UMNO leaders claim that they are natives of Malaya is utter rubish.

Like Chin Peng, Lim Chin Siong was at the forefront fighting against the British Imperialist for the independence of Singapore and Malaysia. Whether he was a communist or not  is immaterial and as many suggested he should rightfully be considered a hero and one of the founding fathers of independent Singapore.

Malays were not the first arrivals in Singapore and Malaya. The Indians and the Chinese were in Singapore and Malaya long before the Malays. The Chinese and Indians came as traders or travellers for the discovery of geographical knowledge although some Indians stayed to found small Hindu states in which they did not prejudice against other races. The Chinese in the hay day of its wealthy and mighty civilization could have occupied and colonised all the lands she discovered but she did not and that reflects the true nature of benign Chinese Civilization which always respect other people or other countries big or small. The Malays who came from different parts of Indonesia, like the Bugis from Celebes, the Boyans,Mingnankerbaus and Javanese from Java and the Bataks and Achinese from Sumatra which all came later after the Chinese and the Indians on the contrary share similar aggressive traits as the barbaric White Men - The Europeans for their chieftains were no more than pirates and robbers who occupied different parts of Malaya and founded domains or enclaves and called themselve penghulus or temenggongs . There was never a Malay state until the British Imperialist came to the scene in the late eighteen century when it occupied all the lands south of Thailand and consolidated them into one political unit called Malaya for convenience of control. So to say that the Malays are sons of the soil is all rubbish and hogwash. The original natives of the peninsula south of Thailand are the Sakais who are of Mongoloid race and they came from Southern China about ten thousand years ago.

After the Second World War the British sold out the interest of the Indians and the Chinese when it granted independence to Malaya without protecting the political rights of the Sakais, the Indians and the Chinese. Of course the Indian and Chinese leaders of the time during the negotiation for independence were downright stupid and idiotic because they cared only for their own personal narrow interest and did not consider the dire consequence of not securing the political rights of the Indians and the Chinese as well as that of the natives, the aborigines.

The second set back for the Indians and the Chinese was during the negotiation for merger with Sabah and Sarawak in 1965. At the time there were not many Malays in Sabah and Sarawak. Other than the natives who are the dayaks and the Ibans there were actually more Chinese than the Malays in the two territories prior to the merger. Why were the Indian and Chinese leaders of the time outmaneuvered by the Malay leaders to deprive the Indians and Chinese of equal political rights. As a result not only the Indians and the Chinese but also the Ibans, the dayaks and others are now suffering at the mercy of the highly racist and corrupted UMNO leaders. Generally speaking the ordinary Malays are simple,kind ,sincere and decent people. It is the pseudo  Malay leaders in UMNO  who are tainted with Pakistani, Javanese and Boyanese or Bugis blood who are ultra racist and extremist  that are now creating havoc for other races.

Population White Paper Protest 5 Oct - 4pm

Press release                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                             
A little update on our forthcoming protest this weekend at Hong Lim Part (5th Oct, 4pm).                                                                                                             
To date, we have six employers participating in the job fair offering various kinds of positions. We thank them for making the efforts to employ Singaporeans first proactively. We welcome more employers to sign up with us.                       

The employers will be there by 3.30pm to set up and prepare for the job fair.                
We also managed to gather?seven brave speakers for this event. Their names are as follows:
1. Leong Sze Hian
2. Robert Teh – retiree
3. Roy Yi Ling – blogger and health? care executive
4. Ariffin – secondary school student
5. Daryl Nihility?- interior design marketing executive
6. Fatimah Akhtar – architect
7. Alex Tan – operations executive                                                                             
Gilbert Louis will also be singing two songs during the protest.Free finger food and drinks will be offered on that day.

We have printed 100,000 flyers for distribution commencing today at various MRT stations and housing areas. The CBD area will be covered as well.                             
We have order eight hundred We Want Change tee shirts and five hundred caps for sales – please support our cause by grabbing a shirt or cap. They will be sold at a affordable price for all.                                                           

We will also dedicate one hour of the 3-hour programme to a Real Conversation whereby the people can ask our panel speakers any questions they want. They should not make a speech during the session though.                                                          

There won’t be any press conference prior to the event but there will be one after the event. Reporters please email me at gilbert@transitioning.org if you need further information on our third protest against the population white paper.         

See you soon Singapore! Be the change you want happen in our country.                                                                                                                                           
Thanks & Warmest Regards,                                                                                                                                                                                                      
Gilbert Goh                                                                                                 
President                                                                  
http://www.transitioning.org/ – unemployment support services                                       

Trust is such a difficult topic to write

I have been trying very hard to write about this new sensitivity. Everyone is talking about trust, including Hsien Loong and how important it is to gain the trust of the people. Now how should I deal with this topic? Shall I talk about the distrust the people have of the govt? Shall I talk about how the govt is losing the trust of the people? Shall I talk about what the govt can do to win back the trust of the people? Or shall I talk about how the govt tried so hard to lose the trust of the people?
 
After tossing the idea around, I came back to square one. How to talk about trust with people you don’t trust? How to discuss trust with people who are lying to you with a straight face? How to believe in people, trust people when they don’t trust you and are not telling you the truth? How to trust people who are not trustworthy?
 
I give up. I think it is easier to talk to children about trust. They are so innocent and so trusting. And children don’t lie, and they did not know what is a lie, those that have yet to think and behave like lying adults. I think going to the kindergarten is the best place to talk about trust, trusting children. Unfortunately the children don’t come to my blog so it is a waste of time really, to try to write this thing call trust when trust is all about deception. Trust me only to be cheated, trust me only to be deceived.
 
How to write about trust when there is no trust, when there is nothing and no one to be trusted?

Foreign talents going home

There was a handsome Pinoy family in the paper a couple of days back. The husband was an IT talent but his application to renew his EP was rejected. The MOM has started to close the door a bit and not approving every application for EP here.
 
From the interviews of the foreigners Singapore is still a choice destination for employment. They praised not only the safe and stable living environment here. The working environment is excellent, good jobs, good pay and good prospect. But this funny part is not what Sinkies, especially the PMEs are experiencing. Why is Singapore so good for foreigners and so bad to some Sinkies is a big irony and a big mystery.
 
Say whatever you like, the govt must know our strength, how good Singapore is as a place for business and work. It is not just cheap labour. It is the whole package which is very attractive and very competitive among the first world countries. There is no comparison among the third world countries. Only fools will compare the two and tell you the third world countries are better.
 
Another astonishing truth that was revealed in the same article was the lack of IT and banking and finance professionals. According to Gerdeep Hora from Synergy HRD Consultancies in New Delhi, ‘Singapore lacks IT experts and managers in its banking and finance sectors, and employers have been hiring directly form India in these areas.’ When has India become the banking and finance and IT centres that a first world country, a regional financial centre, must go to India to recruit such experts that a regional financial centre is lacking?
 
What is happening? Employers forming a beeline to India to hire IT experts and managers in banking and finance directly? India a banking and financial centre producing all the experts that a regional banking and financial centre cannot produce?
 
Holy cow, I dunno what to say.

Tuition, the silliness of it all

There is an article in today’s ST on tuition by Nirmala, ST’s correspondent. In the article she quoted a Professor Mark Bray on some of the characteristics of East Asian societies and the growth and importance of tuition. ‘These East Asian territories are highly globalised and competitive. They stress a need for workers to remain ahead in skills and for students to acquire skills relevant to the global economy….the Singapore education system is a good one that has delivered high quality output.’ She added, ‘But Singaporean parents, like those in many other cultures, are competitive, seeking what they perceive to be the best for their children in a competitive system, and thus are trying to add more even though the school system is already delivering much that is already very good, he(Bray) said.’
 
Now what is so silly or sickening about all these comments? Did not our education system and the parents make them the best educated and skilled workers for the workforce?
 
It is not about the inequality that tuition will cause as this is a harsh reality that the poorer working class must get used to. The rich will pay for the best tutors for their children. You cannot ban tuition and tell them not to pay for tuition. Well, South Korea did ban tuition for 20 years, but has since allowed it to practice again. There were many ways to curb tuition to prevent it from worsening the inequality, which is absolutely a silly thing to do and to even think about for any govt. Forcing the people to level down is an idiotic thing to do, really, believe me.
 
Then what is so silly about tuition? With so much money and effort put in to develop the young, with such great education system and to quote, ‘They stress a need for workers to remain ahead in skills and students to acquire skills relevant to the global economy’, now can you see what is wrong or sickening?
 
Our workers lack motivation, lack drive, lack of skill, uncompetitive, lack of talent, that we need to bring in workers from third world countries without the competitive culture, without the resources and the drive to do well in education or a good education system to replace them in jobs here. They don’t even have competitive parents to make sure their children received the best education money can buy. Basically after all the stress and money spent, the startling result, our students turned workers are a useless bunch for the job market. Really, trust me.
 
What an irony? The less competitive societies and lesser equipped education system are producing all the qualified and skilled workers that our system could not produce. 

Shall I laugh or cry?
 
What is wrong, MOE, MOM?