I do not understand why Trump cannot be prosecuted just because he is going to be the President of the USA in 2025.
What
about Richard Nixon, already a sitting President in office and was
prosecuted for Watergate which led to his resignation? What difference
is there when we say a crime is a crime? Some are obviously above the
law, like Trump. Can we still remember why they failed to prosecute
Trump over Russia gate over four years, during his first term? Does that
also ring a bell over his untouchable position and status? Or are the
judges afraid of Trump's revenge against them when he assumes office?
Trump already touted that he is going to prosecute many people. If that
threat is now working, that is already reaping rewards for him. I do
believe in conspiracy theories that unfortunately sounds true.
Richard
Nixon was a smart President, the first USA President that visited China
in 1972 and led to the evolving good relations between the USA and
China thereafter, until Clinton, Obama and others after him destroyed
all that.
Trump, by comparison is a open-book bullshitter,
fraudster, sex pervert and a convicted felon even before assuming
office. He is 100% clearly involved with Jeffrey Epstein's child sex
ring. Why is the system not taking into consideration all this and
choose to pardon him? What bullshit are they talking about not having
the ability to punish a President-elect that is not even in office.
Trump
really does not need to pardon himself now when he assumes the
Presidency, which is now so laughable. He probably knows they cannot
touch him, which is why he thinks he can do as he likes.
Anonymous