I dare not believe this will happen earlier in the week though I secretly hoped this would happen. My position then was a close fight, a 50:50 chance going either way. A two horse run by election. The strength of the ruling party was still too dominant for the opposition. And this by election was about a little girl facing a top notch elite supported by the ruling party, and in a 4 corner fight. It was too much to ask for.
Now it happens. At 2 am, I am still awake to the excitement of this game changing event. How could the PAP lose this by election, losing a very safe seat previously won by Michael Palmer with a clear margin in a 3 corner fight? This time the result, WP 54% and PAP 43%. The other two in the four corner fight were completely whitewashed. No need to mention about them. It is a good lesson to note that the voters today are very well informed and would do what is best for their own interests. Going forward, three or multi corner fight to disrupt a proper contest between two main parties will no longer be material.
The voters of Punggol East has rejected the PAP outright with a convincing victory that speaks more than just a by election. The repercussion is serious and the foundation of the PAP is rattling. The support of the voters can no longer be taken for granted. The claim that the party is for the people is rejected outright by the people. It also implies that the voters are rejecting most of the policies that the ruling party claimed to be good for them.
This victory in Punggol East is no joking matter. As I had posted earlier, this is a by election that the PAP cannot afford to lose. Losing Punggol East is the harbinger of more losses if the govt still thinks it can do whatever it wants and shafts the policies down the people's throats. It is as good as game over. The PAP's sure win formula is no longer working.
All the opposition will be gearing themselves up for the GE in about 3 years time. Punggol East has shown the way and they can see it coming now. The netizens were reading the ground very clearly. Unfortunately the PAP was not. It was a two horse race as the netizens have predicted correctly.
1/27/2013
1/26/2013
PAP is on the side of Singaporeans
This
is the position of the Govt and spoken by Hsien Loong on Thursday to wrap up
the by election campaign. Many Sinkies are startled into disbelief. But I tell
you the truth, it is true. Look at all the living examples around you and you
will agree.
First,
the foreigner influx is a good thing. Wait for 7m population, it will be even
better. Don’t believe me? Look at your property prices! Every Sinkie is now so
rich, sitting on multi million dollar properties. This must be really good,
extremely good.
Another
example, crowded public transport especially the trains. Some are complaining.
But only rich and fast growing countries would have such jams in public
transport. Look at Japan, we are not even near
there. The jams and the foreigners in the trains are signs of progress and they
make the SMRT make very good profits too, and good for all kinds of businesses.
Some
were complaining about giving university places and scholarships to foreigners
while our own children were deprived of places and have to go overseas on PM’s
scholarship, ie Papa and Mama Scholarship. But we need these foreign talents to
boost our dying and degenerating gene pool. Think about it, these foreigners
will enrich our lives and the quality of our future children. We will have a
lot of kopi susu and tea with milk children growing up soon. And the foreign
talents contributed to our economic growth too, when they stayed to work. And
our boys can do NS happily while the foreign talents oil the economy.
No
need to add more examples, the more foreigners here the more vibrant is our
economy, and the value of things all go up to help our economic growth. And the
Sinkies will benefit directly with all their properties going up in prices. No
need to work, just sit on your properties and see them appreciate in values,
and at the same time can collect rentals.
The
prosperity of Sinkies can be seen by the amount of money they are willing to
pay for a piece of paper, COE, to be allowed to buy a car. You think poor
Sinkies can afford this?
Sinkies
must see the good side of having all the foreigners here. They make us very
rich or at least feel very rich. See, understand or not? All the policies are
for the good of Sinkies. As
for the money in the CPF, the minimum sums, it is all for Sinkies. All the Sinkies
will be able to afford the world best medicare and world best prices. No sweat.
And many will die very, very rich. There will be poor Sinkies alive. But all
dead Sinkies will be very rich with the minimum sums they left behind.
I
am sure you are now all convinced by my clear and simple logic. It makes cents
right? Er, I mean sense.
1/25/2013
SPH employee arrested for threatening Kenneth Jeyaretnam
This is the latest news on ST online that a 23 year old employee of SPH has been arrested for threatening Kenneth Jeyaretnam’s wife and son in London using emails. The administrative assistant with ST classified ad has since resigned and is out on bail.
The brave or provocative Philippines
Depending on how you look at it, some may think the Philippines are very brave to want to stage a fight with China. Some will think it is a very provocative thing to do. Anyway, the Philippines are taking the disputed island claims in the South China Sea to the UN International Tribunal for the Law of the Seas(ITLS) unilaterally as if it is a very brave act against China. And everyone knows that the ITLS has no jurisdiction over such claims if the interested parties could simply ignore its findings or recommendations.
So what are the Pinoys trying to prove? Or who is really behind this silly move, of a little mouse trying to pull the whiskers of the dragon? They have not forgotten how they threatened to arrest Chinese fishing boats only to flee when the Chinese wanted to sink their biggest antique called a warship. Or maybe they are still angry of that sheepish incident and wanted to prove that they are made of stronger stuff?
By making this provocative affront, it has forced Singapore which has always tried to be diplomatic, to take a stance to distance itself from the Philippines. Singapore has made an official statement that this is strictly a Pinoy initiative, nothing to do with Asean. And it added that such territorial claim can only be settled by the claimants and Singapore is not a claimant.
Singapore’s position would have undercut the Philippines if it ever thinks of using Asean to fight this spurious claim with China. And maybe the only country in Asean that would support such callous and silly move will be Vietnam. The rest of Asean would rather choose either to be neutral or to discuss with China through dialogue.
The Philippines have opened its cards, that it wants a confrontation with China, to provoke China, to raise tension, which is the last thing Asean wants with China being the biggest trading partners with several of the Asean states.
Is Lui Tuck Yew kidding?
‘Given Singapore's limited space for new roads, the government plans to further curb vehicle growth from next year, revealed Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew.’ This is quoted from Yahoo News.
We have just heard of a White Paper discussing about Singapore having a population of 7m from the current 5.3m. Can the island have enough space for an additional 1.7m people when it cannot find space for new roads and have to curb the growth of vehicles on the road? It is either the island still has a lot of space for more people or the island has not enough space. It cannot have more space for more people but not enough space for vehicles unless these people do not need the use vehicles in their lives, for private or public transport. The growth of road network will also be halved. Lui said, "You can't allow it (the vehicle quota) to grow at the rates in past years simply because the road networks are not expanding as what we have done before,"
It is getting very confusing. When population growth is concerned, we can grow and grow and build and build more housing to support the growth. Then we cannot have space for more roads for more vehicles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)