What is the USA going to do if the International Space Station were to disintegrate?

 What is the USA going to do if the International Space Station were to disintegrate? No, I am not talking about the loss of lives, which is just collateral damage for the USA and is not important. The important thing is whether the USA has also lost the blueprints for rebuilding it? Oh, pardon me, I forgot that, the ISS was built by the Russians, not the USA. They hijacked it and called it their own. Then they threw out China from participating in the research projects on it.

Every cloud has a silver lining. Today, China, on its own space station to call its own - the Tiangong Space Station operating without troublesome and small-minded elements on board. Everything on board works just harmoniously like clockwork - signages are in Chinese, operating instructions are in Chinese and participating countries are willingly learning Chinese. Someone is obviously not happy with that!

The USA, meanwhile, clearly sour grapes rejected by China from participating, had raised a ruckus earlier by calling China to change the signages and operating instructions to English, just to suit them. And not being able to participate, the USA claims it is not joining because the Tiangong Space Station is not up to their standard. China shot back and said that the USA had nothing worthwhile to contribute. It really hurts.

I think they will also try to sabotage the Chinese Space Station with all the reports of close calls being made. Does this surprise anyone?

Anonymous

Whites 500 years curse and scourge on all the non-white countries of the South still not enough?

 The free world of the South led by BRICS with Russia, China, India, Iran and North Korea at the core will no longer tolerate aggression by white supremacists led by Anglo-Saxon US and UK.

After 500 years curse and scourge on all the non-white countries of the South what more do the evil white people especially the Anglo-Saxons Americans and British want from the rest of the Global South countries. Isn't 500 years of brutal aggression and invasions not enough., The white countries led by US and UK are looking for death now. They are tired of living. The global South countries led by Russia, China, Iran, North Kore and the BRICS are determined to put a stop to the neurotic West unbridled aggression. The day when they can freely attack and invade any country of the Global South is over. If they try they will surely meet their nemesis with BRICS and other countries of the South.

It's high time the free world of the South led by Russia and China at the core confront and destroy the evil Western countries led by Anglo-Saxons United States, Britain and Zionist Israel, and send them to hell permanently into oblivion.

Southernglory1
Friday, 1st November, 1024

Americans are cowards that stank to Heavens

 Good morning All

The Russians are the Ones that died the most liberating the damn EURO NUTs and they so called Free Today and should be grateful to the Russians instead of persecuting and scorned them.

Ironically they were Allies in WWII fighting the Nazis Germany and yet now they ganged up with that DEVIL to fight Russia.

The Americunts are just by standers in WWII with their strategic always EVIL plans that others fought and be weak and then went in to take over all the loots and heroism.

Even till today, their EVIL Strategy.

They are cowards that stank to Heavens and the Daft peoples of the World still be conned by their We Cheat We lied and We stole Mentally Retarded Scams.

Stupidity really indeed.

Daft Countries that Vietnam, South Korea and the Philippines etc been colonised and murdered by the Americunts still sucked up to them sleeping with the DEVILs.

The Americunts with their lackeys and minnons and cronies still think that they could still Rule and Divide the Coloured Peoples and still Ruled and have Status Quos of their decadence luxurious lifes.

Now it's their turns to eat shits and starved as the Coloured Peoples been suffering in the past.

Virgo49

China reinvest billions of US$ into infrastructure, Saudi Arabia kept them in different kinds of American toilet papers

 'Capitalism and free trade are against American and European incompetent, inefficient and ineffective democracy' is probably only true today. In the past, before the rise of China, they were trying to do more trade particularly looking at the huge market in China, investing in cheaper destinations having cheaper labor, and in the process, taking advantage of all the cheap products coming out of China. Life was so good for the USA with Chinese products flooding their giant superstores like Walmart and the USA able to just print and print to get at those products. China was able to accumulate all the toilet papers which were later to be invested in USA Treasuries, Bonds and real estate. It was a win-win situation for both, right?

When China started investing in those trade surpluses in the BRI and using the accumulated US$ as loans for infrastructure developments all over the world and competing with the IMF and World Bank, instead of pouring them into Treasuries and other investments in the USA, the game changes. The USA knew the writing is on the wall and relations took a turn for the worse.

When they found out later that they could no longer compete luring industries back to the USA, they changed their tune, branding cheap labor as 'slave wages', voluntary outsourcing of production to China to take advantage of the cheaper wages as stealing its jobs, unable to compete with Chinese manufacturing as due to 'overcapacity'。

Anonymous 

Inflationary economy is like feeding Peking Duck or French Goose

 Everyone is familiar with Peking Duck and French Goose being forced fed to grow and grow with little concern to their health and well being. They are just being forced fed for the table. Period.

An inflationary economy is quite similar to force feeding ducks or geese, not by productive, innovation or technology, but by simply adding more numbers, any kind of numbers, to inflate the GDP. Singapore is in a way an inflationary economy, with the population as the main contributing factor. Just grow the population at all cost, 6m, 10m, 15m, you can see the saliva dripping from the mouths of the proponents of this economic policy. They shafted aside all the negative consequences of extremely high population density and the big squeeze in this tiny piece of rock. They can only see the good side and refuse to discuss the negative impact on the people and the economy. 

The inflating of the population has basically one goal, consumption, consumption and more consumption. More people, more flats to be built to sell to the people, more food to be consumed, more demand on essential services, just to inflate the GDP. With more consumption of everything, and everything that Singapore does not have, does not produce, means everything has to be imported. Food, oil and gas, electricity, consumer goods, bricks and mortar, water etc etc. And don't forget about the need for more jobs, more schools, universities, more roads, trains etc etc. It was building roads, housing, etc etc because there was a need to do so. Now it was reckless creation of needs to build more and more of everything when there was no need to do so.

At the present level of population, the demand and supply of goods and services are still fairly manageable and stable. But given the trajectory of the advocates of high population for inflationary growth, the demands for water, gas, oil and electricity would be enormous. It is no wonder that they are talking loudly about going the nuclear route to meet the demands for power and electricity. And the discussion, like the proponents of high population, is all goodness, absolutely no problem with nuclear energy and the risks associated with it. Best to brush them aside, not to be discussed or mentioned at all. Just assume all is well.

The big question, what is the purpose of a nation state? To strive for economic growth at all cost, even to dump millions of foreigners into the island, for economic growth? Is growing population, or bringing in more foreigners into the islands and to create employments for them, to look after their well being the responsibility of a sovereign nation state? And are the risks of high population and its tons of associated problems and the big risk of having a nuclear station beneath our homes worth it, necessary to flirt with such dangerous solution that need not be necessary if we just stop the population growth and look at other options for economic growth?

The govt of a nation state has responsibility to look after the well being of its citizens, to provide good jobs, good housing, a good way of life. It is NOT responsible to foreigners for the same things. There is no need to bring in so many foreigners, to look after them, to provide jobs and housing for them, at the expense and risk of the citizens, to compete with the citizens for education, space and everything, and to risk nuclear accidents.

What do you think?