Doomsday Deal - How the American gangsters threatened the Saudis to sign a deal they could not refuse

 

A one hour clip that explained how the American became rich riding on Saudi oil and why the Saudis are turning against the Americans now, and why OPEC too is following Saudi to turn against the American gangsters. (Actually the meat of the clip is the first 30 minutes. After that would be commercial about a Survival Protocol to protect one's wealth when the American Empire collapses). The Americans basically told the Saudis, signed the deal or they would invade and take over Saudi Arabia and its oil. Such a friendly proposal. Those Arab nations that were seen as a threat, like Saddam and Gaddafi, were killed to secure American interests and control of oil. The Americans could have offered the same kind of deal to Marcos Jr, that either he did what the Americans wanted or else.... The Saudis did not sign the one sided petrodollar deal willingly but under coercion by the Americans.

The time has come for the Arab countries to settle the score with the American gangsters. The Arabs are standing up to defend their own rights and interests and would not be controlled and coerced by the evil Americans anymore. Jim Richards was a living witness to the Doomday Deal and telling it as it is. This is history alive and karma coming to claim its revenge for the Arabs.

BRICS must be strong to protect Saudi Arabia from the Americans that are definitely planning to retake Saudi Arabia and the OPEC countries. This is a very serious development in the Middle East and the Americans would not allow it to go on at the risk of American hegemony. The Evil Empire will strike back and fast. Be warned.

This is all about the survival of the American Empire, the end of the American Empire. The Americans would not let it happen without a fight. What are the Americans planning to do next?

You can imagine the pressure Saudi Arabia and MBS are facing now and what kind of threats the Americans are throwing at them. The Saudis are standing firm. China and Russia and all Arab and BRICS states must stand firm and resolute behind the Saudis to fight to the last man against the Americans. They are likely to release the Israelis to be the hit man first.

The rules based-order

1. The USA rules the world.
2. The USA makes all rules including these rules.
3. No one can know what the rules are, only that they exist.
4. No one is allowed to ask what the rules are.
5. The USA will be in charge of the flexibility provided by the rules’ non-existent nature.
6. Non-western countries must be regularly castigated for not following the rules.
7. Western countries must be regularly praised for following the rules.
8. Alternative rules of governance which work successfully (cf. China, Singapore) must always be derided as “authoritarianism”.
9. Unfair global dominance by the 13% western minority (cf. totalitarianism) must always be referred to as “democracy”.
10. These rules over-ride all other rules, including fundamental justice and the laws of nature.

- Pentagon

Anonymous

BRICS and India - A mismatch

 Under BRICs trade and investments on all countries they try to be hassle free and trade fairly.

Mark my words

India be out soon as they would made tradings and investments from other countries very difficult

Why? Because they a damn protectionist country that always wants to be on the upper hand and taken advantage of others.

They would object to any free trading and would want to implement all sorts of tariffs and excise duties on any country that wanted to do businesses with them.

On the ground that they have to protect their local industries and what's NOT.

Also, they would demanded that their peoples, the unemployed as they will called their talents would have to be in other countries freely to gain employments.

So only the Dafts and Stupids would agreed to their terms

Ahem like Sinkeland who thought too highly of them and wanted to be amongst the first to have a head start in believing that their country would be next prosperous nation.

Let them in first and be patience to skin them later.

We had 108 tricks in our hands.

We be more cunning than that MadHater with our own sorts of currency controls laws.

Let them worked their butts out and if lost, that's their funerals.

When they had so called profits and wanted to transfer their own monies out, we would hammered down fast that they contravened our banking rules and laws and our Courts in cahoots will whacked them severally.

Fined them millions if possible billions easy monies.

Cheers

Virgo

Japan dumping nuclear contaminated water into Pacific Ocean - Japanese seafood banned!

 China is banning all Japanese seafood imports immediately. Hong Kong is banning seafood from specific regions of Japan. China and Hong Kong are the two biggest importer of Japanese seafood, so think about the effect.

The South Korean public are protesting, and a few getting arrested by its own Government. Who is protecting the well being of the South Korean people? As someone commented, it looks like the South Korean government is part of the plot to discreetly help the Japanese to carry out this vile act and to stifle dissent. Yoon is going to have much on his hands handle to stifle the protests. South Koreans can be militant when fighting for their rights.

Now, the Chinese ban on seafood is causing panic among Japanese seafood producers, with protest erupting all over Japan. Their Japanese seafood producer's livelihood are on the line. And the Japanese citizens are joining the protest, as seafood is also their most sought after item. This is not going to end well. But, like Japan meekly being dictated to by the USA, Japanese citizens are also very meek when it comes to protest against the Government. They will undoubtedly take it lying down, unlike the South Koreans.

The fact of the matter is, not only is China taking a stand to ban Japanese seafood, but countries around the region are watching and about to take a stand. Malaysia is taking a more serious look into seafood from Japan. My hope is that in spite of banning Japanese seafood, China must continue to monitor the situation eg using Hong Kong as intermediary to do its job.

China's lead in banning Japanese seafood in this situation is important and will be followed by others. Remember that China was the first country to ground the Boeing 737 Max in March 2019, after two fatal mishaps killing 346 people. The rest of the world then followed. They knew China must have good reasons to grounding their Boeing 737 Max planes and the rest followed its decision. This is a situation that is no different.

Anonymous

Presidential Election - Number crunching the odds

 Let me try some number crunching for the Presidential Election based on a few assumptions.

1. 30% of hard core PAP supporters would go to Tharman and Kok Song. Maybe Tharman would get 20% and Kok Song 10%.

2. 30% of hard core protest vote would all go to Kin Lian.

3. 20% vote by ethnicity. So 0.2 x 70 = 14% Chinese, 0.2 x 10 = 2% Indian, 15% of Malay votes can be evenly distributed to pro PAP and opposition. So Kok Song has 7%, Kin Lian also 7% of Chinese votes. Tarman would have 2% of Indian votes. 7.5% Malay votes to Kin Lian, 3.75% each to Tharman and Kok Song.

4. 10% swing votes, assuming Kin Lian gets 5%, Tharman gets 3% and Kok Song 2%.

5. Balance 5% for Others. Tharman gets 3%, Kok Song and Kin Lian get 1% each.

Summation - Can you believe it?

Tharman would get 31.75%, Kok Song 23.75% and Kin Lian 50%. Wow, big upset, Kin Lian won.

Another variation, if all Malay votes go to Tharman, Tharman would get 43%, Kok Song 20%, and Kin Lian 47%. Still Kin Lian won but with smaller margin.

The main problem here is Kok Song's votes. These could have all gone to Tharman, and Tharman could have 63% and win. Split votes may be a big issue for Tharman and the pro PAP camp. Kok Song is likely to take in 20% of the votes, a big share of Tharman/PAP votes.

Just to note, the total in each computation added up to more than 100% as there is a bit of double counting. These are based on very loose guesstimates. The reality after 1 Sep can still be a Tharman victory. The above is only playing with numbers like a general fighting a war on papers. When the assumptions are wrong, the result would be wrong.

Actually, actually, for the pro PAP votes to be 63% is highly generous if past voting results were to be taken into account. In the last 4 corner fight against Tony Tan, he only got 35%. Thus, the opposition camp of the 3 Tans got 65% of the votes. Then again in the fight between Ong Teng Cheong and Chua Kim Yeow, the latter did not even bother to contest. No walkaround, no poster, no pamphlet, don't bother, do nothing practically, and he nearly won. Ong Teong Cheong won after recount by a small margin.

What these past records are saying is that in an EP, the votes for the PAP is not going to be much more than 50%. In a 4 corner fight, with 3 opposition candidates, PAP only could get 35%. Today it is a 3 corner fight with 2 PAP candidates against an opposition candidate, if pro PAP votes are a marginal 50 plus percent, and split between Tharman and Kok Song, Kin Lian would walk off with a comfortable margin.  All it needs is for Kok Song to get 10% of the pro PAP split votes. And he is likely to get 20% or more, eating into Tharman's pro PAP votes.

Statistics based on past EP elections did not favour a Tharman win this time. The Kok Song gambit is going to cost Tharman and PAP dearly.