David Attenborough did a small series called Wild City to parade the few and little wildlife that he could squeeze from this island of concrete jungle. He was really hard pressed to show to the audience what were left from the invasion of the forest by the specie homo sapiens for their selfish interest to make more money, to exploit every little inch of land to be sold as properties with little regards to the wildlife that they destroyed.
The handful of wildlife captured on film by Attenborough include white belly sea eagles, jungle fowls, otters, monkeys, bats and a solitary ant eater plus a few snakes. These are the fortunate and surviving inhabitants left on this little island and were the pride of our possession. We have a sanctuary to protect these wildlife headed by a MP for doing such a great job.
It was so disheartened to hear that the AVA had culled the handful of jungle fowls in Sin Ming estate due to some complaints from intolerant homo sapiens, of noise and fear of bird flu. If these little reasons are justifiable and strong enough to warrant such an execution of the harmless but beautiful jungle fowls, then there is no place for the crows and mynahs and the sparrows living in our midst. It is so regrettable that our children would now have to see what a chicken looks like in the supermarket, all featherless and lifeless. AVA has came out with the explanation that it was about health of the people, about bird flu.
How could such people be so intolerant, so small hearted, to demand the culling of these fowls when the homo sapiens are the invaders of their living space? And they could not find alternative space for these fowls and needed to terminate them? How many? 5 or 10 chickens? Would it be so difficult to dump them in the nature reserves like Sungei Buloh or the neighbourhood of Lim Chu Kang?
It is not nice to cull chicken in the Year of the Cock. Not a very good start, not a good omen. All the cocks are reminded not to anyhow crow or you will be dead meat. There is no tolerance for irritating cocks,... and hens too.
I bet if Attenborough were to be invited to do another series on wildlife here he would show the middle finger to the hypocrites of this wicked city. 3.5m people and stuffing more millions of foreigners here but cannot spare the space and life of a few jungle fowl!
Parliament now finds it important enough to talk about the cocks in the coming session. This time talking cock may save a few wildlife before they are terminated forever. Killing cocks in the year the Cock is not a good omen.
2/19/2017
2/18/2017
Singaporeans have the chance to elect their president
Some Singaporeans still did not know that they did not elect their Prime Minister. The Prime Minister was elected by a special group of elites within the party. Maybe now more Singaporeans know that the electoral system is such that they only elect the MPs and the rest of the ministers, including the PM, are elected by themselves, not the choice of the Singaporean electorate.
But come September Singaporeans could enjoy the benefit of electing their president by casting their votes to the candidate they like. Yes, they are going to elect the president directly. But who would this candidate be? By the way, who would be selecting the candidate for the Singaporeans to elect? How many candidates would be selected for the Singaporeans to elect? Some think there will be one candidate selected, some say maybe two.
What is important in this election of president process is that the Singaporeans would have the chance to go to the poll, which is compulsory, to cast their vote for the elected president. This is a privilege rarely bestowed to the electorates in many democratic countries. Singaporeans are so lucky. They can choose their president and elect the person of their choice. This is democracy at its best. A president from the people, by the people and will be for the people.
What more do you want? Just be grateful. By the look of things evolving, it looks like the Singaporeans would have the chance to elect Halimah as their next president. And Halimah, when elected, would have the mandate to check on the govt. This is called checks and balance to prevent a rogue govt from running away with the country's reserves.
But come September Singaporeans could enjoy the benefit of electing their president by casting their votes to the candidate they like. Yes, they are going to elect the president directly. But who would this candidate be? By the way, who would be selecting the candidate for the Singaporeans to elect? How many candidates would be selected for the Singaporeans to elect? Some think there will be one candidate selected, some say maybe two.
What is important in this election of president process is that the Singaporeans would have the chance to go to the poll, which is compulsory, to cast their vote for the elected president. This is a privilege rarely bestowed to the electorates in many democratic countries. Singaporeans are so lucky. They can choose their president and elect the person of their choice. This is democracy at its best. A president from the people, by the people and will be for the people.
What more do you want? Just be grateful. By the look of things evolving, it looks like the Singaporeans would have the chance to elect Halimah as their next president. And Halimah, when elected, would have the mandate to check on the govt. This is called checks and balance to prevent a rogue govt from running away with the country's reserves.
2/17/2017
Kim Jong Nam assassinated at KLIA
The South
Korean media were swift and detail in their reporting of the assassination of
Kim Jong Un’s half brother at Kuala Lumpur International Airport. They reported
that two women attacked him with poison needles and fled by taxi.
The Malaysia
authority only managed to say that Kim Jong Nam was found sick after someone
splashed water on him at the airport and he was killed and an autopsy was being
conducted. These info were splashed on every media on the next day after the
incident.
How did the
South Koreans know so many details so fast about an incident in Kuala Lumpur
when they were so far away but the Malaysians knew so little? Were the South
Koreans monitoring and following Kim Jong Nam everywhere? And they knew that it
was an assassination by poison needles! Who could have known or seen the two
women injecting poison onto Kim Jong Nam at the KLIA? Interesting story. The
South Koreans did not have accessed to the recordings of KLIA’s cctv.
Why would
Kim Jong Un want to kill his half brother and do it in public in an airport for
all to see and for a foreign authority to do an autopsy to prove and confirm
that his half brother died of poison? This is like a murder done in public for
all to witness, to broadcast to the world that he did it. Kim Jong Un must be
the most stupid leader in the world to do such a thing, to be condemned and to
add to his bad reputation painted by the West.
What is the
truth? Yes, Kim Jong Nam was killed. By who? He had the same bloodline as Kim
Jong Un and could be a threat to his leadership, so must be killed. Ok, a
reasonable theory if you believe so. Now more stories to support this theory.
The North Koreans have records of trying to assassinate Park Chung Hee. But who
eventually assassinated him? Did the agency that assassinated Park also has
such records of committing assassinations, more assassinations, in fact
assassination is like having breakfast daily in this agency? Could the same
agency or agencies did this in a false flag incident?
The South
Koreans even know that Kim Jong Nam wrote a personal letter to Kim Jong Un
asking the latter to spare him and his family’s lives. How did the South
Koreans know? Kim Jong Nam must have sent them a copy for record purposes so
that they can publicise it now that he is dead.
The suspect
arrested could even be a North Korean, a turnaround defector forced to do the
killing. What is the truth? Who knows? But the media already know, it is the
work of Kim Jong Un, so obvious. Anyone wants to question the credibility of
the media or the intelligence services that provided all the evidence?
I wrote the
above two days ago. Now more interesting details are available. An woman,
looking quite like a Korean, holding a Vietnamese passport was arrested as the
first suspect. This is quite expected. The plot thickened when an Indonesian
woman was also arrested as a second suspect. How an Indonesian got involved in
this assassination is going to raise the level of intrigue. She looked
Indonesian alright, at least does not look like a Korean. She could not be a
member of the Korean assassination team, could she?
But the
obvious, it is a North Korean job. Kim Jong Un ordered it. Hehehehhe, how
simple is the story you can get. Yes, so simple. No need to think. The media
are saying so. The South Koreans are also saying so. But two very high profile
countries that have just as much interest to want to put all the blame on Kim
Jong Un are keeping their lips very tight, like the missing MH 370 case.
Definitely got nothing to do with them, so they kept very quiet. Credit must go
to them not to interfere with other people’s business when it got nothing to do
with them.
2/16/2017
Would Singapore be renamed Syonan To?
Below are a
few paragraph from Tan Wah Piow in London on the naming of a new Singapore War
Museum.
‘I was about to release a photo essay on my visit to the London Imperial War Museum on Sunday when I saw the news about a Singapore museum to be launched on Wednesday. I was shocked.
Who in his or her right mind would name a museum in Singapore, Syonan? Syonan-To is the name given to Singapore by the Japanese invaders during the War World II.
It is even more bizarre to time the opening of the Syonan Gallery on the day Japan conquered Singapore. To complete the joke, the Singapore government might as well invite the lunatic fringe of the Japanese ultra-right to officiate the opening of the museum.
The decision with the name, and the timing is an affront to the memory of the 50,000 Singaporeans who were executed by the Japanese, the majority of whom were from the 600,000 Chinese communities....’
The insensitivity in using Syonan with ‘affection’ for this war museum is totally unacceptable. I am equally dumbfounded. OK Yaacob Ibrahim in reply to public outcry said this was not the intention. How on earth could a name like Syonan, Syonan To that is a reminder of the massacres of 50,000 Chinese during the Japanese Occupation be resurrected in bold letters in Singapore soil as the name of a War Museum? Maybe this is the second best name. Did they ever consider naming it Yasukuni Museum or Kempeitai Museum to get better impact of the atrocities of the Japanese Occupation?
No one objected to this naming? Sure they did but why continued with it despite the controversial nature of this name? Is there no other option? How about doing the favourite like calling the Singaporeans to give it a name? Or try the second favourite, pay half a million to a foreign consultancy to come out with a better name like Marina Bay? Would a simple name like the Singapore War Museum or WW2 War Museum do?
The painful memories of the barbaric Japanese crimes committed on our soil are etched deeply in the heads of a disappearing ageing population? Some of the oldies are generous and would forgive the cruel Japanese for their war crimes against out forefathers. But it is something that cannot be forgotten. Some would not want to forget knowing that the barbaric Japanese are unrepentant and trying to whitewash their evil deeds committed during the invasion and claiming they were doing good or did not happen at all. How to forgive and forget when the evil perpetrators did not want to admit their guilt?
Tan Wah Piow has a good suggestion, invite Abe to officiate the Opening of the museum and the Japanese community here and in Japan would be most happy to participate. We would get a lot of Japanese tourists and Japanese money. Abe would book the first flight here and cancel all his other official appointments just to witness the resurrection of Syonan To, the jewel of Imperial Japan’s invasion of South East Asia. They would love to see what their Syonan To would look like if they have won the war, their prized war loot.
Seriously, is this a name that Singaporeans should be proud of, to be associated with a national monument? Syonan To is the darkest chapter of Singapore’s history. This name should not be glorified in any form but stayed in ignominy. There is nothing glorious or cute in this name. It must be spoken with contempt and not be on the lips of tourist guides and advertising material to be spoken as if it is just another tourist attraction.
Running out of ideas even in choosing a decent name for a national monument? How about getting a foreign talent for a better suggestion?
‘I was about to release a photo essay on my visit to the London Imperial War Museum on Sunday when I saw the news about a Singapore museum to be launched on Wednesday. I was shocked.
Who in his or her right mind would name a museum in Singapore, Syonan? Syonan-To is the name given to Singapore by the Japanese invaders during the War World II.
It is even more bizarre to time the opening of the Syonan Gallery on the day Japan conquered Singapore. To complete the joke, the Singapore government might as well invite the lunatic fringe of the Japanese ultra-right to officiate the opening of the museum.
The decision with the name, and the timing is an affront to the memory of the 50,000 Singaporeans who were executed by the Japanese, the majority of whom were from the 600,000 Chinese communities....’
The insensitivity in using Syonan with ‘affection’ for this war museum is totally unacceptable. I am equally dumbfounded. OK Yaacob Ibrahim in reply to public outcry said this was not the intention. How on earth could a name like Syonan, Syonan To that is a reminder of the massacres of 50,000 Chinese during the Japanese Occupation be resurrected in bold letters in Singapore soil as the name of a War Museum? Maybe this is the second best name. Did they ever consider naming it Yasukuni Museum or Kempeitai Museum to get better impact of the atrocities of the Japanese Occupation?
No one objected to this naming? Sure they did but why continued with it despite the controversial nature of this name? Is there no other option? How about doing the favourite like calling the Singaporeans to give it a name? Or try the second favourite, pay half a million to a foreign consultancy to come out with a better name like Marina Bay? Would a simple name like the Singapore War Museum or WW2 War Museum do?
The painful memories of the barbaric Japanese crimes committed on our soil are etched deeply in the heads of a disappearing ageing population? Some of the oldies are generous and would forgive the cruel Japanese for their war crimes against out forefathers. But it is something that cannot be forgotten. Some would not want to forget knowing that the barbaric Japanese are unrepentant and trying to whitewash their evil deeds committed during the invasion and claiming they were doing good or did not happen at all. How to forgive and forget when the evil perpetrators did not want to admit their guilt?
Tan Wah Piow has a good suggestion, invite Abe to officiate the Opening of the museum and the Japanese community here and in Japan would be most happy to participate. We would get a lot of Japanese tourists and Japanese money. Abe would book the first flight here and cancel all his other official appointments just to witness the resurrection of Syonan To, the jewel of Imperial Japan’s invasion of South East Asia. They would love to see what their Syonan To would look like if they have won the war, their prized war loot.
Seriously, is this a name that Singaporeans should be proud of, to be associated with a national monument? Syonan To is the darkest chapter of Singapore’s history. This name should not be glorified in any form but stayed in ignominy. There is nothing glorious or cute in this name. It must be spoken with contempt and not be on the lips of tourist guides and advertising material to be spoken as if it is just another tourist attraction.
Running out of ideas even in choosing a decent name for a national monument? How about getting a foreign talent for a better suggestion?
2/15/2017
UN Security Council Meeting on North Korean missile test
The US led a
charge to hold an urgent UN Security Council meeting ‘seen as a challenge to
President Donald Trump’. What hogwash, a missile test to build a country’s
defence capability is a challenge to a newly elected American president? Can
you believe this American shit? Tomorrow if Kim Jung Un celebrated his birthday
and drink cognac it would be an insult to the Americans for not drinking whisky
and a reason to call for a UN Security Council Meeting?
This is the big bad wolf in the classroom and no one wants to see or say that it is there. Point the finger at North Korea, at Iran, at Iraq, at China, at Russia…! And the stupid around the world believe in these lies, and the UN being made to look silly over and over again. Some clowns even said USA is a benign super power, invited to be the policeman of South China Sea, to maintain peace!
How
dangerous are the North Koreans versus the Americans? The North Koreans still
have no capability to strike the US, no second strike capability and could be
decimated should they dare to press the button first. North Korea would be
blown up in smoke if they dare to launch a nuclear attack on anyone. Are the
North Koreans really mad, to want to attack anyone, for what reason, and to
bring about their own destruction?
Look at what
the Americans have, more than 7,000 nuclear warheads that can be launched by
land, air, sea and space. They could strike any country with impunity or
absolute superiority and could guarantee the complete destruction of even China
and Russia. It is this overwhelming superiority that allows the Americans to
threaten everyone with nuclear strike. It is this overwhelming superiority that
makes the arrogant American to refuse to commit to no first strike, meaning it
is willing to strike first, knowing that no one would or could strike back and
get a way with it. It is the Americans that had used Atomic bombs on Japan,
used all kinds of chemical warfare on their enemies. The Americans have a
scintillating track record of bellicosity, to strike and have shown the
intention to want to use nuclear weapons many times.
Who is the
more dangerous one, the Americans or North Koreans? Why is the UN being made to
impose all kinds of sanctions against a small country that did not have much
capability and nuclear weapons and has a greater fear of being attacked by the
Americans? Why is the UN not imposing sanctions on the Americans for building
the biggest arsenal of Weapons of Mass Destruction and refusing to commit to a
no first to use principle?
The biggest
bad wolf is the USA and it is pointing its fingers at everyone and pulling the
UN by the nose to do its dirty job of demonizing every country except
themselves, the one that is conducting incessant warfare and killing millions
of Arabs and Muslims in the Middle East. And this is not enough, the US is
going to spend more trillions of dollars to build mor e destructive weapons of
mass destruction that would put what the North Koreans have to shame.
What a silly world. This is what Donald Trump said of
the USA. ‘“Lot of killers. We’ve got a lot of killers. Boy, you think our
country’s so innocent? You think our country’s so innocent?” We have carnage
and we have irony.’ This is the big bad wolf in the classroom and no one wants to see or say that it is there. Point the finger at North Korea, at Iran, at Iraq, at China, at Russia…! And the stupid around the world believe in these lies, and the UN being made to look silly over and over again. Some clowns even said USA is a benign super power, invited to be the policeman of South China Sea, to maintain peace!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)