American's formula for peace, the champion of peace?

 The Americans have been promoting themselves as an agent for peace. It is the policeman and the peace maker of the world. Let's see what are the instruments the Americans are using to promote peace.

1. Form military alliances either bi laterally or multilaterally like alliance treaties with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines and NATO. And also defence pacts like those with Solomon Islands.

2. Conduct military exercises near countries it regards as enemies eg North Korea, China and Iran. These military exercises simulating an attack or invasion of the respective countries are for peace.

3. Using its military powers, even nuclear power to threaten countries in the name of peace, threatening to nuke them if necessary.

4. Build military bases all over the world to maintain peace, calling and self appointing themselves the policemen of the world. At least 800 military bases all over the world.

5. Conduct regime change and military coup to remove leaders of countries they called dictators to promote peace.

6. Conduct economic wars, economic coercion and sanctions to promote peace.

7. Encourage countries like Ukraine to fight to the last man, for peace. Agitate and incite wars for peace.

8. Selling arms and provide political support to Taiwan to keep Taiwan separate from China in the name of peace. And sailing warships into the Taiwan Straits to threaten China in the name of peace.

9. Support terrorist groups, provide training and finance and arms, to rebel against popularly elected govts like Syria, Iraq and Libya in the name of peace.

10. Using NGOs to destabilise countries, agitate for social unrest, in the name of democracy, human rights and peace.

In a different way China is always denounced as an aggressive and expansionist power threatening peace. What did China do to warrant such a label as a warmonger, a threat to peace?

1. China did not build military alliances. 

2. China wants to establise defence pact to undermine peace.

3. China may conduct wargames to undermine peace.

4. China builds foreign military bases, just one in Djibouti.

5. China did not call itself the policeman of the world and therefore did not shoulder the responsibility to maintain peace.

6. China conducts economic coercion? Like what, where, how? Selling goods and services cheaper, BRI, build infrastructures, create debt traps? China did not set political  conditions for such project, therefore irresponsible and undermine peace.

7. China did not conduct regime change, China did not interfere with countries domestic affairs of dictators and authoritarian states to remove them by invading these countries for peace.

8. China did not impose sanctions on communist and authoritarian regimes or dictatorships like sanctioning Cuba, North Korea, Iran etc etc.  China is thus irresponsible.

9. China is claiming the whole of South China Sea, thus destabilising the South China Sea. Unlike the peaceful Americans that claimed the whole of USA, the Canadians that claimed the whole of Canada, the Australians that claimed the whole of Australia and brought peace to these lands, by terminating the trouble making natives.

10. China did not support Ukraine and Nato in their wars against Russia for peace.

11. China did not sell arms to separatist groups in Hawaii, the native Americans in their fight for independence. China did not support or sell arms to the Ryukuans in their fight for independence from Japan.

12. China did not create and finance NGOs to destabilise countries in the name of democracy and human rights.

13. China did not invade countries in the name of democracy and human rights, did not kill millions, wounded millions and made millions into poor refugees.

14. China did not conduct freedom of navigation to the coastal seas of other countries.

15. China did not send its coast guards to police the waters of the caribbean or Hawaii.

China is so irresponsible, unlike the Americans, always defending peace, democracy and human rights all over the world and willing to fight and start wars for these virtues and selling weapons to countries to defend themselves against imaginary enemies and imaginary threats.

No wonder the Americans are so well respected and loved by the people of the world, with so many friends and so few enemies. When is China going to behave and do as the Americans to be similarly respected and loved by the people of the world?  Maybe start to invade a few countries in the name of democracy and peace? Perhaps conduct wargames in the Caribbean or around Hawaii? Or perhaps conduct freedom of navigation by sailing its warships in the English Channel or flying its warplanes over Guam or Australia? Perhaps China should broadcast to the world that the PLA aircraft and PLAN warships shall fly and sail anywhere in international airspace and waters as long as the international laws permit, for peace?

What do you think?

Terrorism - American modus operandi

 It is quite obvious that those countries that do not provide the USA with opportunities by having elections for them to install stooges, the USA will ultimately resort to funding 'terrorisim' within those countries to achieve their objective.

The USA had been building up their terrorism ambitions in Xinjiang using radical Muslim Uyghurs, which failed to take off, after China took early steps to prevent further radicalisation. This upsets the USA's objective to destablise Xinjiang first in conjunction with Hong Kong, and later hoping the chaos will spread across the whole of China. But after the Chinese nip the abnoxious plan in the bud, the USA and the West capitalised instead on the mistreatment of Ugyhurs to make China look bad for spoiling their vile intentions. In Hong Kong, the USA via the CIA, trying very hard to provoke Hong Kong police to use more heavy handed methods against protestors, who were encouraged to attack and set fire to Government buildings, which also failed to take off.

Now Vietnam is facing terrorism, supported by foreign forces, whose objective is distablising the country. Vietnam does not afford elections to be hijacked by the USA to install a compliant stooge to run the country, as happened in Thailand. Terrorism and destablisation is the only alternative available to the USA to destabilise Vietnam, with USA funding terrorist groups and less than innocents NGOs, using the CIA as intermediary for their evil designs.

This modus operandi is also seen in Myanmar, after the failure of the USA installed stooge, Aung San Suu Kyi, to take full control of the country. What we are seeing regarding the chaotic state in Myanmar is no more than the USA funding terrorism to put the country in chaos.

Amidst all these terrorism activites by the USA, the Western Media just keep whitewashing the reality and blaming the chaos on other factors.

Closer to home, PM Anwar Ibrahim of Malaysia appears on edge that the country is facing undesirable elements, supported by outside forces, who are out to destablise the country. Why did he say that?

In parting, I just came across this site - New Eastern Outlook or NEO. Lots of interesting articles to be read. Do take a look.

Anonymous

Chinese Car Company Forced to ‘Indianise’

MG Motor India, the local subsidiary of the Chinese-owned passenger vehicle major, has to plan to transform its business by 2028 amid Indian government’s onslaught on investments from the neighbouring country. After securing one per cent share of India’s passenger four-wheeler market in 2023, the company now has to bring in local owners to ‘Indianise’ the business.

The Chinese owners of the company has to divest its majority stake to Indian partners within 2-4 years. For the same, it has already started scouting for buyers among Indian investors, including institutions, its local business partners and HNIs. “We will finalise the new investors-cum-owners of MG Motor India, who together would own more than 50 per cent of the company within FY24," Rajeev Chaba, CEO Emeritus, MG Motor India told the media today. The aim is to ‘Indianise’ the company that will, in turn, help it raise funds for the next phase of expansion through expansion in its production capacity.

Last year the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) had sent a notice to MG Motor India on certain alleged irregularities in its books. It had asked the company's directors and its auditor Deloitte to explain certain alleged audit deficiencies that had been discovered during the course of the probe.

Since then, MG has been in talks to several Indian investors like Sajjan Jindal-led JSW Group to sell close to a 15 per cent stake. MG Motor is owned by SAIC Motor Corporation (formerly Shanghai Automotive Industry Corporation) - a Chinese state-owned automobile manufacturer headquartered in Anting, Shanghai.

Anonymous

PS. The solution is so simple. Just give everything to the Indians. Treat it as doing charity, donate everything, help India to create employment by employing Indians to fill every position in the company. Then go home. Forget about everything and pretend everything is fine, the company is still yours and in the long run you will make money. 

India is a great country to invest. Come one and come all. Just empty your pockets. India will be very pleased. Suckers are born everyday. But the suckers will not admit they are suckers when all their money and investments are stuck in India and never hope of getting it back.

India will say, thank you suckers. 

America playing India against China, with India a willing pawn of the USA

 Trying to rule China or force it down is no longer a possibility. It is today beyond the capability of the USA and its Anglo Saxon White's clique to do so in their wildest dream.

When China was at its weakest point during the Opium War, and the West was at its peak of power, the Eight Nation Alliance of Whites and Japan attempted to tear China up into their sphere of influence. This was like the breaking up of the former Soviet Union, with many of the Soviet satellite states now becoming members of the EU and Nato, after the collapse of the Soviet Union. However, the attempt to tear up China failed to materialise. Five thousand years of history and experience in survival and revival is not that easy to be taken down by a group of nations, some of whom are no more than mere juveniles, with just a few hundred years of existence.

Now, if the USA and the West thinks China is going to be another Soviet Union waiting to be torn down, they are terribly mistaken. China has the military deterrent and the financial strength to compete with the USA plus its allies. Besides that, the most important deterrent is that China and Russia are now geopolitical allies, unlike the days when China stilll had a history of border conflicts with Russia, affording the USA and the West an opportunity to capitalise on those issues, knowing China and Russia will never come together against the West. Heaven works in mysterious ways indeed, with China and Russia now closer than ever.

Making hay while the sun shines, while countries are still at loggerheads by the way, is exactly being reactivated by the USA today, cultivating India to confront China, knowing that these two countries have border disputes to settle and are ripe for the USA to capitalise on those issues, by prodding and instigating India against China. What is most to China and Russia in BRICS is India playing both sides of the chessboard, one foot in QUAD and the other foot in BRICS. The Chinese saying that 'a thief in the house is the most difficult job to prevent theft from happening'.

The USA thinks that by refraining from dictating issues, or discussing pertaining to human rights in India, will purportedly buy over India's allegiance. This does not escape the eyes of the rest of the world. The Muslims are not fooled and the Chinese are even less likely to be fooled. Practicing double standards will not work and puts the USA credibility in even worse state. Not that the USA has an iota of credibility left that is worth salvaging.

Anonymous

Titan gate - Self implosion or torpedoes?

The Titan submersible, operated by OceanGate Expeditions to explore the wreckage of the sunken SS Titanic off the coast of Newfoundland, dives in an undated photograph. (Photo: OceanGate Expeditions/Handout via REUTERS)

A deep-sea submersible carrying five people on a voyage to the century-old wreck of the Titanic was found in pieces from a "catastrophic implosion" that killed everyone aboard, the US Coast Guard said on Thursday (Jun 22), ending a multinational five-day search for the vessel.

The Titan, operated by the US-based company OceanGate Expeditions, had been missing since it lost contact with its surface support ship on Sunday morning about an hour, 45 minutes into what should have been a two-hour dive to the world's most famous shipwreck.

Five major fragments of the 6.7m Titan were located in the debris field left from its disintegration, including the vessel's tail cone and two sections of the pressure hull, Coast Guard officials said. No mention was made of whether human remains were sighted.

"The debris field here is consistent with a catastrophic implosion of the vehicle," Mauger said.  CNA

The first report by the Americans, the Titan imploded. Is this the truth? The vessel must have gone through many pre flight test before diving. It had made many trips to the wreck before. How so that it imploded just like that?

Could it be a mistaken identity, an unknown suspect, maybe a hostile submarine. So someone miscalculated and fired a torpedo to break it up into pieces? Can an implosion resulted in piece lying around? Or these are caused by the impact of an explosive like the Nord Stream pipelines?

How did the Americans know that there was an implosion when everyone did not know and were hunting and hoping to save it? Why did  the Americans stop the British from sending out their search vessels before this announcement? Why preventing other vessels to help in the search and rescue? Did they have prior knowledge of what had already happened, did not want anyone to find out the truth? No one is to be there to discover what really happened?

'The US Coast Guard has found a piece of a deep-sea submersible in a “debris field” near the sunken wreck of the Titanic. The vessel’s five passengers all died in a “catastrophic explosion,” the military branch said.

“A debris field was discovered within the search area by [a Remotely Operated Vehicle] near the Titanic,” the Coast Guard’s northeastern district said in a statement on Thursday." RT

How could an implosion cause a "debris field" when the forces were turned inwards? An implosion and the extremely high pressure at that depth would not force the parts to be blown around. A "debris field" is likely to be caused by an external impact from an explosion, not an implosion.

What do you think?