Below article by Anonymous makes a lot of sense and could save a lot of money, time and resources from doing the unnecessary in giving the vaccinated a third booster shot. The vaccinated already had two doses of the vaccines and should be safe from the virus, if you can believe the pharmaceutical companies and the govts that are telling their people to get the vaccine jabs.
If this is true, then what is needed, instead of a third dose of the vaccine, is to let the vaccinated be exposed to the virus. Another way of doing this is to jab them with inactivated virus vaccines. The bodies would then react to the virus and produce more antibodies and making the bodies stronger and more resistance to the virus, exactly what a third booster jab is expected to do.
See, this is simply brilliant! Stop wasting time and resources on the third booster shot. Why go through all the trouble when it is so easy to get infected with the real stuff and be immuned for life? But of course this is a big risk if the pharma companies are lying and their vaccines are ineffective, useless, cannot protect the people vaccinated.
What do you think?
_____________________________
A mild tapping of the brakes to slow the rate of rise from the mask down
socialisation with many and diverse contacts.
This is to enable the backend to catch up.
Folks
should remember that with the infectiousness of Delta, we are all bound
to meet the virus sooner or later, well within the next 6 months.
We may even meet it multiple times.
The
vaccinated among us can take comfort that meeting the virus would be
like having a 3rd shot booster. We are already well protected against
serious or severe illness or death, and meeting the virus helps remind
our immune system what the target looks like.
The unvaccinated
among us will have to accept the responsibility both to themselves and
to others around them. Their risk of serious illness is higher, unless
they are young, and their likelihood of infecting others is also higher
bcos they carry the infectious virus for longer.
We can track the caseload as well as mobility data to assess the likely trajectory.
We can relax further, if we can clear the 3rd shot boosters for most of the early vaccination responders.
Many parents are understandably anxious about their unvaccinated young kids.
That will come - it’s a matter of 2-3 months as we track data elsewhere, preferably including field data from others.
We
can afford to wait and track as the pre-puberty kids below 12 years old
have very strong and fast 1st line defences against the Covid virus.
This is quite unlike the flu virus, which is dangerous to both the very old and the very young.
So if this were a new flu virus pandemic, we would be extremely worried for our young kids, esp those under 5.
But the Covid virus is like the SARS or MERS virus - dangerous to the old and very mild for the young below 12.
True,
we do have kids with weakened immune system, either from illnesses like
leukemia, or from genetic causes which affect their 1st line immune
response.
There are some signs that Down syndrome is a higher risk
factor for serious Covid illness, perhaps for genetic reasons which
scramble their immune response.
Leukemia is the cancer of the
blood, which messes up the immune response bcos most of the 1st line
response depends on the white blood cells and various other defence
cells patrolling in the blood.
So for a small minority of pre-teen children, there is cause for concern.