Americans freak out by visit of UN human rights chief to Xinjiang - fearing their fabricated lies would be exposed

 

UN human rights chief urged to resist US disinformation, deliver factual Xinjiang judgment - Global Times

As UN human rights chief Michelle Bachelet's visit to China's Xinjiang region is coming to an end, overseas scholars, especially those who have visited the region, called on her to resist pressure from the US and anti-China forces' latest round of disinformation campaign against the region. They pointed out that the US' contradictory attitude and attack of Bachelet's visit showed it's freaking out, as the big lie of "Xinjiang genocide" is "absolutely ludicrous" and anyone with no malicious intent will have different views of Xinjiang than the US' smear the minute they step on the region.

At the end of her six-day official visit to China on Saturday, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights is scheduled to hold a news conference and issue a statement, according to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).

Detailed information on where Bachelet has or will visit in Urumqi and Kashi Prefecture and who she has and will talk to is yet to be released, but the US, some Western countries and anti-China forces just can't wait to express their "concerns" over whether Bachelet will have necessary access to make a "full assessment of the rights situation" in Xinjiang. The US State Department even called her visit a "mistake."

However, it was the US and anti-China forces that urgently called on the UN mission to visit Xinjiang in the beginning. Such a U-turn attitude of the US government toward the UN human rights chief's visit to China raised the alarm among Chinese and overseas scholars, especially those who had visited the Xinjiang region during the past years. Some scholars from France, the US and Turkey reached by the Global Times said pressuring or attacking Bachelet will not make their lies or the "genocide" smearing on Xinjiang become real, but only exposes their malice.

Jeffrey Sachs, a professor of economics at Columbia University in New York and also a senior UN advisor, wrote in an email to the Global Times that he is "gratified" that Bachelet is taking this trip and "her UN mission should not be attacked or criticized by the United States Government even before the trip takes place!"

Issues of human rights under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights should be addressed through the UN processes and "not used to raise geopolitical tensions," said Sachs, expressing hope to get a thorough report that promotes the wellbeing of the population of the Xinjiang region and enables a discussion of the issues based on facts.

In April 2021, Sachs and William A. Schabas, a professor of international law at Middlesex University in London, released an article to oppose the US government's anti-China rhetoric of claiming a "genocide" in its Xinjiang region, as these allegations are "unjustified" and the inappropriate use of "genocide" devalues the historical memory of genocide such as the Holocaust.

The US is pressuring Bachelet to act like its puppet and neglect what she sees in the region to weave the conclusion of "genocide," analysts said, pointing out that it is the US that started and continued accusing China of "genocide" and has banned all products from Xinjiang, making itself the most radical and highly isolated country in the field.

William Jones, the Washington Bureau Chief for the Executive Intelligence Review and non-resident senior fellow of the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China, told the Global Times the "total freakout from the US State Department" about Bachelet's visit indicates its potential significance." 

 Anonymous 

USA - The devil incarnate accusing others of crimes the Americans committed themselves in abundance

Let us be honest. The USA and the West were the forerunners of genocide, human trafficking, climate change pollution before pushing the bad name to other countries and pretend they are angels, now doing humans a good deed by demonising countries that do the same things they did centuries ago. Putin hit the nail on the head when he said the USA and the West always accused others of doing what they already did long ago.

Genocides against the Native Americans stands out as the most inhuman act against mankind by any country, and they stole everything - land, resources, human rights of the Natives by keeping them like animals in concentration camps called reservations to protect them. Why need to protect them and against who? They did not need protection before the Whites landed in America. Fancy protecting them now against those who put them in the reservations, if that is what they mean.

Now the fake angel is going around fighting and accusing countries of engaging in human trafficking. What were the White Curse doing when they were kidnapping millions of Blacks from Africa to work as slaves in the USA. That is not human trafficking? The Whites were the forerunners of global human trafficking and they now pretending they are angels sent to close down the human trafficking scourge.

When drug was a great way to make money, the White Curse became greedy and even forced the Chinese to open up China to the drug trade. China had a horrible time fighting the opium addiction which weakened the Chinese people's hardworking trait and the Whites exploited it. They were the forerunners of the drug menace now screwing up the USA itself.

Before China's manufacturing rise, the USA was the biggest polluter in the world. They wanted to move their manufacturing to China to benefit from the cheap and abundant labour, with all their pollution stigma in tow, and succeeded, and China became the biggest polluter instead, while the USA enjoyed the cheap goods for nothing and just paid for in fiat money. When this became unsustainable, they turned the tables by claiming China stole their manufacturing jobs, but not their pollution baggage. How convenient! Did China forced the USA companies to set up shop in China by force or sanctions?

Enough said.

Again think and think deeply about it!

  Anonymous 

When we have too many mouths to feed

 Carousell tongue in cheek sales. Photo credit to Yahoo News

SINGAPORE — Are you willing to fork out $3,000 for "rare fried chicken cutlet" or $1,500 for a photo of a plate of chicken rice? Or a mouth-watering $10,000 for a live chicken or 50 fried chicken wings coated with 24-karat gold leaves? Yahoo News

This is a simple supply and demand issue. The more mouths to feed, and the lesser the supply of food, the more expensive food prices would be. Or the more applicants available for jobs, then more people would be jobless, especially untalented Singaporeans from very expensive world best universities with genuine degrees that cannot be eaten How many people think we should have more third world background unknowns with A grades from funny universities or degree mills?  Can anyone fail to under this logic? How many people think we should have 10m people on this piece of rock? 

But if we have magicians, we can have miracles and defy gravity.

I think more people will now switch to eating fish. Price of fish now would be cheaper than chicken.

Main stream media(MSM) - Read with extreme caution

Never underestimate the MSM's 'selective' reporting of situations and events. It is all geared towards keeping people uninformed and ignorant of the real world situation. That is why finding real news elsewhere other than the MSM is important. Wise up people!

Mark Twain said this long, long ago when lying was not that rampant on the MSM. "If you don't read the newspaper, you are uninformed. If you do read the newspaper, you are misinformed". How true!

Of course the MSM and the powers that be, that wants to continue to control the minds of the public, will accuse Social Media of misinformation. Really? Those who are aware and stayed informed will never trust the MSM and the powers that be.

They were right in saying that politicians have to learn to and need to lie. Just look at the circus unfolding in the USA pertaining to the 2016 elections, where even contenders for the top job of President, sees it fit to lie and fabricate stories about the other side that were totally untrue. What kind of President will that make, with that kind of thinking and is going to run the country? It is indeed hilarious and can only happen in a third world country, not the USA. Perhaps they are slipping down to third world and have to learn third world tactics of how to govern a third world country.

In the lead up to the Iraq war, I believe people already found out who is really the biggest liar. And the fact that they can get away with such outrageous lies is another area worth noting. No one is able to take them to task or punish them and they are untouchable. Not the UN, not ICC, not Human Rights Watch, not anybody. Since they can get away with such heinous and fabricated lies and managed to kill millions of innocent Iraqi women and children and destroy the country, what is there for anyone to believe that they cannot fabricate more lies pertaining to the situation in other countries that they want to destablise?

Watch closely the MSM news on Russia, China and North Korea in particular. Nothing positive, all selectively negative, all downright hitting below the belt. When it comes to their side of the story about the war in Ukraine, everything bad about the war is thrown onto to Russia and every little Russian slip is a disaster. If you believe in the propaganda that Ukraine is winning, Eastern and Southern Ukraine should still be under Ukrainian control. Why is there now a Russia land bridge stretching all along the Azov Sea? The narratives can lie, but the truth cannot be hidden.

For those who want the truth, move away from the MSM. Read or watch them for entertainment if you need to. I know this is a no brainer advice but it helps in the process of educating more people.

Anonymous 

Americans starting mischiefs for regime change in the Philippines

 The F--King US is colluding with Leni Robredo the defeated pro US presidential of the Philippines to organize protests and demonstrations against president elect Marcos Jr.

President Bidamn recent meetings with ASEAN leaders and the Quad members do not bode well for East China Sea and South China Sea regions. US intention is to round up small cliques or blocs under US leadership to confront and contain China. US may organize colour revolution against Marcos Jr and replace him with a pro US Philippino leader. The US may start to create choas and turmoil and instigate and foment wars in the region between some ASEAN countries and China.

Below are some excerpts from Brian Berleti's article in the website - New Eastern Outlook.'
"Because US strategy in regards to encircling, containing, and potentially waging conventional war against China depends heavily on prepositioning these missiles and other military assets along China’s periphery – especially in regards to Taiwan – securing a sufficient US military presence in the Philippines is crucial. But because such a presence meant solely to threaten China would endanger Chinese-Philippine relations including significant economic ties, no rational government would allow it.

The formation of Marcos’ administration will go far in telling just how Philippine policy toward both China and the US will unfold, but it is safe to say that should the new government attempt build closer ties with China and refuse attempts by the US to recruit it into a regional front against Beijing, the US will employ all the familiar tools used to coerce or even overthrow the government in due time.

If the US is convinced already that the Marcos administration will not pivot toward anti-China policies, it may begin destabilizing efforts through extensive media, NGO, and political networks funded through the NED even before his late-June inauguration. Such efforts would start with youth-led protests citing baseless claims of “voter fraud.” Such protests are already underway.

The New York Times in its article, “Marcos Win Prompts Protests in the Philippines,” claims:

Young voters who had rallied around Leni Robredo during the presidential race gathered to voice their frustration with preliminary results showing her overwhelming defeat."

Southernglory1