How the American terrorists coerced their allies and doggies to do their bidding or else?

 It is quite often to hear stupid doggies of the Americans complaining about being influenced or coerced by China to go against the American terrorists. But none of the American colonies and doggies would dare to breathe a word about how they were coerced by the Americans, practically daily, to go against China, Russia or any country the Americans labelled as enemy.

The American terrorists are ruthless and dictatorial in dictating to their colonies and doggies what to do and what they cannot do. The biggest victims to date are the European states. They were having a little difficulty in the well being of their economies but still doing ok, people going to work, living a life normally, and in peace. Now their economies are heading into the abyss, forced by the Americans not to trade with China and Russia, cannot buy, cannot sell, sanctions, all at the expense of their economic well being. Many of the European states are going into recession and would never climb out of the shit hole again, given the enemies they created with their stupid acts the Americans imposed on them. They are not going to get cheap oil and gas, cheap raw material not just from Russia, the Middle East, not even from Africa and Latin America. And they are not going to get cheap and good consumer goods from China. And their chips and chip making equipment would have no buyers.

Americans did not coerced the European states to kill their own economies? The European states willingly do so to destroy their competitiveness and quality of life? How many silly buggers believe this is the case? And why the Europeans are not crying out loud? They can't or they would be booted out of office by regime change. They are virtually colonies of the American Empire.

In other parts of the world, other than economic sanctions, they are forbidden to use Huawei's advanced 5G network system, only allowed to use fake 4.5G touting as 5G.  Not allowed to buy China's high quality EVs at affordable prices, forced to sanction China and Russia at the dictates of the Americans. Cannot use China's Beidou advanced satellite positioning system and stuck with the antique American GPS. 

And the Americans have virtually taken over their main media to spew American propaganda and fake news against Russia, China, Iran, North Korea etc etc. The control of the main media of a sovereign state to badmouth American enemies is as good as taking over the national policy making function of such countries, mostly American colonies and doggies. And as usual, these colonies and doggies would put up a brave front like nothing of sort is happening. The American masters are so nice, so democratic, freedom, etc etc. They may even turn around to accuse China as the culprit in coercing and influencing their policies, but not a word about how their arms being twisted by the American terrorists to act against their national interests. Many are held at ransom by the American terrorists, beholden to the American terrorists. The worst off are those with military treaty or pacts with the American terrorists and American bases in their lands. MBS and Saudi Arabia are warned against joining BRICS or be taken over by the American terrorists. MBS would be removed or assassinated.

You are with us or against us, speaks volumes about how much control the American terrorists have over their colonies and doggies. No amount of pretences can hide from the truth of what is really going on behind closed doors. Becoming American allies or doggies is not protecting themselves but protecting the American Empire, be slaves to the American Empire.

Fighting against the biggest trading partners, not trading with the biggest trading partners, not buying or selling to the biggest trading partners, are stupid things that no free country would do. American colonies and doggies have no freedom to act on their own without the permission of the American terrorists. Europe would be the first to head towards bankruptcies

The world has changed. America and the West are in decline. They are digging a big hole to bury themselves in. The policy of joining the winning side needs a rethink. The old thinking of the 20th century, the oldies, are outdated and need to be replaced with younger and clear thinking intellectuals that are in tune with the new world dynamics. Stop clinging onto a piece of old furniture that is no longer useful or relevant. Joining the winning side is the way to go. Caveat, must be clear as to which is the winning side.

Politics is a different game. Being faithful to an ageing old lover suffering from dementia would mean being buried together or be discarded when the old lover loses its ability to use its clout, or to stand up.

BRICS - Multi polar world versus Unipolar American Empire

 As the benefits accumulated and countries are able to showcase the results, more and more countries will support the BRI and join BRICS to take advantage of the benefits that others are already enjoying by being a part of the BRI and BRICS.

Fence sitting countries like Indonesia may realize it is missing out on the gravy train, despite trying to be neutral about catering to the big power play. Indonesia is still reluctant to take a stand either to support the USA openly or join BRICS, which it sees as being dominated by China.

This is the mindset of a lot of countries still sitting on the fence. But BRICS is not going to force them with any 'you are either with us or against us' threat. In fact, BRICS must guard well its membership expansion, as some are clearly Trojan Horses, which may be cultivated by the USA to infiltrate the grouping. That will be a bad mistake for BRICS by being too eager to expand its membership base.

As an example, the EU had been exploring the setting up of its own defense bloc, without the USA control and setting the tone, as in NATO. This puts into question the issue of the UK being allowed inside the bloc, which will indirectly allow the USA to have its proxy, the UK, projecting its influence to infiltrate the bloc, whose objective was distancing the USA from EU defense matters.

Countries to watch are those straddling two boats. There is no question of playing around with divided loyalties. It is too dangerous. 

Anonymous

All the Anglo Saxon wars is failing

 The Anglo-Saxons used religion and succeeded in North America, Australia, the Pacific Islands and Carribean Islands. They thought it will work as well in China and India. But it failed in China and India because these two were so much more streetwise, civilized and developed than the Native American Indians, the Australian Aborigines, the Pacific Islanders and Carribean Natives.

But they still tried afterwards to use opium to drug the Chinese, and it also failed after facing a long stretch of opposition. This was also complemented by the eight nations trying to split China up, like in Africa, with each of the eight nations given the audacity, as they like, to rule different parts of China. It was just like robbers splitting the loot among themselves. That did not work either.

Fast forward to today and we have trade wars, technology wars, sanctions against China in semiconductors and threats morphing into economic wars.

What have the USA won so far? Trade wars were easy to win, like taking candy from a kid, right? Tech wars by roping in allies is now backfiring. High end chips are still being available to China via third parties on the blind. Business in those chips are being done outside USA monitoring. When there is a will, there is a way. When there is money to be made, businessmen will find a way, just like the drug trade despite all the fake attempts to cut it off.

The USA and the West are kidding themselves that Russian energy is unsaleable due to their sanctions. Who is kidding who? Even the EU is still importing Russian oil, mixed and marketed as non-Russian oil and India, China and Saudi Arabia are laughing all the way to the bank.

Now, the USA and the West are trying to sanction Iran's oil exports by cutting off settlement avenues. What is to stop the Iranians doing barter trade, or using the Chinese Yuan instead? When energy is cheaper, customers will not stay away. They will find ways and means to get around those sanctions. Joining BRICS is a sure way to do that. And inside BRICS are two of the biggest oil importers, China and India. It is helping China and India to afford cheaper cost of production that outcompeted the USA and the West. Does this indicate self-inflicted foot shooting?

Anonymous

China has proven that Communism can triumph over fake western democratic system in just 40 years!

 China, as a communist country, is now irrelevant for the purpose of demonization, because China proved that communism works better than democracy. Forty years is all it took to bring down the myth that democracy will always triumph over communism. Without that narrative to support its outdated evil hegemonic mindset, the USA and its doggies are using another tactic by demonizing China's domination in manufacturing overcapacity, China's domination of raw materials and supply chains and China's expanding global influence, especially in Africa and Latin America. China is slowly working on upping its influence in the Middle East and the Pacific Islands.

In trying to curb China's manufacturing, the USA and its doggies are using trade wars, tariffs, technology strangulation to put China down. When China is able to manufacture products so cheaply, it is no brainer to think that this avenue of attack will succeed. There is an analysis put up by Kevin Walmsley on his site 'Inside China Business' that revealed why China's EVs are dominating the world and why the USA and EU and even Japan are lagging far behind. Chinese EVs have been stripped apart by the West and Japan and they found out that the Chinese have managed to incorporate many separate parts together to produce more efficient and cheaper EVs.

In trying to wrestle back control of raw materials, the USA and the West now found themselves unable to go back to Africa or South America to take control of those raw materials now in Chinese hands. Their attempt to take control of rare earth minerals in Mongolia also failed miserably. The USA and the West also found that they lack the refining and processing facilities and now have to build them up from scratch. What is even more uncertain for them is the ability of the Chinese to kill off those facilities they intend to set by rendering them incapable of competing against Chinese domination.

Chinese influence is growing in the Middle East and South Asia region, particularly Afghanistan, Pakistan and the five big states of Central Asia. China is exploring co-operative ventures to fund a new link with Afghanistan and Pakistan for its oil imports from the Middle East and be less dependent on the Straits of Malacca. China is building and upgrading ports in Pakistan, ostensibly to host its security arrangements for those ventures that rattles India. 

Anonymous

Today Saudi Arabia would welcome a nuclear Iran

 Saudi Arabia's leader Mohammad bin Salman was reported to have told the media some time ago that Iran's possession of nukes will not be able to use them, and that means it is not going to change anything, as Iran using it will incur the wrath of the rest of the world. He forgot that the USA used nukes against Japan and got off scot free without even a squeak of condemnation from the rest of the world. It was even fabricated that those two bombs saved more lives than what it killed. In other words, the innocent women and children in Japan were just collateral damage and worthless human beings.

Mohammad bin Salman even warned that Saudi Arabia will also go nuclear if Iran has that capability. If possessing nukes is deemed as useless as what he thinks, why is he thinking of going nuclear to counter Iran's possession of nuclear weapons? What then will be the USA and Israel's stand over Saudi Arabia's nuclear ambition if implemented? Will they threaten Saudi Arabia the same way as they threatened Iran? Will Saudi Arabia also be demonized as the biggest threat to the rest of the world? I would even bet that they will welcome Saudi Arabia's nuclear ambition, touting that this was the Saudis' right to defend themselves.

I think Mohammad bin Salman completely missed the point, with respect to his exalted position. Iran's possession of nukes, like North Korea, is a deterrent pure and simple. Unless Israel uses nukes against Iran, Iran has every right to retaliate with nukes. That is what having deterrents mean. Japan did not have that capability and suffered the consequences, and which invited the inevitable.

Does Russia, China, India or Pakistan having nukes a useless possession and cannot use them without being condemned? Of course, the terrorist state, the USA will use it. If the USA resorts to using nukes, does that not be justifiable for Russia or China to resort to nukes as well? I think Russia and China's possession of nukes serves the purpose of deterring the nuclear terrorist, the USA, from ever going to think that they can do what it did to Japan. Every country under threat by the USA harbors intentions to have nukes, even small numbers that can still do much damage. 

Anonymous

PS. The above about what MBS said was at a time when Saudi Arabia and Iran were still arch enemies, manipulated by the Americans to distrust each other. The situation has changed. They are now friends and MBS would welcome a nuclear Iran. He might use the same reasoning to acquire nuclear weapons, to protect themselves from the Americans and Israel. By now all the Arab countries are aware who are their real enemies. Definitely not Iran.