American cheats outsmarted in their own cheating game

 China is also restricting exports of industrial silicon, another important ingredient for chip manufacturing, computers, automobiles among others. China controls 81% of global supply of silicon.

What China does by restricting is more destructive than a complete ban, a move often followed by the USA and the West. China does not want the West to build facilities and supply chains to provide long term alternatives to China. Building those facilities in the West cost huge investments and will not kill China's silicon industry, because it is still a major global supplier and in total control. China on the other hand can kill off those facilities by manipulating supply and demand. The West is thus in a dilemma. Invest and build and risk not being able to compete with China, or continue to face acute shortages in the short and midium term.

The USA and the West are now hysterical and crying foul and shouting that this is unfair trade practices, after being grabbed by the testicles. What hyprocrites are they themselves? When the USA targeted Huawei, the West and other poodles followed. When the USA banned exports of high end chips and chip making equipment to China, the West and other poodles followed as well.

China is doing exactly the same, paying them back in the same coin, nothing more, nothing less. However, China does not need to coerce or force other countries to follow them, thus dragging them into trouble. China alone can strike back like Russia. Gangsters need backups to appear great in facing opponents.

Two commodities that Russia targeted so far are only energy and food. Even fertiliser for crops is in the hands of the Russians. We are now seeing a battle between air backed toilet papers against commodities, ie oil and food, real stuff that is needed by every human being on this planet. Who is holding the upper hand going forward is a no brainer.

Russia's refusal to renew the grain deal is causing panic among the EU countries. Inflation is expected to escalate in the coming months, with grain prices rising. Meanwhile, Russia has promised to ship grains to poor African countries 'free of charge' after not renewing the Black Sea grain deal. This point about 'free' Russian grain for Africa has never been mentioned on MSM, and we know what is the reason. It negates the accusation that Russia is causing hunger in Africa, a point they leveraged on all the time. Russia knows that most of the grains exported from the Black Sea deal went to the EU and China, not to the countries that needed them most, which is Africa. Moreover, why should Russia feed the EU that is out to destroy it?

China's import of grains from Russia, by the way, may be huge, but it makes up only a tiny percentage of its needs, about 1% (?) and is thus not in any way detrimental for China. And now the West is pushing China to influence Russia to go back to the grain deal. The same argument here is why should China help the EU when it is in league with the USA to destroy China. In any case, Russian grain, I believe, can always go by land to China and need not go through the Black Sea route. What are the rail links being built between China and Russia for? China's BRI is a long term alternative against the blockade of the Straits of Malacca and Suez Canal. In fact China is exploring leasing Gwadar Port (if I am not mistaken), Pakistan to bring Middle Eastern oil via pipelines across Pakistan and/or Afghanistan to Western China.

August is coming and soon the EU countries will be facing another winter once again. The last winter was mild, and enough time was given to stockpile oil and gas when they knew Russia was going to cut supplies by end of 2022. This time around, Russia may stop gas supply completely long before winter sets in. Russia knows how to play the game, preventing stock piling being a lesson it has learnt the year before. 

Anonymous

West preparing to start war with China to rule the world

West not prepared for conflict with China – FT

 
The US has only a week’s worth of anti-ship missiles, one think tank has estimated

Ammunition shortages laid bare by the Ukraine conflict have prompted some US think-tanks to check on stockpiles in the West and find them wanting, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday. The military industry of NATO allies is not able to help, either.

A Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) wargame of a conflict with China over Taiwan showed that the US had only about 450 long-range anti-ship missiles, enough for about a week.

Another think tank, the Center for New American Security (CNAS), said the existing missile inventory is “too small to blunt an initial invasion, let alone prevail in a protracted conflict against China.” To deter and defeat Beijing, the Pentagon “needs large stockpiles of stand-off missiles, maritime strike weapons, and layered air and missile defenses,” CNAS concluded.

According to the FT, the US Department of Defense has asked for $1.1 billion in the 2024 fiscal year to buy 118 long-range anti-ship missiles (LRASM), compared to half that amount for 83 missiles the year before. The Pentagon also wants $30 billion for ammunition, a 23% increase over 2023 levels, and $315 billion for new weapons....

Alcomendras
As Corrupt usa's list of high-profile people that they are aiming at China in a waterfall of visits is seemingly endless and their desperation grows, we can expect even more empty promises and threats. All this while they are trying to encircle China in attempts to suffocate China economically and militarily. With "old friends" like usa, who needs enemies?? hahahaha

KYM

The DAMAGE the USA has CAUSED CHINA is and WAS DELIBERATE ... NO GOOD MARINATING on the PAST CHINA ... CHINA needs to STAY FOCUSSED on ... THE NOW ...

Above is from RT.

The article said the West is not ready for war with China and went on to say how the Americans are increasing their war budget and acquisition of more offensive weapons in preparation of a war with China. These white savages everyday thinks of going for war, agitating and provoking for war. And they are daily accusing China of being aggressive, expansionist and wanting war when China is not involved in any war but the white savages are fighting wars everywhere everyday.

How many silly people are still believing in this white lie that they are for peace? Their definition for peace is to conquer and rule the whole world under their terms. All the coloured people must be their slaves, to work for them. They will dictate the roles of the coloured nation states, to do only menial stuff, to serve the white savages and their good life.

They have already started this WW3 in Ukraine and will expand it to Asia using NATO, a warmongering organisation, to start wars in Asia and later in Africa and the Middle East. Latin America is already in their control, without the weapons to withstand an attack from the white savages, too weak to fight back. They have kept a lid to stop the Latin American states to buy better weapons to defend themselves. Argentina was prevented from acquiring any weapons to defend itself and the Falkland Islands against the British. American and European countries were banned from selling weapons to Argentina to fight the Brit colonialists. This is how the Americans control and suppress the Latin American countries, to be contained and kept forever as third world underdeveloped countries.

Yes, they are not ready, but getting ready to attack China with the help of some silly coloured states in East Asia, South Asia and SE Asia. All these coloured states do not mind being subservient to the white men, to be ruled by the white men, to call them masters. They are useful now when the white savages need them to die first, fighting for the white savages. But once they defeated China and Russia, there will be no more use for these silly coloured people except to be slaves Class One to the white savages. 

And there will be peace in the world, under the rule of the white savages. The slaves would be treated well, playing the role of slaves. China men will continue with their roles as cooks and laundrymen. Africans can go back to the cotton fields etc etc. It would be a beautiful and peaceful world for the white rulers again.

 

India has a big role to play in USA's agenda vis a vis China.

The USA knows how to leverage its bets knowing that India and China are not on good terms. Same with Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Same with Vietnam and China. Same with Japan and China and same with Taiwan and China. How else can the prospect be so good for the Military Industrial Complex without stirring shit. With Nato giving it unlimited businesses resulting from replenishment of obsolete weapons sent to Ukraine for target practice by the Russians, and with the China issue, things are really looking good for the MIC.

Now trying very hard to pry India away from Russia with their undying love for the Hindus. It is very difficult for the USA to profess the same love for the Muslims in India, as they did in Xinjiang, while at the same time professing their love for the Hindus, so brushing that aside as 'internal problems' for India, everything is settled as far as it is concerned.

In Manipur, it is the ruling Meitei Hindus against the Christian Kukis, with the Hindus in power and giving little benefit to the Kukis, which gives rise to the present situation. All it needed was a spark to ignite the ethnic violence. Now, the USA also cannot profess their loving DNA for the Kukis and at the same time giving so much love to the Hindus. So, like the Muslim issue, just brush it away as an 'internal problem' for India.

India has lots of problems with its many ethnic groups. There is the Muslim problem, the Sikh problem, now the Kukis problem. But never mind, just let India solve it the Indian way, and everything will be fine.

Anonymous

US using India to attack BRICS/SCO and China

 It is already seen by many that India is being used more and more by the USA to be another pawn cultivated to contain China. China knows it, the world knows it, but only the Indians have yet to know it or pretending not to know it. India may be good in playing both sides, but eventually will regret just like those countries that had been used by the USA, and than discarded or destroyed when their usefulness is over.

Whatever alliances or treaties that the USA signs with any country is all for the interest of the USA, nothing more nothing less. Enemies just have to strengthen themselves militarily for whatever the USA is planning, while friends may yet end in more fatal ways, by letting their guards down and being blindly lead to the abatoir for slaughter later on.

Yes, the USA is not going to condemn the Modi Government's treatment of the Muslims in India the same way they accused China's treatment of the Uyghurs. Neither will it now condemn the ethnic/religious conflict now erupting in Manipur, between majority Meitei Hindus and the largely Christian Kukis, a group which had been suppressed and mistreated by the Hindu Government. In return the Modi Government had to tow the USA line, just like the Philippines and PNG, and the USA Government is now demanding a base in India for logistics to support their confrontation with China.

BRICS has to take a stand now with India in the process of hosting USA naval and logistical facilities. Most people commenting on this issue are of the opinion that India cannot be allowed to remain inside BRICS and a way must be found to remove the Trojan Horse that is already doing the damage.

Anonymous

EU taking up case of anti Christian, anti women, anti minorities against India

 It is left to the EU Parliament to take up the issue of what Hindus in India are doing to women and Christianity. And it is good that the issue has been highlighted to the world what the Indian Government stands for. And the Indian Government and Indian MSM are not happy that the EU is debating the issue. The hypocrisy is that the Indians, like Junkie Joe, are now arguing that this is an internal matter and has nothing to do with the EU. Really?

In other words, just because even the USA said it is India's internal problem, it is therefore true and the EU cannot talk about it and anyone countering the USA stand is therefore wrong. But women around the world are not buying this nonsensical argument spouted by forked tongue Journalists. It is of international concern that women are being treated in the most degrading manner and gangraped in India, the biggest democracy in the world. It is also an affront to Christians and Christianity, the other issue now being targeted in India by the Hindus. The Muslims may be toothless in fighting back with divided and fragmented support, but not White Christians with enough global backing.

When they accused China of mistreating the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, the USA hype up the narrative that it was an 'international' issue, and rabid dogs started barking day and night. Isn't the Uyghur problem in Xinjiang an internal problem for China as well? Now that the USA is trying to use India against China, Trump claimed unashamedly that Muslim issues in India is an internal matter for India. Now the treatment of women and Christianity in Manipur is also India's internal matter. How convenient! Being a friend of the USA is not fatal for the Indian Government, but fatal for minorities in India.

The world must not let this matter be swept under the carpet. It is good that the EU Parliament sees it fit to take up the matter and human rights are in it too. Where does that leave the USA stance as the beacon of democracy? This shows the EU is no longer following the horseshit trotted out by the USA and are taking a different stance.

Anonymous