Singapore
Retains Brand of Questionable Authenticity
Need
to Restore Authenticity and Integrity in Our Universities
Once
again, 2 of Singapore’s top 4 Universities are ranked among the global top 10
for 15 subjects, according to the 2016 Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World
University Rankings by Subjects. The
National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University
(NTU) are at top 10 in the QS 2016 World University Rankings just-released by
Quacquarelli Symonds (QS). And since only UK and US Universities were ranked
better, it means that Singapore NUS and NTU are the best Universities in
Asia.
The
other 2 Universities, the Singapore Management University (SMU) and SIM
University, did not participate in “The Big Lie” propagated by such annual beauty contests of
Universities.
And
yes, this is the same QS Ranker whose annual QS World University
Ranking was condemned by eminent Chicago University Professor Brian
Leiter, Karl N. Llewellyn Professor of Jurisprudence and Director
of Center for Law, Philosophy, and Human Values, as
“a fraud on the
public”. Another scholar, Professor Simon
Marginson, an eminent scholar in international higher education,
had also criticized “QS simply doesn’t do as good a job as the other rankers
that are using multiple indicators”.
It is
common knowledge that QS methodology contains serious fundamental conceptual and
methodological flaws to render QS Rankings practically useless, irrelevant
and immaterial for any serious educational policy purpose. Under
scrutiny, the QS Ranking Methodology should have failed to withstand the
penetrative professional scrutiny of truly Top Academics and Research
Institutions like NTU and NUS, who instead now endorse the spurious Rankings
results so as to position themselves dishonestly in full knowledge of the lack
of validity and reliability of their proxy measures and methodology.
In
return for dancing and cavorting with bogus University Rankers like QS and THE,
we received for our legacy excellent Universities a Brand of Questionable
Authenticity. This is a disservice to Singapore and Singaporeans.
By
embracing misleading University Rankers like QS and THE, NTU and NUS
administrators, senior manager and Professors have been disingenuous and
unprincipled in conferring legitimacy on the meaningless results of what
essentially are bogus ranking standards of dubious University
excellence.
The
successful Annual seduction of NTU and NUS by “beauty contest” University
rankings can only be attributed to either sheer mindless stupidity, or the
abject ignorance of rigorous, sophisticated and transparent scientific research
methods.
In
fact, one of QS’ competitors, the
Times Higher Education (THE)
World University Ranker, had in fact pointed out that QS
employed a “very, very weak and simplistic methodology” to assess universities
worldwide.
According to THE, the QS’ “weak” methodology has actually ranked undeserving Malaysian Universities to be of
world-class status when they were “way off” from being so, and thereby
gave Malaysian education authority an “over-optimistic, distorted” idea of how
local varsities actually fare.
All the World University Rankers use different factors and criteria to “measure” University excellence. None has any scientific basis for their choice of proxies for University quality. None have in fact published their methodology nor subject it to the vigorous due diligence expected of a simple research paradigm.
No
wonder the United Nations education body,
UNESCO, concluded that “these rankings
are of dubious value, are underpinned by questionable social science,
arbitrarily privilege particular indicators, and use shallow proxies as
correlates of quality”.
Actually,
QS themselves have "been surprised by the extent to which governments and
university leaders use the rankings to set strategic targets. We at QS think this is wrong. …" And
added: "Ranks should not be a primary driver of university mission statements
and visions. …. "
NTU
became a full-fledged University in 1991. It is noteworthy that by April 2001, NTU's research had resulted in 20
spin-off companies with many funded by venture firms, with 150 disclosures, 76
patents filed and 30 patents granted. The research papers of its
staff and students in refereed international journals also won numerous awards
in international competitions and conferences.
In
the recent 8 years, NTU has re-directed its energy and resource to satisfy the bogus criteria/standard of dubious University
excellence purveyed by Rankers such as QS and THE. And as it improved on its meaningless Rankings on the
QS and THE, its earlier highly visible impact of entrepreneurship, patents and
innovations disappeared strangely from its list of true achievements. These
never returned.
The impact of NTU and
NUS on Singapore students and society cannot be measured by the degrees of newly
ascribed dubious proxies of excellence defined by bogus “World University
Ranking” Standards. It can only be measured in terms of their contribution to
the happiness and well-being of stakeholders and of the Singapore and global
communities to which we belong and serve.
It is more important
what we think of our own Universities and what they have achieved for our young
people, our communities and our nation. What foreigners think of us using
irrelevant and bogus criteria should not make us unhappy.
A University’s
contribution to society is its sufficient measure. The important thing is to let
other people think whatever they want, and not to lose one’s self-esteem by
letting others diminish the accolades of our genuine acclaims and true
achievements, so that we can lend them our excellent reputation of authenticity
and honesty to cover up their lack of credibility, validity and reliability.
We should stop
participating in any and all the fraudulent World Universities Rankings, so as
to stop endorsing such bogus standards of dubious quality
excellence.
Related:
