Why primitive technology can land Americans on the moon?

SpaceX and Tesla Inc TSLA CEO Elon Musk said recently that the 1969 Apollo 11 Moon-landing mission was an “anomalous situation.”

What Happened: “The fact that we were able to go to the Moon in '69 was such an anomalous situation it was like reaching into the future and bringing the technology forward,” said Musk on the "Full Send" podcast.

The landings, which saw Neil Armstrong become the first human to step on the lunar surface, were “not the natural pace of technology development,” according to the SpaceX founder.

“It’s just that the United States just collectively decided that this has got to be done,” Musk said, referring to the space race between the U.S. and the Soviet Union.

The above is posted in Benzinga.com.

The reason why the Americans could land on the moon in 1969 and then many more times in the 1970s is not because of technology. It is about collective will, as I highlighted above in bold. The Americans just wanted to beat the Russians to the moon, and they did it.

After that, they relaxed and forgot about everything, lost all the blue prints, all the files, all the technology. Now they could not find any of the records that could help them to rebuild the same rockets to the moon. They would have to start all over again from scratch.

Now the Chinese are going to the moon. Not to worry. When the Americans want to beat the Chinese to the moon, when they collectively decided that it has to be done, it would be done, got technology or no technology does not matter.

The failure of Artemis from lifting off is not because the Americans have no technology to do it. It is because they have yet to collectively think that they have to do it. Wait for a few more years, wait for the Americans to want to do it, collectively, and an American miracle will happen. Another anomally would happen. They will get to the moon before the Chinese, just the same way they beat the Russians to it.

PS. For the moment, no country would make an official statement that the Americans are lying. They can only say it if someone has gone to the moon, to the sites to confirm that the Americans had not been there. This is a scientific and reasonable way to approach this belief.

The truth would need to be confirmed by facts, not beliefs. It can go either way until then.

My guess, the cake mud footprints were the giveaways. The moon is dry, dry dust could not create cake foot prints. Just examine the area around the footprint and ask how is this possible.

Pacific Islands - What kind of help they need?

The Pacific Islands have enjoyed some measure of peace and tranquility for a long while. They have been left alone in peace for a long while too. But they have seen the progress made in other countries, benefiting from the Chinese BRI investments and infrastructure all over the world. They therefore want to bet on China. But the USA says, China cannot be allowed to influence the Pacific Islands. So they are stepping in, as always, using the China threat.

The Pacific Islanders can smell the foul drift of sulpur, once the USA steps in with the intention to talk them into countering China, the usual narrative in their USA playbook. So, they ordered the leaders of the Pacific Islands to the White House for a lecture. Obviously the Pacific Islanders do not buy into the USA agenda.

So, what can we expect in the days ahead? Trust the USA to come up with underhand tactics to force them to do their bidding. And that means work to do for the CIA and USA funded NGOs to 'help' the Islanders.

'Help' is a word that can be moral or immoral. Eradicating poverty is a moral undertaking. Developing infrastructure for poor countries to progress is another moral undertading. But fermenting regime changes to assist their stooges to hijack power, in the name of democracy, is an immoral form of help. Just like in Venezuela. Instigating social unrest to topple legitimately elected governments is also immoral. Also just like in Venezuela.

Anonymous 

From the USA playbook - China is a threat, just keep repeating this

 

China is a threat. Keep repeating that China is a threat. Tell that to everyone that China is evil.

China is exerting influence here and there with the BRI and infrastructure developments. That is a debt trap. Tell that to everyone not to opt for development and stay poor and backward. It will help the USA to control them with military bases on their soil, to protect them and with debts from the IMF to buy more of their weapons instead.

China is expanding it's military reach. Keep repeating that China is out to conquer the world. Tell that to everyone that China is suddenly expansionist, even though throughout their five thousand years history, they have not started wars on any other nations soil, but only have civil wars and border skirmishes with India.

The USA is not provocative. It only sends warships to other people's front yard, and when others fired crackers into the sky, it is provocative towards them. That is similar to a thief trying to break into your house and you confront him with a gun, and the thief will shout 'provocation'. Is that the new 'Rougue' law that the thief crafted and is following?

Anonymous 

Pacific Islands Summit - No joint statement dictated by the US

 The Emperor of the American Empire ordered the head of states of the Pacific Islands to the White House in the hope of coercing them to sign a joint statement against China and Russia. Surprisingly, the leaders of the Pacific Islands are more enlightened than many countries in the world and had seen through the plot of the Americans and refused to budge. No joint statement to denounce or condemn China and Russia. They came and they went, leaving the Americans in the lurch, still wondering why the Pacific Islanders have unanimously stood together to speak in one voice and act as a group of independent sovereign states, telling the Americans to mind their own business, that they are in charge of their own affairs and will chart the course of their future development.

The Americans tried, Biden and Blinken, to dangle some carrot in front of the islanders, to take the bait, to come under the umbrella and 'protection' of the Empire. The islanders are facing external threats, from who, the Americans alleged. And the Americans would be there to protect them. This was the first insult to the islanders. The islanders are very safe in their own ways and any external threats are likely to come from Australia and the Americans.

The second insult, the Americans wanted to send their warships to patrol the region, in the name of protecting the Pacific Islands. The truth is to control the Pacific Islands militarily with the presence of their warships and eventually military bases. No way would the Pacific Islands be controlled by any big powers. They are absolutely capable of protecting their waters. Where is the threat? The obvious threats are from the AngloSaxon tribes, wanting to send their warships to control the waters around the Pacific Islands. In fact both the Americans and the British sent a warship each without consultation with the Pacific Islands, without their agreement or approval, to want to patrol the waters. This is an act of aggression, a haughty and condescending act, thinking that the islanders are stupid and could not see the sinister ploy of the AngloSaxons. The Solomon Islands had given notice to the Americans and Brits not to send their warships to the region without their approval. Period.

As far as the Pacific Islands are concerned, they do not need the Americans presence after decades of neglect and exploitations. The Marshall Islands still have vivid memories of the American nuclear tests on their islands and treating their people as guinea pigs, exposing them to the harm caused by nuclear explosion and radiation. While the Americans had totally abandoned and ignored the interests of the Pacific Islanders, China was there all the time to trade and to offer assistance, to help in infrastructure development that benefitted the islanders. The Americans are coming back now after seeing what the Chinese have contributed to the well beings of the islanders, and would likely to continue to ignore the islanders if not of Chinese presence. This is something that the islanders could see clearly, that the Americans are opportunistic and only care about America's own interest. If China is not helping and working with them, the Americans would not be bothered with them.

The emptiness of the summit with Biden is the best indication of where the Americans stand in the eyes of the Pacific Islanders. The Pacific Islanders would be their own masters and are fully able to take care of their own interests. The Americans can no longer deceive them or stir trouble in the region. Any attempt to include a security clause in any joint statement would provide an opportunity for the Americans to muscle into the Pacific Islands with their military and warships, to take control over the region, to control the Pacific Islanders  The Pacific Islanders are not stupid and are fully aware of the Americans intention.

PS. Everywhere the Americans go, they hyped about security threats, accusing others as threats and inviting themselves to be the policemen, not just to counter the threat but in reality to control and turn countries into their stooges.

More Studies Confirm the COVID Jab Does More Harm Than Good

 

BY Joseph Mercola

TIME: October 4, 2022

Cardiologist calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.


A scientific review in the Journal of Insulin Resistance, written by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra, calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.

Data from Israel shows myocarditis post-jab is occurring at a rate of 1 in 6,000. Hong Kong data from male children and teens found a rate of 1 in 2,700.

Data from the British Yellow Card system shows 1 in 120 people who have received at least one mRNA injection suffer an adverse event “that is beyond mild.”

In Norway, the rate of serious adverse events post-jab is 1 in 1,000 after two doses of Pfizer.

Researchers looking at data from the FDA, Health Canada and the Pfizer and Moderna trials concluded the absolute risk of a serious adverse event from the mRNA shots was 1 in 800, which massively exceeds the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization found in randomized controlled trials.

Leaked audio from a June 2022 meeting between Israeli researchers and the Israeli Ministry of Healthy reveals the Pfizer jab causes long-term adverse effects and is associated with more severe side effects upon rechallenge (i.e., with repeated doses). While the researchers wanted to warn the public, the Ministry altered their final report to say that adverse effects are mild and short-lived. The government then canceled any further research into adverse effects.

The COVID jabs are an absolute disaster, with injuries and deaths piling up by the day. Yet so-called health authorities, doctors, media, drug makers and many of the jabbed themselves claim there’s nothing to see here.

Ever since their release, brave medical professionals have spoken out against them, calling for a more cautious approach.

Now, a peer-reviewed scientific review, published in two parts in the Journal of Insulin Resistance calls for the immediate suspension of all COVID shots as real-world data show they cause more harm than good.

According to this paper, “Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Through Real Evidence-Based Medicine,” authored by cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra:

“In the non-elderly population the ‘number needed to treat’ to prevent a single death runs into the thousands. Re-analysis of randomized controlled trials using the messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology suggests a greater risk of serious adverse events from the vaccines than being hospitalized from COVID-19.

Pharmacovigilance systems and real-world safety data, coupled with plausible mechanisms of harm, are deeply concerning, especially in relation to cardiovascular safety.

Mirroring a potential signal from the Pfizer Phase 3 trial, a significant rise in cardiac arrest calls to ambulances in England was seen in 2021, with similar data emerging from Israel in the 16–39-year-old age group.

Conclusion:

It cannot be said that the consent to receive these agents was fully informed, as is required ethically and legally. A pause and reappraisal of global vaccination policies for COVID-19 is long overdue.”

SSO