Singapore version of Meng Wenzhou??

Don't play play with US...see what happened to Imran Khan recently?

Kenna shot.

It's good to be stupid sometjimes:

'Recently Sahra Wagenknecht has defined Germany’s government as the “most stupid” in EUrope for managing to embroil itself in a full-blown economic war with its top – and thus un-replaceable — energy supplier, namely Russia. Speaking at the Bundestag, the former co-chair of the party Die Linke (“The Left”) urged for an immediate end to the anti-Russian sanctions and also for the resignation of German Vice Chancellor and Minister of the Economy, the now infamous ´Herr Green´ Robert Habeck. While still describing the ongoing conflict in Ukraine as a “crime” Wagenknecht insisted that the anti-Russian sanctions are “fatal” for Germany itself.

She told her fellow Bundestag leaders in-their-face that “The biggest problem is your grandiose idea of launching an unprecedented economic war against our most important energy supplier. The idea that we are punishing Putin by impoverishing millions of families in Germany and destroying our industry while Gazprom is making record profits – how stupid is that?” she wondered out loud.

So, an important German at an important German venue publically told many other important Germans how stupid they were. Not me, she did. “The promise of NATO membership did not help any. Militarily, this war cannot be won”. Of course, this has meant that some Left Party members now demand the expulsion of Sahra Wagenknecht for good.'

Link to article:

http://thesaker.is/how-bright-are-europeans/

 

Anonymous

Bounty to arrest Singaporean for trading with North Korea!

 North Korea is not an enemy of Singapore. Why is it an offence to trade with North Korea? Does the Singapore govt forbid Singaporeans from trading with North Korea?

The arrogant and rude Americans even put up a notice in our main media offering a bounty to arrest a Singaporean for trading with North Korea, in violation of an American law/sanction. It is reported in the Straits Times that Kwek Kee Seng, owner of a shipping company, is now wanted by the Americans for selling oil to North Korea with a US$5m bounty, for violating a UN sanction that not all countries would abide by as it was American led to contain North Korea.

Would the Singapore govt assist to arrest Singapore citizen Kwek Kee Seng and hand him to the Americans? Or would any Singaporean become a bounty hunter to catch another Singaporean for the Americans just for the US$5m bounty?

What is the position of the Singapore govt on this? What is the position of Singaporeans on this bounty by the Americans? Why no other country would be putting up a bounty for such a purpose, to arrest anyone trading with North Korea, supposedly in violation of a UN sanction other than the Americans? Basically no one cares. Are the Americans the policeman of the world or the policeman of the UN?

What do you think? Would any Singaporean betray Kwek Kee Seng, a Singaporean citizen, just for the money, and catch him for the Americans? Many countries have violated the onerous sanctions of the Americans, totally ignoring these sanctions without any consequences, like buying oil from Iran and Russia or trading with countries that were supposedly sanctioned by the UN.

Would Singaporean Kwek Kee Seng be safe in Singapore from the Americans? What would Singaporeans think of the audacious and disrespectful Americans putting out bounty to arrest Singaporeans in Singapore media?

The Americans are not the policeman of the world or the policeman of the UN. They are making use of the UN's name to arrest citizens of independent countries, behaving like international gangsters and terrorists.

Evil Americans setting bad examples -China and Russia will return the favour

Russia should re-evaluate placing 'strategic' weapons in Cuba again, if the USA does the same in South Korea. South Korea is as near to Russia and China as Cuba is to the USA, and that is reason enough for Russia to adopt a tit for tat stance. So does China start doing it in USA's backyard ie the Central American countries.

What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. China has not yet talk about placing strategic weapons in Cental American countries, even after the US and UK have already decided to place nuclear submarines in Australia. Who is provoking the proliferation of nuclear weapons? Think about it!

Now that they cannot exert control over North Korea, they are trying to drag Russia and China into their evil plans to split their relationship. It will not work, since it is the USA's provocations that angered North Korea. Why must Russia and China rein in the aggrieved party? It makes no sense and works the same way as China's stand on Ukraine. They tried ways and means to drag China into the Ukraine conflict, attempting to split the Russian/Chinese alliance. That has failed.

The days of their total control of their narratives on MSM has been well countered on social media, and their influence has been marginalised, and they obviously cannot now control the truth being dispensed by alternative voices. Moreover, since the Iraq War, people are wary of MSM cooking up propaganda and fabricating evidence to advance the interest of the USA and the West.

It is very obvious that they are trying very hard to demonise such social media sites from dispensing the truth by closing down sites that espouse the truth that they could not handle. Either that or trying to force such sites out of business by de-monetising them to starve them of funding. It will not work either.

The USA and the West have failed on many fronts and are resorting to desperate means like trade wars, biological wars and technology wars which they do not even have the upper hand and need to pull in support from their allies like Japan, South Korea and Taiwan.

The Germans knew that and are pivoting East towards China. More Europeans will follow when the shit hits the fan this winter and what follows into 2023. The USA is not seen as trying to help the EU, but instead pushing them underwater, and taking advantage of their misery by selling energy to them at high prices and using printed fiat money to entice the EU's manufacturing to set up base in the USA. The USA can do that with fiat money printing that costs little and trying to de-industrialise the EU to benefit itself. Is this proof that being friends of the USA is fatal? Think about it too!

Compare the USA treatment of it's so called close allies to Russia's treatment of humanity by giving free grains to the poor countries in Africa. That is what a friend in need is for. Not one that takes all the benefit but give nothing in return even to allies. Think also about that!

Anonymous 

Korea - Americans' next Ukraine in East Asia if Taiwan does not work

Pentagon reveals stance on ‘strategic assets’ in Korea
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin insisted on an “ironclad” US commitment to defending Seoul

The US does not plan to permanently base “strategic” weapons systems in South Korea at this time, but will evaluate that position in consultation with Seoul and Tokyo in order to deter any attack from North Korea, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday.

In a brief press conference after his meeting with South Korean Defense Minister Lee Jong-sup, Austin mentioned a recent arrival of US “strategic assets” to the peninsula, prompting a question from CNN.

The above is reported in RT. The Americans have 'strategic assets' in South Korea and would move them in and out as they like. Supposedly these 'strategic' weapons are not based in South Korea permanently. They would consult Seoul and Tokyo if they want it to be permanent. Never mind if China, Russia or North Korea agree to it.

What are these 'strategic' weapons? Nuclear weapons? What is the difference between placing nuclear weapons in Cuba or Ukraine from placing them in South Korea? If the Americans would not allow the Russians to place nuclear weapons in Cuba, if the Russians would not allow the Americans to place nuclear weapons in Ukraine, would China and North Korea allow this to happen in South Korea?

I strongly recommend the South Koreans to agree to place nuclear weapons in South Korea.  Japan definitely would agree to it. The reason is simple. If South Korea has nuclear weapons, then North Korea would have no reason not to drop nuclear weapons in South Korea. Then the whole Korean Peninsula would be a wasteland. There would be no Koreans, both North and South, left. Whatever left and alive would be anything resembling a human bean.

South Koreans, be brave, go for it, allow the Americans to place nuclear weapons in South Korea. Very good, to protect South Korea and to kill North Koreans...and vice versa.

Are the South Koreans that stupid to invite their own destruction and the destruction of the Korean people at the agitation of the Americans and Japanese? Both the Americans and Japanese would like the two Koreans to go to war and wipe out each other and they would watch from far away, providing more weapons, to make the massacre more complete.

Ukraine - AngloSaxon treachery exposed

 

Popcorn ready:

'The Russian ambassador to the UK has claimed Britain played a role in an attack on its warships - warning the country is "too deep" in the Ukraine war. In an interview with Sky's Mark Austin, diplomat Andrei Kelin claimed he had 'proof' that UK special forces were involved in a Ukrainian drone assault on Russia's Black Sea fleet in Crimea and had handed evidence to the British ambassador.
Pressed to give evidence to the public on Moscow's accusation the attack on the Russian fleet in the Black Sea was carried out under the guidance and leadership of British Navy specialists, Mr Kelin said it had been handed to the British ambassador and added that "it will become public pretty soon," perhaps today, perhaps tomorrow.'

'One may ask WHY Russia concentrates on UK now, because many speculate that the US was directly involved at least in preparation, not execution, of this act. The answer seems obvious--UK is a disposable asset. Russia and the US are the main parties to the whole geopolitical realignment, UK is not and could be made into the main culprit, because it leaves the door for communications and eventual "settlement" between Russia and US open. This is a classic case of sacrificing a servant to send the message to the master. UK obviously denies all those "allegations", but it doesn't matter since the record has been created and is being filed.'

Link to full article:

https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/

Anonymous 

 

PS. Latest, Russia confirmed that it was UK that sabotaged the Nord Stream pipelines and demanding compensation or Russia will bomb London.