This morning I read that the donations to the cause of Roy’s legal fee
have hit $50,000 in 3 days. This shows that Singaporeans are willing to
stand up to fight for a cause they believe in, in this case it is not
only about defending a young man but also about the fate of their CPF
money.
The contributions are still pouring in and are likely to go beyond the
$70,000 target. This is the spirit of true blue Singaporeans, the type
of Singaporeans that disappeared into Sinkies but rising and standing on
their feet and putting their money where their mouth is. The
Singaporeans are standing behind Roy, to support the underdog in a
worthy cause.
That’s the way to go. For every Singaporean that contributed, there must
be tens or hundreds or thousands also in support of this cause. After
all it is their money they are defending. The turnout at Hong Lim this
Saturday is likely to exceed those that went to support the protest
against the Population White Paper.
It is interesting to see how many would be there to fight for their CPF
savings. This could be the Kopitiam Movement that is taking shape, a
spontaneous cry of the people never seen before.
Kopi Level - Yellow
6/02/2014
The wisdom of saving for retirement
Many people worried about not saving and providing enough for their
retirement. So die die must make sure they will have enough money when
they are still alive at 90 or 100. Lets assume that a person needs 200
packets of chicken rice to live during his economically active and
younger life. And lets say he needs another 200 packets of chicken rice
during his retirement.
Case 1. A is wealthy and has 2000 packets of chicken rice. He sets aside 500 packets of chicken rice for retirement. Very comfortable retirement I should say and would not affect his luxuriously lifestyle in his youth.
Case 2. B has 400 packets of chicken rice. So setting aside 200 packets for retirement not a problem and would live happily ever after with no drop in his standard of living during retirement.
Case 3. C has only 300 packets of chicken rice. He can either set aside 100 packets for retirement and live normally. Conversely he can set aside 200 packets for retirement but tighten his belt a bit for an easier retirement.
Case 4. D has only 200 packets of chicken rice. He can set aside 100 packets for retirement and stinge a bit now. It is like living with half a stomach full now and also half a stomach full during retirement.
Case 5. E has only 100 packets of chicken rice but needs 200 packets to keep his stomach full. So how? Live with half full stomach and leave nothing for retirement or set aside 50 packets for retirement and live with only a quarter full stomach now and a quarter full stomach during retirement?
Case 6. F has only 50 packets of chicken rice to live on. Barely enough to survive. How to set off for retirement?
Then comes the do gooder. Everyone must save for retirement. It is compulsory. Everyone must have 200 packets of chicken rice for retirement. Case 3 and 4 must set aside 200 packets for retirement. How much they are left with is not the do gooder’s problem. Case 5 and 6 must set aside all they have, 100 packets from Case 5 and 50 packets from Case 6 for their retirement. If not who is going to feed them. And Case 5 and 6 would need to top up the balance to 200 packets when they have more incomes. Tomorrow is more important than today.
I remember a Buddhist teaching about today and now. Today and now are the more important and precious moment, for tomorrow and the next moment one could be dead. The philosophy of saving for tomorrow is to have a lot in the future is more important than being dead now. Always look and plan for tomorrow, even if it does not come.
The intention is good. And all of them will have a good retirement up to 90 years old with no worries, provide they are still alive. Those who have not enough to eat now, just too bad. They must go and find their own way to feed their hungry stomachs.
What happens if they die at 60 years old? Well they will leave behind a lot of chicken rice uneaten while in the case of Case 5 and 6, they were hungry while setting aside the chicken rice for retirement but never live to enjoy them. They could have filled their stomach while alive or at least half filled their stomach when they could.
Should they thank the do gooders for helping them to save for their retirement and suffered while in alive, while in the prime of their youth and not enjoying a single packet of the chicken rice they were forced to set aside.
What do you think?
Kopi Level - Green
Case 1. A is wealthy and has 2000 packets of chicken rice. He sets aside 500 packets of chicken rice for retirement. Very comfortable retirement I should say and would not affect his luxuriously lifestyle in his youth.
Case 2. B has 400 packets of chicken rice. So setting aside 200 packets for retirement not a problem and would live happily ever after with no drop in his standard of living during retirement.
Case 3. C has only 300 packets of chicken rice. He can either set aside 100 packets for retirement and live normally. Conversely he can set aside 200 packets for retirement but tighten his belt a bit for an easier retirement.
Case 4. D has only 200 packets of chicken rice. He can set aside 100 packets for retirement and stinge a bit now. It is like living with half a stomach full now and also half a stomach full during retirement.
Case 5. E has only 100 packets of chicken rice but needs 200 packets to keep his stomach full. So how? Live with half full stomach and leave nothing for retirement or set aside 50 packets for retirement and live with only a quarter full stomach now and a quarter full stomach during retirement?
Case 6. F has only 50 packets of chicken rice to live on. Barely enough to survive. How to set off for retirement?
Then comes the do gooder. Everyone must save for retirement. It is compulsory. Everyone must have 200 packets of chicken rice for retirement. Case 3 and 4 must set aside 200 packets for retirement. How much they are left with is not the do gooder’s problem. Case 5 and 6 must set aside all they have, 100 packets from Case 5 and 50 packets from Case 6 for their retirement. If not who is going to feed them. And Case 5 and 6 would need to top up the balance to 200 packets when they have more incomes. Tomorrow is more important than today.
I remember a Buddhist teaching about today and now. Today and now are the more important and precious moment, for tomorrow and the next moment one could be dead. The philosophy of saving for tomorrow is to have a lot in the future is more important than being dead now. Always look and plan for tomorrow, even if it does not come.
The intention is good. And all of them will have a good retirement up to 90 years old with no worries, provide they are still alive. Those who have not enough to eat now, just too bad. They must go and find their own way to feed their hungry stomachs.
What happens if they die at 60 years old? Well they will leave behind a lot of chicken rice uneaten while in the case of Case 5 and 6, they were hungry while setting aside the chicken rice for retirement but never live to enjoy them. They could have filled their stomach while alive or at least half filled their stomach when they could.
Should they thank the do gooders for helping them to save for their retirement and suffered while in alive, while in the prime of their youth and not enjoying a single packet of the chicken rice they were forced to set aside.
What do you think?
Kopi Level - Green
Cash is King
‘My mother recently suffered a heart attack. She was hospitalised and a
stent was inserted into her heart. The resultant hospital bill came up
to about $18,400.
My brother and I have more than $90,000 in our Medisave accounts, but only $3,950 could be deducted from my brother’s account as this was the maximum amount allowed. We had to pay the remaining amount of more than $14,000 in cash….’
The above were the introductory paras of an article ‘What good is Medisave if you can’t use it when you need it?’ by a Danny Tseng posted inn TRE. Danny and his brother had to pay cash to settle the bill. It was like they only wanted cash and money in CPF/Medisave was not acceptable. Actually not. Money in the CPF is limited used money, not money that you can use freely. It is money good on paper but not when you want to use it. This accentuates the saying ‘Cash is King’. Trust the value of your cash. Other forms of money are funny money, money but when you need it, becomes elusive.
Now you understand why the govt is encouraging people to put in more cash into their CPF or their parents’ and spouses’ CPF? The Govt also believes in cash. Give me your cash and I print some numbers in your CPF statements and guarantee that the money will be there, very safe.
Which one is more useful? Which one is more real? And ‘sway sway kena’ a case like Danny’s mother with a huge medical bill then you cry and curse yourself for putting more money into your CPF/Medisave.
Be smart, keep your money in cash so that you can use it when you need it. Money in CPF/Medisave will only make you smile when the monthly statement arrives. Don’t be a daft Sinkie.
Kopi Level - Yellow
My brother and I have more than $90,000 in our Medisave accounts, but only $3,950 could be deducted from my brother’s account as this was the maximum amount allowed. We had to pay the remaining amount of more than $14,000 in cash….’
The above were the introductory paras of an article ‘What good is Medisave if you can’t use it when you need it?’ by a Danny Tseng posted inn TRE. Danny and his brother had to pay cash to settle the bill. It was like they only wanted cash and money in CPF/Medisave was not acceptable. Actually not. Money in the CPF is limited used money, not money that you can use freely. It is money good on paper but not when you want to use it. This accentuates the saying ‘Cash is King’. Trust the value of your cash. Other forms of money are funny money, money but when you need it, becomes elusive.
Now you understand why the govt is encouraging people to put in more cash into their CPF or their parents’ and spouses’ CPF? The Govt also believes in cash. Give me your cash and I print some numbers in your CPF statements and guarantee that the money will be there, very safe.
Which one is more useful? Which one is more real? And ‘sway sway kena’ a case like Danny’s mother with a huge medical bill then you cry and curse yourself for putting more money into your CPF/Medisave.
Be smart, keep your money in cash so that you can use it when you need it. Money in CPF/Medisave will only make you smile when the monthly statement arrives. Don’t be a daft Sinkie.
Kopi Level - Yellow
6/01/2014
The rogue of WW2 wants to protect its former victims of barbarity
Abe has offered Japan
as the peace keeper of Asia, to protect East and South
East Asians from the rise of China.
Japan was the
barbaric invaders of Asian countries, looted their countries, colonised the
people, raped their women, murder their young and old. But some Asian countries
seem to have forgotten the depraved and cruel acts of the Japanese and are
welcoming Japan
to be their protector, or at least two countries have openly said so other than
Vietnam and the
Philippines.
And the gangster of the world, the USA,
with its disgraceful records in the Middle East, in
conducting regime change, invasion, in bullying the Arab and Islamic countries,
also declared itself as the protector of Asian countries that include many Islamic
countries. And these Islamic countries actually welcome the Americans to be
their protector as well, against a western hyped expansionist China.
To the Americans, China
is a provocateur for building structures in its islands in South China
Sea. China
is not supposed to do so as long as there are other countries putting up silly
claims against its territories. The countries that made outrageous claims are
not provocative. Countries that sent its ships to ram China’s
oil rig are not provocative but peaceful. Countries that blatantly arrested
Chinese fishing boats are not provocative. Countries that claimed Chinese
territories as theirs and scrambled jets to intercept Chinese civilian aircraft
are not provocative. Countries that sent their spy planes into an area when
other countries are conducting war games are not provocative.
China
has not invaded any South East Asian countries but their major trading partners
is provocative and aggressive. Countries that colonised and robbed these
countries are peaceful and friendly and reliable as the protector of their
former victims.
How silly can South East Asian countries be? It is as good
as sleeping with the murderers, robbers and rapists once again and feeling very
safe. What is happening to this world? A country that had its entire naval
fleet sunk without any declaration of war is kissing with the country that it
dropped atomic bombs into its cities. Or put it another way, a country that
suffered two atomic bomb hits is kissing with the country that dropped the
atomic bombs. And both are telling the silly Asian countries that they are
peace loving countries, to protect them from countries that had never invaded
them.
Kopi Level - Yellow
Who’s afraid of Roy Ngerng?
I have several titles in mind for this piece, like Crowd
Funding or People’s Power Singapore style. The above title is quite catchy and
amusing and had my vote. The gist of this article is not about who is afraid of
who but the evolving political consciousness of the Sinkies crawling their way
back to become Singaporeans again. There are so many serious issues facing the
Sinkies today, once timid and docile to the extent of being daft, but gradually
rediscovering themselves and recognising the need to stand up to fight for
their rights to live a decent life in a country overwhelmed by the presence of
foreigners poised to edge them out of their comfort zones. Many have already
fallen victims to this deluge of so called foreign talents or funny talents
that their life style and livelihood have taken a serious setback.
The current hot issue is the life savings of the people in
the CPF and this is gradually transforming into a grey area when ownership
becomes a questionable issue to the detriment of their rightful owners. While
the Govt continues to behave smugly and try to explain away their rights to
determine and decide for the people in the use of their savings, and when and
how much should be returned to them as if the money belongs to the Govt, the
docile Sinkies are rising to demand to have their money back as promised. For
the moment the Govt is still having the upper hand, holding the trump card of
legislature to make whatever it wants to do legal. The Sinkies are not taking it
quietly, not going to be pooh poohed away by superficial explanations that even
children would not find them funny.
This tussle for the return of the people’s savings has
indirectly led to a defamation lawsuit involving a young blogger and the Prime
Minister. Roy Ngerng has crossed the line by his comparison of the trial of
misappropriation of the City Harvest
Church fund and the CPF money and
the Prime Minister. The PM is demanding for his pound of flesh by engaging the
island’s top defamation lawyer to sue Roy Ngerng.
Many people in the social media are rallying to support Roy
financially and morally in his legal battle with the PM not because they agree
to his allegation but more because of their unhappiness over the CPF money and
also a righteouness to defend the weak against the mighty. It is like the
people standing up to the govt. It is like a surge of People’s Power against
the Govt. And the people are doing it the Singaporean way, through the legal
system, abiding by the rule of law.
To protest or to challenge the Govt, they are not marching
in the streets with their feet. They are storming into the courts of law with
their money. In one day, $15,000 was raised through anonymous contributions
ranging from $2 to $1,000. By end of yesterday, more than $36,600 has been
received. Roy is aiming to raise
$70,000 to cover his legal fees and it looks that this is not a difficult
target to achieve. The People’s Power
will be determined by the sum of money raised. No violence, no street protest,
no burning of police cars or rioting. It is all about money, the only language
Sinkies understood.
No money no talk. No money no justice as the price for
justice will not come cheap, at least $70,000 for a start. The rich and powerful
can literally drown the poor and weak by unleashing the might of their war
chest of money.
Would Roy get
the support from the people, would the people rise in tandem like a spontaneous
uprising by throwing their money behind Roy?
Or would the CPF members abandon Roy
to fight his own battle, just like all the pathetic Sinkies? From the donations
received so far, there are enough Singaporeans who are willing to put their
money behind Roy.
Kopi Level - Yellow
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)