How the Americans coerced the world to fight China and Russia

 There is no such thing as being neutral in the eyes of the American terrorists. You are either with us or against us. Some in the world think they can be neutral, no need to choose side. To some extent, in some cases, this may be possible. But in many cases, the rest of the world were coerced to fight on the side of the Americans. A good example was the sanction on Russia in the Ukraine War. Those who were coerced to sanction Russia ended up fighting Russia by not trading with Russia. Some silly asses volunteered to sanction Russia to fight on the side of the Americans. Not sure if they know about this.

India thought it could straddle between two boats because of its position as a pawn to counter China. Trump is now throwing India under the bus, not wasting time to humour Modi anymore. You are with us or against us. Period. The Americans have been practising this policy for ages, coercing everyone, friends or foes, to be on their side, to go against their enemies. But some silly ASEAN countries often stood up to smear China as the party that were forcing ASEAN countries to take sides without shame. Playing doggies to the Americans is a way to be invited to the White House I supposed.

Countries of the world have been coerced by the Americans to fight their wars against China and Russia and friends, directly in all wars of invasion conducted by the Americans or indirectly in trade wars, sanctions and bans unwillingly and unknowingly. The Ukraine War is a good case of such American tactics. When the Americans go against the Russians, every country in the world must also do so, by sanctioning Russia or not trading with Russia, to isolate Russia and to kill the Russian economy.

Then there is the greater tariff war. All the tariffs were shafted to all affected countries to coerce them to stop trading with China and Russia. The trade and tariff negotiations would include terms and conditions that these countries must stop all relations with China and Russia, meaning that they would be on the American side in their wars against them. All the countries are dragged, forced, coerced to be fighting on the side of the Americans. There is no chance to be neutral. They all became unwilling allies of the Americans in wars that they are not interested and would not want to be involved. The American terrorists would not let anyone off the hook. They weaponised everything possible to get everyone in their wars of aggression.

And some willing parties, while pretending to be neutral, thinking that the world is stupid, would use their national media to attack China and Russia and American's enemies, daily, publishing negative articles about China and Russia, smearing and insinuating that China and Russia are the bad guys when the bad guys were the American terrorists, their political masters pulling all the strings.

India and Philippines taking role of sheriff of South China Sea...Actually two Mickey Mouse in a looney show

 India, the strongest military power, and the Philippines, the strongest military power in ASEAN, are stepping up their military cooperation in the South China Sea. They are now holding joint naval patrols to maintain peace and stability in the area, once the role of the Americans and Australians. The real reason is to counter China's presence.

The point is this, did India and the Philippines got approval from the Americans and the Australians, and also from the Japanese, to assume the role of being the policemen of the South China Sea? Or they think they are strong enough to ignore the Americans and allies. They just do what they want as the two most powerful countries in the region, with antique warships and hand me downs from the Americans and Japanese.

Oh, did India and the Philippines ask the views of ASEAN states? ASEAN states also have an interest in the security and stability of the region. Maybe they have, and the rest of ASEAN just say yes, after all India and the Philippines are the two most powerful states here. Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have very small and weak navies and better shut up. 

Another point, patrolling the South China Sea needs a lot of money for fuel, supplies and the salaries for the sailors. And India and the Philippines are also very rich, so they can afford to pay for the role they are taking up, as the protectors of the South China Sea, to ensure there is freedom of navigation so that their merchant ships can ply safely through these waters, with their cargoes of bananas, maids, pharma drugs, and high tech goods from India.

The South China Sea trade routes are very important to these two great trading nations. China and the ASEAN states should say a big thank you to the Indians and Pinoys to patrol and maintain freedom of navigation at their own costs and save some money from doing it themselves.

Good job, India and the Philippines. 

Trump and American data cannot be trusted

When a country is presented with mediocre candidates for election, when more credible ones are sidelined, the result is obvious. Not just India. Look at the USA today. Unrecognizable to say the least. But then, as we know, Empires come and go, and no matter what plans have been put in place to make the USA the only superpower forever, thinking that the fall of the Soviet Union is making that a reality, things are falling apart. The rise of China was never factored in.

Trump thinks he can threaten Putin to stop attacking Ukraine by using two nuclear submarines trying to make Putin pee in his pants. In geopolitical horse trading, they say that everyone should know for a fact that you cannot threaten Putin. Russia tells the USA it has more nuclear subs than the USA and all the resources to make more. In fact, Russia has more nukes than the USA. Only problem is whether Trump knows it or not.

I believe Trump is at the end of his tethers and is desperate, with everything crumbling around him. The deportation of undocumented immigrants is coming back to haunt him as well, with his wife Melania also an immigrant allowed into USA using dubious means that Trump was able to carry out with his wealth. Some people in the USA are calling for Melania and Baron to be deported like those immigrants.

The jobs data statistics for May, June and July was substantially reduced by hundreds of thousands, clearly showing that the USA job creation gloated about were all baloney and highly inflated figures, as was in the past. For releasing the reality, the head of the Labor Statistics Department lost his job for telling the truth. Truth is no longer acceptable for Trump. Lying is the norm nowadays. For people like Scott Bessen, Pete Hegseth and Howard Lutnik, I think they knew what they had to do, by lying about everything just to make Trump happy.

Is that a recipe for how an Empire is going to collapse? But I think the Trump administration does not think so. Let us enjoy the show for while it lasts.


Anonymous

How to spin the story that China is forcing India to take sides

How to spin the story that China is forcing India to take sides. China and India do not even see eye to eye in BRICS and SCO.

If the USA, using its roguish behavior, cannot even force India to buy its F35, open up its agricultural sector, force India not to buy Russian oil and abide by its agreement in negotiations with Trump, with threats and more threats, how is China even seen as succeeding in coercing India to take sides?

The USA is now so hard up for forging reasonable propaganda against China, it has to resort to peddling fake news and lies. How can countries just continue to swallow USA lies when the truth does not reflect its credibility. In the mindset of Trump, getting rid of the truth by removing those who dared to expose his lies is the only recourse left for the rogue regime. Removing the labor chief who revealed the real statistics of USA employment tells us that the USA administration can only tolerate its own lies, nothing else. When the truth hurts and those who wanted to reveal the truth are removed, who dares to go against the de-facto dictator sitting in the White House?


Anonymous

Sun Tzu - Never fight a losing war

  This ancient military strategist's theory of war, that no country should start or engage in a war unless it is sure of winning, is perennial and continues to be relevant today, to all military forces and countries. Why fight a war that one cannot win? China has learnt from this strategy and has avoided war since Mao successfully reunited China and started on a journey to rebuild a modern China. Mao knew that China was weak in all fronts, and it would be a losing proposition for China to engage in any war with any countries. 

China still could not avoid wars since the founding of the PRC. There were wars that were forced upon China, along its borders, not initiated by China by threatened by external powers to destabilise and weaken China. The Korean War was the worst war that was forced upon China, a war that China could not afford to fight and likely to lose. Mao took the drastic decision to enter the war like a lose or die decision. The Americans were at the peak of their military might. China then was about the poorest and weakest nation on earth. Under all circumstances, and contrary to Sun Tzu's strategy of war, Mao must not be involved in the Korean War. It was a losing proposition from the start. It was a stroke of genius and true grit that China could fight the Americans to a draw, actually beating the Americans by driving them from its border at the Yalu River to the 38th parallel, with minimal and antique weaponry. China was trading lives with bullets and stayed in the war until a ceasefire that both sides have to concede without a clear victory.

China was involved in a few border wars or skirmishes with Russia, India and Vietnam. All were short border wars that lasted less than a month. China fought and pushed out the invaders, then withdrew and disengaged. Other than the border war with Vietnam where China was superior militarily, the wars with Russia and India were not wars that China could win easily against better armed enemies. China would have avoided all these wars if it had a choice. Never fight a war unless sure of winning.

The Americans, since it became the world's number one superpower did live by Sun Tzu's above strategy. In many cases America was right. In the Korean War, Vietnam War, Afghan and Iraq War, Americans were sure of winning these wars as they were militarily and economically more superior than their enemies and winning was more or less guaranteed. Though the results did not speak well for the Americans, their starting points were the same. They fought and could win and should win.

Then came the Ukraine War. This is the biggest blunder of the American Washington clowns. This is an obvious case of a war they cannot win. They may think that the combined forces of the Americans and allies would easily defeat the Russians. Still, they cannot win if they think deeper. They can win a conventional war against the Russians, but Russia is a nuclear power and would release their nuclear arsenal against the Americans and the Europeans should they be defeated conventionally. Only the really reckless, irresponsible and dumb clowns in Washington cannot think of this. Unfortunately, they are still thinking that they can win against the Russians. This is how dangerous the world has become, when reckless clowns are in charge of national affairs. Just like Mickey Mouse states provoking China and thinking they can get away from it.

And the Washington clowns are preparing another war they cannot win, this time against China. Over and over again, they have repeated their wargames against China, conventional war, but cannot win. Still, they are bent on starting a losing war with China, knowing very well that they will be the losers and they will have to resort to using nuclear weapons against China. Would they win a nuclear war against China? These dumb clowns think China would be sitting there waiting for them to nuke and bury China without reacting. The dumb and irresponsible clowns are not only risking the lives of the Chinese, the lives of the Americans and the whole world would be on the table, to be wiped out in one instance. China may not have as many nuclear weapons as the American terrorists, but enough to finish the Americans as well.

Still, the Washington clowns are at it, planning and preparing for a war they cannot win. And they are dragging other silly countries into this war of total destruction, the end of civilisation. Stupidity cannot be cure. The dumb asses in Washington cannot be taught. Mickey Mouse also cannot be taught.