Patriot:
see the video link on Trump vs Clinton Presidency.
Globalistion and free liberal import of immigrants
threaten every nations jobs, identity, sovereignty and security .
Establishments, special interests groups and donors
who supported globisation are reaping the nations wealth at the expense of the
citizens.
Those who spoke against it are labelled as xenophobic
and rebels.
Britain had dump globalization. Will US follow
likewise?
70% SG pls wake up now . Save SG .
The US and
Britain are closing their doors to immigrants and to globalization. Whether this
is good or bad would depend on where you are coming from. To Trump and the
Brits, globalization is bad, and that I also agree. But I would want to take
another angle to view this position and say that globalization is not only good
to the US and Britain and also to Europe but also a natural eventuality of
history. And here are my reasons.
America does
not belong to the Europeans or white Americans. It originally belonged to the
native Americans. The white Americans called them savages or Red Indians. They
massacred them and robbed their land to call it the USA for the migrants from
Europe. See the point I am making?
The USA does
not belong to the migrants from Europe. Thus, globalization, brining in more
immigrants is not new. Every migrant has a right to be in this new country that
the earlier migrants devastated and disemboweled of its original natives. It is
open country now for every migrant. The early migrants and the new migrants
have all the right to be in this ‘No man’s land’ robbed from the native
Americans. My apologies to the remaining survivors of the native Americans that
are now as good as non entities in their homeland. No one, not the early
migrants, asked them if it was alright to bring in all the migrants to their
country to replace them. Now there are so few of these original natives to make
their voice heard, that this was and still is their land and they have a right
to say No. But who cares? Did the white Americans bother to ask for their
opinions, to protect their rights to their country, to massacre them?
The moral of
the story, if one loses his country to the new migrants, forget about getting
it back. The new migrants would take over and in the name of globalization,
share the country to anyone they want. How is this related to Singapore? Are
the Singaporeans also losing their country to globalization?
What about
Britain and Europe? Look at history, Britain and Europe were built on the wealth
and riches of the countries they conquered and looted. It is time they share
their countries with the natives of those lands they conquered and raped. This
is only fair right? This is pay back time for Britain and Europe. The wealth in Europe to a great extent
belonged to the rest of the world, especially Asia, Africa and Latin America,
including the Middle East of course.
So, be generous,
return the favour, yes globalization is the right thing, to share your wealth
and countries with the rest of the world. No one will accuse them of being
traitors to their people and countries. They owed everything to the rest of the
world and they are coming to Europe to take back what was theirs. Britain and
Europe are just returning what they took in the past.
Do I sound
logical, fair and just? I think it is historical correct. What you sowed you
shall reap. But there will be those who said forget about history. It is the
past. Let’s move on. Don’t be so sure.
The fairest and most just natural law is what you sowed you shall reap. The
Asians called it karma.
Is globalization
good for Singapore and Singaporeans? It depends on whether you think this
island is yours or if you are silly enough to give it away or daft enough not
to know what is happening to your island. Then you deserve it when it is lost
to globalization and to the new migrants.