USA is more than a terrorist state, now a rogue state

A senior US official personally offered several million dollars to an Indian captain of the Adrian Darya I, the Iranian tanker that was hijacked by the British in Gibraltar and subsequently released after Iranian Army arrested British tankers in retaliation. The American dog refused to release its bite and wanted to hijack this same tanker at all cost.
 
American State Department spokesman has confirmed this, that a Brian Hook, a State Dept pointman in charge of Iran, had sent emails to Captain Akhlesh Kumar to offer him “‘good news’ of millions in US cash to live comfortably if he steered the Adrian Darya I to a country where it could be seized according to AFP.
This kind of daylight piracy and kidnapping of ships in the high seas could only be done by the European powers, in this case the British and the rogue Americans, and openly admitting it while the rest of the world was unable to do anything, not even one country dares to condemn or criticize these acts of piracy and robbery.
 
After being refused by the captain, the Americans went further to “imposed sanctions both on the ship and on Kumar himself, freezing any assets he may have in the US and criminalizing any US financial transactions with him. Any US of foreign persons that engage in certain transactions with designated persons or entities may themselves be exposed to sanctions.” Said the State Department.
 
This kind of hooliganism, gangsterism, lawlessness by the evil Empire is still the rule of the day, with many cronies and little USAs supporting such acts of hostility or keeping mum about it. Very likely the only country that would dare to stand up to the evil Empire is India, now with their citizen under threats and undue duress from the Americans. Would India speak up or hoping to get a better deal from the Americans in exchange?
 
Where is international law, rule of law? This is rule of outlaw! The Americans are behaving like thugs, international gangsters. Any country willing to open its big mouth to tell the Americans that this is against the rule of law, on the ground of principles? The USA is a peace loving country and should be invited to be the policeman of the world, for peace and human rights. My two big balls.
 
PS. The Iranian tanker that the Americans tried to hijack has reached its destination and unloaded its oil safely. The Americans have failed to intercept and rob the tanker from the Iranians, thanks to the non cooperation of other states, including Nato countries that refused to do the dirty work for the Americans. 

The UK was the first to accede to the Americans evil plan, like Canada in the Meng Wanzhou case, but relented and released the ship when Iran hit back by arresting British tankers in the Persian Gulf. Since that incident, and knowing the rogue Americans’ unilateral action to cripple Iran, European nations have dissociated themselves with the evil Empire.
 
Without their assistance, the Americans could not continue with their devious plans unless other silly countries are willing to go along to execute it for the Americans. This is good news and an eye opener for little USAs to learn not to be silly asses of the Americans. The European, hardcore American allies and cronies, did not want to be part of the American mafia in the high seas.

Periscopic Insights: USA monstrous Crimes

     USA monstrous crimes against other people and countries knew no ends.

To escape persecution from the then almighty Catholics the Anglo-Saxon protestants then set sailed across the Atlantic Ocean to found a new colony in America. Like the Spaniards and the Portuguese they were initially welcomed, giving food and lodgings by the friendly native Americans. The natives taught them how to hunt and grow crops like potatoes, maize and tomatoes. But within one year or two as hundreds of thousands of new Anglo-Saxons immigrants came from England the social climate changed. The European settlers began to terrorise the natives by stealing their lands and crops and their cattles. They kidnapped their wives and daughters, rape them and destroyed whole native villages. When the natives tried to escape from the burning villages they were shot and killed. The natives discovered too late that their generosity and benevolence to the 'pale face' ( natives referring to European immigrants ) were repaid with hatred, killings and murder by the newcomers who claimed that the rich and resourceful lands of America were destined by their Christian God for white European christians and that the savage natives ( that's how they ironically referred to the generous and civilize natives ) did not deserve such beautiful well endowed resourceful land. The white invaders were intent right from the first day to dispossess the native Americans of their lands and they justified this robbing of native lands with their evil militant religious doctrine, ' The Doctrine of Christian Discovery'. The natives realized that too late and when they resisted, their  tomahawks or axes and arrows were no match for the savage invaders great fire power in their guns and cannons. The persecution of native Americans persisted in the last few hundred years and continues to this day in the United States where few native survivors are put in  "Native Reservations" euphemism for their evil slave labour concentration camps. In the slave labour camps the American government and white supremacists hope to kill all natives thus eventually leaving no trace of them in history. 

Fast forward from the first day of the Independence of the United States on 4th July 1775, the US government had lay down broad visions for the conquest of the whole of North America. This evil design was reinforced and fortified with the later more aggressive bellicose doctrine of conquest, "The Doctrine of the Manifest Destiny of America." Having killed and genocided almost a hundred million native Americans or almost 98 percent of native population and taken over all of North America except Canada ( similarly under the rule of savage European invaders ) the evil white Americans proceed to the next phase of expansion for worldwide domination.

American grand design for world domination started with the 'Monroe Doctrine' . Under the doctrine the United States will not allow any other foreign country to have or hold a dominant interest in the economic and political affairs of all the countries in South America and Central America. All economic and political affairs of the region must go through Washington DC for prior approval. This monstrous policy and doctrine immensely enriched the United States but tremendously impoverished all the countries in South and Central America. Thus the US has always been able to have a strangle hold on the region. Nevertheless the South American and the Central American countries are fighting back now and hopefully with the help of Russia and China and the whole world they will be able to free themselves from the evil dictatorship and ditrimental hegemony of the Evil Empire, the United States.

We will return to discourse on  how the United States evil design has greatly devastated the economy and people of Central and South America ( also known as Latin America ) later . In the meantime USA had expanded its American Manifest Destiny across the Pacific Ocean to invade and conquer Hawaii, Guam and many other smaller Pacific Ocean islands. In the invasion of Hawaii US had killed and genocided not less than 300, 000 patriotic Hawaii resistant fighters. US illegally annexed Hawaii in the 1950s against the will of the native Hawaiians.

To take advantage of other countries and to deal with international relations to its undue advantage the US has propounded the policy of American Essentialism. Under this doctrine US arrogantly  claims that America will not submit to international laws and regulations of the United Nations , rules of which they were in the forefront to formulate. In other words international rules do not apply to US for they are meant to hamstrung other countries and enhance US aggression, dictatorship and hegemony of the whole wide world. Thus US has never signed the United Nations Conventions of the Laws of the Seas 1982, but demands others to follow. Also again on rules against militarising space, cyber, the internet and UN rules and regulations regarding declaration of war against another country under false and fake excuses as seen in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Yemen and Somalia.

Descriptions of USA monstrous crimes will continue in subsequent articles.

Southernglory1

Monday , 9th September, 2019

Chinese majority under challenged

Singapore— At a ceremony recognising outstanding Teachers held at the Singapore Hokkien Huay Kuan (SHHK), the country’s Education Minister, Ong Ye Kung, reminded everyone present as to the significant contribution that key stakeholders like parents and the Chinese community have made to the educational system.

Mr Ong says he sometimes gets asked for the reason why the children of clan members may avail of an earlier phase for Primary 1 registration.

He talked about the history and beginnings of government-aided schools, and how much stakeholders have contributed to the bigger picture.

“Without them, these schools would not be here,” the Education Minister said. “Today, they continue to play the role of upholding the tradition and culture of the schools and the community that started them.”

The above is copied from theindependent.sg. More and louder voices are heard from the minorities and also from foreigners working here and getting paid questioning and challenging the rights of the Chinese majority that came with the natural advantage of critical mass and calling for a change to this majority.  The questioning of the privileges of Chinese children in having priority as quoted by Ong Ye Kung is not new. It is understandable that new citizens would not know why such privileges were extended to the Chinese children. Even the young Singaporeans ignorant of our history and cultural heritage would not know why.

Ong Ye Kung gave a simple and pointed answer.  “Without them, these schools would not be here,” These are not govt schools but govt aided schools. They were built by the Chinese community, with their own money and to fulfill their dreams of educating their children...(to uphold) the tradition and culture of the schools and the community that started them.”

The same reason applies to NTU, though the name has changed from Nantah, the buildings, the land, the idea, were from the Chinese community, to educate their children and to preserve their history and cultural heritage. Would the appointment of a foreigner, non Chinese, as President of NTU serve the original reasons for the existence of the NTU? Would Ong Ye Kung answer this? Would the ugly and insensitive incident when Chinese characters were banned from NTU foodcourt a sign of how the history and reasons for the existence of Nantah/NTU would be eroded, lost or something to be forgotten?  

The latest, NTU hired a foreigner, an associated professor, who wrote an article challenging the presence of the Chinese majority here and the associated privileges, not legal or institutionalised, and advocating that this be changed so that the minorities would not feel discriminated or underprivileged. Reading this and the trend of unhappiness by some minorities against the Chinese majority, how far would it go before NTU and Chinese govt aided schools would lose their Chinese character and be a thing of the past? 

Or would Ong Ye Kung repeat his defence line, without the Chinese community there would be no Chinese govt aided schools, no NTU and no modern Singapore? The minorities all contributed to what Singapore is today. But without the majority Chinese community, would Singapore be a modern world city as good as the best cities in the world? Or would Singapore be just another city like the slum cities of third world countries where there is no Chinese majority?

So far, despite the challenges to their existence, the Chinese majority has been very quiet, not a sound is heard. Not even with the vulgar video attack and accusing the Chinese majority of being racists did the Chinese majority utter a sound of objection. Everything is fine, nothing to worry about. Soon everyone will be equal when more foreigners are brought in to change the racial composition of the population and the Chinese may not be a majority anymore. And all will live happily ever after because there is no Chinese majority and thus no privileges to the Chinese community.

Some banana Chinese are favourable to the idea and have made suggestions on how to reduce the Chinese majority so that with equal population representation things would also be equal for all the different communities. Be sure you know what you are asking for. Would it be, can it be? Ask, why are the Chinese more successful when they were a minority when they first came? Ask why are some overly represented despite smaller in numbers. Assuming a day will come when all the 4 major ethnic groupings of CMIO are equal in numbers, would there be equality then? Or would there be more stupidity? 

Would Singapore be better off if the smartest man is Mahathir? The modern Singapore today, with first class housing and infrastructure did not come about by accident. It would not happen without the effort of the Chinese majority that everyone is enjoying and benefiting from. 

PS. If only India would to allow the Chinese to rebuild its country, in less than 30 years, India would have all the super infrastructure, super highways, super trains and super cities. Without the Chinese participation in India, in another 50 or 100 years, India would still remain a slum country.

Mahathir – the smartest man in Malaysia

Mahathir is widely revered in Malaysia as the best PM they could get. After several PMs came and gone, Mahathir, at 93, was reelected as the PM of Malaysia after being out for 2 decades. Why would Malaysia need to bring in an old man that is in his twilight years and in many ways should not be in active life? Here Mahathir is in the thick of things, the man central to everything that is happening in Malaysia. He is not a piece of furniture putting there for show, but fully involved in every minute affairs in Malaysia.

The one and only reason for Mahathir to be back is that he is the most capable and smartest man in Malaysia. They could not find anyone that is better than him after trying out a few young PM. I am wondering if this is a blessing or a curse for Malaysia, with the smartest man in Mahathir. He is the best Malaysia could produce in the last 50 years.

And the few smart things he did when returning to office were to cancel major infrastructure projects signed by his predecessor, Najib, in the name of cutting cost, cannot afford to pay. And he expects the cancellation of these projects with no cost implications or downside to the Malaysian economy. The contractors would just give up everything, including hundreds of million spent on the projects that have already started. This is how smart Mahathir is, tearing away contracts freely with no consequences, no need to pay. This is the law of Mahathir.

His next clever move was to keep shifting his goal posts with regard to handling power to Anwar as promised and spoken publicly. He has no qualms or regards to whatever he said or promised, or how the PKR and the rakyat think of him. He just do it and nothing can be done to stop him. The PKR is hapless, the rakyat is hapless.  He is the smartest man after all and who dares to challenge him?

To conclude, let me just add one more Mahathir wisdom. They have finally run down a monopolistic national airline. Mahathir still wants to own a national airline. It is the pride of a nation. His latest quip, Malaysia can own a national airline without paying for one. This kind of smartest is unequalled, unparalleled. Only Mahathir can claim that it is possible. Tomorrow he may tell the Chinese to resume the cancelled major projects for free. And the Chinese would have to do it because Mahathir said so.

Mahathir is the smartest man in Malaysia and no one is near to him in intellect. Malaysia has a great future with the smartest man in Malaysia in charge. Not only Malaysia will have its national airline for free, the high speed train and Malacca port will be built for free by China because of Mahathir.

Handcuffs of youth and children

MPs concerned about use of handcuffs, leg braces as restraints in youth homes

Members of Parliament raised their concerns about the psychological impact of using such measures on teens and questioned whether there will be procedures to prevent the abuse of power.

The above is from the Today paper. I remember writing about this, also included in my book Redbean Soup, of a child below teenage, being handcuffed in a police station and objected to such insensitive and cruel acts against children. Reading the above being raised in Parliament gives me grave concern whether such practice on little children is still in practice and found acceptable.

Youths in homes are often difficult to control and may have committed some offences. The need to put them on cuffs and leg braces may be controversial but at times may be necessary. There must be serious contemplation in making such decisions and not be permitted freely to the point of callousness, careless tidak apa attitude or abuses on the youths and definitely not on pre teens children.

For the MPs to think this is a serious concern that merited to be raised in Parliament is a good start. For this to be an issue is a sign that things are getting out of control. It could be another case of one size fits all as is often applied to rules and regulations without the need to think, for convenience. A case of suka suka just cuffed. At least I think this is something more worthy of Parliament's time than discussing about the use of plastic bags, trying to save a few pieces of plastic to save the environment. Without plastic bags, how are the people going to store their wet waste before throwing them into the rubbish chutes?

Shanmugam’s expertise would again be called upon to write up more laws to provide clarity in the application of such laws, rules etc etc. For a start, all police personnel must be told to be sensitive on little children and must not be allowed to put cuffs on little children. This is a poor reflection of a highly educated population of a first world city when a little human decency and sensitivity towards children are expected to be the norm without having to question or to have rules to implement them.

Are we still a first world city state when we are still fumbling over such basic issues of handling our children and young delinquents, after 44 years of independence? Can you imagine what it looks like for a below 10 year old child to have cuffs on when the cuffs could easily slip off? It happened then, not sure it is still happening.