Americans asking Russia to decolonise? What about USA decolonising and returning the stolen land to native Americans

 

FILE PHOTO. Native American protesters and supporters gather at the Black Hills, now the site of Mount Rushmore, on July 3, 2020 in Keystone, South Dakota. © Getty Images / Micah Garen

On June 23, 2022, an organization funded by the US Congress, the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe – also known as the Helsinki Commission – held a virtual conference calling for the “decolonizing of Russia.”

This begs the question of why they are not seeking the decolonization of the United States. After all, the country was literally founded by the successors of white colonists who had crossed an ocean to violently seize the territory from its indigenous people...

This is, of course, tantamount to calling upon the US to relinquish nearly all of its territory from the Atlantic to Pacific, not to mention more recent holdings such as Hawaii.

The above is from RT.

When would the white Americans decolonise and return the stolen land to the native Americans if they think the Russians should do so? And this call shall also apply to Canada, Australia, New Zealand and all the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian Ocean islands.

It is time to stop the rape and return the lands and islands to their rightful owners.

PS. This is how much the Americans have stolen, money and land.

In a brazen act of colonial theft, the US simply stole $7 billion (or about 40% of national revenue) from Afghanistan after its 20-year war there. The US continues to hold these funds even as Afghanistan faces a looming famine and the after effects of a devastating earthquake. Similarly, the US purloined Venezuela’s greatest single source of national revenue – its US-based oil company CITGO, which is now being sold off by Washington in pieces. And of course, the US stole billions of dollars of Russian financial reserves held in American banks earlier this year.

Meanwhile, Washington continues to maintain its colonial hold over territories such as Puerto Rico, Guam, Guantanamo Bay, and Hawaii, not to mention the fact that the entire territory of what is now known as the United States of America represents lands stolen from indigenous peoples and Mexico. 

The Anglo Saxon tribes should start by examples, as the biggest thieves of the world, they should return everything they stole to the rightful owners and go back to where they came from, ie Europe and UN.

Covid19 - 100pg report on Vaccines from Australia

https://8630368.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/8630368/AMPS/Altman%20Report%20Final%20Version%2011-8-22%20(1).pdf

Conclusion pg 42

The introduction and worldwide use of COVID-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ has been associated, in the short term, with far more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities than any other therapeutic agent in the history of medicine. Due to the total lack of any long-term safety data, the potential future iatrogenic effects (including neurological, immunological and carcinogenic effects) may be even more devasting.

Despite initial claims, the COVID-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ have now been shown to possess disappointing clinical efficacy - they neither prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection nor do they prevent transmission of the virus; any immunological protection wanes rapidly and, coincident with the emergence of the Omicron variant, evidence of negative vaccine efficacy is being reported in many countries including Australia.

In light of widely reported emerging and compelling evidence, there appears to be little scientific or clinical justification to support vaccine mandates as a health policy.

The latest hospital admission statistics do not support the claim that unvaccinated individuals are more at risk of serious COVID-19 disease, hospitalisation or death.

Excess non-COVID-19 related deaths coincident with the introduction of the gene-based ‘vaccines’ are now being reported by many countries, and suggest a surge in heart attack and stroke among both the young, adolescents and middle age individuals (especially males).

Advocating the worldwide use of a new class of serious COVID-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ never before deployed, and advocated for use in healthy individuals of all
ages regardless of clinical status (eg. natural immunity, pregnancy etc), with relatively little short-term safety data and no long-term safety data, is neither prudent or necessary and defies the Precautionary Principle.

The knowledge that the synthetic mRNA in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can enter the nucleus of human liver cells in culture, raises the serious questions about genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and adverse impact on future generations. Disturbing safety signals regarding fertility and miscarriages are emerging.

Given the statistically or virtually nil risk of serious COVID-19 in general affecting children aged 6 months to 11 or 12 years of age and the clear and significant risk of serious adverse effects including myocarditis, pericarditis and death in this age group – there seems to be little benefit to be gained by vaccinating these children.

Considerable scientific, clinical and statistical epidemiological data and understanding has been acquired since the introduction (on a provisional basis only) of the investigational COVID-19 gene-based “vaccines”. Many of the initial ambitious claims and assumed perceptions regarding the safety and efficacy of these serious therapeutics have now been invalidated and it is now time to review and reconsider the utility of these products in light of the known unprecedented level of serious adverse reactions and death attributed to their use.

The urgency for this review cannot be overestimated given the current and potential future impact on the health and wellbeing of all Australians. 

 

Anonymous 

Characteristics of Chinese politics...so unlike Singapore or the US democratic systems

Shanghai COVID-19 crisis puts political spotlight on key Xi ally

BEIJING: If Shanghai Communist Party chief Li Qiang has been politically bruised by the city's struggle to tame a COVID-19 outbreak that has infuriated residents and caused severe economic damage, there is little sign of it.

A close ally of President Xi Jinping for decades, Li has long been seen as destined for the powerful Politburo Standing Committee this year, tracking a well-worn path from Shanghai's top spot that many analysts say appears safe despite the city's COVID-19 crisis.

Outbreaks have derailed the careers of some local Chinese officials. But they did not share Li's stature or history with Xi, under whom the boss of China's most populous city has risen steadily through the party ranks.

And while Xi may be China's most powerful leader since Mao Zedong, he needs a core of staunch loyalists on the seven-member Standing Committee.

To be sure, the opacity of Chinese politics and Xi's willingness to break with precedent - he scrapped presidential term limits - make predictions difficult for the once-in-five-years Communist Party congress this autumn that will determine Xi's next leadership lineup.

Above is an extract from a CNA article, not sure who was the author. Not stated, likely from Reuters. The article highlighted 3 points that the typical West would like to smear the China. The first point was about patronage. The Party Chief of Shanghai, Li Qiang, is an ally of Xi, pally pally type of politics, your men, my men, unlike the transparent western political system, everything is so transparent and elected by the people. You must believe these are true. Trust me. The rise of western style leaders is not because of patronage, not that they are the kakis of their Presidents or PMs. Trust me. It is the democratic process that elected them to position of power. How true, indisputable truth of western democratic system.

The second point, Xi needs a core of staunch supporters, quite similar to the first point, political cliques working together to support each other. Such things would not happen in the democratic system.  Trust me. Biden does not have staunch supporters, so did Trump. Their politics are so transparent and individual, no need for balls carriers and sycophants.

And the third point, Xi scrapped the presidential terms limits, ie changing the rules as he likes, on how many terms can a president stay in power. This kind of anyhow changing the rules is never heard of in a democratic system. Trust me. Democratic system respects the rules and never anyhow change rules to suit the interest of the ruling party. This kind of things cannot be allowed in a democracy. That is why a democratic system is superior to an authoritarian system. Trust me.

That is also why the Singapore political system is so good and so transparent unlike the Chinese system, anyhow changing the rules of the system. Not rules based order.

The handling of the surge in Covid cases in Shanghai has infuriated the residents and caused severe economic damage.  Nothing of these had happened to Singapore or the US. Both were so well managed, no infuriated residents and no severe economic damages. The Shanghai party chief would have to take responsibility for not handling the crisis well. He may lose his job or affect Xi's position in the country for someone must take the blame, no free ride to the top, no free ride for a job not well done. There is accountability to the people in China.

 

There is also accountability in the US and in Singapore. But since both were so well handled, no one needs to be blamed. How many cases of infection were there in the US and Singapore? How many deaths in both countries?

In Singapore's case, it was so well controlled that there is a high chance that the MMTF would be rewarded for a job well done, accountability and recognition with medals to go with.

 

What do you think?

BRICS - The increasing importance of alternative international bodies

Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune has reportedly said that his country is interested in joining the BRICS and is close to qualifying for membership in the group.

Algeria largely meets the conditions for joining BRICS already, Tebboune said on Sunday in an interview with a state-owned broadcaster. The group is named for its member states – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – and it plans to consider adding Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt at its summit next year.

Read more Three more countries set to join BRICS - official

This year’s BRICS summit, which was held online in June, was expanded to include participation from 13 other countries, including Algeria. Tebboune was the first guest to speak, calling for “a new economic order where parity and equity between countries will reign.”

“Our past experiences have shown us that the imbalance recorded on the international scene and the marginalization of emerging countries within world bodies constitute a source of instability, lack of equity and absence of development,” the Algerian president added.

BRICS nations already account for more than 40% of the world’s population. The bloc’s stated goals are to promote peace, security, development, global cooperation and development of humanity. Iran and Argentina formally applied to join the group in June.  RT

The emergence of BRICS as an alternative to the western control international organisations is gaining momentum. Thanks to the reckless and irresponsible disregard of the role of international organisations by the US and western bloc of countries. The Americans and the West have repeatedly abused their power and control of international organisations at the expense and detriment of smaller non western states. 

The frustration and disappointment of non western countries of the bully and irrelevance of western control international organisations have reached a breaking point that mere disillusion is an understatement. Countries of the rest of the world are looking for alternative international bodies where their interests can be protected and where they can be treated as equals among equals, not being told what to do or else by the bullying Americans and the West.

Many countries have seen the need for BRICS to play a bigger role to represent their interest, where they could have a fair and bigger voice and not just token membership, not to be seen and not to be heard. Smaller states now have an alternative organisation that they could really call their own and belong. More and more countries are now knocking at the door of BRICS to apply for membership. If the trend continues, BRICS could eventually gain enough membership to replace the UN and other western controlled bodies and be truly an international organisation for the countries of the world.

The rise of BRICS and other similar organisations would ring the death bell for the likes of the UN, WHO, IMF, World Bank etc etc. Those western controlled organisations are looking so farcical and hypocritical and totally irrelevant. All the war crimes committed by the Americans and western countries have been totally ignored. The death and destruction of non western countries, particularly the Arab and Muslim countries were simply treated as war collateral and even said their deaths were worth it to serve the interest of the white men. The daily massacre of Palestinians, Syrians, Iraqis, Yemenis and many others are going on and on, without a word of condemnation from these western controlled organisations. On the other hand these western controlled organisations were chasing after fake and fabricated crimes invented by the white men eg WMD, Xinjiang genocide, virus came from China not the Fort Detrick, not from Ukraine etc etc.

There will be BRICS and more BRICS related organisations coming up to replace the rotten and wicked old world organisations and world order.

Trump - Winning trade war is easy

Now the USA is talking about rethinking the lifting of some tariffs on goods from China in the wake of China's response to Taiwan. Let not the USA thinks this is anything wise, or doing China a favour, knowing that inflation is still a grave problem in the USA with oil and gas not getting cheaper any time soon.

If they think that just raising interest rates will tame inflation, they have to be prepared for the consequences of high interest rates on businesses, mortgage payments, loans etc. A recession in the USA is already on the cards and apparently clear, but has been vigorously denied and repackaged by hogwashing it's definition, in order to fool the voters.

Moreover, it is not China begging the USA to lift those sanctions. On the contrary, China's trade surplus actually hit a record US$101 billion in July, 2022, despite all the gloom and doom forecast by the West about the consequences brought about by all those lockdowns. So, the propaganda does not fit the reality and China should care not little about whether the USA lift those tariffs or not. Let the USA talk to itself and pay little importance to it's game of contorted lies.

The irony is that the dull witted USA citizens do not fully realise that they are the ones paying for those tariffs imposed by the USA side. It is a tax on their side, clear and simple. This is made apparently clear now by the USA admitting that the tariffs are a factor adding to the high inflation in the USA. China is still having very low inflation by the way.

Trump had all along been claiming that the tariffs are meant to punish China unilaterally, by lying to his own people. Have Chinese exports been curtailed substantially? This July, 2022 trade surplus figures tells the whole story. China is exporting even more. And what can we expect if China were to dispense with all those lockdowns and go full steam ahead? Go figure it out. Now the cat is out of the bag and who is bearing the punishment is abundantly clear.

Biden is dead duck. On the one hand not responding to China's present action against Taiwan will affect his November mid term. On the other hand, not lifting some tariffs on China products will be one big factor in fighting inflation. He is between a rock and a hard place. 

 

 Anonymous