6/16/2017

Dark clouds over Red Dot

The open letter by Hsien Yang and Wei Ling took all Singaporeans by surprise. The allegations were serious and Hsien Loong would probably in a state of shock. Could he have seen this coming? Not likely as he is on holiday mood.  He would not have gone on vacation if he has seen this coming.

What were the allegations?

1.     Abuse of power

2.     Fear of personal safety from state organs

3.     No confidence in Hsien Loong’s leadership

4.     Disagreement between Hsien Loong and LKY over the demolition of 38 Oxley Road house

Details of the allegations are in the open letter by Wei Ling and Hsien Yang at http://statestimesreview.com/2017/06/14/original-letter-what-has-happened-to-lee-kuan-yews-values/

The allegations are very serious indeed and Hsien Loong would be compelled to make a defence to clarify the matters raised or he would not look good. His integrity is being questioned. In other cases that were slightly similar in nature when Hsien Loong’s integrity was questioned, a legal letter on defamation would be delivered to the alleger in double quick time.

Would Hsien Loong follow up like before after returning from his holiday? Many things, negative things, are now on the table. Not disputing and clearing them would put Hsien Loong in a very bad light and Singapore’s reputation too would be affected. He has replied with a 41 points argument today.

How would this family saga continue from here? And the matters are not only just about a family feud, many of the allegations concern Singapore as a free and democratic state, transparent and rule by law. There is now a dark cloud overhanging the bright little Red Dot and the whole world is watching, not just Singaporeans, in silence. The whole episode would describe what Singapore is all  about, warts and all, baring all, for all to see. This will be the ultimate hard truth about Singapore that no one would be able to read under normal circumstances. The shocking revelation and truth that all Singaporeans and the whole world would finally see and read about are surfacing.

Who is going to sue who? Hsien Loong definitely has ample grounds to sue Wei Ling and Hsien Yang if the allegations were untrue. Do Wei Ling and Hsien Yang have any grounds to sue Hsien Loong before being sued? And whichever happens, more beans will be spilt for sure. This is Battle Royale uniquely Singapore that no one could expect coming from the near perfect family.

6/15/2017

QS ranking downright shady and unethical

Would anyone not under the influence of drugs believe that NUS and NTU are better universities than Princeton, Cornell or Yale? Well, some Singaporeans are gloating over this great achievement by the two local universities, no ill intent in my statement as one is my alma mater. I should be proud that my alma mater is better than top Ivy League universities in the US. Soon many top American universities would be asking for joint NUS degrees to boost up their reputation instead of Singapore begging to host joint Singapore American university degrees here.

Some of the Singaporeans that were so impressed with the rankings are the uninformed or ill informed uncles in the kopitiams and aunties in the wet market. I heard them chirping about it with great excitement, and I can understand, given their exposure and lack of understanding on the QS criteria for judging.

Ok, maybe on face value, maybe the top American universities are living on their past glories while NUS and NTU are what they are today by today's standard. The good American universities were good in the past but no longer. Time has changed. For the well informed, the comments are different and some are outright cynical of the outcome with good reasons. Below are some comments taken from the onlinecitizen.


'On Thursday (8 June), Nanyang Technological University (NTU) was named Asia’s top university in the 2018 Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Rankings, surpassing the National University of Singapore (NUS).

 
NTU is also ranked 11th in the world, ranking above other notable institutions such as Princeton University, Cornell University and Yale University, and two positions above its previous 13th spot.

 
Below is a response written by John Ouserhout on question-and-answer site, Quora on the question of "How accurate are the 2018 QS rankings? They seem to rank Nanyang Tech higher than Princeton, Yale, Cornell, Columbia, and Berkeley."

 
Ouserhout's response in full

First impressions suggest it is almost laughably inaccurate. UC Berkeley at #27? This is the same university that is affiliated with 91 Nobel Laureates, 13 Fields Medals, 23 Turing Awards and 16 elements of the Periodic Table. The rest of the ranking seems similarly strange as well; NUS and NTU ranked right alongside or higher than Princeton, Cornell, Yale, Columbia and Johns Hopkins?

 
(Haha, this Ouserhout does not know of the many great Nobel laureates hiding in the Singapore universities or akan datang, ie coming soon, going to happen).

 
Is it just my Anglo-American bias speaking? I know these universities have made rapid strides in funding and encouraging cutting edge research, so perhaps it’s inevitable that they’ve caught up and surpassed the more well known Ivy League universities. That is obviously partly the case, but after digging around for a bit, there seems to be a whole host of articles about the flawed methodology and downright shady practices of the QS organisation.

 
Some of the flaw methodology include counting more foreign students and faculty as good without any relations to academic merits. More foreigners mean more points. How silly.

 
And 50% of the points come from surveys from Academics and Employers. Look, there are hundreds of good American universities and only 2 or 3 good Singapore universities. In the latter, all the scores would go to these 2 or 3 universities while in the US the scores would be thinly spread. See the flaw? Which university would the Employers hired from? In the US they could hire from hundreds of universities but only 2/3 in Singapore.

 
Ouserhout went on with many other flaws in the methodology. Below are a few more.

 Secondly, QS’s business model is really shady:

  • A dubious Star ranking system, where universities pay to be evaluated. (Conflicts of interest anyone?)
  • ‘Branding Opportunities’ for $80,000 with QS Showcase
  • A highly lucrative ‘consultancy service’ to help universities rise up the rankings

In short, ranking systems might have their flaws, but this one is downright shady and unethical.

No need to say anything more, just let the daft to gloat over this mirage as a badge of honour.  I don’t blame the uncles in the kopitiams or the aunties in the wet market. I understand where they are coming from. Would any reputable academics bother to question the allegation by Ouserhout that the ranking system 'is downright shady and unethical'?

6/14/2017

Hsien Yang and Wei Ling leaving Singapore

From Yahoo News.

‘The siblings of Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong have issued a statement of “no confidence” against their brother, saying that they felt threatened by his pursuit of a personal agenda ….
Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Wei Ling, …made the open statement through their Facebook accounts in the early hours of Wednesday (14 June).

In the statement, Lee Hsien Yang said he felt “compelled to leave” Singapore “for the foreseeable future”.

“This is the country that my father, Lee Kuan Yew, loved and built. It has been home for my entire life. Singapore is and remains my country. I have no desire to leave. Hsien Loong is the only reason for my departure,” the statement quoted Lee Hsien Yang.’

 Wei Ling is also saying the same thing, that she did not want to leave Singapore as this is home but will also be leaving.

Malaysia China relations: When shared interests dominate the narrative

The sale of Malaysia's national car, the Proton, to China has raised many objections from the nationalists in the country, especially Mahathir who gave birth to the idea. There must be good reasons for Najib to want to part with this national project that is all about pride and progress of the bumiputra policy. It is easy to criticise Najib for selling a national asset, though not strategic in any sense, on emotional grounds overriding economic and financial considerations. If the Proton is such an attractive proposition, not losing money but gaining popularity as a national car, with new technology and engines to propel it into an international product, Najib would not have done what he did.

 

The logic behind the sale of Proton to China is very similar to the sale of Lotus by Britain to Malaysia or Sweden selling its Volvo to China. In the case of Lotus and Volvo, there are technologies involved that the Chinese are interested. There is nothing of this when the Proton is concerned, an antique dressed up with bright colours to be sold only to the locals as a cheap product but losing its glitters as the days gone by. Najib either sells it now when there is a buyer or would have to end up folding the company when no one else is interested in this shell of a car manufacturing company. There is nothing worthy or worthwhile for anyone to want to buy the Proton unlike Lotus or the Volvo. Period. China is actually doing Malaysia a big favour by pouring money into a dead end product and giving it a future with the injection of modern technology and engines to give it a new life. Would the critics be able to see it in this light?

 

There are times when interests collide and times when common interests compliment and would bring about more cooperation to benefit both parties. China has a great strategic interest to want to invest in Malaysia for strategic and economic reasons. The greatest fear of China is the choke point in the water ways through the Malacca Strait and the Strait of Singapore. 80% of China's oil flow through these narrow channels of water and with the Americans posing a greater threat in its increasing belligerent rhetoric against China. The latter has to do something to avoid a blockage of the Straits by the Americans.

 

China is looking at the geography of the region and found several alternatives to break away from the choke points. China is making big plans to find alternative routes for its oil supply from the Middle East bypassing the Straits of Singapore and Malacca in Gwadar, Pakistan, oil pipeline in Myanmar, a possible cutting of the Kra of Isthmus and cutting across from peninsula Malaysia. The strategic plan would involved several options and Malaysia is just one of them.

 

Why would Malaysia want to be part of this Chinese strategic plan? What benefits would Malaysia derive from it? For centuries, Malaysia has been bypassed by the strategic location and infrastructure of Singapore as a regional transportation hub. In the Chinese plan, involving great engineering, infrastructure development and financing, Malaysia would become the next transportation hub of the region to rival Singapore. China stood to gain strategically with its development in Malaysia. And Malaysia stood to gain economically enormously in replacing Singapore as the new transportation and financial centre. When both countries have so much to gain, there are all the reasons for Malaysia to rethink its strategic interests to participate fully in a plan that would make Malaysia a vibrant hub of economic activities. Or would Malaysia choose to let this piece of pie go and seek closer ties with the Americans that are meddling in its internal affairs and could only offer to sell more arms and weapons that are totally unproductive and a waste of money?

 

Malaysia can also decide against being aligned and enmeshed intricately with China as some critics would caution. Malaysia has a choice, and so has the Chinese. If Malaysia does not want to come on board, China would accelerate its plan to cut the Kra Isthmus in quick time and by pass Malaysia totally. China has to do one or the other. Malaysia could choose one or the other. When China chooses to go the Kra way, all the benefits that Malaysia could gain would go up in smokes and Malaysia would remain on the side line of the world's major water way and transportation network.

 

The Chinese proposition makes a lot of economic sense to Malaysia. The Chinese would find a way out from the potential American blockage, and Malaysia would become the new shining centre of global trade. Najib and his govt must have gone through the whole thinking process to want in and the instant reward is the sale of a karung guni car that no one would pay a cent for to China, and at a good price and with potential of the Proton name gaining more traction with new technology and engines to compete in the international market. To Malaysia, there are so many avenues and opportunities to benefit from this strategic alignment with China's economic and strategic plan with no compromise to its national interests.

 

Now what would the critics say or could offer other than emotional gripes? Would the Americans buy the Proton for a song? Would the Americans turn Malaysia into a new transportation hub and a new financial centre, or into another war zone?

6/13/2017

Globalisation creates more and higher paying jobs for Singaporeans…or for foreigners


 
This is posted in the statestimesreview,

 

'In the latest interview with ABC Radio today (June 10), Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that globalisation and the import of foreigners create more jobs and higher salaries for Singaporeans:

“In some countries, globalisation is viewed as a monster that wrests jobs from workers. But in Singapore, I see it as a creator of jobs and booster of workers’ wages. This is because as a globalised nation, we can play a role which is servicing the region, which is servicing the world. In doing so, we can have jobs in Singapore which are better paying for a wide range of our people.”'

 

How many of you agree with this statement that more foreigners create more jobs and higher salaries for Singaporeans? What I know, and what everyone knows, and reported in the media and govt statistics, is that more than 2m jobs were created for foreigners in Singapore and more than a few hundred thousands of these foreigners are earning higher salaries than Singaporeans, and many are earning millions in Singapore companies and govt linked companies. As for the number of jobs created by foreigners for Singaporeans and paying higher salaries, we need statistics to prove that this is the case. Would there be statistics to show how many jobs were created by the foreigners/foreign companies and how many are higher paying jobs occupied by Singaporeans?

 

The statistics so far proved that Singapore is creating more jobs, millions of jobs for foreigners and many paying higher salaries and many in the millions in Singapore companies and GLCs. Many CEOs of local companies and GLCs are foreigners.

 

What do you think? Can anyone prove otherwise that indeed more foreigners are creating higher paying jobs for Singaporeans? Name the million dollar Singaporeans that benefited from this globalization drive. Just the academia alone is providing thousands of foreigners with higher paying jobs that they could not get in their home countries.

 

The big question, is this a win win for Singaporeans and foreigners or a win for foreigners and lose for Singaporeans?

6/12/2017

The invasion of the Philippines has begun

China sent its troops to fight the terrorists in Marawi in response to the Philippines govt asking for assistance. The troops have landed in Marawi. Now President Duterte has denied asking China for assistance and for Chinese troops to fight in the Philippines. This is an invasion of Philippines territorial integrity. Come on western media, this is good opportunity to blast at China for invading the Philippines.

Of course this is fake news. There is no Chinese troop in the Philippines and neither did Duterte ask the Chinese for military assistance. The truth, the Americans have sent in their Special Forces on the pretext that the Philippines govt has asked for their military assistance. Be it China or the USA, the facts are the same, there is an invasion of the Philippines by foreign military forces and the President of the Philippines has confirmed this.

The President of the Philippines has confirmed that he did not ask for help from the Americans and did not give permission for the American soldiers to be in the Philippines, in Marawi.

The American Special Forces have invaded the Philippines without an invitation from the Philippines govt. Would the western media write about this invasion?

What do you think, got invasion or no invasion? What would the Filipinos think, is their country being invaded?

What is the game in the Philippines?

What is the game in the Philippines?
The seizure of Marawi by the ISIS created a new situation in the Philippines' relation with the Americans. When Duterte came into office, he wanted the Americans out, including the American Special Forces. The Americans begged to stay on the excuse that they were there to help the Philippines tackle the insurgency problems in the South. Duterte reluctantly agreed with pressure from the Philippines military that were beholden to the Americans and wanted the Americans to stay.



The Special Forces have been in the Philippines for many years and it is not sure what value have they added to the Philippines, what have they helped to quell the insurgencies and the rise of ISIS. Some were questioning whether the Special Forces were there to help and support the growth of ISIS and other insurgents in southern Philippines. For after being there and presumably working very hard for the interest of the Philippines, the ISIS and the insurgents continued to grow in strength. Did the Special Forces know of the ISIS plan before the capture of Marawi or they were sleeping or worst, have a role in the uprising.


What have the Philippines benefited from the presence of the American Special Forces? Apparently none. The 'call by the Philippines govt for assistance from the Special Forces' could be one way Duterte is telling the Americans, you are here, get to work and show us what you can do and prove how useful the Americans can be. There is no point in having the Special Forces sitting in the Philippines doing nothing or doing things that were against the Philippines. It is pay back time for the Americans to prove their worth. Can't imagine that they have done sweet fuck all during all these years in the Philippines.


Another view on the situation in Marawi is that it has to happen to justify the presence of the Americans. Now the Philippines, being so useless even against an insurgency, would now be more reliance on the Americans. The Americans now have a good reason to be in the Philippines, maybe to send in more troops to fight the ISIS exactly in the same formula as in Iraq and Syria. Someone could have started this ISIS attack and who stands to benefit from the fighting in Marawi? No need to guess.


Some quarters are gloating that it is the Americans that are coming to the aid of the Philippines ad not China or Russia. With the Americans present on the ground and working on the ground for so many years, why would Duterte want to call on China or the Russians to send troops there? Would it not only be logical for the Americans, presumably knowing the ground and fighting the ISIS and the insurgents as their sole reason to be there to be called to perform?


Calling the Russians or the Chinese to fight the ISIS and with the Americans hiding in the background can be a treacherous proposition. They would have to watch their backs very carefully and for every move they make. Very likely Duterte would like to see if the Americans are real in what they claimed to be doing. They could repeat the whole story of fighting an unending insurgency war to justify their presence in the Philippines forever like in Iraq and Syria until the Russians came in to turn the table against the ISIS. The Americans are pretending that they are now fighting the ISIS with some successes that they failed to claim in the past.


Let's see if history repeats itself and the Americans would take the opportunity to want to send in more and more troops to turn the Philippines into another Syria or Iraq and be forever at the mercy of the Americans, and eventually Duterte has to call in the Russians to wipe the ISIS off the face of Filipino soil. Duterte still has the Russian and China cards to play and would be watching the Americans like a hawk.

Now the latest news on the situation in the Philippines in the front page of the media. Duterte denied calling for American assistance. What does this mean? Duterte said he only heard about it after the Americans arrived. It is pretty clear that the Americans have passed on another piece of fake news, telling the world that they were asked to be in the Philippines but in fact no such things happened. But based on the fake news they fabricated, they moved in their troops into Filipino soil without permission.

The intention of the Americans is very clear. They want their troops to be in the Philippines and the causes of the fighting in Marawi becomes clearer, more like another cooked situation to facilitate the presence of the Americans that are claiming that their military cooperation agreement allowed them to intervene in Filipino internal affairs at will, even without Filipino permission.

A nationalist group in Mindanao has criticized the Americans' intervention. 'We oppose US meddling and intervention in the Marawi crisis.' Duterte would now have an American problem in hand, how to ask the Americans to leave Filipino soil and what if they refused to leave? This sneaky American military entry into the Philippines is all aimed at Duterte and he better be very careful of a regime change, a military coup as there are elements in the Philippines military that are pro American and beholden to the Americans.

Now you are witnesses to a fake American news fabricated right before your eyes to allow Americans to enter a sovereign country without its permission. Duterte has no reason to ask the Americans for help and would not have done so.

6/11/2017

China to balance the menace of the world

This is a statement that no one would utter to be politically right, meaning to be aligned to the American and western world view. Many Asians, particularly the English educated Singaporeans, are still trapped by the western narrative that the Americans are the righteous Empire and deserving to rule the world and China is the bad guy. So the call for China to balance against the menace of the world is just inappropriate, incongruent to the current mindset and political reality when the Americans are seen as the good guy.

China has always been painted as an aggressive and expansionist country by the West though the fact is that China was the victim of western imperialism. China was invaded and dismantled into a poor and dysfunctional country by the West, just like the Arab countries you are seeing today. Many parts of China and Chinese islands were seized by the conquering invaders, including Russia and Japan. The islands in East China Sea and South China Sea were Chinese territories but by deceit the Americans allowed the islands to end up in Japanese hands and also trying to take the position that the islands in the South China Sea were not Chinese and China is seizing these islands when the truth is that the other SE Asian countries are seizing Chinese islands. The expansionist countries are the SE Asian countries, not China.

The America side of the story is easy to gain traction by the SE Asian countries as it befits their intent and interests and was against Chinese interest. So China is flagged by the Americans as the aggressor and expansionist country instead of the SE Asian countries. So, how can China an expansionist country, be the country to balance the power of the menace of the world? This is the present story of geopolitics in the region. And you only hear silly Asian leaders uttering that the Americans, the world's menace, and the world's number one super power, has to be here to balance the rise of China when the Americans are threatening China in every way it could, warnings, pressure, threats of war and invasion by the American navy.

No one is asking why is there a need for the world's number one super power to balance against a much weaker emerging power. No one is asking why is there a void, that no one is calling for an emerging country like China to balance the menace of the world, to keep it from starting wars, conducting regime change, invading smaller countries, and breeding terrorist organisations all over the world, to destabilise countries and threatening every country that is not its ally?

There is this unspoken acceptance that the Americans are allowed to do what they want, unchallenged, unfettered, as the menace of the world, as if it is the right thing. No one is asking why are the Americans conducting wars everywhere and seen as a peaceful country whereas China is not involved in any war but seen as an aggressive expansionist country?

And every donkey is uttering that the Americans are a rule by law country when in fact the Americans are only following rules when the rules suited them but dismissing every rule that goes against its interests. The Americans are calling the rest of the world to follow the rules but not the Americans, the Americans are above the rules.

The Americans are violating all the rules in their wars of aggression and regime change, or to put it in the right context, removing legitimate leaders from power in foreign countries, interfering in the internal politics of every country. And the Americans could only do so with impunity because the silly leaders of the world, the American cronies, the little USAs, allowed the Americans to do so in acquiecence. And there is no country powerful enough to balance the brute force of the American military power.

The time is here for the rest of the world to rein in this menace by calling for other military powers to balance the military might of the Americans, to insist that the Americans observe the rules of law and play by the rules of law. No country should be above the rule of law, not the Americans, the menace of the world. As the blinkers are removed, more and more world leaders would come to acknowledge the fact that the menace of the world must be curbed in its wrong doings and the wanton use of force against smaller countries.

The menace of the world must be balanced by the growing might of the rest of the world to keep the world safe and peaceful. The menace of the world must not be allowed to continue to threaten other countries and world peace. In the new world order, there will be more calls for countries like China and Russia to balance the number one super rogue instead of the other way.

6/10/2017

Why Japan rescind the pacifist Constitution



The pacifist Constitution imposed on Japan by the Americans has served Japan well and keep this monster country at bay from wanting to cause mischief, to invade other countries again. Why is there an urgency and a need to abolish this pacifist Constitution? What the pacifist Constitution can and cannot do to protect and defend Japan as a sovereign nation state?

The main provision of the pacifist Constitution is to forbid Japan from engaging in a war of aggression. It does not forbid Japan to fight a war to defend itself and its territories from an invasion. Despite the Constitution, Japan has built the most powerful and formidable military force disguised under the name Self Defence Force that is second only to China. This Self Defence Force has the capability to invade any Asian country and run over them like in the Second World War other than China. With such a big military force, no Asian country would think of invading Japan and getting away with it.

Then why is there this need to tear away the pacifist Constitution? The key is to allow Japan to go to war at its own initiative, not when it is attacked. This is how treacherous and ambitious the Japanese today have become, very similar to their forefathers in WW2, that they should be allowed to wage wars of aggression when they think it is time to do so. With the pacifist Constitution, theoretically and legally Japan is not allowed to conduct wars of aggression unless attacked.

Now with the Constitution out of the way, the Japanese can go ahead to build an armed force as big as they want and get rid of the name Self Defence Force to whatever they want to call it, like the Imperial Japanese Armed Forces of Conquest or whatever. The aggressive intention of the Japanese is as clear as day light. They are free to conduct war once again like their vile and monstrous forefathers. Do not be deceived by the polite bow and the business suits they are wearing. Beneath this veneer of civility is the same barbaric Japanese of WW2, all ready to conduct wars of aggression when given a chance.

This is what the abolishing of the pacifist Constitution is all about.

6/09/2017

How much more must daft Sinkies suffered from the Pinkerton Disease?

The recent write down of $208 million by Singpost for a failed acquisition of an American online shop, TradeGlobal, is a sad reflection of how silly Sinkies are in front of Pinkerton. To the daft Sinkies, every Pinkerton is like a white god, to be prostrated and let the bugger screw them all over and to feel very grateful. In the case of this Wolfgang guy who was a consultant, but as usual so impressive to the daft Sinkies, that they offered him the CEO job and the story ended with this TradeGlobal fracas. You can’t blame this Pinkerton as the daft are so willing to pray to the white god. To the daft he must be very good.

The same pathetic story has been repeated over and over again all over this little former colony of Britain. Look at the pathetic state of the stock market and you would be wondering why no one could see anything wrong with it. During the financial crisis, the Pinkertons marched in offering to sell their lemon bank shares at a good price to the impressionable Sinkies. And within a month or so, not sure how much due diligence was done, tens of billions were handed to the Pinkertons only to find out overnight that the lemon banks were rotting inside that the Pinkertons did not fully disclosed. They were so gullible, almost defenceless when a Pinkerton is staring down at them. They were almost begging for the pleasure to be screwed.

How many more Pinkertons are there in Singapore lording over the impressionable and never grow up daft Sinkies and getting paid by the millions of good Singapore dollars when the money could be better off given to another equally daft Sinkie? At least you would not feel cheated. But the daft Sinkies are so happy to have the services of these white gods in pink and are not complaining. And many failed Pinkertons are still lording over the daft Sinkies and highly regarded here and refused to go home, probably ended with more prized jobs.

My advice to the Pinkertons around the world, please come to Singapore. They are begging for your return to screw their arses and would even feel very grateful for it. They would never complain for the losses or big failures and failed recommendations. They would ask for more. Look at the universities and ask how many Pinkertons are there sitting on top of daft Sinkies and being paid as the new colonial masters ruling over their willing subjects! In another decade or so there would not be any Sinkie academics left in the academia.

How long more, how many more of such failures and stupidity would the daft Sinkies wisen up to their folly to treat the Pinkertons as what they are really worth and not gods? When would the daft Sinkies believe in themselves? Looking for titans? No need to look further, just bring in more Pinkertons or more third world talents with dubious degrees and backgrounds would do the job.

How could you find titans in a nation of daft?

6/08/2017

Poor Arabs, forever divided and ruled by the West

This is a paragraph quoted from Noah Browning in Yahoo News.

 DUBAI (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain severed their ties with Qatar on Monday, accusing it of supporting terrorism and opening up the worst rift in years among some of the most powerful states in the Arab world.

Iran -- long at odds with Saudi Arabia and a behind-the-scenes target of the move -- immediately blamed U.S. President Donald Trump for setting the stage during his recent trip to Riyadh.

 

When I read this report by I can’t stop shaking my heads. After so many centuries of being controlled by the West and set up to kill each other, the Arabs never learn a thing and is repeating the whole cycle all over again and again. And there stood in their midst the little Israel all high and mighty, ruling over them. And what are the Arabs doing, yes, continue to bicker and fight among themselves. My God, the Arabs have one of the longest and oldest civilization and were once great and intelligent people. What have they become today, minions and irrelevant in modern geo politics.

They are now tearing away at Qatar with bravado, that Qatar is supporting terrorist groups. So they are breaking relations with Qatar. Did they not know who mothered ISIS, who is arming and training ISIS, feeding ISIS and supporting ISIS? Is it Qatar? Why didn’t they break off relations with the Americans when Hillary Clinton and Obama were openly claiming their roles in supporting ISIS?

Across the Atlantic, Trump is praising himself for building unity among American allies against ISIS and supporters of terrorism. And unity to the Americans is disunity among the pathetic Arabs. Would Trump follow up with a Presidential decree to investigate all the American leaders and intelligence units that were behind the birth of ISIS and terrorism in the Middle East and across the world?

Trump is perhaps the only serious American President that is dealing with the terrorists and not supporting them with covert operations. At least on the face of it he is doing what is politically right. And the world should thank Trump for keeping the Arabs at each other’s throats and not uniting as a single column to want to conquer and rule the world. Imagine what would happen if the Arabs were one, with one single mind, to rule the world? ‘Perhaps this will be the beginning of the end to the horror of terrorism.’ Said Trump.

Poor Arabs would forever be divided and ruled by the West and it is a good thing, really.

6/07/2017

The reverse colonisation of Europe and the USA

This reverse process of historical change is in the making and will change the face of Europe and the USA in the next 30 to 50 years. Many white Europeans and Americans are familiar with how township change hands and change character once a coloured new resident moved in. Every white man would quickly sell his house to run away from the new resident and property price in the neighbourhood would plunge. And soon the whole neighbourhood would be sold to the coloured people and a new character takes shape, with only a few poor white men left.

This is starting to happen in Europe and the USA in a grander scale. The influx of the new coloured immigrants has reached a proportion that with their rate of multiplication, in another few decades the white Europeans and Americans would become a minority. And to add spice to this new trend is the threat of terrorism to turn Europe and USA into inhospitable places for the white men. As things get worse down the road, there will be a new exodus, away from Europe and the USA, perhaps to Australia, New Zealand, Latin America and whatever places that are safe for the white men.

Europe and the USA would be re colonized by the Afro Asians, a reverse process started 5 or 6 centuries ago when the European went out to conquer and colonise the Afro Asian states. The natives of these states are flocking to Europe and America to reclaim whatever they lost during the days of European conquest and colonization. In those days, the brutalities of the Europeans were thousands of times worse that what the terrorists are doing in the isolated cases in Europe and the USA today.  The natives of countries were arrested, caught, robbed, killed, looted, treated like slaves. In those days there was no bleeding heart to condemn these acts of aggression and crimes against the natives. All the aggression and invasion and killings seemed right. There were no Asian or African leaders to share messages of condolence and contempt against the marauding hordes from Europe. No Asian or African or European leaders would say they were outraged by the massacres of natives and the looting and stealing of their countries.

Anyone who has difficulties understanding the pain and suffering of the victims of colonialism and conquest needs not look further than Iraq, Libya and Syria of today, how the people suffered at the hands of the invaders, how their countries were destroyed and so were their lives.

The process of reverse colonization is moving very fast and soon the white Europeans and Americans would have no where to run and no where to hide when their homelands are turned into hostile and inhospitable war zones by terrorist acts. This process is unstoppable with the declining population of the white men against the way the coloured people are breeding in their homeland. They have come to stay, to take over the white men’s homeland just like the white men came several centuries ago to take their homeland and their wealth.

History is coming full circle.

6/06/2017

Shangri La Dialogue – What’s new?

The Shangri La Dialogue came to a close after a two day session where the Americans set the agenda for the blind and daft to say aye aye. In yesterday’s media, Eng Hen gave a summary of the main issues of the Dialogue and as I asked, what’s new, he literally repeated the American agenda that North Korea and terrorism are the clear and present danger to the region. The big question, how many Asian countries feel threatened by the North Koreans or believe in this threat? The other big question is that how come none of the Asian countries could come out with alternative agenda on what are really important to the region and question the American slime that North Korea is a threat to the region? All happy and clueless coming to Singapore to have a holiday and to listen to the preaching of the Empire?

When Eng Hen repeated what Mattis said, does it mean that he or Singapore agrees with the American myth? It is difficult for Asians to think differently especially when the white man is from the most powerful country in the world and what he said must be right or at least not to be questioned. Or was Eng Hen just behaving like a gracious host, not to offend the most powerful nation in the world, Singapore’s staunchest backer in international affairs, and just has to repeat what the American said? Or is it due to the lack of an Asian view, an Asian agenda, that the rest of the Asian delegates were there making empty noises or talking nonsense or making no noise at all, so there is nothing to talk about other than the American agenda? Yes, what is new other then allowing the Americans to come all the way across the Pacific Ocean to tell the daft what is their problem and that the daft did not know.

Ok, to be fair to Eng Hen, I think he just gave lip service to Mattis by mentioning North Korea in passing while his main speech was all about terrorism which is the real threat to the region.  His only mention of North Korea was in one sentence, if the media is quoting his full speech, and the rest of his address was all about terrorism. Can the daft see and understand the difference in saying something and let it pass as irrelevant and then concentrate on the real issue, ie terrorism?

Who cares about North Korea other than the Americans and those that were stirring the hornet’s nest? If no Asian country is taking a pole to poke at the North Koreans, the North Koreans would not be bothered with the country’s existence. The real threat to the region other than terrorism is from the world’s Number One Terrorist, the Americans and their provocation and agitation for war in the region. The Americans are still behaving like the rogues from Europe that raped the whole world in the colonial days, believing in might is right. Remove this monster and there will be peace and stability with only the smaller terrorist threat to deal with.

Get the picture? The Number One Terrorist is pointing the fingers at the North Koreans and others and all the daft forgot to look at the Number One Terrorist as the real threat. They just divert the attention to something else and the daft just look at where the Number One Terrorist is pointing to. When would the daft open their eyes to see the real terrorist in the region, in the whole world?

Stupidity has no cure.