By Alessandro Bianchi
Q: I start from a brutal question:
What has become of a country that it offering Donald Trump as its ‘best
candidate’?
AV: It is not much different from the
country that it used to be for decades, even centuries. Since the beginning, the
US presidents (all of European stock, of course), had been promoting slavery,
extermination campaigns against the native population of North America,
barbaric wars of aggression against Mexico, and other Latin American countries,
the Philippines, etc. Has anything changed now? I highly doubt it. Donald Trump
is horrendous, but he is also honest. Both Presidents Clinton and Obama were
great speakers, but unrepentant mass murderers.
Q: Will the growing US expansionism
come to a breaking point and collision with China?
AV: Yes it will. I have no doubt
about it. China is one of the greatest cultures on Earth, and it is one of
those countries that suffered immensely from colonialist horrors and
humiliation. Chinese people are indignant. Indignant! For decades, despite
everything, they tried to make peace with the West. They are in fact the most
peaceful big nation on Earth and what do they get in return? They get insults,
provocations and intimidation.
The Western public should learn and
remember one essential thing about China: no matter what European and North
American propaganda barks about the People’s Republic, China is much more
“democratic” than the West. It is democratic in its own way. For thousands of
years, it developed its own political system. Its rulers, no matter who they
are, are given a conditional right to govern by the people. In the past, but
even now it is called a “Heavenly Mandate”. If the rulers fail to respect the
will of the people, they get deposed. And the Communist Party of China is greatly
respectful of the desires of the majority of the Chinese people. When they want
liberal reforms, they are delivered. When they want more Communism and an epic
fight against corruption, like now, China’s government immediately reacts. It
is powerful and democratic, although a very specific and complex arrangement.
And now, the Chinese people are
outraged and they are sending clear signals to Beijing: “do not succumb to the
West.” “If you do, our nation will suffer immensely, and the rest of the world
will turn to ashes.”
Do understand: Chinese people are
brilliant; the West cannot fool them. And they are thoroughly sick of Western
imperialism. This time, if confronted and provoked, the Chinese government
would yield to the pressure from its people: it would be forced to give orders
to fight – to defend its motherland!....
The West, both the elites
(consciously) and ordinary people (sub-consciously), want Russia to go to hell;
to disappear, drown, explode. It is because Russia is once again defending humanism
all over the world. If it succeeds, the elites would lose their power over the
planet, and the ‘ordinary citizens’ of the West would lose their privileges;
the plunder would have to stop, and the life of one African or Asian person
would suddenly gain the same value as that of a one European or North American.
And that would be really ‘unacceptable’!
On top of it, Russia and China have
become two great allies. They’d never be divided as they were during the Cold
War Days. Russia and China together cannot be defeated: militarily,
economically or morally. The West can only try to destroy them internally,
through horrendous sets of tricks, propaganda and toxic lies. But now even such
a scenario is unlikely. Russian people, like their Chinese comrades, are well
aware of what is going on. And there are tens of millions of their martyrs who
are reminding them what is to be expected from the West.
Encircled and provoked, Russia is
once again turning into a mighty monolithic defense wall. Its people are ready!
They want peace, above anything else. But if they’d have to fight for their own
survival, and for the survival of the world, they will. And this time again, if
there is a showdown, two enormous nations, Russia and China, standing
side-by-side, will defeat fascism!
That is why Russia is hated. That is
why China is hated. They are forming a tremendous, final defense line
protecting humanity from the Western terror…..
Q: What do you think will be the
final scenario for Syria? It risks crystallization like the Cold War-style
situation between the two blocks – Damascus, Russia and regional allies, on the
one hand, and Kurds with the United States on the other – and Raqqa, which
would become a new Berlin?
AV: The Western planners are
definitely trying to fragment the entire Middle East. They already have done,
on several historical occasions. But this is a new chapter. They play with the
Arab countries as if they were simply some milking cows. There is no regard for
human lives, or local national interests. It is because the West, despite its
hypocritical rhetoric (political correctness) does not really consider
non-whites and non-Christians as human beings. You kill millions, so be it. You
ruin 5 regional states; who cares?
Q: 14 years ago, the coup in
Venezuela against the democratically elected President Hugo Chavez failed and
began the US exit from Latin America. Shortly after, the US invaded Iraq. Today
the hegemony in the eastern Mediterranean wobbles, and Washington uses all the
weapons at its disposal to return to Latin America. Is, in your opinion,
President Rafael Correa right when he says that we are facing a new Plan Condor
in the region?
AV: Definitely! Comrade Correa gets
it right, most of the time. This is new, ‘final’ offensive of the Empire in
Latin America. I have just returned from Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay; it is
absolutely horrible what is going on there. The Empire is trying to finish both
BRICS and all the Latin American revolutions.
Andre
Vltchek is a philosopher, novelist, filmmaker and investigative journalist. He
covered wars and conflicts in dozens of countries. His latest books are:
“Exposing Lies Of The Empire” and “Fighting Against Western Imperialism”.
14 comments:
China and Russia are no match for the Amerian and other White Supremo in strategy and evilness.
The past few days were eye opening for the world to know how US navy positioned itself. John Richardson, navy chief of US was shown the China navy and carrier. Richardson was told face to face by China navy chief: China is not afraid of US flexing its muscle. That was a point. It meant to man to man s talk: lai lah, lets fight.
To settle South China Sea issue, China s offer to fight is a very rational way. That is my view. Those islands were given to the Chinese by their parents and grand parents. If US want those islands, US must fight for them. China is offering US this golden chance: the US carriers are in positions to fight, while the PLA are in positions to resist.
What else US want to do? Navy chief told point blank: let fight lah. Weapons and troops are in position, not on US soil that worry US politicians, but on China waters. What is blocking US politicians minds? Not good enough to match? Humanity consideration worrying for China brothers lives may be lost?
Its laughable to look at US. Not serious about South China Sea, asking Philippines to go for the USD30millions cost, and end up practically nothing in results.
Are US politicians successful? or failed? I choose failed. What about u?
I think round one, round two, ... no end
R Well said Bro Anon 11.49
Honourable Chinese always believe in reasoning and "learn" patience in give and take. Only the farking bananas and white devils and the farking blacks knew marble licking and violence.
See the farking whites always in their speeches.
We had joined the Army and Marines and heros of America.
Chinese would not joined the Armed Forces as they considered these are useless Chiak liao bee professions. Only prodigal sons and leeches are in.
But for the sake of their Motherland they are in out of necessity and patriotism.
You will give your lives defending your country but not conquering others.
The will to fight is 10000000000 times stronger than the Agressors.
USA dare to fight? ??
Also Sinkies smart ones will not fight for sinking land after what discrimination against them.
Anon 12:19pm
Its a big surprising contract between June Shangrila where US defense minister shouting on stage telling China generals to follow "principle" or face "isolation".
He said if Scarborough Shoal or hungyendao is developed, "there will be consequence, US will respond". In the face to face meeting with US navy chief, China navy chief told his counter part that China would continue to develop the Scs islands.
That was a clear signal to tell the US navy chief: US must fight now.
Since then, there was nothing from US, not a response from the US defense minister.
During June Shangrila, US defense minister went on helicopter with some Asean minister to land on one Carrier at South China Sea to indicate Asean was behind US on South China Sea issue.
Asean went silent except Hun Sen on the Philippines judgment announcement. US. Japan said China must follow the rules set in judgment. No other countries from Asean openly support US and Japan.
US must know, these Asean countries are looking at US for guidance. US therefore must pull the trigger, as PLA wanted them to do. This is the fastest way to settle the South China Sea issue for Philippines. But US is lost. The golden time is to tell China to back off with the judgment on hands like bible. Instead, US minister keep quiet. Obama also kept quiet. Only Abe asked Asia and EU leaders at Mongolia to discuss the Scs issue, but China PM thumbed it down, and it went down.
From these few days. My conclusion is: US is weak, China PLA is strong. The weak force back down, so far. I agree with you, China PLA is motivated, after being talked like cork in Shangrila, i guess the chinese mainland should have been angry with US, and Asean. PLA want to challenge US carriers became evidenced, when one major general told US to send 11 carriers, 10 would be just live targets. US never had been so quiet on South China Sea, before the judgment lots of noise, after the judgment when PLA is ready to resist, US said nothing practically. So i think China won this round. so far.
Correct 1:32pm
contrast and not contract.
Man-dead from heaven alright.
Man of Sin, dead
There need to be a war to break UA up. Its a secret who will start it.
No problemo.
No response is also a response.
Anyway, Chinese people like to “牙擦擦” , want to " Puah Hung " , act like 老江湖 . By all means - go ahead. Lets wait for next chapter.
Who is the real “牙擦擦”?
As per US no.1 meeting with China no.1 in March, we will see whether China will dredge and reclaim scarborough shoal or set up ADIZ.
There were plans to build airbase or radar installation on scarborough shoal earlier on. If built, it will directly break up the island chain set up by US and also threatened directly US subic bay. Luzon air space will be directly monitored and P8 will be useless and indirectly allow China subs (especially the SSBM) to sail out freely into the Pacific ocean.
The ball is in China court after Jul 12 ruling. If you look at the map, All along US had plot to position itself in Pinoy, Sg, some Jap island (near taiwan) to contain the China out of Pacific Ocean which is always its objective in the beginning.
BTW, there is a joke online. PLA admiral 吴胜利 Wu Shengli also means no win or no victory.
Bad name.....
A bit of his family background.
Wu Shengli was born in Wuqiao, Hebei Province in August 1945.He is the son of Wu Xian (吴宪), who was a Red Army political commissar during the Second Sino-Japanese War and the Chinese Civil War. The elder Wu later held important political positions during the Mao years, including mayor of Hangzhou and vice governor of Zhejiang Province. Due to his parentage, Wu Shengli is considered a "princeling" in Chinese political parlance.
Dont play play, got backing one.
Haha you are ... buttering or u are bashing ?
If you need to ask such question, then also no difference for you to know the answer.
The key is not so much on scarborough shoal externally but rather on which side is the PLA on internally?
Haha..
Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen: Beijing must respect our democratic will.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2016/07/21/44b0a1a4-4e25-11e6-a422-83ab49ed5e6a_story.html
Post a Comment