This is the main topic of discussion in the ST forum page on Saturday 20 Jul. Do not trust bloggers that post as anonymous, or blogs that are owned by anonymous owners. In other words trust only those you know who is behind the blogs or when the identity of the owner is known. Would this also apply to articles in the main media when the name of the writer is not stated, like from the Editor, from the PMO, from the Ministry of Dounce? Some may not even say that it is from the editor.
Superficially it may sound true that an article or blog with
the owner identified is likely to be more composed and less capricious in what
is being posted. Then again, there are many blogs with owners living in no
man’s land and letting everything flies, right or wrong, truths or untruths,
blasphemy, defamation, scandals, anything goes. And on the other hand there are
many very serious bloggers blogging under anonymity and making very good sense.
Even using a nick is posting in anonymity if no one knows who is behind that
nick.
I used to pose as redbean without identifying myself until I
signed up as a writer with Asian Correspondents. I do not see any difference in
what I posted then and now. The style and content are still the same. What I am
trying to say is that it is the person and his intent and not whether the
person is posting in his real self or incognito.
Another forumer in the ST forum by the name of Tan Ying San
also warned of websites run by anonymous owners. Then he quoted, “there have
been reports of foreign agencies setting up websites to promote certain causes
and regularly editing entries in Wikipedia to favour certain viewpoints (CIA,
Vatican and Howard’s office ‘edited Wikipedia’”. He went on to say that ‘Many
less discerning Singaporeans believe whole articles on such websites simply
because parts of them are true and the message resonates with them. They forget
the best liars do not lie completely.’
Tan Ying San has an important point here. Many undiscerning
readers are unwitting made to believe what they read, sometimes over an
article, sometimes over a long period of time reading a certain viewpoint. A
very good example is the anger and hatred for countries the Americans have
painted as bad or evil, like North Korea,
Iran, Myanmar,
China, Russia
and a whole lot of others. People are just reading the American slanted views
from American and western media source, NYT, Washington Post, Guardian or
Reuters, AP, Agencies, Fox, CNN etc etc and will eventually think like them
without realising it. That is why China
and North Korea
are so hated by unthinking Sinkies till today. The mentioned of North
Korea will send the blood pressure up as if
they are enemies of Singapore
and are about to launch a nuclear strike on the island. Daft can be acquired or
programmed by others with the victim unknowing or did not understand what is
happening.
It is thus very important to know the source of the
information, who wrote it and what is his agenda and motive. Know the author or
owners of blogs and websites helps and is better than not knowing who is behind
them. The important thing is to be discriminating and thinking and questioning
and don’t be a literate fool, being fooled all your life without knowing it.
North Koreans bad, Americans good. North Koreans killer, Americans not killers.
North Koreans for war, Americans for peace. You have been programmed and
conned.
How many of you trust the main media or information coming
from the govts or official sources?