Xi Jinping says peaceful reunification with Taiwan is in country’s best interests

 
President says the ‘complete reunification of the motherland must be fulfilled’ and warns that those who oppose this are doomed

President Xi Jinping said on Saturday that Beijing hoped Taiwan could be reunited peacefully with the Chinese mainland as he warned that those who opposed this would be “judged by history”.

“To achieve the reunification of the motherland by peaceful means is most in line with the overall interests of the Chinese nation, including our compatriots in Taiwan,” Xi told a meeting in Beijing commemorating the 110th anniversary of the revolution that established the first Chinese republic.

The Xinhai Revolution, which began in Wuchang, now part of modern-day Wuhan, led to the downfall of the Qing dynasty.

In his most high-profile speech on Taiwan since July 1, the Communist Party’s centenary, Xi said: “We [should] adhere to the basic policy of peaceful reunification and one country, two systems, adhere to the one-China principle and the 1992 consensus, and promote the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.”

He urged Taiwan to “stand on the right side of history jointly to create the glorious cause of the full reunification and the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”.

Xi added that secessionists were “the biggest obstacle to the reunification of the motherland and a serious hidden risk to national rejuvenation”.

“Those who forget their ancestors, betray the motherland, or split the country are doomed. They will definitely be spurned by the people and judged by history.”

Without naming any country directly, Xi also warned of foreign interference. “The Taiwan issue is entirely China’s internal affair, and no external interference can be condoned,” he said.

“No one should underestimate the Chinese people’s determination, and strong ability to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity, The historical task of the complete reunification of the motherland must be fulfilled, and it will definitely be fulfilled,” he said. 

Anonymous

Anonymous

COVID-19 Discriminations: The Vaccinated And The Unvaccinated

 For many unvaccinated individuals who find today’s announcement troubling, here is the takeaway: I do support that our country needs to open up and declare the situation from pandemic to endemic. However, we have a government that is practicing endemic for foreigners but pandemic for its citizens, further discriminating and ostracizing the innocent unvaccinated citizens and individuals. 

This is why: 1. Unvaccinated cannot dine in hawker centres (not even alone) where hawker centres are a day to day living culture for many. What is the rationale for this policy? Close proximity with a dining partner? If this is so, it shall mean unvaccinated individuals should not be taking any public transport like MRT or public buses because they are jam packed and usually for more than half an hour for most commuters. 

2. Unvaccinated cannot enter shopping malls but stand-alone supermarkets are exempted. If the unvaccinated are seen as posing risks to the vaccinated, then such supermarkets will be a haven for the unvaccinated. Hence, in order to protect the vaccinated, should you not ban the vaccinated from visiting these stand-alone supermarkets? Why is there this need to segregate and divide the harmonious community? 

 3. You close your doors to your unvaccinated citizens (due to so many ostracizing policies removing their very basic rights to live normally) making them stay in a Pandemic situation, but you allow the foreigners quarantine free, practising Endemic. May I ask is this a fair manner in treating your own citizens? You already have a compliant 82%. 

 4. So it is said vaccines wear off after 6 months and therefore booster shots are recommended. Hence, what is the difference between a person fully vaccinated 6 months ago vs the unvaccinated/partially vaccinated? 

5. Government or rather the PM told us not to be alarmed or fear covid-19 and should treat it like a flu. Is this not hyprocritical when there remains further restrictions in the economy and community especially the F&B sector, further tightening our own market when the unvaccinated now cannot be the spenders. 

6. When the ministers and PM tell us not to fear and especially with now only the vaccinated can dine in restaurants and go to malls, why is the 2-to-a-table restriction not eased? What is the fear or concern in allowing dining back to pre pandemic days? Preach Endemic, but act Pandemic? 

 7. Telling us to respect Covid-19? Hello, would you respect your enemy / killer? I know of many who have health problems who cannot be vaccinated; I know of an unvaccinated friend who is just earning a living operating a small store in a shopping mall but with this new further tightening rule (it is not an opening up), she ended up crying because she does not know how to continue to run her store in two days’ time, where she will certainly chalk up more losses during the shop closure. Why is she not vaccinated? She is pregnant and although they say it is safe for pregnant ladies, her concerns to protect her first pregnancy is definitely valid. 

 It is an opening up in disguise back to what it seems like a 90% circuit breaker, further tightening and constricting our own market by sending our elites and wealthy out of our country spending outside our country, leaving the unaffordables to continue in this struggle and the beauty now is government no longer has to pay relief and help struggling businesses. Brilliant. Vaccination is not by choice in Singapore. Devising it mandatory but Not declaring it mandatory is for obvious reasons. The wisemen know why. Really poor Singaporeans. 

PS: And I have one more question: If I stay in a one room flat and tested Covid positive with mild or no symptoms and the direction now is not to visit any hospital but to isolate and recover at home. Obviously, I don’t want to infect my beloved family members. Can I go to either of the MTF’s ministries to look for OYK GKY or LW and seek a solution? A squatter in your bungalow will do. 

Jun Low

Foreigners controlling employment of PMETs - Donkeys interviewing horses

 Recently, I had chances to come across a few interviews conducted online with a local friend. No surprises all the hiring managers are foreigners from India, China and elsewhere. These foreign managers are located in Singapore, two of them are new citizens.

I went to browse their profiles on Linkedin, most of them are armed with unknown qualifications or low ranking universities in their country of origin and a number of them worked for local enterprises there. But when they landed in Singapore, they got good jobs at MNCs. As the interviews went on, I found they sounding superior, making a lot of reference to their past experience. ...

The debate about re-balancing foreign and local PMETs is no fluke. But these foreigners were imported and converted to new citizens and PRs. And many local PMETs are marginalised or displaced from their jobs, downgrading to low level menial jobs like Grab driver or Food. But instead of acting on the complaints, those who raised such issues on immigration, foreign work force are always dragged down the route of racism, xenophobia, against foreign investment and foreigners.

Our grads from world class institutions are being interviewed by third class institution grads, isn’t this a big joke now? And they are senior managers in Singapore. And sometime later, he was informed that he was not selected. Any surprise?

The above is part of an article posted in the TRE by a reboot, titled Third World interviews First World.

This pathetic and sorry state of affair is only made possible by the imbeciles that Singaporeans voted to power. Instead of looking after the well beings of Singaporeans that put their trust in these imbeciles, the imbeciles chose to look after the foreigners, mostly half baked cheats from funny universities, some with fake degrees and credentials.

When you put a few donkeys up there to interview the horses, the donkeys would look for donkey qualities and dismissed the qualities of the horses.  This is only normal and only donkeys would appreciate the qualities of donkeys. Period.

Donkeys would seek the company of donkeys. They understand and appreciate each other.

Below are some comments in the article in TRE. Singaporeans must remember that they voted to be in this shit.

Iskandar:
October 3, 2021 at 4:03 pm (Quote)

This is so typical of foreign manpower. Not talent. Another friend also got interviewed by a local company for manager post but interviewer is from india and he touted his experience and education as first class. Overseas hiring mgr was happy but after indian interview, ended up rejected for position. Any surprise?

xoxo:
October 3, 2021 at 5:00 pm (Quote)

Now that it is common knowledge that MANY FTs are armed with FAKE DREGEES or degrees from Low-ranked universities ,the G changes its tune and SING LOUDLY ITS NOT ABOUT DEGREES,its about *SKILL SETS*?

WTF! THEY WILL ALWAYS FIND EXCUSES TO COVER UP THEIR LAPSES ,be it FTAs,FTs,whatever.

What is SKILL SET?
Come on,years ago,when SGPOREAN TECHNICIAMS were mending lifts and escalators,but with low education,THE F GOVT brought in SO-CALLED FT-engineers to take over sgs.
We all can see how slow these FTs are in repairing or servicing lifts,escalators compared to when our own less-educated but SKILLFUL sgs were doing?!

Now,all these SGS are chronically jobless n lost their skills ,the G turns around and say SKILL SETS?

KONG LYE,KONG KER,THE G ALWAYS WIN?

xoxo:
October 3, 2021 at 5:06 pm (Quote)

Indeed,most TALENTED ANG MOHS already left Sg for Shanghai,Dubai n to their HQs in USA,EUROPE,JAPAN ,ETC.

What we are seeing now are *LEFT-OVERS* NO GOOD GOVT WANTS EXCEPT THE PAP,LOL!

SKILLS ARE ACQUIRED WITH EXPOSURE.
HOW CAN WE SAY sgs lack skills when the govt put these sgs out of jobs?
Even LKY said it takes quite a few soild years to train a scholar to be a good minister,a good perm sec.

If scholars need time n exposure,what about us?

I say FARK THE G FOR MONKEYING AROUND.
THEY OUGHT TO BE REPLACED THEMSELVES!

NotMyProblem:
October 3, 2021 at 6:47 pm (Quote)

Well, that’s what Singapore going to be, third world talent supervising first world workers! Just worry about the future of our Singaporean children!

Take an example; People who never seen a toilet supervising toilet installation! These people only knew how to use the Ganges for washing, cleaning, shitting and dispose of their deaths.

They may even wondering why our toilets are better than the place where they sleep. So can we expect them to understand what they are doing?

Reunion Dinner - Return of Taiwan to China

 The question of Taiwan reuniting with China is like a Chinese New Year Reunion Dinner. It is not if, but when.

The timing of the Reunion Dinner has to be set by China, the Motherland, not Taiwan, the prodigal son.

The military might of China today is totally different from that 75 years ago. Today, China's Armed Forces are meant to defend China's integrity and sovereignty against external aggressions, especially from the US military and its its allies combined. How can a small Taiwanese army with some old fighter aircrafts and fair skin, soft legs and Western-influenced decadence behaviours, be able to withstand the might of the People's Liberation Armed Forces - land, air, sea, space and cyberspace combined - with the most modern and up-to-date state of the art weapons, equipments, communications, and fire power?

In fact, all China needs to do is to drop a few tactical nuclear warheads onto Taiwan's military headquarters, communication centres, military airports and logistics bases.

Then game over!

Taiwan, like the Japanese in 1945, will have to surrender unconditionally. No more one country two systems. No more soft negotiations. All the way will be one country, one people, one system.

Tsai Ing-wound and her pro-US Japanese in disguise will be arrested, put in prison and charge for treason. And executed with their heads chopped off and hang up high at the tourists favourite place at the Great Wall of China.

LIPS

US’ Revelation of Troops in Taiwan Will Hasten Cross-Straits War - Beijing

 

Both the Pentagon and Taipei declined to comment on The Wall Street Journal's Thursday report that about two dozen members of US special operations and support troops were "secretly operating in Taiwan to train military forces there" for at least a year. But since the US has exposed the news through anonymous officials, it has taken a step forward to undermine, from covertly to semi-overtly, the key conditions for the establishment of diplomatic relations between China and US.

The US dispatching military personnel to Taiwan is a very severe matter. The US, out of the need for providing after-sales training to Taiwan's military forces, had also sent military personnel to the island in the past, but it did so quietly. The US now attempts to send a strong signal to China by semi-publicizing such operations.

The US wants to get on China's nerves - a consistent tactic of Washington. China must respond to the US' new provocations to make both Washington and Taiwan fully realize the severity of their collusion. Otherwise, in the next step, US military staff may show up in Taiwan island, publicly wearing uniforms and their number may increase from dozens to hundreds or even more to form a de facto US garrison in the island. Beijing must let them know they are playing with fire to provoke a war and the consequences their acts will bring are unbearable to both the US and Taiwan.

Any act to strengthen the US-Taiwan collusion will further reinforce China's resolve to realize reunification by force. It will also accelerate overall preparations for military actions and lead the critical moment to come earlier.

China must resolutely define the deployment of US troops in Taiwan as an "invasion." China has the right to carry out military strikes against them at any time. Beijing will not make any promises over their safety. Once a war breaks out in the Taiwan Straits, those US military personnel will be the first to be eliminated. Through such a declaration, Beijing must make Washington understand that it is playing a dangerous game that is destined to draw fire onto itself and it is risking the lives of young US soldiers.

China has the initiative to decide the timetable of when to take military strikes and will make overall decisions. Domestic cohesion and the public's high trust in the country are of critical importance. China must make the US and Taiwan island have a deep sense of crisis for the future and let them understand the rhythm of the cross-Straits situation is not decided by their plot. Chinese people won't dance to their tune but will crush their tricks with strategic aggressiveness.

The struggle across the Taiwan Straits is more about a result. that the island will finally return to the embrace of the motherland. Both the US and Democratic Progressive Party authorities have had an increasing sense of urgency. This is determined jointly by the mainland's strength and will.

China is a nuclear power. The absolute military advantage that China has formed over Taiwan is sufficient to enable the former to take over the latter in one strike. If the US military participates in the war, it will be severely hit by the PLA and suffer unbearable losses.

The US wants to strengthen Taiwan island's self-defense capabilities and increase its confidence in resisting the PLA through training the island's military forces. It's only wishful thinking. The US military had fully equipped and trained the Afghan government forces, but the army they built couldn't withstand even a single blow.

The secessionist authority in Taiwan overestimated itself, claiming to act as an outpost of the US to contain the mainland. But once the PLA launches a general offensive against the authorities on the other side of the Taiwan Straits, or even it issues an ultimatum before launching the attack, the world will see how weak and coward the Taiwan secessionists are.

Anonymous