USA/West views on Global Security is White centered VS China's views.

USA and the West views on global security is white supremacist centered versus China's views which are world brotherhood centered. In talking about world security US and the West are always selfishly referring to their own security at the expense of others. Every nook and corner of the world is important to their security but not to others in the countries of the South.

In the last over 500 years the West and the Anglo-Saxons US went on a rampage aggressively to attack, invade and terrorise all the non-White countries of the South without mercy. That was how the Europeans, England, Spain, France and Holland came to occupy the whole continent of North America, Australia , New Zealand, South America and many parts of Asia. But during the last 5000 years China did not invade even a single foreign country. That speaks for itself who is posing a threat to global security - to other non-white countries security.

Western countries and US have been a threat to others security with their unquenchable thirst for aggression and their avarice for other countries wealth and riches. To achieve their toxic ambition they have a perennial plan for world conquest and hegemony. So the West and US have always pose a great danger to global security. But the problem is that they always unashamely and hypocritically point the accusing fingers at others.

Today the United States has over 800 military bases around the world threatening and intimidating all other countries big or small. US has always been posing a security threat to others with these evil intent military bases. But China does not even have one military base overseas. So the facts speak for itself. China has always practised her ancient philosophy of the brotherhood of mankind and that the rich and strong must always help the weak and poor to survive.

When the West and US talk about global security, first ask them what happpened to the hundreds of millions of the native populations in the Americas, Australia and New Zealand. Security is only meant for white people only when all natives and non-white people are butchered and genocided by them. The white people of the West and US are not qualified to talk to non-white people and countries about global security, human rights and democracy. Always remember the native Americans warning,  "White men speak with fork tongues and can never be trus

The West and US relish in downtrodding others so that they can have security and live in plenty and splendour at the expense of other non-white countries.

Southernglory1

Sunday, 10th November, 2024

The EV Revolution - No one can resist an EV

 Many younger people would not have heard of records or cassette tapes. Many would not have seen a tape recorder or disc player. These gadgets, once the main entertainment tools of the past, of pop music and movies, are now like dinosaurs. They have lost their relevance and no longer useful, their places have been over taken by new technologies, thumb drives, micro discs, clouds etc etc.

New technologies can be very overwhelming and can totally erase the existence of old technologies. What were once popular and necessities could be totally replace by cheaper and more efficient gadgets. The domination of legacy internal combustion engine (ICE) cars are heading towards oblivion. 

Just 20 years ago, electric vehicles were just an experimental toy without much of a future. The ICE cars rule the world with their powerful engines and great performance. The big names in the industry were the Americans, Europeans and the Japanese. 20 years today, these big names are facing the biggest existential threat to their well being. Many are seeing a bleak future, to be overtaken by the high performance, efficient, eco friendly new EVs, no air pollution, no noise pollution and costing only a fraction.

The EVs are not only better in every aspects of a car. They are now cheaper and super efficient, with performance that even the best and most efficient high performance European cars could not match. And they are selling for the price of a song.

The big legacy car manufacturers are up in arms, wanting to stop the charge of the EVs into their respective fields. This is futile. No amount of sanctions and tariffs can stop the onslaught of a new technology that is so superior and revolutionary that resistance is futile.

The EVs would revolutionise the whole transport industry, from production to performance. And there are more to come once they become the gadgets of the future when every EV is embedded with AI to be the complete personal tool of the owner, lying somewhere around, without becoming an encumbrance but always there when needed by the owner, would appear to do its parts at the beck and call of the owner.

And the cost is going to be a fraction of a top high performance ICE car, cheaper than the cheapest average workhorse of an ICE car. No one can resist an EV. EV is the future. ICE is dead and gone in a decade or two, resting in the museum or someone's old garage for keepsake.

Oops, the biggest clean up in human history would be how to dispose all the scrap metals that were once ICE cars. No prizes for guessing the winner in this EV Revolution.

Anglo-Saxon Whites throughout the centuries have been keeping the non-Whites divided

 What the Anglo-Saxon Whites have been doing throughout the centuries is keep the non-Whites divided - the Muslims, the Africans, the Asians so that they can continue to be the supreme race controlling them. Just look at history in Africa, Middle East and Asia - between the two Koreas, between China and India, between China and the Japanese, Philippines and Australia, between the African states and the Anglo-Saxon instigated wars of division. Even ASEAN is being threat of fragmentation if not careful.

The only fortunate thing is that China did not suffer fragmentation during its humiliation at the hands of the eight nations. The Anglo-Saxon White's intention was to split China up into various concessions for easier control like Africa, to be shared among the eight. Had that succeeded, there would not be any China to speak of. Five thousand years of civilization would then have been destroyed by the White barbarians.

China did not disintegrate when the Mongols conquered and founded the Yuan Dynasty under the rule of Kublai Khan. In fact, it was to prosper under his rule. The Mongols did not rob China off its resources and thousands of years of heritage, because the Mongols were content to be assimilated into Chinese culture and civilization. Suffice to say, the Mongols were more civilized than the Anglo-Saxon Whites, who were out to destroy China.

It is perhaps heaven's will that Russia is now closer to China than before but facing greater instigation by the USA and the West to face confrontation with Japan and the Philippines, with Australia playing a pivotal role as its White attack dog in chief. 

Anonymous

50% Americans did not have $400 to spare but came up tops as having most money left to spend?

 Some of the 90% are living on the streets, some holding two to three jobs to put food on the table and afford a roof over their heads. Holding two jobs is considered job creation, a rosy claim. Are these people really rich?

A propaganda video ranking people in countries around the world having most money left over to spend after all the necessities were taken care of, and the USA came out tops. This must be talking about the 1%, not the other 90%. For that perspective, there were many videos talking about people in the USA not having US$400 in their savings for emergencies. How are these people even considered rich in the richest country in the world?

Anyway, we all know that statistics lie all the time. It is just for us to separate the wheat from the chaff to get at the real facts. 

Anonymous

BRICS membership - quality over quantity

 In a concerted effort to expand BRICS, those inside the bloc must not just attracting quantity, but quality and safety are equally essential to safeguard the future of BRICS. BRICS' leadership have seen the dangers and are looking at the problem in more subtle ways of attracting members into the bloc. Putin already had set one condition of not allowing those engaging in sanctions to be admitted.

Countries that have steadfast leaders and commitments towards a cause geared towards de-dollarization are relatively safe bets. The only problem is when regime change hits them, the whole equation is turned on its head. Then the solution that comes after that may be problematic.

Pakistan and Bangladesh are risky bets for sure. One Trojan Horse is easy to pinpoint. Two Trojan Horses can be difficult to handle. BRICS will be led on a wild goose chase trying to determine who the culprits are. 

Anonymous