As a responsible government, I feel obliged to
find a way to deal with the Taiwan murder case so that justice can be
done for the deceased, her parents and society, while at the same time
address the deficiencies in our system so that Hong Kong will not become
a place for criminals to evade legal responsibility.
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/carrie-lam-hong-kong-speech-extradition-bill-in-full-11630390
Read more at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/carrie-lam-hong-kong-speech-extradition-bill-in-full-11630390
The above is Carrie Lam's comment in her long speech on the Extradition Bill that has since been suspended due to the street protest. Nathan Rich, an American working in China gave a more detail explanation for the Extradition Bill and the irrational Hongkongers protesting against this Bill.
In
Nathan King’s video on the recent protest in Hong Kong against the Extradition
Bill, he explained it clearly the reasons for this Bill. Nathan Rich is an
American, a creative tech nerd working in China. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCokRDKR89c
In
short, the Bill came about when a Hongkonger brought his girl friend to Taiwan,
murdered her, put her into her luggage bag and dragged it out of the hotel. He
subsequently disposed her body and returned to Hong Kong to brag about it. The
Taiwanese could not bring him back to face murder charges due to a lack of
extradition treaty between Taiwan and Hong Kong. Though the crime was committed
in Taiwan, I am puzzled why Hong Kong could not prosecute him.
This
is the story that led to the Extradition Bill proposed and initiated by the
Hong Kong govt, not by China. Initially there were a lot of opposition just
like the Huawei and anything related to China, it is bad, can be bad, could be
bad. The strongest critic by an anti China lawyer for fear of this new law
being abused for political prosecution eventually accepted the Bill after
several provisions were included against such possibilities. The Bill will not
be used for political prosecution etc etc.
Still
the protest went on and such a big scale. Why, the Hongkongers could not
understand the Bill, protest for the sake of protesting, just being anti China
when the Bill was proposed by the Hong Kong govt to ensure that justice is done
and criminals would not get away from their crimes, or there is something more
sinister to the protest, instigated by foreign elements?
As
Nathan has said, this is an irrational protest, creating irrational chaos. This
is lawlessness and the law is supreme against lawless people. There is no
excuse to engage in lawlessness.
I
agree that the protestors should be put down. All the baseless allegations
cannot hold water in this case about abuses, just like the American dubious
allegations against Huawei is mischievous.
Protesting
against this Bill is saying, murder, crimes by Hongkongers overseas are ok and
should not be prosecuted. The Hongkongers are protecting their criminals from
foreign prosecution.
If this is not obstruction to justice what is? What
do you think?