I am sure everyone reading this will have their eyes popped out and
couldn’t believe what they are seeing. I don’t think anyone can fix the
govt intentionally as they would likely to be fixed instead if they dare
to try. I don’t think any opposition party could do this either. We all
know how the game is being played, the odds and what would be the
consequences. And definitely not for me to fix the govt.
But the govt is being fixed and appears to be ignorant of it. Perhaps
they could not see it in this light. Who then could be doing the fixing?
We have all been kpkbing about the job market and how Sinkies have been
fixed real bad by the foreigners and foreign owned recruitment
agencies. But the real culprits include the CEOs of local and foreign
companies who are condoning this practice of not hiring Sinkies and
replacing Sinkies with foreigners and their own kind. They deliberately,
either with one eye closed, or just turn and look the other way, or
worse, even promoting it, to discriminate Sinkies in employment.
So the end result, many Sinkie professionals lost their jobs. When the
number was small, they blamed themselves, thinking that they were really
no good and the foreigners were really better. Today, when the truth is
out, many are feeling very sore. And who would they blame? No need to
give you this simple answer. Their unhappiness and anger, their feeling
of being cheated and short changed, would be directed at the govt for
sure. You can read it in the social media. And this will cost the govt
dearly and the political price to be paid will be very high. Yes, the
govt is being fixed when the people are being fixed. And the fixers are
those employers who discriminate against Sinkies in employment.
The lackadaisical attitude of the govt to fix this problem only adds to
the grievance of the victims. They may not see the correlation or did
not think the people would turn against the govt. They would think that
it is not the govt’s fault! From the way they are happily embracing the
foreigners and sleeping with them, and keep welcoming them without
hesitation speak for itself. It looks like they are blind or choose to
be blind to what is happening and feeling very comfortable and secure
with the situation. Yes the proverbial deaf frog, always doing the right
thing.
As the anger grows against the foreigners for taking their good paying
jobs away while they downgraded to underemployment, with many even
forced into retirement, unable to find employment, it is a matter of
time when they will be break free from their slumber and hapless state
to make those who helped in condemning them to pay for it.
Those who fixed them will have to pay for their crimes. They would not
be going after the employers and the recruitment agents. They would not
want to know that it was the employers and the recruitment agents’
faults.
Who do you think they will go after or put the blame on? This is a
simple case of being fixed by others and thinking they will get away
with it. The govt appears to be a willing party to be fixed by the employers.
Kopi Level - Green
Chinatown hawker centre. Hawker Centres are a national heritage, selling a wide variety of food at very reasonable prices. They are spread across the whole island and is part of the Singapore way of life.
3/18/2014
3/17/2014
MH370 – Explaining the bizarre, strange and questionables
The information flowing out from Malaysia over the weekend made many
people saw red and at times shocking to know that Malaysia had the
information but chose not to tell.
MH370 was seen and tracked by military radars. Why did Malaysia take so long to tell the world? And the Chief of Air Force General Daud was reported to have made a trip to Butterworth to find out what they saw on that fateful morning. It was also reported that there was a military radar at Kota Bahru. This fact is not confirmed. At the point where the plane disappeared, Butterworth was unlikely to have it on radar. Even if they were plotting it, they would have erased it off as it was going away, off their radar coverage. Why did the information came out so late?
Let me make a guess. Butterworth or whichever military station was stood down for the weekend or manned by a skeleton crew. And very likely all were ‘kooning’ or on a very relax mood and did not see anything or track anything. How embarrassing to admit that this was the case. So they need to piece together a story, that they saw and were tracking the aircraft from the moment it turned back and disappeared. But they did not know that this was discredited by the aircraft flying at normal height to be tracked all the way to Penang/Butterworth.
Why was the pilot flying to Penang/Butterworth to be seen on radar when he was trying to avoid it? One possible reason, he thought by switching off the transponder the air traffickers could not see the aircraft and he could fly anywhere and at any level he liked. Unfortunately, the radars used by the air traffickers could also see the blips even when the transponder was switched off, and the radar operated like any primary radar and picking up any aircraft in the air. The second reason, the pilot somehow became stupid that he did not know his flight path could be tracked by military radars. He did not know of the existence of military radars! This could not be as all experienced Malaysian pilots would know the existence of military radars in Malaysia.
Why fly towards Penang/Butterworth to be picked up by radars when his destination was Northwest? I dunno. Maybe he was mad. Maybe he wanted to show his face to the military radar controllers.
And the new theory, he was a political fanatic and decided to hijack the aircraft after attending Anwar’s trial. So he made up his mind to hijack an aircraft full of passengers in a fit of a moment. Did he plan anything, where to go and where to land? You don’t fly an aircraft like driving a car and could park anywhere. And if it was just the pilot who was angry and doing the flying, what about the second pilot and what about the rest of the crew? They could not be sitting there doing nothing. The passengers too would not be sitting idly by and let the pilot do whatever he wanted. They might not know anything. But the fact that none could send out a mobile message or attempted to was an indication that they were restrained or prevented from doing so. How could the pilot restrain 238 passengers alone?
Oh the decompression theory of flying to 45,000 ft. If I am not mistaken the aircraft cabin pressure is designed to maintain at a certain level, normally about 10,000 ft, independent of the height the aircraft was flying. There would be no decompression just by flying at 45,000 ft. When there is a decompression due to malfunction, the aircraft is designed to drop the oxygen masks for the passengers.
Anyone wiser?
MH370 was seen and tracked by military radars. Why did Malaysia take so long to tell the world? And the Chief of Air Force General Daud was reported to have made a trip to Butterworth to find out what they saw on that fateful morning. It was also reported that there was a military radar at Kota Bahru. This fact is not confirmed. At the point where the plane disappeared, Butterworth was unlikely to have it on radar. Even if they were plotting it, they would have erased it off as it was going away, off their radar coverage. Why did the information came out so late?
Let me make a guess. Butterworth or whichever military station was stood down for the weekend or manned by a skeleton crew. And very likely all were ‘kooning’ or on a very relax mood and did not see anything or track anything. How embarrassing to admit that this was the case. So they need to piece together a story, that they saw and were tracking the aircraft from the moment it turned back and disappeared. But they did not know that this was discredited by the aircraft flying at normal height to be tracked all the way to Penang/Butterworth.
Why was the pilot flying to Penang/Butterworth to be seen on radar when he was trying to avoid it? One possible reason, he thought by switching off the transponder the air traffickers could not see the aircraft and he could fly anywhere and at any level he liked. Unfortunately, the radars used by the air traffickers could also see the blips even when the transponder was switched off, and the radar operated like any primary radar and picking up any aircraft in the air. The second reason, the pilot somehow became stupid that he did not know his flight path could be tracked by military radars. He did not know of the existence of military radars! This could not be as all experienced Malaysian pilots would know the existence of military radars in Malaysia.
Why fly towards Penang/Butterworth to be picked up by radars when his destination was Northwest? I dunno. Maybe he was mad. Maybe he wanted to show his face to the military radar controllers.
And the new theory, he was a political fanatic and decided to hijack the aircraft after attending Anwar’s trial. So he made up his mind to hijack an aircraft full of passengers in a fit of a moment. Did he plan anything, where to go and where to land? You don’t fly an aircraft like driving a car and could park anywhere. And if it was just the pilot who was angry and doing the flying, what about the second pilot and what about the rest of the crew? They could not be sitting there doing nothing. The passengers too would not be sitting idly by and let the pilot do whatever he wanted. They might not know anything. But the fact that none could send out a mobile message or attempted to was an indication that they were restrained or prevented from doing so. How could the pilot restrain 238 passengers alone?
Oh the decompression theory of flying to 45,000 ft. If I am not mistaken the aircraft cabin pressure is designed to maintain at a certain level, normally about 10,000 ft, independent of the height the aircraft was flying. There would be no decompression just by flying at 45,000 ft. When there is a decompression due to malfunction, the aircraft is designed to drop the oxygen masks for the passengers.
Anyone wiser?
Boon Wan the Sweeper
When the housing problem reached a stage that was waiting to blow up,
Boon Wan volunteered to take on the task to clean up the mess. Actually
it was no mess as far as his predecessor was concerned. It was all
expected, prices determined by market forces, prices were affordable,
and there was no queue and no demand even. It was a beautiful situation
except that the home buyers were making nonsensical noises.
If a junior minister were to tell the MND Minister that there was a serious problem, he would be shooed out of his office. When the MND Minister said no problem it meant just that, no problem. Who had the audacity to tell him otherwise? Luckily Boon Wan was heavier and could use his weight to shove the MND’s objection aside and to do what was necessary.
So Boon Wan went on a ramping programme to ram through all the barriers against building more flats. Eng Hen was full of praise for Boon Wan for decisively tackled the housing problems created by his predecessor who would not admit that there was a problem in the first place and thus no actions needed.
With the housing problems stabilized, Hsien Loong should move Boon Wan to the MOM to tackle the growing problems of foreigners, fake degrees and discriminations against our own PMEs, to remove the term ‘local’ to tell the real story of how Sinkies are fairing in the job markets, to ram through the walls of local and foreign owned companies that are refusing or discriminating against Sinkies for employment.
Here again, Boon Wan’s weight as a senior minister would come in handy to bang his way through. He could decisively tackle the employment of PMEs and the fake qualifications problems just like he tackled the housing problem. He could order the CEOs of foreign companies to wait outside his office instead of crawling to their offices to beg them to be nice to Sinkies looking for jobs.
I support Boon Wan to take on the MOM and deal with the crisis immediately. No more dilly dallying. The mess is real big, bigger than the housing problem and growing by the days.
What do you think?
Kopi Level - Red
If a junior minister were to tell the MND Minister that there was a serious problem, he would be shooed out of his office. When the MND Minister said no problem it meant just that, no problem. Who had the audacity to tell him otherwise? Luckily Boon Wan was heavier and could use his weight to shove the MND’s objection aside and to do what was necessary.
So Boon Wan went on a ramping programme to ram through all the barriers against building more flats. Eng Hen was full of praise for Boon Wan for decisively tackled the housing problems created by his predecessor who would not admit that there was a problem in the first place and thus no actions needed.
With the housing problems stabilized, Hsien Loong should move Boon Wan to the MOM to tackle the growing problems of foreigners, fake degrees and discriminations against our own PMEs, to remove the term ‘local’ to tell the real story of how Sinkies are fairing in the job markets, to ram through the walls of local and foreign owned companies that are refusing or discriminating against Sinkies for employment.
Here again, Boon Wan’s weight as a senior minister would come in handy to bang his way through. He could decisively tackle the employment of PMEs and the fake qualifications problems just like he tackled the housing problem. He could order the CEOs of foreign companies to wait outside his office instead of crawling to their offices to beg them to be nice to Sinkies looking for jobs.
I support Boon Wan to take on the MOM and deal with the crisis immediately. No more dilly dallying. The mess is real big, bigger than the housing problem and growing by the days.
What do you think?
Kopi Level - Red
3/16/2014
MH370 – Misinformation and fuzzy logics
A few days after the disappearance of MH370 and the failure
to locate any debris in the surrounding seas, the possibility of it being
hijacked became very real. And the few evidences available pointed to a highly
sophisticated team of hijackers who were doing everything they could to avoid
detection by radars. And it took 6 fruitless days to discover nothing,
absolutely nothing to tell anyone where it could have gone to.
Then on the 7th day after its disappearances there
was a flood of information, even confirmed to be genuine, coming out to tell
everyone a completely different story. The aircraft did not disappeared but was
seen all over the sky and making all kinds of illogical manoeuvres to tell the
world where it was and where it was going.
When such things happened, when logic becomes illogical,
when the information made available, volunteered even by normally reliable
sources, even by friendly sources, one must raise the antenna of doubt. If the
information does not make sense, and telling some wild stories, one has to be
suspicious and to question its validity and reliability.
Often information can be offered for the wrong reasons,
mischief, misinformation, spurious, given under duress or circumstances that are
unacceptable. And why, when this information was supposedly known, was not made
known earlier and led so many nations on a wild goose chase in the South
China Seas
for almost a whole week?
The new information that was withheld and now made public
include: Aircraft flying to 45,000 ft and descending to 23,000 ft. Aircraft
flying to the west and under military radar screen. Aircraft flying at 29,500
ft and towards Penang into the centre of Butterworth and
Penang radars with no attempt to hide its position. And
subsequently aircraft flying towards the direction of India,
presumably towards central Asia, where it would be seen
by civilian and military radars. It was like the hijackers telling the whole
world here I am, see, come and catch me. Why no longer trying to avoid radars?
All the information is saying that the first premise that
the aircraft was manoeuvred to avoid radar detection is not true. The aircraft
did not have that intention and was on the radar screens of military radars.
Why didn’t the military raise an alarm and scramble fighters to intercept an
unknown aircraft flying into Malaysian airspace? If it had hostile intention,
it would have succeeded in whatever it wanted to do.
MH370 was claimed to have climbed to 45,000 ft when its max
ceiling height is only 43,000 ft. It is not easy to fly an aircraft beyond its
height ceiling. The pilot would have to fly it like a fighter aircraft,
accelerate on descend to max speed and pull it up to hit a new high. A
commercial aircraft doing such a manoeuvre would subject the fuselage to
excessive stress and the wings could fall off. Is it believeable?
And the aircraft was happily flying into Penang
and Butterworth radar zones at a height that it could not be missed. How
ridiculous could this be? Are the hijackers suddenly became that stupid?
In my earlier posts though I mentioned a westerly route, 280
to avoid the Butterworth radars and staying at the verge of Phuket air traffic
radar, I ruled this out as flying further would make it visible to radars in
the west, unless it is hitting some deserted islands in the Indian Ocean. The
best route to take is the easterly direction where there were no radars to pick
it up on their screens.
The new information throws all the earlier premises into
disarray. It suggests that the hijackers are likely to be associated with the
Uighurs and their destination is central Asia. They
could not fly there without being picked up and it was exactly that way, it was
not picked up by anyone at the level they were supposed to be flying. They
could not fly low level without burning out fuel for that kind of distance and
not seen across India
or countries in the region.
Najib spoke as if the latest information were gospel truths,
unquestionable. Really? Could the
information offered, that were concealed for so long, be misinformation,
fabricated information or spurious information?
A new dream, not owning a home
Nina
Brown lost her townhouse to foreclosure due to recession. That was not the only
house she lost, but another three. She now lives in a rented home. The American
Dream of home ownership is crumbling. With recession, foreclosure, and more
recession in the pipeline, more Americans are giving up on home ownership. This
seems to be a new trend in the world’s biggest economy.
Could
this be something that Sinkies would be looking forward to, renting their homes
instead of home ownership, though some are saying that we have been renters all
the time, at least 80% of them living in HDB 99 year leasehold flats? This is
another story.
At
the moment many are still in the property speculation game when money makes
money and lots of money without having to work. Would the same outcome in America hits us the same way when
a major recession comes along? Would our young and new home owners, with their
massive debt from housing loans ended like Nina Brown, facing foreclosure and
become the statistics of a new fad, renters?
We
are following closely at the heels of the Americans in everything they do. When
they got a cold, we will surely have one as well. How long can we hold before
the next wave of recession and foreclosure hits the City? The only way to avoid
such a crisis is to push property prices higher and kick the can further down
the road.
But
if we are to listen to what came out of Parliament, the problem crisis is over
and we should be congratulating the ministers and ourselves that all is well. No
longer a problem, all problems solved. In fact it is time to raise the prices
of properties or else the developers would start to kpkb again.
What
do you think? The next dream will be not owning cars.
Kopi Level - Yellow
Kopi Level - Yellow
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)