LKY chided Japan and
China for their presumingly flawed population policies. China’s
problem is its one child policy to hold back a population explosion.It must be
crazy to keep growing the population with 1.3b now. In the case of Japan, it is
its homogenous society that did not take too kindly with immigrants of other
origins. So, would these two countries be better off by abandoning their
population control policies? The hyped fear is that the countries will age too
rapidly and eventually ran out of stock of people. And leave it to the
mathematicians, it is then possible theoretically, assuming that the human race
is unthinking and as predictable as robots and both countries will be nothing,
no people left.
Putting this argument aside, are these two
countries progressing or regressing? One has just emerged as the second biggest
economy in the world and threatening to over the USA as
the biggest in 30 years or less. Japan is
still the third largest economy in the world, having been overtaken by China
which is impossible to stop given its physical size and population. But Japan is
still unbeatable as the number three, ahead of all the developed European
economies, ahead of Britain, France and Germany.
Though the Japanese were experiencing very
little economic growth over the last 30 years, is the quality of life getting
worst? Definitely not. They are still enjoying possibly the highest quality of
life without growth, and also with little inflation while housing prices
remained practically stagnant to mitigate against slower or no growth. The
Japanese are still very wealthy as a country with plenty of reserves and
industries and high productivity. Japan
does not need the ponzi population growth to maintain a high quality of life
without the apparent growth that is deemed desirable.
In both these countries, would they be
better off or worst off if their populations were to shrink another 10% or 20%?
Economists can argue either way but more population does not only bring growth
alone but could bring along many more social and political problems that would
negate the little benefits from economic growth. Would it be better to maintain
a high quality of life with little economic growth and little population
growth?