Covid19 - The days when they took control of your bodies

The War on the Unvaccinated was lost

If Covid was a battlefield it would still be warm with the bodies of the unvaccinated. Thankfully the mandates are letting up and both sides of the war stumble back to the new normal.

The unvaccinated are the heroes of the last two years as they allowed us all to have a control group in the great experiment and highlight the shortcoming of the Covid vaccines. The unvaccinated carry many battle scars and injuries as they are the people we tried to mentally break, yet no one wants to talk about what we did to them and what they forced “The Science“ to unveil. We knew that the waning immunity of the fully vaccinated had the same risk profile as others within society as the minority of the unvaccinated, yet we marked them for special persecution. You see we said they had not “done the right thing for the greater good” by handing their bodies and medical autonomy over to the State.

Many of the so-called health experts and political leaders in Australia admitted the goal was to make life almost unlivable for the unvaccinated, which was multiplied many times by the collective mob, with the fight taken into workplaces, friendships, and family gatherings. Today the hard truth is none of it was justified as we took a quick slide from righteousness to absolute cruelty. We might lay the blame on our leaders and health experts for the push but each individual within society must be held accountable for stepping into the well-laid-out trap. We did this despite knowing full well that principled opposition is priceless when it comes to what goes inside our bodies and we let ourselves be tricked into believing that going into another ineffective lockdown would be the fault of the unvaccinated and not the fault of the toxic policy of ineffective vaccines.

We took pleasure in scapegoating the unvaccinated because after months of engineered lockdowns by political leaders blinded by power, having someone to blame and to burn at the stake felt good. We believed we had logic, love, and truth on our side so it was easy to wish death upon the unvaccinated. Those of us who ridiculed and mocked the non-compliant did it because we were embarrassed by their courage and principles and didn’t think the unvaccinated would make it through unbroken and we turned the holdouts into punching bags. Lambie, Carr, Chant, Andrews, McGowan, Gunner, and the other cast of hundreds in prominent roles need to be held to account for vilifying the unvaccinated in public and fueling angry social media mobs.

The mobs, the mask Nazis, and the vaccine disciples have been embarrassed by “betting against” the unvaccinated because mandates only had the power we gave them. It was not compliance that ended domination by Big Pharma Companies, Bill Gates and his many organizations, and the World Economic Forum… It was THANKS to the people we tried to embarrass, ridicule, mock and tear down.

We should all try and find some inner gratitude for the unvaccinated as we took the bait by hating them because their perseverance and courage bought us the time to see we were wrong.

So if mandates ever return for Covid or any other disease or virus, hopefully, more of us will be awake and see the rising authoritarianism that has no concern for our well-being and is more about power and control. The War on the Unvaccinated was lost and we should all be very thankful for that.

Source: AFIPN

The above article appeared in TRE.

The main issue is not how the pharma companies and the states coerced, discriminated and intimidated the unvaccinated, how they made life very difficult for the unvaccinated. 

It was a battle of resistance against oppression. It was a battle by the unvaccinated to protect their bodies from invasion, forceful violation of their bodies by questionable experimental drugs. In a way it was a battle against colonialism, a battle for freedom and independence and human rights.

The unvaccinated finally won. The coercion to violate their bodies supposedly for the common good has proven to be futile and baseless. The whole war was based on false scientific data and assumptions, false or weak premises that have now proven to be untenable and doubtful vaccines.

The unvaccinated may have stood their grounds and protected the sovereign rights of the sanctity of their bodies. Their bodies belonged to them, not to the state.

But have they won? Or the state and the pharma companies have tested and found that they could take control over the bodies of the people under whatever excuses by using the legal power of the state?

Would there be more state coercion to violate the sovereignty and integrity of the bodies of the people? Has any laws been broken, or the state has won the right to violate the bodies of individuals? Has a precedence been set to allow the state to do so again in the future? Or has the failure of the vaccines to protect the people has made this whole war a mockery, that the forced vaccination mandated by the state/pharma companies was unnecessary from the beginning, that the theory was unfounded or has now been proven wrong?

What do you think?

USA - the greatest violator of human rights

An online poll launched by the Global Times on Saturday asking respondents whether the UN Human Rights Council should conduct a field investigation into US human rights violations has drawn more than 247,000 participantsas of press time on Sunday, with over 96 percent supporting the proposition.

Specifically, about 81 percent of respondents voted "yes," saying that the issue of US human rights violations is very serious and requires further investigation. Another 15 percent of respondents also voted "yes," saying that the investigation would not happen as it would be strongly hindered by the US government. Around 4 percent of respondents voted that the US has long been plagued by human rights problems, saying an investigation will not change anything.

In answering the poll, many netizens left messages on the page to voice their support for a thorough investigation of the US' gross human rights violations. Some netizens said that "the US is doing a lot of things against humanity in the name of humanitarian actions" while some said "the US government is indifferent when its own people suffer from systematic violations of human rights but is keen to attack other countries under the guise of 'human rights.'"

On the Global Times Twitter account, some netizens said the so-called beacon of human rights does not shine a light on its dark history, and the US' move presents a vivid image of "a thief shouting to catch a thief."

It should have been, an Online Crook shouting, "Catch the Crook!"

A-Non-Yes-Mouse 

Covid19 - The moral story of horse thieves

When horses were so important to the lives of cowboys, the only effective and efficient solution to stop horse stealing is the death penalty. Many countries learnt this lesson and make death penalty mandatory for drug peddling and smuggling offences. But many have gone soft on the legs and have done away with the death penalty.

Is the creating and patenting of viruses dangerous enough to be banned like horse thieves? Has the world had enough of pandemics? The creation and spreading of computer viruses have also reached a point when they could cripple the whole process of internet communication, ie kill the international communication network in industries and between nations. The failure of the internet caused by viruses could bring the whole world to a standstill. The proliferation of organic viruses could bring a natural disaster that would destroy billions of life forms.

When the risk and destructions are of unimaginable and unacceptable scale, would it be time to bring in the death penalty for anyone creating, spreading or transmitting viruses, organic or computer viruses, to remove these plagues against human civilisation once and for all?

No more creating, patenting and production of viruses of any kind, no need to keep creating and producing unproductive anti viruses softwares or vaccines unnecessarily. The only viruses that need to be dealt with would by from mother nature, not from human nature. Patenting of viruses must be banned, make a crime. The intent and purpose of patenting viruses are up to no good.

Hang everyone that produce or create viruses for the purpose of profit making. There would be lesser need for computer anti virus businesses and the resources can be better deployed in more productive areas. Same as in the creation of organic viruses that could lead to death and destruction of lives.

No more horse thieves, no more creator of viruses, organic and inorganic. Reduce the need for anti virus vaccines and softwares.

In my previous article I wrote about the clear signs and evidence that the covid19 virus was created by the Americans. Today, with the surge in Covid19 cases in countries using mRNA vaccines, it is enough evidence that this fake vaccine did not work, did not prevent infection. How many silly buggers are still calling for more booster shots using this fake vaccine?

10 Downing Street welcomes PM Sunak

 

Snap shots from Hindustan Times.

All wares and cutlery would be auctioned off. Dining would be banana leaves and by hands. No more Yorkshire pudding and pies or fish and chips. It would be masala chicken, curry and rice.

Singapore looking at third world country as role model

IN FOCUS: Experiencing Rwanda's plastic bag ban, and whether Singapore could adopt a similar approach

Rwanda's approach of banning plastic bags with stiff penalties in 2008 has reaped environmental rewards. What lessons could Singapore learn in its own push to cut its massive amounts of plastic waste?

A supermarket cashier in Kigali putting groceries in paper bags. (Photo: CNA/Aqil Haziq Mahmud)

Above CNA article by Aqil Haziq. 'But the white sign that confronted me as I cleared customs in Rwanda’s Kigali airport last month presented a rather unusual message: "Use of non-biodegradable polythene bags is prohibited."'

 

Let's say Singapore is so inspired by Rwanda and forbid use of non biodegradable polythened bags not only for carry items but also the packaging for all items, rice, instant noodles, instant 3 in 1, frozen seafood etc etc, everything must use paper wraps like in the above photo, what would life be like in Singapore? Coming home from the market would leave a trail of water all the way. Putting the items in the car boot would mean water dripping as well. How about wrapping all your rubbish and swill in paper bags to throw into the rubbish chute?

 

Singapore must also send a notice to all the suppliers of goods to Singapore, all items must now be packed in non biodegradable polythene bags. All the frozen stuff must be wrapped in paper bags? Brilliant. 

Let's see how the super talents respond to this since everyone is earning millions and must come up with million dollar solutions to justify their million dollar salaries. Saving the use of plastic bags would be miniscule. The effort would probably cost more than the savings.

My solution to lesser waste, lesser use of plastics, lesser demands for housing and cars, just stop exploding the population. Just by cutting down one head imported, it would save one year of waste effort. Pardon the pun. Imagine how much would be the savings if Singapore cut down importing 100,000 foreigners annually!