7/21/2025

US$10 billion for a drawing of a naked woman or a scoundrel's reputation?

Trump is suing Wall Street Journal for US$10 billion over its claim of a lewd letter that Trump was claimed to have sent to Jeffrey Epstein on his 50th birthday, showing a drawing of a naked woman. Trump claimed his reputation has been tarnished, which is laughable. What sliver of a reputation does a man with six bankruptcies to his name and a history of sexual misconduct have left to be destroyed?

Trump and Rupert Murdoch, the owner of WSJ and other USA media, are said to be at each other's throat and they hated each other. Trump calls the WSJ a 'pile of garbage'. By the way, Scott Ritter in an interview called Trump 'A lying bag of manure', LOL.

One of the most stunning insults that takes the cake must be that no-holds- barred takedown of Trump, from a North Korean media, a woman reporter, after Trump's birthday military parade, where she said that Trump was sitting between a drunk television host (Pete Hegseth) and an expensive prostitute (Melania Trump). Many said that the reporter was telling the truth for once - just imagine that! Now, I just wonder why Trump did not sue the North Korean media with this kind of no-holds-barred insult that really dismantled the reputation of Trump. Perhaps, Trump thinks that video will not make a wide circulation, but those who knows how to look will find it.

By the way, legal analysts of Trump's legal action against the WSJ will not succeed. The Jeffrey Epstein files are now the prime-time entertainment issue in the USA, while the world watches with amusement.


Anonymous

US and EU's supply chain war with Russia and China

I was puzzled when social media talked about China's dark factories. Those were actually factories completely run by robots and does not even need lights on for robots to work in the dark, producing 24 hours a day. And most amazingly, making rockets and missiles in those factories using robots 24 hours a day sounds terrifying. Maybe even robots making other military robots for war.

Trump gloated about producing patriot missiles for Ukraine. Wonder how he is going to do that without most of the raw materials controlled by China. China's control of rare earth elements for weapons is already helping Russia big time, no need for China to directly help Russia by supplying weapons. Maybe China is doing that via North Korea already, supplying all the essential materials to the North Koreans. There are always ways and means to get around a problem, the same as Russia getting around the oil sanctions imposed by the West. Does it work? Honestly it does work in reverse gear for the EU, having to pay through their noses for expensive energy and crippling its own manufacturing base. How stupid is that?


Anonymous

Hsien Loong - New framework, world minus one

Lee Hsien Loong just made a pointed remark that the 'best framework is the world minus one' which is directed at the USA. Everybody in the world is now fighting a trade war with the USA and has to look at the bigger picture of why not just ignore the USA market and concentrate on the Global South and BRICS.

China has afforded least developed African countries with zero tariffs on 100% of their exports to China from December l, 2024. China has also signed a free trade agreement with ASEAN countries. Such African countries and ASEAN know who is giving them a better deal in trade moving forward. China is a much bigger market than the USA for products from such least developed countries of Africa and they will benefit greatly in mutual co-operation in decades to come. The Africans know that China will be in Africa for the long term, as China has done decades in the past when Africa was facing grave difficulties due to exploitation by the Western colonizers. At that time China was a poor country, but the fact is China still went ahead to aid Africa in fighting against colonialism. Now we are seeing more African countries taking up the fight, like Burkina Faso.


Anonymous

7/20/2025

American's evidence of destroying Iran's nuclear plant?

 

This handout satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies and dated Jun 27, 2025, shows excavators at the tunnel entrances of the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) one week after US strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites early on Jun 22. (Photo: Maxar Technologies/AFP)


WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Saturday (Jul 19) insisted that the US bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities "completely destroyed" the sites after a report said that some had largely survived.

On his Truth Social platform, Trump reiterated his frequent claim that "all three nuclear sites in Iran were completely destroyed and/or OBLITERATED"....

Despite Trump's claims of total success, several US media outlets have reported leaked intelligence suggesting a hazier picture.

The latest to cast doubt was an NBC News report on Friday, quoting a military damage assessment that only one of the three sites was mostly destroyed.  CNA

As expected, the Americans keep bragging about how successful was their bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. It is also their way of claiming how effective were their weapons. Just look at the picture above and the massive mountains, what can bunker buster bombs that can penetrate at best 60m do to them? Very likely the bombs may not even penetrate 20m of the hard rock structures.

And Iranian engineers would not be so stupid to build their facilities at a depth to be conveniently destroyed by the American bombs. They will drill into the mountains from the base which will give them hundreds of metres of rock to shield them from above. There is no way that the American bombs can come near them.

The recent wars in the Middle East have destroyed many of the myths of western weapon superiority. What world best Rafales, F35s, Iron Domes, David Sling, Arrow 2, Arrow 3, all turned out to be no better than Lego toys. Wait for the second attack on Iran, and with Iran's newly acquired Chinese air defence systems, and the snipers in the air, J10s, waiting, see how many F35s would be taken down like the world best Rafales.

The stage is now set for a showdown between China's J10Cs against the self claimed world best F35s in the skies of the Middle East. The world is waiting for this great show to end the white men's myth for good.

American terrorism and cyber espionage for the uninitiated

 The Americans have been very successful in controlling and ruling the world with its anti terrorism strategy to gain acceptance and compliance. The idea is nothing ingenious or clever, very basic, and is successful for many reasons. Applying threat and coercion, bribing of corrupt national leaders and also the complicity of pro western elites that believe everything white is good. They happily embraced all the American lies as truth.

The American propaganda machine simply broadcasts daily about threats from this country or that country by slanders, defamation and lies. When there are willing listeners and brain dead pro western elites, there is no need for proof or evidence. What the American media said is good enough proof. And when evidence is lacking, the American terrorists simply supply the terrorists to do the damage. Out of the blue, a strange new terrorist group will be created and commit some terrorist crimes. The American media or so called intelligence sources would immediately come up with a new name for the group. QED. And the suckers would simply go along without wanting to know who is behind the terrorists.

In a way, the old method of killing the messenger is a good way to stop such fabricated terrorism. The messenger is sent by the terrorists and often is a member of the terrorist organisation to deceive the intended victim.

The same methodology is applied in cyber warfare, or cyber terrorism. Like the seller of antivirus products, the terrorists would create the virus, spread the virus, then show them to the users, see, this is the virus, and they have the antidote, the antivirus software, to kill the virus. Deal done, money in the pocket.

Cyber terrorism is not far from this. The cyber terrorists would do the attacks or set up terrorist cells to do the attack. Then they will use the attack as evidence to show the targeted parties that they have been attacked with their fabricated proof. It sure looks very genuine. And like all things in cyberspace, who is able to track down the source of the attack?  The Americans or any country can launch an attack and leave traces pointing to China. The gullible or willing accomplice will then tell the world it is China. The attackers or terrorists could be the one standing right in front of the listener, and offering to provide the assistance needed, at a price of course. Any unwary or unsuspecting targeted client, especially those that are not well versed in cyber warfare or IT would easily be convinced and fell prey to such scams.

For corporate clients that ended up being suckers to such cyber scams and pay the scammers for their aid packages, like buying antivirus solutions from the people creating the virus, the loss could be just monetary. For a nation state, falling into such silly traps, without killing the messengers, would compromise the security of the nation by inviting the terrorists into their ministries and opening the doors for them to access their security networks. Such cheap tricks would work on simple minds and willing minds that are already sold before even the terrorists come a calling.

When the American terrorists come calling and claimed that there is such a threat, be very sure that they are behind it. This is their SOP. Just like the Americans accusing China of fake genocide in Xinjiang when the Americans are committing genocide daily in Gaza. No one would condemn the daily genocide but would condemn minor attacks by the freedom fighters.

Beware, do not be duped by snake oil salesmen.