‘Sir
It was with much dismay that I read the report ‘Blogger ordered to pay PM 150k in damages’ in the Straits Times of 18 December 2015. I was less struck by the specifics of a court case that Singaporeans must have been following with great interest over the months – the standpoints taken by the contending parties, the various judicial processes, the assessment of damages to be paid to the plaintiff – than by one stark fact: once again, Sir, your powerful government is putting to use its most powerful instrument for silencing critics, namely, the defamation suit.
This dreaded instrument that had been created in a past era to punish political opponents specifically and instil fear in the people generally, could not have appeared at a more inappropriate time. For this is supposedly a period of sweeping change and new connection with the people, following the PAP’s resounding victory in a highly fraught general election. Charged with new energy, the government has been engaged in a massive exercise of goodwill and generous giving to the people, firstly to consolidate and strengthen the support that they had given in the election, and secondly, to lead them, during this crucial period of transition, into a new era of PAP leadership that promises to be even better connected with their needs and aspirations…
Catherine
quoted words like amity, unity, magnanimity, grace, enlightened creativity,
courage etc etc hoping that her message will get through to Hsien Loong and
maybe the latter will have a change of heart in view of the great election
victory and the hope for sweeping changes and a new ethos of kindness and
compassion. Many thought the overwhelming victory to the PAP will lead to goodwill
and generosity and not an endorsement of past practices and norms.
Would it be,
would Catherine’s appeal to the heart and emotion of Hsien Loong do anything or
change anything to minimise the financial damages to Roy Ngerng?