There is
another issue? Are the Eurasians lumped together under the category of
Indian? Someone posted this in TRE and I
wrote a piece on it saying that it would be another worm if it is true. I asked
for confirmation if this is true but no one came forward and the question was
left unanswered. This Shanmugam outburst
against The Statestimes gives an opportunity for this issue to be cleared once
and for all. In his defence, Shanmugam said he did not say it in the forum at
the Institute of Policy Studies where he was quoted to have said so and more,
that ‘Indians outnumbered Eurasians 20 to 1. So it makes it difficult for
(there to be) an Eurasian president.’ The allegation was even more convincing
when it quoted, ‘when the President of the Eurasian Association of Singapore, (Mr)
Benett Theseira, criticized the definition of Eurasian in the candidacy
regulations.’
All these
are ‘outright falsehood)’.And here is Shanmugam’s facebook post. ‘All of this
is completely false. During my session
which lasted 90 minutes, I said nothing of the sort attributed to me, about
Eurasians.’ So all is false, he did not say what he was attributed to have
said. Now it seems quite clear, or is that so, that the Eurasians are not
lumped under the category of Indian?
Shanmugam
said he did not say what he was alleged to have said. It would be good if he
could just say the Eurasians are not lumped in the Indian category. Short and
sharp and would have dispel all the malicious rumours floating around. Would there be an official statement on this
crucial point as it is very important to the Eurasian community. Or would it be like the CPF is not your money
statement in Parliament and no one bothered to say it is or it is not?
The other
big question, how could the allegation be so specific, that the name of the
Eurasian President was even used to make it more real. Funny isn’t it, we have
all the media at our disposal and a small factual thing like this could go so
distorted that the people have to try to read in between the line to guess what
is the truth?
From
Shanmugam’s reply, the Eurasians are not lumped in the Indian category. That is
how I read it. Anyone still think this is confusing and needs a clear and unconfusing
reply so that no one misunderstood what is the truth and what is falsehood?
Anyone read
the report in the media about this?