more or less disappeared, lost, for almost a decade after the demise of his father. Tiger Woods was in supreme form when his father was alive and guiding him with a firm hand. Tiger Woods was unbeatable with his father standing beside him like a pillar of strength.
The day his father passed away his game collapsed. He was lost. He destroyed everything he had, his family, including himself. His discipline life was in a mess. And so was his game. He fumbled and stumbled and lost not only his top world ranking, but could not win a competition henceforth. His sickness also took a toll on him. His back was crippling him.
Everyone who knew Tiger wrote him off completely. Tiger Woods without his father was a hapless child. He needed his father badly to bring his game back but everyday seemed to confirm that his glorious days were gone, game over.
A fortnight back in the Valspar Open Tiger Woods almost won. He came in second, losing only by a stroke. The Tiger that everyone wrote off is back and in contention. His return to golf and playing to win is most welcomed by the golfing world.
Tiger Woods has rediscovered himself. Tiger Woods has changed and found himself. He is now a man of his own. He has proven that he can win without his father. He has stepped out of the shadow of his father.
A Tiger Woods that can triumph over himself and play on his own merit, without the need for his father’s presence would be more fearsome and even better than before.
The new revived Tiger Woods is going to take the world of golf all over again as a new man. More victories would come his way. There is nothing more formidable than a man who is his own man and can win on his own steam, without his father watching over him.
Tiger Woods is the man.
The day his father passed away his game collapsed. He was lost. He destroyed everything he had, his family, including himself. His discipline life was in a mess. And so was his game. He fumbled and stumbled and lost not only his top world ranking, but could not win a competition henceforth. His sickness also took a toll on him. His back was crippling him.
Everyone who knew Tiger wrote him off completely. Tiger Woods without his father was a hapless child. He needed his father badly to bring his game back but everyday seemed to confirm that his glorious days were gone, game over.
A fortnight back in the Valspar Open Tiger Woods almost won. He came in second, losing only by a stroke. The Tiger that everyone wrote off is back and in contention. His return to golf and playing to win is most welcomed by the golfing world.
Tiger Woods has rediscovered himself. Tiger Woods has changed and found himself. He is now a man of his own. He has proven that he can win without his father. He has stepped out of the shadow of his father.
A Tiger Woods that can triumph over himself and play on his own merit, without the need for his father’s presence would be more fearsome and even better than before.
The new revived Tiger Woods is going to take the world of golf all over again as a new man. More victories would come his way. There is nothing more formidable than a man who is his own man and can win on his own steam, without his father watching over him.
Tiger Woods is the man.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)