Human rights, democracy, genocide, what a white joke

 Can you believe it, the newly appointed German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has pledge to put human rights at the centre of German Diplomacy. Obviously this young girl grew up at a time when the world is so beautiful and peaceful, at least in Germany. Has she heard of the name Hitler? Has she heard of the word holocaust? Does she know that there were a lot of Jews in Germany before she was born? Does she know what the Germans did to the Jews in places called concentration camps? Does she know what the Germans did to the Africans in South Africa and neighbouring African states?

My God, this German girl is so proud of herself and her country's record of human rights and going to push human rights as her main agenda? And she wanted to talk tough to China about human rights? Does she know what Germany did to China in the19th Century, the invasion of China? The Germans went there to save China, to protect the Chinese and their human rights?

Merkel, where are you? Are you going to tell this little young girl some fictional stories about holocaust in Hitler's Germany and how well they treated the Jews? Did German wrote out all the holocaust stories from their history books and put them in the fiction corner?

She must be thinking that she is another American. The Americans can do anything they want, they are above the law. The Americans also talk very tough with China about human rights and genocide. The Americans also did not teach these subjects in their history lessons. Or they too taught their children that the massacres of tens of millions of indigenous Americans, the native of the American continent were lies or fictions too? Or black slavery, the killings of blacks, exploitation of blacks for free labour, using black women as sex slaves, beating up blacks for fun, were all fictions, not true. 

The history of the Americans and the Germans were so clean and beautiful, no violation of human rights, no genocides, no holocaust. They were all so nice people, so they can go around the world talking tough with the victims of their crimes against humanity on what is human rights and also what is fabricated genocide?

Grow up silly girl. Grow up white men and white women and see your crimes against humanity in history and still perpetuating them today all over the world, starting wars, massacring innocent people, burning, bombing and destroying their countries and turning them into refugees if they were not killed or maimed by you, the white savages.

Satan and the devils bragging about human rights and genocides.

Why doesn’t the world view China as the villain despite the best efforts of the West to vilify it?

First, many non-Western nations were colonies of, or exploited by the West (and continue to be). They recognise the West is driven by the desire to maintain its economic superiority, which has come from centuries of imperial power. This is why non-Western countries have to be legitimised as “civilised and democratic” by Western gatekeepers if they are to be offered the opportunity to live peacefully and prosperously, without sanctions, trade wars, and real wars.

Second, many post-colonial nations have suffered from the neoliberal prescriptions of the West and seen how it has used the “spread” of democracy to deny them their own sovereign rights. They have seen how the West selectively uses human rights arguments to undermine the legitimate actions of other nations, while turning a blind eye to blatant human rights violations by Western-aligned states.

Third, non-Western countries may have qualms about the Chinese governance model and aspects of its foreign policy, but they also respect China’s successes. They are not fooled by biased Western reporting: they look at the facts, see the results, and visit China to understand it.

They see a government that has worked for the people and produced results. These non-Western nations want to produce the same results for their people, rather than adhering to more of the misleading and condescending Western rhetoric about democracy as a utopian fast-track.

Lastly, China has been ramping up its investment and relationship-building across the world – such as through the Belt and Road Initiative and coronavirus vaccine agreements.

So, what has China achieved that these countries seek to emulate? For starters, its poverty alleviation rate. In 1994, the government set a goal of lifting 80 million people out of poverty within seven years – by 2021, it had uplifted 800 million.

Additionally, over the last two decades alone, China’s Gross National Income (GNI) per capita grew from US$940 in 2000 to US$10,410 in 2019. This is double the rate achieved by Russia, the second-fastest growing BRICS economy.

China has demonstrated that a nation does not need to meet the West’s definition of “democracy” to achieve success for its people. Democracy is the right of all peoples, and cannot be arbitrarily judged by the US.

According to the United Nations Charter: “The UN does not advocate for a specific model of government but promotes democratic governance as a set of values and principles that should be followed for greater participation, equality, security and human development”.

This is to say that the political systems of a country and its method of governance are important because they must ultimately serve the people, enable them to have a sense of participation, satisfaction and improvements to their quality of life. Democracy is just one approach to this, so it is reasonable to conclude that China has developed a successful governance system suited to its culture, history, and the needs of its population.

For many countries, the dated prescriptions of former imperial powers or settler communities (the US, UK, Australia, Canada) are unsuitable.

It is time to reverse the dangerous attempts of the West to confront China under the pretext of democracy.

Anonymous

COVID-19: The Folly Of The Vaccinated Travel Lanes Scheme Exposed

The Singapore Airlines (SIA) picked up Covid-19 diseased travellers from South Africa, tested negative prior to departure from Johannesburg as claimed.

SIA brought then into the transit area of Changi International Airport to rest, go shopping, eat, shit and urine, and mingle freely with the other transit passengers of the other airlines.

And, most probably, the Immigration and Customs Checkpoints allowed some of these transit passengers to leave the Transit Area to mingle with healthy people in other places within the Airport as well as outside the Airport. Some of whom could have taken taxis or trains to town for a quickie business.

All that means Singapore is actively facilitating and promoting the spread of Covid-19, especially the Delta and Omicron Brands in Singapore as well as to other countries.

The Vaccinated Travel Lane is the gimmick used to attract and lure infected people, both fully vaccinated and or fakedly vaccinated, to easily sail through Singapore onto another destination.

However, as shown by the Australian immigration authorities, other countries are not that stupid. If SIA brought into Australia, Omicron infected people, then SIA is responsible to bring them back, out of Australia.

Likewise, having now been alerted to this 'smuggling' of Covid-19 diseased persons scam, other countries are now also sending back to senders or facilitators all the Covid-19 coronavirus diseased persons.

The only country now that is happilee and eagerlee accepting Covid-19 Diseased People into the country is Singapore. (And from yesterday onwards, the desperate for tourists Switzerland).

There is an old saying:

"Be smart is okay but don't be too smart."

The Vaccinated Travel Lanes scheme is one notch too smart!

Taking for granted that others are stupid, the scheme ended up making oneself looks like an idiot and a laughing stock of the world!


Queen of Hearts.

Covid19 - Continue to confuse

SINGAPORE: People who have received two doses of the Sinovac or Sinopharm COVID-19 vaccine are reminded to take their third dose to be considered fully vaccinated from Jan 1.

The Ministry of Health (MOH) said that since Wednesday (Dec 1), it has been progressively sending out SMS notifications to 70,000 people who have received two doses of these vaccines. They are eligible to take their third dose three months after their second jab.

"To maintain their fully vaccinated status from Jan 1, 2022, onwards, they are strongly encouraged to take their third dose before Dec 31, 2021, as long as their second dose had been administered three months ago," said MOH on Thursday.

From Jan 1, eligible individuals who have not taken their third dose will have their vaccination status go back to "vaccination in progress".  CNA

KNN, can they report something so important in a simple and clear for the masses to understand? Anyone find the above confusing? I do. If I can be confused, what about the general public, the uncles and aunties?

Just look at the 3 parts that I have added in bold. 

1. From Jan 1, need third dose to be considered fully vaccinated.

2. From Jan 1, not taken third dose, vaccination status go back to 'vaccination in progress'.

3. Those taken 2 doses are only eligible to take their third dose 3 months after their second jab, not before 3 months.  A person that took the second dose on 31/10/21 would only be eligible to take the third dose 3 months later, ie  1/2/22 and so on. So, would such a person be reclassified as 'vaccination in progress' on 1/1/22?

Why no qualification or explanation that those affected by the 3 months lapse after second dose would not be affected? Expecting the general pubic to figure out, to second guess? To get confuse and frustrated and angry? Or they would be reclassified as 'vaccination in progress' and to go through the hassle of being discriminated when they were once classified as fully vaccinated, and no fault of theirs as they could not get the third dose until a lapse of 3 months from the second dose?

These people cannot take their third dose before 31/12/21.

What is what?  Why rushed out something like that to upset those taking Sinovac and Sinopharm vaccines? For the convenience of who and the inconvenience of who? How many people would be affected by this halfway house change of rules? Picking on those using Sinovac and Sinopharm?

No speak English cannot be employed as canteen staff - Who is this ass making such demand?

Singapore — If the National University of Singapore (NUS) is an English-speaking university, does it seem unjust that canteen employees who do not speak English are permitted to work on their premises?

While studying at NUS, a student was annoyed by the fact that the canteen aunties and uncles could not speak English.

“I think it’s unfair that NUS as an English-speaking institution allows canteen staff who don’t speak English at all to work. As a non-Chinese speaking race, I was outright ignored when the canteen staff didn’t understand me. When I ask how much the food was, she replied in Chinese. And when I asked for extra chili she just waved her hand indicating she doesn’t know what I’m talking about. I kept my sentences short and I don’t have any heavy accents.”

“I am okay if I go to Chinatown for example and they don’t speak English as their primary customers will be Chinese-speaking people. I am not blaming the staff in particular. However, as a university with many international students, the school should impose a standard of being able to service the university population."

The student stated emphatically that he was not blaming the staff. He only desires that the school adhere to a set of standards.

Above is copied from theindependent.sg

Who is this ass making this kind of silly demand? Singapore is a multi racial society. English may be a coommon and official language, but Singapore is NOT England.

What set of standards is he expecting? His own racist standard?

Is he a Singaporean, a new citizens or a foreigner?

Please tell him to fuck off to where he came from if he is a foreigner or a new citizen. Do not come here to make demands on Singapore's way of life and making life difficult for the ordinary folks.

When in Singapore, you are expected to be tolerant and accept whatever that is here, not what you think it should be or what you want it to be. This smelt of intolerance and arrogance. What is so great about being in the university? As an undergrad you are expected to be more understanding, kind and circumspect and with some sense of humility.

This is a racist unwittingly exposing himself using a different excuse.