For the whole of last week the western media were aggressively painting a
picture of a timid and frighten little Japanese boy hiding behind Uncle
Sam in fear of being attacked by the Chinaman. They made it so real
with the Japanese politicians acting very panicky that China was going
to overrun Japan in the like of the Russians taking over Crimea. And for
no reason China is being propped up as the big bad wolf again to the
delight of the western thinking audience.
In reality Japan has a military force that could challenge China for
supremacy in East Asia. It has never stopped bullying and harassing
China since its defeat in WW2. Its military is strong enough to overrun
the two Koreas once again. Its problem with China and South Korea is
caused by its seizure of their territories during the days of Japanese
Imperialism.
Not only had the Japanese been scrambling fighter jets to intercept
Chinese aircraft, it has regularly been arresting Chinese fishing boats
in the disputed islands with China and Korea. Is that the act of a timid
and frighten nation needing protection from the Americans? Japan is
behaving like the Yakuza against its neighbours.
Recently it was emboldened enough to threaten to take military actions
against China. It arrogantly announced the building up of its military
forces and openly sided with the Philippines and India to fight China in
case of war.
The most dangerous act of the cunning and lying Japanese is its latest
announcement to shoot down North Korean missiles. This is an act of
hostility, an act of war. Any attempt to do so would force the North
Koreans to declare war on Japan. Now, would a frighten little short ass
nation be so trigger happy to shoot down another country’s missile that
is not aim at Japan? Only the Japanese and the Americans would commit
such a hostile act against another country.
The western media and the Americans are totally blinded to their ally’s
hostile acts and intention and instead playing it up against its
neighbours, painting the neighbours as the aggressors instead. Reading
the western media will give the readers a strongly skewed and biased
view of China and the Koreans and giving the impressions that Japan is
such an innocent and peace loving nation and being bullied by its
neighbours. The truth is that Japan has always been the aggressor and
the bully. But this is not what the western media and the Americans
would want the world to know for their own vested interest. Their goal
of dominating the world and Asia with Japan as an ally would dictate
their views and actions against countries in the region, particularly
China and the Koreans.
The world must stop listening to the lies of the Japanese and the western media and the Evil Empire. One is acting like a victim and the other drumming up to support the lie.
Kopi level - Green
China's J10CE, the Rafale killer. The only modern fighter aircraft with real battle experience and real kills. 4 Rafales, 1 SU30, 1 MiG29 and an unknown aircraft.
4/07/2014
4/06/2014
Sermon of a dead fish
For those who have been to the market, a dead fish can be
just as good looking as the one swimming in the ocean, with its scales and
colour intact. The fishmonger will tell you it is fresh and will poke at it to
show you how good it is. No matter how fresh and alive it appears, it is a dead
fish. Its head is dead and the rotting process has started. It has no life and
no feeling. It is only a matter of time before the smell and rot spread across
the whole body. But this will take some time.
The fishmonger will offer the fish to you at the best price
he could get from you, for a fresh but dead fish. You would have to cook and
consume it while it is still fresh or it would lose its value fast. The process
of rotting is silent and unseen. It is the work of the billions of bacteria and
micro organisms in and outside the body of the fish. When the brain is dead, it
no longer controls the defensive mechanism to protect the body from the attacks
of these foreign organisms. And the organisms will have their meal of the whole
body, and as they eat away, it will manifest itself first with the stench and
then the rot. At its final stage, the maggots would wriggle out of the rotting
flesh to make a point that it is all over.
A ‘bo cheng hu’ country is like a dead fish that is brain
dead. A country without a head, or ‘bo cheng hu’ will run on its own for a
while, but keeps drifting and spiralling down towards self destruction. In such
a state, there will be things like autonomy or deregulation, where every
sector, institution, ministry or department will be running on their own,
serving their little narrow interests without a clear and defined common goal.
And they could tear the whole country apart and still looking very good
individually, like a gleaming dead fish. It is like a soulless nation, just a
country existing without a purpose, without knowing that it has a people to
look after.
Kopi level - Yellow
Kopi level - Yellow
Aspiration of the new Sinkies
Many of these babyboomers have retired or semi retired. Many
are very lucky to have a landed or private property, or a bigger HDB flats to
fall back on, to downgrade and live on the spare cash as retirement fund. Many
have gone the full circle of HDB flats, private properties and car ownership
and back to a smaller HDB flat and no car but taking public transport. And some
are happy with this formula.
What is the new aspiration of our well educated young? Many
are graduates of the universities or polytechnics. And many are two income
families. It seems that their aspiration is for a small HDB flat and no cars.
Their only wish as far as transportation is concerned is for the public
transport providers to provide a reliable service. Many have given up the idea
of car ownership and ownership of private properties. A few of the more
successful young people would still be able to do that. But the majority of the
middle income families, with two incomes, will not be able to do so.
And not to forget, many of the babyboomer generation
belonged to the socalled sandwiched class, supporting their parents and bringing
up families, and still could afford larger homes and cars. The new young
families are luckier with lesser of them having to support their parents who
could look after themselves by downgrading and cashing out.
When this group of young people’s time comes for them to
retire, not many would have the comfort of downgrading from their HDB flats, to
cash out and live on that. Hopefully their CPF is still around and adequate to
do that. You cannot be sure about this as the babyboomer generation also
believed that their CPF savings would be enough for retirement. Many will not
have the luxury of experiencing the HDB flat, private property and back to HDB
cycle. Many will live a life without knowing what it means to owning a car. All
they could afford would be very high tech bicycles.
Is this an aspiration worthy of a Swiss standard of living?
Is this something to work a life time for? Let me try to figure out what kind
of aspirations the maids and foreign workers would have? Some told me they will
go home, buy a land to build their own house, maybe buy a car and set up a
small business, all achievable if they work for maybe 6 to 10 years here. No
need to spend a small fortune on a tertiary education as well.
But Sinkies must congratulate themselves for a better
quality of life in the world’s most expensive city and stress free life for
themselves and their children. Did I just say stress free?
Kopi level - Yellow
Kopi level - Yellow
4/05/2014
Meritocrazy in a decadent city state
They say a fish rots from the head. When that happens, the
fish does not think anymore and soon the rot will spread through the entire
fish. And because of a rotted brain, the stench of rot would not even be
noticed. There is no sensory organ to detect the smell of a rotting fish.
The dearth of talents and skilled professionals in this
prosperous city state does not stop at the banking and finance industry or the
IT industry. It is pervasive and starting right from the top to the semi
skilled worker’s level. The absence of intellect affects all levels of the
citizenry that the city state is now a glittering shell of its former self.
Every level of its people would have to be replaced as there is nothing good
left in them, or have already been replaced.
Reading an article this morning in the ST on the hollowing
of the academia is just too depressing. This is the seat of the intellect of
the nation, the hotbed for the gestation of ideas and ideals by the best
academic brains. The rot is just as pervasive but to some, is a good thing. Let
me quote a few numbers. 18 out of 25 faculty members in the NUS Political
Science department are foreigners, or only 7 are Singaporeans. At the Lee Kuan
Yew School of Public Policy, 38 are locals (not sure how many are Singaporeans,
but you can guess that it will be very small when they have to resort to use
the term locals instead of Singaporeans) out of 82 faculty staff. In the
Rajaratnam School of International
Studies, 12 are locals out of 29 faculty staff. At NTU’s Wee Kim Wee School of
Communication and Information, 21 of the 48 faculty are Singaporeans. Here they
feel comfortable enough to say 21 are Singaporeans.
This sad state of affair is not missed by some of the
Singaporean thinkers and academics. Some have raised their grievances to the
ministers. Seah Kian Peng found this worrying and brought the matter up in
parliament and ‘highlighted the fact that that fewer than half of the faculty
in political science, communication and public policy – which he described as
“some of the most important and context sensitive fields of endeavour in any
country” – are Singaporeans.’ NMP Eugene Tan of SMU had raised the same issue
six times in Parliament since 2002. Obviously nothing has been done or no
action was taken, and the problem continues to grow. Is it a problem, or is it
something desirable, planned by the establishment and so no action needed?
According to reporter Andrea Ong, the seed of this
transformation or hollowing out in the academia seemed to have started in 1996
when, ‘then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong challenged the National University of
Singapore and Nanyang Technological University to build “the Boston of the
East” and be dubbed the “Harvard and MIT of Asia”. The two universities could
achieve this by drawing in “the best and brightest” from Asia
and around the world, he said.’
Though Chok Tong did not ask the universities to bring lock,
stock and barrel from Harvard and MIT, ie buying and bringing all the academic
staff here, and replacing all the dull Sinkie students with the best and
brightest in the world, the people who executed this ‘dream team’ apparently
went ahead to replace the Sinkie academics and students with foreigners. Buying
an international football team to compete in the world cup is an isolated
fetish craze that would go away with maturity and with minimum negative impact
on the country, maybe a few billion dollar lesser, but to replace the seat of
learning and the academia with foreign faculty staff and students are simply
shallow. But till today, with the problem growing and no concrete steps taken
to reverse the trend, it seems that the lunatics have won and are having a
field day to transform our universities into the Harvard and MIT and Sin
City becoming the Boston
of the East.
Those who are still left with a little grey matter are
shaking their heads at this silliness but no one is going to do anything about
it. We will have our own Harvard and MIT soon, and the faculty staff will be
from the real Harvard and MIT, and the students would not be children of daft
Sinkies but the brightest and the best from the whole world. We are succeeding,
surely and steadily.
Where would the Sinkies go? How would the Sinkies fit in?
Kopi level - Yellow
Can Singapore retain its unique selling points?
What are the unique Singapore selling points that made it so successful
and attractive as a city state? This is Hsien Loong’s reply to Malcolm Rifkind
in Chatham House.
"It's a first world system in a very complicated and non-first-world part of the world. Things work, the country is stable, the society is cohesive, people are well-educated, the government is incorrupt and efficient, and we deliver on what we promise and we try to head in a consistent direction over a long period of time.
"So if you come to Singapore, and you want to do business, you can count on what we promise you, and what you see is what you get and that's not bad."
We all know that. But what contributed to the stable
society and made everything works? The govt is incorrupt and efficient because
of a very disciplined and well educated workforce. No rioting or burning police
cars. Would the Singapore workforce
still be the same disciplined and well educated workforce as before when the 3rd
World foreigners are brought in to replace them? Would they keep everything
working, support an incorrupt and efficient govt?
What do you think when the original Singaporeans are
replaced and we have a new Singaporean population from the 3rd
World?
Kopi level - Yellow
Kopi level - Yellow
4/04/2014
Are we having a very dangerous govt?
In an article on unemployment posted in TRE by a Dr Tommy Wong, titled
‘Hidden unemployment in Singapore’, it attracted this comment from a
blogger.
• Pink Panty Loong - "Wussy Doormat LEEderSHIT!":
April 4, 2014 at 9:54 am (Quote)
Yes, just send the 175,000 EP holders back home and our older PMETs with good experiences should not have any problem getting employed! So if you tell me there isn’t a ethnic cleansing of Singaporeans by the PAP government for new foreigner-turn-citizen voters, than WHAT IS IT?! That is why I keep repeating and I’m going to repeat tirelessly that we have a very DANGEROUS government here! Please vote them out in the coming GE to save Singapore and ourselves!
Pink Panty Loong is talking about ethnic cleansing of Singaporeans and pointing the finger at the PAP govt….that we have a very DANGEROUS govt here. How many of you see the unemployment problem in the same light or disagree with Pink Panty Loong?
• Pink Panty Loong - "Wussy Doormat LEEderSHIT!":
April 4, 2014 at 9:54 am (Quote)
Yes, just send the 175,000 EP holders back home and our older PMETs with good experiences should not have any problem getting employed! So if you tell me there isn’t a ethnic cleansing of Singaporeans by the PAP government for new foreigner-turn-citizen voters, than WHAT IS IT?! That is why I keep repeating and I’m going to repeat tirelessly that we have a very DANGEROUS government here! Please vote them out in the coming GE to save Singapore and ourselves!
Pink Panty Loong is talking about ethnic cleansing of Singaporeans and pointing the finger at the PAP govt….that we have a very DANGEROUS govt here. How many of you see the unemployment problem in the same light or disagree with Pink Panty Loong?
Is your life getting better?
Sure, definitely better. Swiss standard of living is nothing when one is
earning millions every year. Swiss standard of living is nothing when
one is living in a house worth tens of millions and owning a few more to
rent out. Swiss standard of living is nothing when buying a Ferrari or
Lamborghini costing more than a million is small change.
For those who cannot afford to send their children to university, cannot afford to have more children, cannot afford to pay medical bills, downgrading to smaller HDB flats, can only afford to buy smaller HDB flats, cannot afford a car, are your life getting better?
Talking Point on 2 Apr telecasted live on the topic of the middle class and whether their lives are getting better. My impression after listening to the panel and callers is that Sinkies do not deserve to be called Sinkies. They should be called daft Sinkies. The Hongkies, Taiwanese and PRC Chinese did not call Sinkies stupid for nothing. It is a well deserving title.
Now why do I say that? The views from the forum is all about adapting to your means and downgrading. I can accept that when one is an idiot, one should not aspire to anything more than 3 meals and a pair of shorts. But when one is talking about the middle class, the 50 to 60 percent sandwiched between the lower income and the rich, what kind of life or aspiration should they be expecting other than downgrading?
In the 70s and 80s, everyone was talking about upgrading, getting bigger flats and private properties if possible, and going for that super convenience called a car. And the people aspiring and attaining such level of comfort were not even the middle class but the workers, the taxi drivers, the supervisors, the technicians, the young graduates. Life was getting better for everyone, including those below the middle class.
Today, it is very normal for a young family to have at least a graduate, or both are graduates. They spent millions and a life time studying to get to that position. Is it too much, unreasonable, for them to aspire to live in a bigger HDB flat or condominium? Forget about private landed properties, these are way beyond their means today but not within the means of their lowly educated parents. Is it too much for them to aspire to own a small Japanese car to make living that much more convenient and pleasant, eating out once a week or a month?
What transpired in the forum is that daft Sinkies should be happy with public transport, if not even go on bicycles. Forget about small cars, cars are not necessary. When have daft Sinkies been fed with this kind of stupid ideas? And a small HDB flat should do, live within your means. Is that what daft Sinkies are contented after spending a third of their precious life pursuing tertiary education and spending a fortune on that to live in stupid small HDB flats and go around taking public transport? Is this what the future holds for the Sinkie middle class?
But the daft Sinkies that were airing their views found this acceptable, the type of life they feel reasonable and happy to be. Who said Sinkies are unhappy? Most of the views expressed by the daft Sinkies was that they were happy not owning a car. They did not want to know why the roads are so heavy with traffic and the prices of cars and COEs so high. They are very happy if public transport is satisfactory and they can live without a car.
This message of no need for a car has been successfully stuffed and buried in the daft Sinkie mind. They are all talking about downgrading and living within their means. I can accept that if they could not even make it to tertiary education and should not be asking for too much. Why would a minister find it difficult if she could not be earning a couple of millions a year to live a ‘decent’ lifestyle?
I must say the daft Sinkies are easily contented with life and are a very happy lot, living, adjusting and adapting with the quality of life without cars, without a decent job, smaller HDB flats and eating out lesser.
Is this what Sinkies are living for? No more ambition for a better life, no more aspiration that things can be better? Oh, the new aspiration, to own and ride a bicycle, and perhaps become his own boss, driving a taxi and with a few degrees to hang inside the taxi..
Kopi Level - Yellow
For those who cannot afford to send their children to university, cannot afford to have more children, cannot afford to pay medical bills, downgrading to smaller HDB flats, can only afford to buy smaller HDB flats, cannot afford a car, are your life getting better?
Talking Point on 2 Apr telecasted live on the topic of the middle class and whether their lives are getting better. My impression after listening to the panel and callers is that Sinkies do not deserve to be called Sinkies. They should be called daft Sinkies. The Hongkies, Taiwanese and PRC Chinese did not call Sinkies stupid for nothing. It is a well deserving title.
Now why do I say that? The views from the forum is all about adapting to your means and downgrading. I can accept that when one is an idiot, one should not aspire to anything more than 3 meals and a pair of shorts. But when one is talking about the middle class, the 50 to 60 percent sandwiched between the lower income and the rich, what kind of life or aspiration should they be expecting other than downgrading?
In the 70s and 80s, everyone was talking about upgrading, getting bigger flats and private properties if possible, and going for that super convenience called a car. And the people aspiring and attaining such level of comfort were not even the middle class but the workers, the taxi drivers, the supervisors, the technicians, the young graduates. Life was getting better for everyone, including those below the middle class.
Today, it is very normal for a young family to have at least a graduate, or both are graduates. They spent millions and a life time studying to get to that position. Is it too much, unreasonable, for them to aspire to live in a bigger HDB flat or condominium? Forget about private landed properties, these are way beyond their means today but not within the means of their lowly educated parents. Is it too much for them to aspire to own a small Japanese car to make living that much more convenient and pleasant, eating out once a week or a month?
What transpired in the forum is that daft Sinkies should be happy with public transport, if not even go on bicycles. Forget about small cars, cars are not necessary. When have daft Sinkies been fed with this kind of stupid ideas? And a small HDB flat should do, live within your means. Is that what daft Sinkies are contented after spending a third of their precious life pursuing tertiary education and spending a fortune on that to live in stupid small HDB flats and go around taking public transport? Is this what the future holds for the Sinkie middle class?
But the daft Sinkies that were airing their views found this acceptable, the type of life they feel reasonable and happy to be. Who said Sinkies are unhappy? Most of the views expressed by the daft Sinkies was that they were happy not owning a car. They did not want to know why the roads are so heavy with traffic and the prices of cars and COEs so high. They are very happy if public transport is satisfactory and they can live without a car.
This message of no need for a car has been successfully stuffed and buried in the daft Sinkie mind. They are all talking about downgrading and living within their means. I can accept that if they could not even make it to tertiary education and should not be asking for too much. Why would a minister find it difficult if she could not be earning a couple of millions a year to live a ‘decent’ lifestyle?
I must say the daft Sinkies are easily contented with life and are a very happy lot, living, adjusting and adapting with the quality of life without cars, without a decent job, smaller HDB flats and eating out lesser.
Is this what Sinkies are living for? No more ambition for a better life, no more aspiration that things can be better? Oh, the new aspiration, to own and ride a bicycle, and perhaps become his own boss, driving a taxi and with a few degrees to hang inside the taxi..
Kopi Level - Yellow
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)