CPF
is our life savings, how can it be a liability? By 55 we should all be happily
getting it out from our CPF accounts for our retirement. Ok, the rules have
changed, by 65 we should be happy, late than never.
The
rude shock to CPF members, by 55 they are told that they ‘owe’ the CPF or the
govt $155,000 in the Retiremment Account and $43,500 in the Medisave Account.
Yes, you need to let the CPF or govt have these sums of money like you owe
them. If you don’t have enough in your CPF savings, or lesser than these sums
in your CPF, you cannot take out your savings. But the CPF would be so kind to
let you have $5,000. Or you can pledge
your property to the CPF for half of the total sum of the total sum of
$198,500, or is it half of the $155,000, with the CPF.
Put
it whatever you like, isn’t this a liability, a huge sum of money that you now
‘owe’ to the CPF? Yes or No? By 55, many
would find the CPF a liability instead of an asset in away.
This
must be another Uniquely Singapore thing. You can owe the govt or a savings
scheme money when you are supposed to be taking out your savings to live your
golden years. And many Singaporeans are finding this damn stressful.
Oh,
not to forget, if you sell your property bought using your CPF savings, you
have to return the sum borrowed plus the equivalent of interests that the money
should have earned over the same period to your CPF account even if you are
retired, in your 80s or 90s or 120s. It is not that after the withdrawal age
kicks in, whatever money you took out for the purchase of properties is none of
the CPF business. All these open ended contributions to the CPF regardless of age
must be driving many people crazy, except the people making these rules and
collecting the money.
Tiok
boh?
Kopi Level - Green