Mickey Marcos wants to buy a submarine to take on China

 Zelensky just demanded the Americans to supply him with submarines to fight Russia. He is going to sail his submarine from New York to Moscow through the Arctic Sea. Brilliant idea from a comedian. 

Now Mickey Marcos is also saying that he needs a submarine to level up with China in his war against China. Not sure who got this submarine idea first, but the two clowns are singing the same chorus.

How many submarines did China have? 90 or more than 100? So, a submarine is going to turn the table against China in a war? By the way, is Mickey Marcos thinking of buying or like Zelensky, hoping that someone would throw a submarine to him for free? Or is he really thinking of buying one? Did he has the budget to pay for it? Or he thinks just ask and he will be given?

Oh, China has one submarine available for sale immediately. This was built for Thailand but because of the sanction by the Americans, the Germans could not provide the engine and the Thais insisted on a German engine. Think it would be a good deal for the Philippines. Could be had for a bargain.

Think about it seriously, but definitely this submarine would not be for free. But it would be new, not hand me down antiques lie the Sierra Madre. With this submarine, Philippines can trot around like a super power in Asean, ready to go to war with China and defeat China.

To prepare for war with China, the Mickey Marcos had also signed a defence treaty with Japan to come to his aid. So the Philippines now has two defence treaties with its former invaders that killed and massacred millions of Pinoys before and during WW2, ie the USA and Japan. This makes the meaning of sleeping with the devil more acute. The Philippines is now the strongest military power in Asean with America and Japan in Mickey's pocket.

Non Arab Muslim states are not even trusted by the Arab League countries.They slept with the American terrorists

 Turkey is a NATO member since 1952 and also interested in joining BRICS. That is not a good idea for BRICS, although Turkey did not join the sanctions against Russia, which would still qualify Turkey for membership. That it hosted nuclear weapons in the 1960s is testament to its loyalty to NATO. I believe those nukes are still in Turkey and never pulled out.

However, Turkey, like India, is just playing musical chairs between NATO and BRICS. Therefore, Turkey is not a trustworthy country to be admitted into BRICS, only good for Christmas dinner tables. Who knows which side Turkey will bend towards after President Recep Tayyip Erdogan steps down? Just look at the Philippine as an example, being a puppet of the USA deep inside its DNA.

Turkey is an important member of NATO, because of its geographical position and the USA will not let it loose. It holds the key to the Black Sea, controlling the Bosphorus or Straits of Istanbul connecting Asia and Europe and is a critical passage for international maritime trade. The USA, as leader of NATO, by definition, controls this critical waterway, just like the Panama Canal and Suez Canal, all critical choke points in the event of conflict. Do not be fooled also by claims that the Panama Canal is under Panamanian Government control and the Suez Canal under Egyptian control. That is just pulling wool over unsuspecting eyes.

However, countries are now looking at opening up alternative routes in Nicaragua to bypass the Panama Canal and Iraq is looking at a land route leveraging on the BRI extension to bypass the Suez Canal, and of course Thailand is interested in reviving the Isthmus of Kra project to bypass the Straits of Malacca. Russia is even exploring the Arctic route with climate change making it more feasible to navigate with wider melting ice.

Anonymous

China - India Border War 1962. When China stopped being Ah Q

 The China - India Border War 1962

China knew India plans since 1958 that Nehru and his Defense Ministry and Indian war generals were planning something regarding encroaching on Chinese Xichang ( Tibet ). India was at the time controlling a large part of Chinese territory in South East Tibet which was taken by the British from China in around 1913 to 1914 and eventually annexed to British India inspite of constant Chinese protest.

When England gave India independence it did not settle the border issue between China and British India but retained the Chinese territory. India wanted to retain the stolen territory from China. Nehru and his generals and India Defense Ministry were tone deaf to China's pleading for talks to settle the border dispute a left over baggage from colonial England.

But Nehru and India wanted to retain the Chinese lands stolen from China and refused to enter into any talks with China. In short India wanted to inherit and maintain the mantle of British colonialism and imperialism. The Indian generals and the Indian Defense Ministry wanted to take over all Xizhang or Tibet claiming that China was very weak after over a century of Western and Japanese aggressions and invasions and after a debilitating Civil War and the Korean War 1950 to 1953 and so it was the best time for India to take over Chinese Xizhang. Moreover Indian Ministry officials claimed that India had at the moment of time inherited a lot of the most modern and latest weapons from UK, US and the West compared to the Chinese peasant army which was poorly armed with archiac rifles of the First World war.

India was so sure of defeating the Chinese army in an open warfare. It started to nibble more of Chinese lands beyond the Actual Line Of Control. China had given India ample warnings to stop encroaching more on Chinese lands. But instead of giving heed to Chinese warnings India under US instigationsand encouragement began a full scale attack on China's positions to march further into Xichang hoping to take full control of Chinese Tibet in one full swoop with all the mighty weapons supplied by the US and England.

China was then forced to counter attack the Indians at all fronts with great fury and fierce ferocity which drove the unanticipated Indian armies back behind the Line of Actual Control. However the Indians continued to attack the Chinese despite China's call for a ceasefire and to begin talks on settling the border question. This time the Chinese army fought with even greater valour and drove the Indian armies right up to the doorstep of Delhi the Indian capital. More than ten thousand Indian soldiers were either captured by the Chinese or they just laid down their arms and surrendered to the Chinese. It was a rout for the Indians. Only then did Nehru and his generals and defense ministry agree to hold talks with China.

In her victory China could have taken back all her former lands taken by England and retain all the lands right up to New Delhi. But for the sake of peace and Asian solidarity and corporation in face of continuous Western aggression led by the United States, China was honourable to return to the Line of Actual Control.

Thus in the relevance of China - India border war China did not appear to behave like an Ah Q but used it patiently like one so as to carry out its strategy of 'calm before the storm' on the Indians.

China always want peace. When China's army return back to the Line of Actual Control it acted with great honour and respect for the Chinese people cherish peace. Though the Chinese people cherish peace and do not like war but the Chinese people are also not afraid of war. If war is imposed on China the Chinese people will fight with great patriotic fervour and will always fight to win.

Southernglory1.

Still flogging old horse Biden?

 It is really, honestly, unequivocally crazy that they are still insisting that Biden is suitable for the job. The whole fake mental and physical image of Biden propped up by lies has been openly exposed for the USA and the world to see during the debate. I think the USA takes its 'exceptionalism' belief a bit too far this time around.

The wife, the son all still wants him to stand. For what? Protection for his son at the expense of the whole USA?

I think the Biden family and the Democrats are afraid of Trump winning and paying them back in their own coin. And NATO and Ukraine likewise are afraid of being left in the lurch should Trump wins this time. I would say Trump has a good chance, more so after the debate, that was a bloodbath for Biden and the Democrats. If they are not panicking, they are simply lying and hoping for a miracle.

Actually, the EU and vis a vis NATO breaking off from USA is a good thing. It is only the leaders like Stan Stoltenburg and Ursula von der Leyen that are the root cause of all the problems for the EU and NATO by following the dictates of the USA. And the USA needs these two morons to control the EU and NATO.

For USA voters, whether they vote Red or Blue, they will be screwed, as one astute observer commented. The same goes for the UK election just concluded. 

Anonymous

Trump or Biden cannot save America going broke

 How to vote both out? The Deep State's idea was and is to put both as candidates, so voters only can vote for the Deep State's right hand or the left hand. That is the choice the voters have been given.

After all, the playbook that both candidates use is the same book. The songbook that the Democrats and Republicans are using in Congress are the same songbook. The USA's political system can never change.

What is the favorite song in the USA playbook and songbook? Using the Russian and Chinese bogeymen as punching bags for their domestic consumption is top of the list. Real domestic issues play second fiddle. Homelessness, escalating debt, drug infestation, people raiding supermarkets and laughing at Biden's gaffes are inconsequential and deniable. Those issues can be left to fester after every four years for the next President to inherit. What is even worse is raising tariffs that will cause even greater misery to USA voters with higher cost of EVs and other Chinese products after November.

Talking about USA debts and the fear of a default is one example of how ignorant the USA voters are. Most would assume that China and Japan will suffer the most in the event of a debt default by the USA. That is far from the truth. Foreign holders of USA debts stand at just about 7 trillion, with the Fed holding about 5 trillion and Banks another 3.5 trillion. The rest of about 19 trillion is held by USA citizens, corporate entities, hedge funds and pension funds. Pension funds carry the most damage to USA citizens in the event of default.

So, who suffers the most in the event of a debt default by the USA? Not China or Japan obviously, though they will be affected. It is the USA citizens themselves. Everything will be wiped out - pensions, investments, bank accounts resulting from bank failures, with their American dreams turned to rubble.

The Fed and USA Treasury are making great efforts to flog a dying horse using hanky panky moves and lying to the public about how strong the USA economy is and how tight the job market has become. Amidst the escalating debt, some are even suggesting that just printing more toilet papers will help to save the debt crisis. That will be the straw that is going to break the camel's back in de-dollarization for sure. 

Anonymous